Kratos XQ-58 Valkyrie Drone Crashes During Takeoff Test at Utah's Dugway Proving Ground, Investigation Underway

U.S

UTAH — A Kratos Defense XQ-58 Valkyrie uncrewed aircraft crashed shortly after takeoff during a company-funded research and development (R&D) test at the U.S. Army's Dugway Proving Ground in Utah on Tuesday, Aug. 4, 2026, prompting the company to temporarily suspend flight testing of that specific system while an investigation is conducted. According to Kratos, the aircraft involved was a test configuration of the Valkyrie operating as part of the company's ongoing efforts to develop new configurations and capabilities. The incident occurred after the drone took off from a test-range runway at Michael Army Airfield, with the cause of the crash still under investigation. An installation spokesperson at Dugway Proving Ground confirmed that an unspecified uncrewed aircraft crashed at approximately 8:00 a.m. local time shortly after takeoff. Officials said the aircraft was not owned or operated by the U.S. military. There were no injuries, no fatalities, and no damage to base infrastructure or buildings. Base representatives did not identify the aircraft type, but Kratos later confirmed it was one of its XQ-58 Valkyrie drones. In a statement, Kratos said: "A Kratos test configuration of Valkyrie experienced a mishap following takeoff from a test-range runway on Tuesday, August 4, 2026. This was a Kratos internally funded R&D event, part of continually adding configurations and capabilities." The company added: "No one was injured in the incident. As safety is our top priority, flight test operations for this system have been paused temporarily in an abundance of caution while we investigate the cause of the incident." Kratos also confirmed that it has additional test systems available and intends to resume testing once the investigation is completed. Runway-Capable Valkyrie Under Development Kratos declined to disclose the exact configuration of the aircraft involved, stating that doing so could affect the ongoing investigation. However, the company's confirmation that the drone departed from a test-range runway indicates it was likely one of the Valkyrie variants developed for conventional runway operations, rather than relying solely on the aircraft's original launch method. The original XQ-58 Valkyrie, which first flew in 2019, was designed to launch using a rocket-assisted system from a static launcher and recover using a parachute. As development progressed, Kratos introduced a launch trolley to support runway takeoffs and later announced a Conventional Takeoff and Landing (CTOL) variant equipped with built-in landing gear while retaining the ability to use rocket-assisted launches when required. In August 2024, Kratos announced development of the CTOL version. Later, in January 2026, the company said the first flight target for that variant had shifted to early 2026. Platform Continues to Support U.S. Military Programs The XQ-58 Valkyrie remains one of Kratos' key uncrewed combat aircraft programs and has been used to support the development of affordable autonomous aircraft for future military operations. The U.S. Air Force became the first known operator of the Valkyrie after its initial flights in 2019. The platform is also being developed for the U.S. Marine Corps under the Marine Air-Ground Task Force Uncrewed Expeditionary Tactical Aircraft (MUX TACAIR) Collaborative Combat Aircraft program. Kratos has confirmed that the runway-capable version, sometimes referred to as the MQ-58B, is being developed in part for this effort. The Marine Corps plans to receive its first MQ-58 aircraft in 2029 and has already carried out testing with earlier XQ-58 variants. Beyond the United States, the Valkyrie program has also attracted international interest. Kratos has partnered with Airbus to develop a version of the aircraft for the German Luftwaffe. Dugway Remains a Major UAS Test Site The test took place at Michael Army Airfield, located within Dugway Proving Ground, which is regularly used for testing by both the U.S. military and defense companies. The proving ground supports a wide range of research, development, testing, and evaluation activities, including work involving uncrewed aircraft systems and programs focused on defense against chemical and biological threats. Kratos Explains Its Development Approach Speaking after the incident, Steve Fendley, President of Kratos' Unmanned Systems Division, said the company could not discuss the exact aircraft configuration because it is directly related to the ongoing investigation. Fendley said Kratos continually expands the capabilities of its unmanned systems to meet future operational requirements and customer needs. He also described the company's development philosophy as one that aims to accelerate innovation by accepting that occasional setbacks may occur during research and development. According to Fendley, Kratos focuses on rapidly improving its systems, learning from testing outcomes, and moving development forward more quickly than traditional defense acquisition approaches that generally allow little tolerance for failures during testing. Investigation Continues The cause of the Aug. 4 mishap has not yet been determined. Kratos has temporarily suspended flight testing of the affected system while the investigation remains underway. The company has not released additional information regarding the aircraft's configuration or whether the incident will affect the broader development schedule for the various XQ-58 Valkyrie variants.

L3Harris Completes First Two-Aircraft Flight Tests of Viper Shield EW System on F-16C and F-16D at Edwards AFB

U.S

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. — L3Harris Technologies has completed the first two-aircraft flight tests of its Viper Shield electronic warfare system at Edwards Air Force Base, marking the first time the system has flown simultaneously aboard an F-16C and an F-16D. L3Harris announced the milestone on Aug. 5 following a series of two-ship flights conducted as part of the ongoing Viper Shield flight-test campaign. The latest testing moves the program beyond individual aircraft evaluations and expands testing into coordinated multi-aircraft operations. The campaign is intended to reduce integration risks, expand the system's test envelope and support preparations for planned deliveries to international F-16 operators. Viper Shield Tested in Two-Aircraft Operations During the flights, test teams evaluated Viper Shield's ability to detect, identify and counter advanced electromagnetic threats while operating alongside the F-16's existing avionics and mission systems. Engineers also assessed the system's digital architecture and real-time response capabilities across different mission profiles. Adding a second aircraft allowed L3Harris and the U.S. Air Force test community to evaluate the electronic warfare suite in a more representative operational environment. Fighters commonly operate alongside other aircraft, requiring electronic warfare equipment to function without disrupting friendly sensors, communications or coordinated tactics. A key part of the evaluation was therefore determining how Viper Shield performs when multiple equipped aircraft operate together. The system is designed to prevent electronic warfare interference between wingmen when fighters simultaneously operate their radars, sensors and countermeasures. F-16C and F-16D Used for Testing The campaign involved both the single-seat F-16C and two-seat F-16D, allowing engineers to evaluate Viper Shield across different aircraft and mission configurations. The F-16C was used to assess combat loadouts, sensor configurations and specific electronic warfare profiles. The F-16D, which is also used for training and multi-crew missions, provided additional opportunities to evaluate the system under different flight conditions, cockpit workflows and mission configurations. Testing the two variants together provided a broader assessment of Viper Shield's performance than previous single-aircraft sorties. Lauren Barnes, President of Spectrum Superiority, Communications & Spectrum Dominance at L3Harris, said the two-aircraft flights demonstrated continued progress in the flight-test program. “The two-ship flights with Viper Shield are another strong example that the system is performing as intended,” Barnes said. “Viper Shield is showing exceptional threat awareness and rapid reaction capability throughout the flight test campaign at Edwards.” AN/ALQ-254(V)1 Viper Shield Viper Shield, designated AN/ALQ-254(V)1, is an all-digital, software-defined electronic warfare suite developed to improve the survivability and combat effectiveness of advanced F-16 fleets. The system combines digital radar threat warning, threat identification and electronic countermeasure capabilities. Its digital radar warning receiver is designed to integrate with the F-16's APG-83 Active Electronically Scanned Array radar, allowing the electronic warfare suite and aircraft radar to operate as part of an integrated configuration. Viper Shield also incorporates a Digital Radio Frequency Memory-based jammer (DRFM jammer), designed to provide rapid and precise electronic countermeasures against advanced radar-guided threats. L3Harris is developing Viper Shield in partnership with Lockheed Martin and the U.S. Air Force. Providing Threat Information to F-16 Pilots Viper Shield is designed to process electromagnetic activity around the aircraft and provide pilots with usable threat information. The system combines threat detection, identification and countermeasure functions to help aircrews respond to hostile emitters. This can provide pilots additional time to maneuver, employ defensive measures or change their mission plan when required. The two-ship flights also allowed test teams to examine how the system supports pilot situational awareness during coordinated operations rather than evaluating aircraft protection only in isolated sorties. L3Harris has incorporated commercial off-the-shelf technology (COTS) into Viper Shield's digital architecture to reduce overall weight and simplify future software upgrades. Internal and Podded Configurations Viper Shield's compact design allows the electronic warfare system to be installed internally on an aircraft or carried in a self-contained external pod. The two configurations use common hardware, helping simplify maintenance, training, software upgrades and logistics support across different F-16 blocks and national configurations. According to L3Harris, Viper Shield is currently the only electronic warfare system in production with a form factor small enough to fit the range of F-16 blocks. The flexible installation approach is particularly relevant for international F-16 fleets because aircraft configurations can differ between operators. 233 Viper Shield Systems Planned L3Harris is preparing to move toward full-rate production of 233 planned Viper Shield systems. The company said eight nations have selected Viper Shield for their F-16 fleets. L3Harris is supporting the program with an active production line, quality assurance processes and a supply chain being prepared for large-scale manufacturing. The planned production effort will support international operators adopting the system as an electronic warfare and survivability upgrade for their F-16 aircraft. Program Moves Toward Operationally Relevant Testing The first coordinated flights involving Viper Shield-equipped F-16C and F-16D aircraft represent another stage in the system's flight-test campaign at Edwards Air Force Base. Moving from individual aircraft evaluations to two-ship operations allows engineers to assess how the electronic warfare suite performs when multiple fighters operate together while using their sensors, radars and defensive systems. The latest testing is intended to further reduce integration risks and support Viper Shield's progression toward planned deliveries to international F-16 operators.

