World
In a major leap toward next-generation