Trump, Pentagon Deny Report of Camp David Clash Over U.S. Missile Shortages During Iran Conflict

U.S

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The White House and the Pentagon have strongly denied a report claiming U.S. President Donald Trump confronted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over ammunition shortages during a Cabinet meeting at Camp David, even as concerns over U.S. weapons stockpiles continue amid the ongoing conflict with Iran. A report published by The Washington Post, citing two sources familiar with the matter, said Trump questioned Hegseth during last Friday's Cabinet meeting at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland after learning that shortages of key long-range guided missiles and air-defense interceptors remained unresolved. According to the report, Trump expressed frustration because he believed the ammunition issue had already been addressed and felt he had not been fully informed about the actual condition of U.S. military stockpiles. The reported shortages have limited available military options during the conflict with Iran. Report Claims Trump Sought Explanation The Washington Post reported that Trump pressed Hegseth for an explanation regarding the continued shortages. According to the newspaper, Hegseth denied responsibility and instead pointed to Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg, saying his deputy was responsible for ensuring the president received accurate updates on the military's inventory. The report said the exchange reflected growing tensions between Trump and Hegseth, who had been among the strongest supporters of military action against Iran and had previously assured the president that operations would be short and decisive. Reports Highlight Pressure on U.S. Munitions The reported discussion comes as U.S. military operations have placed heavy demand on precision-guided weapons and air-defense systems. According to The Washington Post, during the first month of the conflict U.S. forces used: More than 850 Tomahawk cruise missiles More than 1,000 Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptors More than 1,300 Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) The newspaper, citing a source familiar with the matter, reported that the ATACMS inventory has been reduced to the point that essentially none remain. Earlier reporting by CNN stated that the United States had used roughly 80% of its prewar THAAD interceptor stockpile and about half of its Patriot interceptor inventory during the conflict. CNN also reported that reserves of ATACMS and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM) had been significantly reduced, with the shortages contributing to Trump's decision to pause plans for additional large-scale strikes. Defense officials have previously acknowledged that replenishing certain advanced munitions takes considerable time. Production of some key air-defense interceptors, including Patriot missiles, can take up to two years despite expanded manufacturing agreements. White House Rejects the Report The White House categorically denied that any confrontation took place. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed the report, stating: "This is 100% fake news. It literally never happened. President Trump has the utmost confidence in Secretary Hegseth." Leavitt later wrote on X that she attended the Camp David meeting and said the reported exchange never occurred. She also said the story had been shared with several media organizations in an effort to discredit Hegseth, adding that Trump "loves the Secretary and thinks he's doing a tremendous job." Pentagon Also Denies Allegations The Pentagon issued a similar response. Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell rejected claims that Hegseth misled the president about U.S. munitions inventories or shifted responsibility to Deputy Defense Secretary Stephen Feinberg. Parnell described the allegations regarding depleted stockpiles, internal disagreements and Hegseth's position on Iran as "fabricated" and "fake news from beginning to end." Senate Hearings Raised Similar Questions Questions regarding U.S. weapons inventories had already surfaced during Senate hearings in July. Democratic lawmakers asked Hegseth whether he had accurately informed President Trump about the risks that a prolonged military campaign could pose to U.S. stockpiles. During those hearings, Hegseth repeatedly attributed any inventory shortfalls to policies of the previous administration. Meanwhile, the administration has taken steps to expand production by invoking the Defense Production Act and requesting additional funding from Congress to replenish military inventories. Trump Responds on Truth Social President Trump also responded publicly following the reports. In a post on Truth Social, he denied that the United States was facing a weapons shortage, saying the country has "massive amounts" of munitions and that additional weapons are being manufactured and supplied as needed. Trump also said his administration was pursuing individuals responsible for leaking what he described as "treasonous statements" to the media and that long prison sentences would be sought. Conflicting Accounts Remain The reported Camp David exchange has become the latest point of disagreement between media reports and official statements from the administration. While The Washington Post and CNN have reported significant pressure on U.S. missile inventories during the conflict with Iran, both the White House and the Pentagon continue to reject claims of internal disagreements over the issue, maintaining that President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth remain fully aligned on U.S. national security policy.

CBO Estimates U.S. Navy's 15 Nuclear-Powered Trump-Class Battleships Will Cost $275 Billion

U.S

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Navy's planned fleet of 15 nuclear-powered guided-missile battleships would cost an estimated $275 billion through 2056, according to a report released Wednesday by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The nonpartisan budget office estimated that the lead ship of the Trump-class (BBGN) would cost $23.4 billion, while the remaining 14 ships would average about $18 billion each. The estimates are based on 2026 dollars and cover ships expected to be ordered between 2028 and 2056. The planned battleships are part of the Navy's broader Golden Fleet initiative, announced in December 2025, and represent a major shift toward larger, heavily armed surface combatants. Nuclear Propulsion Increases Program Cost According to the CBO, the projected cost of the nuclear-powered fleet is significantly higher than the Navy's earlier estimates for a conventionally powered design. The Navy had previously estimated that the first conventionally powered battleship would cost $15.1 billion, with the second and third ships averaging $10.2 billion each. The CBO estimated that a fleet of 15 conventionally powered ships would cost about $243 billion. By switching to nuclear propulsion, the acquisition cost increases by about $32 billion, or 13 percent, bringing the total estimated program cost to $275 billion. The CBO noted that nuclear propulsion could reduce long-term operating costs by eliminating the need to purchase and transport conventional fuel. However, it said there is not enough information at this stage to estimate those savings because the ship's final design and propulsion requirements have not yet been finalized. The Navy has indicated that the battleships would use a reactor plant similar to the one installed on the Gerald R. Ford-class aircraft carriers. Largest Surface Combatant Planned Since World War II If built as planned, the Trump-class BBGN would become the largest surface combatant in the world and the largest surface warship constructed for the U.S. Navy since World War II. The Navy expects each ship to displace at least 35,000 tons at full load and measure between 840 and 880 feet in length. According to the Navy's current plan, the battleship would carry: 128 Mark 41 vertical-launch system (VLS) cells 12 Conventional Prompt Strike (CPS) hypersonic missiles Nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missiles (SLCM-N) High-powered laser systems An electronic rail gun Defensive weapon systems The Trump-class would replace the Navy's planned DDG(X) destroyer, which was expected to displace about 14,500 tons. The Navy has said the larger battleship design avoids the "undesirable capability and weapon system compromises" associated with the smaller DDG(X) concept. Cost Comparable to Aircraft Carriers The CBO noted that the lead Trump-class battleship's projected $23.4 billion cost is close to the estimated $22 billion price of future Ford-class nuclear-powered aircraft carriers included in the Navy's fiscal 2027 shipbuilding plan. It also estimated that one Trump-class battleship would cost about the same as five DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. However, the CBO noted that those destroyers would require more sailors, maintenance, and fossil fuel over their operational lives. Construction Timeline Faces Challenges The Navy's fiscal 2027 shipbuilding plan proposes ordering the first three battleships beginning in 2028, followed by approximately one ship every other year. However, the CBO questioned whether construction can realistically begin in 2028 because the battleship remains in the early stages of design. The report noted that beginning construction before completing the design has historically increased the risk of cost growth, schedule delays, and expensive rework. Current U.S. Navy shipbuilding programs already face extended construction timelines. According to the CBO, attack submarines, destroyers, and large amphibious ships now require nine to 11 years to build, compared with five to six years during the early 2000s. The Navy has said it intends to reduce schedule and cost risks by using modern digital engineering, advanced production practices, and artificial intelligence-enabled design tools. However, the CBO pointed to delays affecting the Constellation-class frigate program as an example of the challenges facing current naval shipbuilding efforts. Industrial Base Under Pressure Because the Trump-class will use nuclear propulsion, Newport News Shipbuilding is expected to perform final assembly, as it is currently the only U.S. shipyard certified to build nuclear-powered surface ships. Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding could manufacture non-nuclear modules for the ships, but final integration would take place at Dock 12 at Newport News, the same facility used for aircraft carrier construction. The CBO warned that adding a new class of 35,000-ton nuclear-powered battleships to the existing workload could increase pressure on the shipyard, which is already building three aircraft carriers and several submarines. Final Cost Depends on Ship Size The CBO said the final cost of the lead ship will depend heavily on its final size and configuration. According to the report: Reducing displacement to 30,000 tons could lower the lead ship's cost by about 13 percent. Increasing displacement to 41,000 tons could raise the lead ship's cost by about 16 percent. The report also stated that additional weapon integration and higher survivability requirements could further increase acquisition costs. Part of a Larger Fleet Expansion Plan The Trump-class program forms part of the Navy's broader plan to expand its large surface combatant fleet. Under the fiscal 2027 shipbuilding plan, the Navy proposes operating 72 large surface combatants, compared with 51 in the 2025 shipbuilding plan. To support that expansion, average annual funding for large surface combatants would increase from $6.9 billion to $15.2 billion. Total annual funding for both large and small surface combatants would rise from about $11 billion to $19 billion. The plan also calls for annual construction output of large surface combatants to increase from approximately 16,000 tons to 35,000 tons by 2035, placing additional demand on the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base. According to the information released, the first ship is expected to be named USS Defiant. The program was announced by President Donald Trump in December 2025 as the centerpiece of the Golden Fleet initiative. Congress has not yet fully authorized the program. The Navy's fiscal 2027 budget request includes approximately $1 billion for advance procurement and $837 million for research and development related to the Trump-class battleship program.

Boeing and Northrop Grumman Demonstrate Automated Teaming Between P-8A Poseidon and MQ-4C Triton

U.S

SAN DIEGO, Calif. — Boeing and Northrop Grumman have successfully completed a jointly funded laboratory demonstration of automated manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) between the Boeing P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft and the Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton unmanned aircraft system. The demonstration marked the first time the two platforms collaborated through automated mission control using an open systems architecture, allowing them to exchange mission tasking and intelligence without relying entirely on manual operator inputs. During the laboratory simulation, an operator aboard the P-8A Poseidon transmitted machine-readable and machine-actionable mission tasking to a simulated MQ-4C Triton using Universal Command and Control Interface (UCI) formatted messages. The Poseidon directed the unmanned aircraft to travel to a designated operational area and collect intelligence. After receiving the tasking, the MQ-4C Triton autonomously planned and executed the mission using onboard artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. The aircraft employed its sensors according to the assigned mission, processed the collected information onboard, and automatically transmitted the intelligence back to the P-8A crew. To replicate real-world operational conditions, the data exchange was conducted through a simulated satellite communication relay. According to the companies, the demonstration showed how crewed and uncrewed maritime platforms can work together more efficiently by sharing intelligence and coordinating missions through standardized digital interfaces. Open Systems Architecture Instead of using a dedicated point-to-point connection between the two aircraft, the demonstration relied on the Universal Command and Control Interface (UCI), a machine-to-machine collaboration standard built on Open Mission Systems (OMS) and the Autonomy–Government Reference Architecture. This standardized approach allows military platforms using the same architecture to communicate and operate together without requiring custom software integration. Boeing and Northrop Grumman said the common interface can support interoperability with other U.S. and allied military systems that use the same standards while reducing integration time and cost. Operational Benefits The companies said the demonstration highlighted several operational advantages for maritime patrol and reconnaissance missions. By allowing the MQ-4C Triton to autonomously carry out assigned tasks and process information before sending results to the P-8A, operator workload can be reduced while enabling crews to focus on mission management. Automated machine-to-machine intelligence sharing can also speed up the delivery of operational information to commanders, improving decision-making during maritime intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and targeting (ISR&T) missions as well as anti-surface warfare operations. The use of standardized interfaces also makes future integration between crewed and uncrewed aircraft less complex and more cost-effective across U.S. and allied forces. Company Statements Jane Bishop, vice president and general manager of Northrop Grumman's Global Surveillance Division, said the MQ-4C Triton and P-8A Poseidon form the backbone of the U.S. Navy's maritime patrol and reconnaissance force by providing complementary capabilities. She said the demonstration highlighted the flexibility of both systems, the companies' continued investment in advanced technologies, and the value of industry collaboration. Bishop added that Northrop Grumman remains committed to advancing technologies that support U.S. and allied operators against evolving maritime threats. Tory Peterson, vice president of Boeing's P-8 Program, said the demonstration expands real-world interoperability between the P-8A Poseidon and MQ-4C Triton for the United States and allied operators. He said Boeing's continued investment is intended to help current and future P-8A operators enhance mission capability through evolutionary upgrades while building on the aircraft's existing maritime patrol and reconnaissance roles. About the Aircraft The Boeing P-8A Poseidon is a multi-mission maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft designed to conduct anti-submarine warfare (ASW), anti-surface warfare (ASuW), intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR), and search and rescue (SAR) missions. The Northrop Grumman MQ-4C Triton is a high-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aircraft system developed for persistent maritime intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance operations. Built at Northrop Grumman's facility in Palmdale, California, the aircraft also supports signals intelligence, early threat prediction, and search and rescue missions. It is operated by the U.S. Navy and the Royal Australian Air Force. The companies said the demonstration is part of their ongoing investment to accelerate advanced maritime capabilities for U.S. and international operators through open systems architecture and automated collaboration between crewed and uncrewed platforms.

U.S. Army Selects Four Companies to Expand Hydra-70 Rocket Production and Strengthen Supply Chain

U.S

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Army has selected four defense companies to help expand production of the Hydra-70 rocket as part of an effort to strengthen the defense industrial base, reduce dependence on a single supplier, and improve manufacturing capacity for one of the military's most widely used rocket systems. The Army awarded Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements to Firehawk Aerospace, iRocket, Nammo Perry, and Albers through the Aviation Rocket and Small Guided Munitions (ARSGM) Product Office using the One Nation Innovation (ONI) marketplace. According to the Army, the initiative is intended to establish multiple qualified production sources, encourage competitive pricing on future annual orders, and build additional manufacturing capacity to meet operational requirements. Four Companies to Deliver Prototype Rockets Under the agreements, each company will manufacture 24 prototype Hydra-70 M151 High Explosive rockets within the next 18 months. In addition to producing the prototypes, all four companies will work together to update the government's Technical Data Package (TDP) for the Hydra-70. The government-owned TDP contains the engineering and manufacturing information required to build the rocket. The Army said modernizing the package will improve manufacturability and make it easier for additional qualified suppliers to enter production. If the prototype phase is completed successfully, the Army expects to issue follow-on agreements covering additional variants of the Hydra-70 rocket family. Expanding the Industrial Base The Army typically procures 100,000 to 200,000 Hydra-70 rockets each year, making the weapon one of its highest-volume munitions. Officials said expanding the number of qualified manufacturers will strengthen the supply chain and improve the Army's ability to increase production when required. The OTA contracting approach also enables the Army to fund prototype projects more quickly than under traditional acquisition methods while allowing participation from companies beyond the established prime contractor base. Long History of the Hydra-70 Program The Hydra-70 is a 70-millimeter unguided rocket powered by the MK66 rocket motor and can be fitted with different warheads depending on mission requirements. The rocket is launched from multiple platforms, including AH-64 Apache and AH-1 Cobra attack helicopters, as well as fixed-wing aircraft such as the F-16. It is used across all branches of the U.S. military and by many allied nations. The system traces its origins to U.S. Navy rocket designs developed in the late 1940s, while the current Hydra-70 has served as a standard munition since the Vietnam War era. When equipped with the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) guidance kit, the Hydra-70 becomes a laser-guided precision weapon. The guided version has increasingly been used for counter-drone missions because it provides a lower-cost option than employing Hellfire missiles, which typically cost between $150,000 and $200,000 per missile. Reducing Reliance on a Single Supplier For decades, General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems has served as the primary systems integrator for the Hydra-70 program. Since 1996, the company has produced more than 5 million Hydra-70 rockets and has received Army contracts that include awards valued at up to $3.42 billion. Army briefing materials shared with industry indicated that the program's maximum production capacity is about 330,000 rockets annually, although actual production has often been below that level. The Army also noted that it fires more than 100,000 Hydra-70 rockets each year for training, in addition to operational and combat use. Over the past decade, approximately 1.7 million Hydra-70 rockets have been used in training, combat, and testing. By bringing additional qualified manufacturers into the program, the Army aims to reduce dependence on a single primary supplier while improving its ability to increase production when required. Firehawk Aerospace Expanding Production Texas-based Firehawk Aerospace said its OTA agreement supports efforts to diversify the Hydra-70 supply chain and strengthen the U.S. defense industrial base. Founded in 2019 by CEO Will Edwards, the company develops rocket motors and propellant using modern manufacturing methods, including 3D printing. Earlier this year, Firehawk opened a rocket integration facility in Crawford, Mississippi, with an initial production capacity of approximately 40,000 rockets per year. The company plans to increase production capacity by 2028. Firehawk is also developing a propellant production facility in Oklahoma and holds propulsion-related contracts supporting programs that include the Javelin, Stinger, and Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS). The company recently raised $60 million in a Series C funding round led by 1789 Capital and also received a strategic investment from Hanwha Defense USA. iRocket Supporting Guided Rocket Production New York-based iRocket also secured a related contract valued between $30 million and $150 million to manufacture components for laser-guided Hydra-70 rockets. The company plans to use its automated Factory ONE production model, which is designed to manufacture up to 97,000 units annually while producing a propellant unit approximately every five minutes. Future Production Plans Following successful completion of the prototype program, the Army plans to expand production opportunities across additional Hydra-70 variants. Army officials said the initiative is intended to create a more resilient manufacturing base, improve competition among suppliers, and ensure long-term production capacity for one of the U.S. military's most widely used rocket systems.

U.S. Navy Successfully Conducts SMART Sounding Rocket Mission from Wake Island to Study Space Plasma

U.S

WAKE ISLAND, Pacific Ocean — The U.S. Navy has released new details of the Space Measurement of A Rocket-released Turbulence (SMART) mission, a scientific sounding rocket experiment conducted on February 12, 2026, from the remote Pacific atoll of Wake Island. The mission was designed to study how plasma energy converts and behaves in space, providing data that could improve understanding of space weather and its effects on satellites and other space-based systems. The SMART mission was managed by the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) and carried out by the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC), Port Hueneme Division's White Sands Detachment. The launch marked the detachment's largest sounding rocket mission to date and its first flight of a four-stage sounding rocket. Mission aimed at studying plasma turbulence The experiment focused on understanding plasma turbulence and energy conversion in Earth's upper atmosphere. Scientists say space weather can affect satellite communications, navigation systems, and other spacecraft operating in low Earth orbit. Dr. Gurudas Ganguli, NRL Senior Scientist for Intense Particle Beams and Plasma Processes, said space weather poses challenges for spacecraft in much the same way atmospheric weather affects aircraft. To carry out the experiment, the Navy launched Oriole IV, a 68-foot (20.7-meter), four-stage sounding rocket built using four repurposed motors—Talos, Terrier, Oriole, and Nihka. According to officials, using existing rocket motors significantly reduced mission costs compared with developing a new large single-stage motor capable of reaching the same altitude. The rocket reached an altitude of approximately 539 kilometers (335 miles), within the region where many satellites operate. At that point, the payload separated, and a directional shape charge vaporized several pounds of barium metal, creating an artificial plasma cloud in the ionosphere. After the release, sunlight ionized the neutral barium atoms. Officials said the neutral atoms glowed green, while the ions produced blue and purple colors. Earth's magnetic field confined the ions, triggering electrostatic plasma turbulence. A second payload carrying scientific instruments then passed through the plasma cloud to measure the resulting electric and magnetic field changes and other electromagnetic effects. Testing plasma-wave conversion in space According to the Naval Research Laboratory, the mission was designed to confirm how electrostatic lower hybrid waves convert into electromagnetic whistler waves during a high-speed metal vapor release in the ionosphere. Christopher Netwall, Branch Head for Dynamics and Control Systems at the Naval Research Laboratory's Naval Center for Space Technology, SMART program manager, and experiment lead, said the experiment addressed a scientific question that had previously been studied mainly in laboratory conditions. Officials reported that the team successfully induced and measured plasma turbulence in the space environment using this method. Instruments recorded electric and magnetic field fluctuations, while ground-based sensors tracked the plasma cloud's size, optical intensity, and the propagation of the resulting electromagnetic waves. The complete mission sequence, from liftoff to final measurements, lasted about 10 minutes before the vapor dispersed and recombined with atmospheric elements. Jay Breuer, Senior Test Director in the White Sands Detachment's Suborbital Vehicles Division, said the mission demonstrated scientific theories that could eventually support future operational capabilities. Wake Island selected for safety reasons The SMART mission was originally planned for NASA's Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia. However, NASA safety assessments determined that detonating a shape charge at such a high altitude could spread debris across an area too large for that location. The project was subsequently transferred to the U.S. Navy, which selected Wake Island, a remote atoll managed by the U.S. Air Force. Located approximately 2,300 miles (3,701 kilometers) west of Honolulu and 1,500 miles (2,414 kilometers) northeast of Guam, Wake Island's isolation allowed the military to safely close the required airspace and ocean areas. The nearest inhabited island is nearly 600 miles (966 kilometers) away. Breuer described the location simply as being "in the middle of nowhere." Building a launch site in a remote environment Launching from Wake Island required extensive preparation because the island lacks permanent sounding rocket infrastructure. Unlike established launch ranges such as White Sands Missile Range, the Hebrides Range in Scotland, or the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Kauai, Wake Island did not have permanent telemetry systems or launch control facilities. An advance team surveyed the island months before the mission, and eight personnel from the White Sands Detachment spent about seven weeks, from early January through late February, establishing the launch site. The launch control center was set up inside an abandoned garage with a dirt floor, leaking roof, and mold-covered walls. The team relied on Starlink satellite terminals for internet connectivity throughout the operation. In total, 42 personnel participated in the mission, including scientists from the Naval Research Laboratory, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, the Naval Surface Warfare Center Indian Head Division, university research teams, and supporting contractors. Rocket and equipment transported across the Pacific Transporting personnel, rocket hardware, and equipment to Wake Island required three C-17 Globemaster III cargo aircraft operating from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico. Aircraft carrying rocket stages and explosives stopped at Travis Air Force Base in California and Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii before continuing across the Pacific to Wake Island. Officials said the journey covered approximately 5,800 miles (9,334 kilometers) and took about four days. The launch used a Missile Defense Agency launcher capable of handling payloads of up to 50,000 pounds (22,680 kilograms). The launcher was extended to accommodate the 68-foot Oriole IV sounding rocket. Mission planners also delayed launch opportunities several times to avoid potential conflicts with orbiting satellites before successfully completing the flight. Mission supports future research and testing Following the successful launch, the Missile Defense Agency transferred ownership of the heavy-duty Wake Island launch rail to the White Sands Detachment. According to Navy officials, the successful expeditionary launch demonstrated the unit's ability to conduct complex sounding rocket operations from remote locations. They said this capability could support future hypersonic vehicle testing and work related to the Golden Dome for America homeland missile-defense architecture. The Naval Research Laboratory said the SMART mission successfully confirmed laboratory predictions of plasma-wave conversion in the actual space environment while providing valuable data to improve understanding of space weather and its potential effects on satellites and other space-based systems. The mission involved multiple government organizations, including the Naval Research Laboratory, Naval Surface Warfare Center divisions, Pacific Air Forces Regional Support Center Wake Island Detachment, U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command Reagan Test Site, U.S. Space Force 19th Space Defense Squadron, Missile Defense Agency Test Directorate, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and the University of Washington. Sponsors included the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, the Office of Naval Research, the Department of War Space Test Program, the Rocket Systems Launch Program, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Space Security and Defense Program.

U.S. Used Nearly 80% of THAAD Interceptors During Iran Conflict, Pentagon Stockpiles Run Low

U.S

WASHINGTON — The United States has used a significant portion of its advanced missile interceptor inventory during the five-month conflict with Iran, raising concerns inside the Pentagon over the readiness of U.S. air and missile defense forces if another major conflict emerges. According to an exclusive CNN report published on Tuesday, U.S. military commanders have warned that the Pentagon's stockpile of key interceptor missiles has reached "dangerously low" levels after months of sustained operations against Iranian missile attacks. The report, citing officials familiar with the latest Pentagon inventory assessment, states that the U.S. Army has expended nearly 80% of its pre-war Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) interceptor inventory and roughly half of its Patriot air defense interceptors since the conflict began in late February. THAAD and Patriot Inventories Under Pressure The reported decline reflects the heavy use of U.S. layered missile defense systems during repeated Iranian ballistic missile attacks targeting American military bases and regional partners across the Middle East. According to estimates from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the United States entered the conflict with approximately 2,200 Patriot interceptors (including PAC-3 and GEM-T variants) and 452 THAAD interceptors. CNN's assessment indicates that nearly four-fifths of the THAAD inventory has now been consumed, while about half of the Patriot interceptor stockpile has also been used during combat operations. Earlier CSIS estimates, published before the latest Pentagon assessment, projected somewhat lower levels of expenditure. The think tank estimated that between February and July the United States had used about 65% of its Patriot inventory, leaving fewer than 1,000 missiles, while THAAD inventories had fallen by at least 38%, to roughly 250 interceptors. CSIS noted that the actual numbers could change as additional operational data became available. Concerns Raised Before Additional Strikes Were Halted According to CNN, senior military officials warned about the rapid depletion of interceptor stockpiles before President Donald Trump decided last week to halt additional military strikes against Iran. The reported shortage has also raised concerns among U.S. partners in the Middle East, where American missile defense systems play a central role in protecting military installations and allied forces from ballistic missile attacks. Officials are concerned that prolonged regional tensions could place additional pressure on remaining interceptor inventories if another large-scale missile campaign occurs. Budget Request Focuses on Rebuilding Missile Inventories The depletion of interceptor stockpiles is reflected in the Trump administration's fiscal year 2027 defense budget request. The proposal includes $95 billion for munitions procurement, together with an additional $21 billion in supplemental funding, aimed at accelerating production of critical missile systems. The procurement request includes plans to acquire more than 3,000 Patriot interceptor missiles and approximately 800 THAAD interceptors. Defense analysts note that replenishing these inventories will take time because procurement levels in previous years were comparatively lower, limiting near-term missile deliveries. Missile Production Capacity Being Expanded To address increasing demand, the U.S. Department of Defense has begun expanding missile production capacity through long-term agreements with industry. In January 2026, Lockheed Martin signed a framework agreement with the Department of Defense to increase THAAD interceptor production capacity from 96 missiles annually to 400 per year. The company also announced construction of a new Munitions Acceleration Center in Camden, Arkansas, to support higher production rates using advanced manufacturing technologies. Separately, the Pentagon has also signed agreements to increase production capacity for Patriot interceptor components as part of a broader effort to rebuild U.S. missile inventories following high operational demand. THAAD's Role in U.S. Missile Defense THAAD (Terminal High Altitude Area Defense) is designed to intercept ballistic missiles during the terminal phase of flight, including engagements outside the Earth's atmosphere. The system uses the Talon hit-to-kill interceptor, which destroys incoming ballistic missiles through direct kinetic impact rather than an explosive warhead. According to publicly available U.S. Army information, THAAD can engage ballistic missile threats at altitudes of up to 150 kilometers (93 miles) and at ranges of up to 200 kilometers (124 miles). The United States currently operates seven THAAD batteries and plans to expand the force to eight batteries. Higher interceptor production is intended both to replenish depleted inventories and support future force expansion. Patriot Provides Lower-Layer Missile Defense The Patriot air defense system operates alongside THAAD as part of the U.S. layered missile defense architecture. Using PAC-3 and GEM-T interceptor missiles, Patriot is designed to engage tactical ballistic missiles as well as aerodynamic threats such as aircraft and cruise missiles, providing medium- and high-altitude air defense for military forces and critical infrastructure. Precision-Guided Missile Stocks Also Reportedly Affected The reported pressure on U.S. munitions has extended beyond defensive interceptor missiles. According to Reuters, U.S. forces also came close to exhausting inventories of Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) long-range precision-guided weapons during the five-month campaign, highlighting broader concerns over the sustainability of high-intensity military operations and the pace of munitions production. Defense analysts have said rebuilding these inventories will require sustained production increases over several years, even with expanded manufacturing capacity now being introduced across the U.S. defense industrial base.

Mistral, UVision Clear First HERO 120 Lot Acceptance Tests Under $982 Million U.S. Army Contract

U.S

BETHESDA, Md. — Mistral Inc. and UVision have successfully completed the first Lot Acceptance Tests (LAT) for the HERO 120 loitering munition system under the U.S. Army's Lethal Unmanned System (LUS) program, marking an important step toward fielding the system with Army units. According to the companies, all HERO 120 systems successfully completed the required acceptance-test missions during the recent testing event. The results support continued progress toward operational deployment under the Army's LUS program. The LUS program is managed under the Precision Strike Reconnaissance System (PSRS) portfolio within the Capability Portfolio Executive for Mission Autonomy, which oversees the development and fielding of advanced autonomous capabilities for the U.S. Army. HERO 120 Moves Closer to Army Fielding The successful completion of the first Lot Acceptance Tests confirms that the evaluated HERO 120 systems met the Army's required acceptance-test objectives. The milestone allows the program to continue toward broader fielding across Army units. Mistral Inc. and UVision are jointly delivering the HERO 120 under a $982 million multi-year Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract awarded in October 2025. The contract covers procurement, fielding, training, and sustainment of the system for the U.S. Army, with initial deliveries scheduled to begin in early 2026. HERO 120 Designed for Reconnaissance and Precision Strike The HERO 120 is a mid-range loitering munition designed to provide tactical units with both reconnaissance and precision-strike capabilities. The system is intended to give soldiers greater operational flexibility while operating in complex battlefield environments. The munition uses a pneumatic launch system and features a gimbaled electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) seeker supported by advanced image processing technology. A key capability of the HERO 120 is its man-in-the-loop control, which allows the operator to maintain control throughout the mission. Operators can observe, identify, track, and engage both moving and stationary targets. If battlefield conditions change, they can abort an attack during flight or redirect the munition to another target. According to the companies, the system is also designed to operate in GPS-denied environments while maintaining precision accuracy and minimizing collateral damage. Previously released specifications state that the HERO 120 carries an approximately 4.5-kilogram warhead, has an operational range of approximately 40 to 60 kilometers, and can remain airborne for up to 60 minutes. The system is compatible with multiple launch platforms, including vehicles, and can also be operated by infantry teams. Companies Share Responsibilities Mistral Inc. serves as the U.S.-based prime contractor and systems integrator for the program. The company is responsible for system integration, the lethality package, program management, and sustainment. UVision serves as the design authority for the HERO 120. The company supports the system's development, manufacturing, and delivery and also provides training and sustainment support for the HERO family of loitering munitions. Together, the companies are responsible for delivering the systems and supporting Army units throughout fielding and operational service. Company Statements Yoav Banai, Senior Vice President at Mistral Inc., said the successful testing represents an important milestone for the companies and the U.S. Army. "Completing the first Lot Acceptance Tests is an important milestone for Mistral Inc., Uvision, and the U.S. Army. The successful completion of all required acceptance test HERO 120 missions reflects the shared commitment of both companies to deliver reliable, effective, and mission-ready capability to our warfighters. Mistral Inc. and Uvision are proud to support this Army program and remain focused on providing warfighters with the tools they need to win the fight." Jarmin Blanton, Vice President of Business Development, Sales & Marketing at UVision Inc., said the milestone demonstrates the close cooperation between the Army and industry partners. "Uvision is proud to support the U.S. Army's LUS program. As the design authority for HERO 120, Uvision is committed to delivering a mature, reliable, and combat effective system that exceeds the operational needs of the soldier. This LAT milestone reflects the close collaboration between the Army, Mistral Inc., Uvision, and the broader program team, and we look forward to continuing our support as the program advances." Next Phase Following the successful completion of the first Lot Acceptance Tests, the HERO 120 program will continue toward active fielding with the U.S. Army. In addition to supplying the systems, Mistral Inc. and UVision will continue providing training and sustainment support to help ensure Army personnel are prepared to operate and maintain the HERO 120 throughout its service life.

Pentagon Drafts New Nuclear Strategy With Greater Focus on Tactical Weapons for China and Russia

U.S

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Defense is drafting a new nuclear strategy that would place greater emphasis on the possible use of shorter-range tactical nuclear weapons during regional conflicts involving China or Russia, according to officials familiar with the classified review. The strategy, led by Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, is intended to expand the range of nuclear response options available to the U.S. president while retaining all existing strategic capabilities. Officials said the proposal does not replace current nuclear policies but seeks to strengthen regional deterrence by giving greater importance to tactical nuclear weapons. Strategy Aims to Expand Deterrence Options According to officials, the review is designed to provide the president with a broader set of credible nuclear response options during regional crises. Pentagon planners believe that relying only on high-yield strategic nuclear weapons, such as intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), may not always present a believable deterrent in limited regional conflicts. The draft strategy therefore gives increased attention to lower-yield, shorter-range tactical nuclear weapons, which officials believe offer more proportionate response options while maintaining deterrence. The proposal would leave all existing U.S. nuclear options in place and expand the role of tactical nuclear capabilities within regional defense planning. Review Focused on Two Nuclear-Armed Competitors The classified review comes as U.S. defense officials continue assessing how to deter both China and Russia simultaneously. Officials have pointed to China's continued expansion of its nuclear arsenal and Russia's large inventory of non-strategic nuclear weapons as key factors behind the review. Earlier this year, Elbridge Colby told Congress that the administration would not conduct a formal Nuclear Posture Review similar to previous administrations. Instead, he said the Pentagon was reviewing nuclear strategy to address the challenges posed by two nuclear-armed peer competitors. A senior defense official also said the review is examining nuclear force requirements, modernization efforts, and possible additional theater nuclear weapons programs, including options based on existing stockpiles and delivery platforms. Changing Global Nuclear Environment The review also reflects changes in the international security environment. In February 2026, the New START arms control treaty expired without a replacement agreement, ending the last legally binding limits on U.S. and Russian strategic nuclear forces. At the same time, U.S. officials have highlighted developments in Russian and Chinese nuclear capabilities. Russia has updated its military doctrine to lower the threshold for the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons during conventional conflicts and has deployed tactical nuclear weapons to neighboring Belarus. China, meanwhile, continues expanding its nuclear triad and has deployed dual-capable intermediate-range systems, including the DF-26, which can carry either conventional or nuclear payloads across the Indo-Pacific region. National Defense Strategy Supports Nuclear Modernization The 2026 National Defense Strategy, released earlier this year, calls for modernizing and adapting U.S. nuclear forces with an emphasis on deterrence and escalation management. Defense officials have also identified the nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile as one option to strengthen regional deterrence without relying solely on long-range strategic nuclear systems. Officials have stressed that maintaining and modernizing the U.S. nuclear triad remains a top defense priority. Debate Over the Proposed Strategy The draft strategy has generated debate within Washington's national security community. Supporters argue that expanding tactical nuclear options would improve the credibility of U.S. deterrence by providing response choices that are more appropriate for limited regional conflicts. They believe a wider range of options would reduce the likelihood that potential adversaries miscalculate U.S. intentions during a crisis. Critics, however, caution that increasing the role of tactical nuclear weapons could lower the perceived threshold for nuclear use. They argue that integrating such weapons more deeply into regional military planning could increase escalation risks and shift attention away from long-range strategic deterrence. Strategy Still Under Review The nuclear strategy review remains classified, and the Pentagon has not announced when it will be finalized or whether it will lead to changes in U.S. nuclear doctrine, force posture, or future weapons programs. Officials have stated that the review is part of broader efforts to ensure the United States maintains a credible and effective nuclear deterrent while responding to evolving security challenges involving China and Russia. Source : nbcnews

U.S. Begins Transferring Ukraine Security Assistance Leadership to NATO in Major Mission Restructuring

U.S

WIESBADEN, Germany — The United States has begun reorganizing its Ukraine security assistance mission, directing U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) to restructure the Security Assistance Group–Ukraine (SAG-U) and gradually transfer its core leadership responsibilities to NATO. U.S. officials said the move is intended to improve the efficiency of military assistance to Ukraine while shifting greater responsibility to allied nations without reducing U.S. support. USEUCOM announced the decision on Aug. 3, stating that the reorganization will not affect overall U.S. military assistance to Ukraine. Instead, it is designed to streamline security assistance, transition leadership of key mission elements to allies, and allow the United States to focus more resources on other global priorities. "Allies have shown that they can take the lead in support of Ukraine's defense," said U.S. Air Force Gen. Alexus G. Grynkewich, commander of USEUCOM and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe. "SAG-U was always meant to be a temporary command. Its transition builds on the progress that we have already seen, helping to set conditions for lasting peace in Ukraine." Leadership Transition Begins The restructuring officially began with a change-of-command ceremony on Aug. 3, 2026, at Lucius D. Clay Kaserne in Wiesbaden, Germany. During the ceremony, Lt. Gen. Guillaume N. Beaurpere assumed command of both SAG-U and the NATO Security Assistance and Training for Ukraine (NSATU) mission, replacing Lt. Gen. Curtis A. Buzzard, who had led both organizations since August 2024 and is retiring after 34 years of military service. Beaurpere previously served as Chief of Staff of U.S. Special Operations Command. NATO to Take Greater Responsibility NSATU is NATO's operational command responsible for coordinating military equipment deliveries and training for Ukraine provided by NATO allies and partner countries. According to USEUCOM, SAG-U will gradually transfer its roles and responsibilities to European allies and NSATU over the next year. Once the transition is completed, SAG-U is expected to dissolve. Under the new structure: NSATU will assume responsibility for Ukrainian military training, material management, and sustainment support. The mission will eventually be led by a European or Canadian commander, with an American officer serving as deputy commander. U.S.-specific support functions currently handled by SAG-U will move to U.S. Army Europe and Africa and other USEUCOM components. U.S. Says Support for Ukraine Will Continue U.S. officials emphasized that the organizational changes do not represent a reduction in military assistance to Ukraine. "The reorganization of SAG-U does not diminish our support or commitment to Ukraine," said Col. Michael Weisman, spokesperson for U.S. Army Europe and Africa. "We will continue providing support to Ukraine through coordination with USEUCOM and NSATU in alignment with U.S. policy." USEUCOM also stated that the transition reflects the increasing role played by allied nations in supporting Ukraine's defense over the past year. Role of SAG-U Since 2022 SAG-U was established on Nov. 4, 2022, following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, to coordinate long-term U.S. security assistance. The headquarters was built around the U.S. Army's XVIII Airborne Corps, which initially deployed to Europe to reinforce NATO's eastern flank before expanding its mission to oversee the training and equipping of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. According to USEUCOM, the organization has: Overseen the delivery of more than $2 billion in security assistance. Coordinated military support from allied and partner nations. Served as a central organization for conventional defense coordination in Europe. Shared lessons learned from the Ukrainian Armed Forces' battlefield experience with U.S. and NATO military institutions. SAG-U and NSATU currently include joint and multinational personnel from more than 25 nations and are headquartered at Clay Kaserne in Wiesbaden, Germany. International Training Effort The multinational training mission has continued to expand alongside military assistance efforts. In 2024, 34 countries participated in training Ukrainian troops through the combined efforts of SAG-U and the European Union Military Assistance Mission (EUMAM), highlighting the broad international participation in supporting Ukraine's armed forces. Part of a Broader U.S. Strategy The reorganization is also part of a wider U.S. effort to shift greater responsibility for European defense to allied nations. Earlier this year, the Trump administration announced plans to reduce part of its senior military leadership presence in Europe. As part of that broader realignment, the administration also announced that command of NATO's Joint Force Command Norfolk, currently based in Norfolk, Virginia, would be transferred to the United Kingdom. The transfer of SAG-U's responsibilities to NATO represents another step in that broader restructuring of the U.S. military posture in Europe. Transition to Continue Over the Next Year USEUCOM said the transfer of responsibilities from SAG-U to NATO will take place gradually over the next year. During this period, NSATU will assume a larger operational role while U.S.-specific support functions move to other USEUCOM organizations. Officials said the restructuring is intended to maintain uninterrupted military assistance to Ukraine while placing more operational leadership in the hands of NATO allies and partner nations.

U.S. Army Plans 53-Month Boeing Contract to Remanufacture Up to 12 AH-64E Apache Helicopters

U.S

REDSTONE ARSENAL, Ala. — The U.S. Army is moving forward with plans to award a sole-source contract to Boeing for the remanufacture of up to 12 AH-64E Apache attack helicopters as part of its continued effort to modernize the Army's primary heavy attack and reconnaissance aircraft while addressing aging components across the fleet. The U.S. Army Contracting Command at Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, published a notice on Aug. 4, 2026, announcing its intent to negotiate the contract directly with Boeing rather than open it to competitive bidding. Interested parties have until Aug. 19, 2026, to submit capability statements if they wish to challenge the proposed acquisition approach. The planned work will be carried out as a 53-month effort under an existing Boeing contract. In addition to the remanufacture of up to 12 AH-64E helicopters, the program includes work to manage and correct obsolescence in critical electronic components that have become outdated or difficult to obtain. Boeing Remains the Only Practical Source According to the Army, Boeing is the sole designer, developer, manufacturer, and systems integrator of the AH-64 Apache helicopter. The Army does not own a complete production-level technical data package, including the engineering drawings and manufacturing instructions required to build the aircraft. It also does not hold the rights to Boeing's proprietary technical data developed over decades of Apache production. Because of these legal and technical limitations, the Army stated that no other company can realistically manufacture a fully functional Apache helicopter, making Boeing the only practical source for the work. Remanufacturing Continues Long-Term Modernization Strategy Rather than producing entirely new helicopters, the Army continues to rely on remanufacturing existing aircraft as its preferred modernization approach for the Apache fleet. The same process was previously used to convert older AH-64A helicopters into the AH-64D configuration. More recently, Boeing's facility in Mesa, Arizona, has remanufactured hundreds of AH-64D helicopters into the current AH-64E standard now operated by the U.S. Army and several allied nations. The latest effort will also focus on replacing obsolete electronic components. As older technologies leave production, engineers must redesign and requalify replacement parts to maintain aircraft availability and long-term fleet support. AH-64E Provides Expanded Operational Capabilities The AH-64E is the U.S. Army's primary heavy attack and reconnaissance helicopter, designed to engage ground targets and provide combat support for ground forces. The aircraft is equipped with a 30-millimeter cannon, 2.75-inch rockets, laser-guided and radar-guided Hellfire missiles, and the Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM). Its digital network architecture enables crews to control unmanned aerial vehicles from the cockpit while sharing real-time intelligence and targeting information with other joint forces, improving battlefield coordination. Boeing is also continuing efforts to expand the helicopter's capabilities. Current integration work includes launched effects, which are small drones deployed directly from the aircraft, directed-energy weapons, and the Lockheed Martin-Rafael Spike NLOS (Non-Line Of Sight) long-range missile. Recent live-fire testing has demonstrated the AH-64E's ability to employ the Spike NLOS missile against targets at distances of up to 32 kilometers (20 miles), extending the aircraft's engagement range beyond that of Hellfire-equipped configurations. International Orders Continue to Support Production Demand for the AH-64E remains strong among U.S. allies, helping sustain Boeing's production and remanufacturing lines beyond domestic Army requirements. The United Kingdom completed delivery of its fleet of 50 remanufactured AH-64E helicopters earlier this year. Other international customers are also progressing with deliveries. Australia is acquiring 29 AH-64E helicopters, with deliveries underway and six aircraft already in the country as of mid-2026. India's Army completed the induction of six AH-64E helicopters by late 2025, in addition to the 22 Apache helicopters already operated by the Indian Air Force. Morocco has received 12 of its 24 ordered AH-64E helicopters. Meanwhile, Poland has finalized the purchase of 96 AH-64E Apache helicopters through the U.S. Foreign Military Sales program, with deliveries expected to begin in 2028. Supporting Fleet Readiness Work under the planned Army program is expected to take place primarily at Boeing's Mesa, Arizona, facility, consistent with previous Apache remanufacture programs managed by Army Contracting Command at Redstone Arsenal. The proposed contract reflects the U.S. Army's continued investment in sustaining the AH-64E fleet through aircraft remanufacture and electronic component modernization while maintaining the industrial capability that supports both U.S. military requirements and Apache operators around the world.

U.S. Space Force Awards Rocket Lab $397 Million Contract for Space-Based Threat Tracking Constellation

U.S

LONG BEACH, Calif. — Rocket Lab Corporation has secured a $397 million contract from the U.S. Space Force to develop, launch, and operate a constellation of advanced Flatellites under the Space-Based Airborne Moving Target Indicator (SB-AMTI) program. The satellites will provide persistent space-based tracking of airborne threats and support the Space Force's next-generation sensing architecture. The award is part of a $615 million package of three firm-fixed-price Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreements announced by Space Systems Command on Aug. 4, 2026. Besides Rocket Lab, Systems & Technology Research (STR) also received a contract, while the identity of the third recipient has not been disclosed for operational security reasons. SB-AMTI Program Aims to Expand Space-Based Surveillance The SB-AMTI program is led by the Portfolio Acquisition Executive for Space-Based Sensing and Targeting. Its objective is to create a resilient network capable of detecting and tracking airborne threats—including aircraft, cruise missiles, and other moving targets—in real time. Unlike traditional airborne surveillance platforms, the program is designed to provide persistent coverage from orbit. The architecture combines satellites, secure communications links, and ground processing systems. Artificial intelligence will assist in processing large volumes of sensor data, filtering background clutter, and identifying moving targets. According to the Space Force, the move toward space-based sensing is intended to reduce reliance on conventional surveillance aircraft, which face increasing operational challenges in contested environments where advanced anti-access and area-denial (A2/AD) systems can restrict their ability to operate. Rocket Lab to Develop, Launch and Operate Flatellites Under the contract, Rocket Lab will build multiple Flatellites, a next-generation flat satellite platform designed for deployment in large constellations. The spacecraft will carry advanced space-based sensors along with high-bandwidth, low-latency communications links to transmit tracking data. The satellites will be launched aboard Rocket Lab's upcoming Neutron medium-lift rocket, which is currently targeting a late-2026 debut. Following deployment, Rocket Lab will operate the satellites from secure ground facilities and provide tracking information directly to the U.S. Space Force. The contract covers spacecraft development, launch services, and on-orbit mission operations. It also includes an option for additional Flatellites within the total contract value, although Rocket Lab has not disclosed the number of satellites included in the initial award. Focus on Multiple Technologies and Supplier Diversity According to the Space Force, this second task order is intended to expand the supplier base and evaluate multiple sensing technologies rather than relying on a single technical solution. The agency said this approach supports long-term competition while advancing different technologies for the airborne moving target indication mission. Col. Ryan Frazier, Acting Space Force Portfolio Acquisition Executive for Space-Based Sensing and Targeting, said the program is focused on broadening available capabilities. "With these new partnerships, we are exploring unique innovations and technologies and fundamentally different ways to accomplish the airborne moving target indication mission." Rocket Lab also said the inclusion of its Neutron launch vehicle will increase vendor diversity within the SB-AMTI program. Rocket Lab Highlights Vertically Integrated Capabilities Rocket Lab Founder and Chief Executive Officer Sir Peter Beck said the company is well positioned to support the Space Force because it provides satellite manufacturing, launch services, and mission operations through a vertically integrated business model. "Rocket Lab is honored to play a key role in the SB-AMTI program, which is critical to expanding the Space Force's layered, resilient tracking architecture. Our vertically integrated, constellation-class satellite capabilities, mission operations, and launch services uniquely position us to deliver innovative solutions that meet the urgent needs of the Space Force. We are proud to contribute to the deployment of a resilient space-based sensing layer that will enhance the Joint Force's ability to operate in contested airspace." Part of a Broader Space Force Acquisition Strategy The latest award follows an earlier $4.16 billion Space Force contract awarded to SpaceX to establish an initial SB-AMTI constellation, with satellites expected to be fielded by 2028. Space Force officials have stated that the overall program will involve multiple vendors and different sensor designs as the architecture expands. According to the Space Force, the acquisition strategy is intended to mature emerging technologies, leverage commercial investment, and maintain long-term competition while developing the future SB-AMTI tracking network. Expanding Rocket Lab's Defense Portfolio The contract further strengthens Rocket Lab's role in U.S. national security space programs. The company has previously supported missions for the U.S. Space Force, National Reconnaissance Office (NRO), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and NASA. The SB-AMTI award also follows two recent milestones for the company. Last week, Rocket Lab secured a $266 million suborbital launch contract, and earlier this year it completed the Victus Haze responsive space mission, further expanding its participation in U.S. defense and space operations.

Anduril Eyes Baltimore's Historic Sparrows Point for Major U.S. Drone Boat Factory

U.S

BALTIMORE — Anduril Industries is in advanced negotiations to establish a major manufacturing and testing facility for unmanned surface vessels (USVs) at Maryland's historic Sparrows Point industrial site, a move that would significantly expand the company's autonomous maritime production capacity if the agreement is finalized. The Southern California-based defense technology company has signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the operators of the 3,300-acre Tradepoint Atlantic industrial complex in Baltimore County. The site, formerly operated by Bethlehem Steel, includes a deep-water port and has a long history of steel production and shipbuilding. The proposed investment could reach the hundreds of millions of dollars, with plans to convert part of the site into a manufacturing and testing hub for autonomous military boats. However, negotiations are still underway, no lease has been signed, and the project could still be abandoned if a final agreement is not reached. Maryland Governor Wes Moore's office has participated in the discussions, and any completed agreement is expected to include state incentives. Strategic Location for Naval Production Sparrows Point offers several logistical advantages for defense manufacturing. Located near Washington, D.C., the site is also close to the U.S. Coast Guard's largest shipyard at Curtis Bay, allowing easier testing of new vessels and smoother integration with existing military fleets. The deep-water port further supports manufacturing, sea trials, and transportation of completed vessels. Growing Demand for Autonomous Surface Vessels The proposed facility comes as the U.S. Department of Defense continues expanding the use of uncrewed systems across naval operations. Recent military operations have increased demand for autonomous platforms that can perform surveillance, reconnaissance, logistics, and other missions while reducing risks to personnel. Defense planners have also emphasized deploying larger numbers of lower-cost autonomous systems as militaries increasingly face inexpensive drones that often require much more expensive interceptor missiles to defeat. Operational Use Highlights Expanding Role Autonomous surface vessels have already demonstrated their operational value in recent missions. In June 2026, a 24-foot autonomous Corsair unmanned surface vessel built by Saronic Technologies successfully located and rescued two U.S. Army Apache helicopter crew members after their aircraft was shot down near the Strait of Hormuz. The mission marked a notable example of an autonomous vessel conducting a personnel recovery operation without placing additional crews at risk. The same class of vessels was later used during operations against Iranian shipping and submarine infrastructure at Bandar Abbas Naval Base in July 2026, marking the first reported combat use of U.S. unmanned surface vessels. Although surveillance remains their primary mission, these operations demonstrated their expanding operational roles. Anduril Expanding Manufacturing Capacity The Sparrows Point project aligns with Anduril's broader effort to increase defense production. The company completed a $5 billion Series H funding round in May 2026, led by Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz, valuing the company at $61 billion. Following the investment, Anduril announced plans to roughly double its weapons production capacity. The company has also expanded its autonomous maritime programs through partnerships in the United Kingdom and with South Korea's HD Hyundai Heavy Industries to develop and produce autonomous surface vessels. In addition to surface systems, Anduril manufactures autonomous underwater vehicles, including the Dive-LD and Ghost Shark. Future U.S. production is also planned at American shipyards, including a facility at the former Foss Shipyard in Seattle, where the company has already invested. Technology Still Faces Reliability Challenges Despite increasing investment and growing military interest, autonomous maritime technology continues to face technical hurdles. During testing, unmanned vessels have reportedly misidentified objects, crashed, stalled, or drifted off course. The U.S. Navy is also working to improve the reliability of autonomous piloting software for operations in unpredictable open-water environments. In one May 2025 exercise off the California coast, more than a dozen Anduril drone boats operating with the company's Lattice software failed to complete their assigned missions and instead entered a fail-safe idle mode. Historic Industrial Site Could Gain New Role Sparrows Point has long been one of America's most important industrial locations. The property was once home to one of the world's largest steel mills and an active shipyard that produced merchant vessels and warships during both World Wars under Bethlehem Steel. Today, Tradepoint Atlantic is redeveloping the site as a modern industrial and logistics center. If the negotiations are successfully completed, the Anduril project would represent another example of the U.S. defense industry repurposing historic industrial facilities to expand domestic production of autonomous maritime systems.

Lockheed Martin, U.S. Air Force Complete 27 AI-Controlled Fighter Intercepts Using Live Sensor Data

U.S

EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. — Lockheed Martin Skunk Works and the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School (TPS) have completed a flight test campaign demonstrating an artificial intelligence (AI) agent directly controlling a fighter aircraft during live intercept missions using operational onboard sensor data. During the campaign, the U.S. Air Force's X-62 Variable In-flight Simulation Test Aircraft (VISTA) completed 27 AI-controlled intercepts against a live T-38 target aircraft across eight flights. The tests demonstrated the AI system's ability to receive live sensor information, make tactical decisions, and control the aircraft during real-world intercept maneuvers without relying on simulated target data. AI Demonstrates Real-Time Sensor-to-Action Capability The X-62, a heavily modified F-16 used for advanced flight research and autonomy testing at Edwards Air Force Base, was equipped with Lockheed Martin's Legion Pod, an operational infrared search-and-track (IRST) sensor. During each intercept, the Legion Pod continuously tracked the T-38 target aircraft and securely transmitted live targeting data to the onboard AI agent. Using only this real-time sensor information, the AI autonomously controlled the X-62 and maneuvered the aircraft into tactical intercept positions. The flight tests successfully connected target detection, autonomous decision-making, and aircraft control in real time, completing what engineers describe as the "sensor-to-action loop." According to Lockheed Martin, the campaign marked the transition from AI operating with simulated target information to using live data from an operational onboard sensor during flight. Three-Month Development and Integration Lockheed Martin said the project validated the complete software development process, including AI development, simulation, training, integration, ground testing, and live flight operations. The company completed AI-agent integration and all required ground testing within three months using its proprietary "Supermassive" AI agent generation capability, which is designed to accelerate software development and system integration. The successful campaign also expands the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School's work in integrating mission-critical onboard AI and operational autonomy into advanced flight testing. Company Officials Highlight Operational Benefits Ron Fehlen, vice president and general manager of Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, said the latest flight series demonstrated the AI's ability to operate on an operational combat aircraft using live sensor data. "Our ongoing partnership with TPS is driving important progress with this latest flight test series demonstrating that our AI can effectively and reliably close the sensor to action loop aboard an operational combat aircraft. Our autonomous agents consumed classified infrared search and track feeds and executed combat-critical maneuvers in real time. This achievement marks a decisive advance toward delivering AI augmented air dominance for the United States." Stacy Kubicek, vice president and general manager of Lockheed Martin Sensors and Global Sustainment, said reliable sensor data becomes more valuable when it is directly connected to AI systems capable of taking action. "Our ability to provide reliable sensor data is critical, but the real advantage comes when that data can connect seamlessly with AI to take action. This project demonstrates how sensing and autonomous AI can come together as a force multiplier to make faster, more informed action in complex environments." Lockheed Martin added that allowing AI to perform complex tracking and maneuvering tasks gives pilots more time to focus on broader tactical awareness, improving effectiveness and survivability during complex operations. Future Mission Systems Upgrade Planned Building on the successful completion of the 27 AI-controlled intercepts, Lockheed Martin plans to carry out a Mission Systems Upgrade for the X-62. According to the company, the future architecture will integrate advanced combat systems, sensors, and airborne AI agents within a next-generation mesh communications network. The upgrade is intended to support future uncrewed and AI-assisted fighter operations. X-62 Continues to Support Advanced Flight Research Skunk Works has supported the X-62 program for decades through its open hardware and software architecture, allowing the aircraft to serve as a flexible platform for testing new technologies. Originally designated NF-16D before being redesignated X-62A, the aircraft has been used for variable-stability flight research and, more recently, for autonomy and artificial intelligence flight testing, including earlier work under the DARPA Air Combat Evolution (ACE) program. The latest flight campaign further expands the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School's experience in testing onboard AI and autonomous flight technologies using operational aircraft and live sensor data. The results of the flight test campaign were announced on August 4, 2026.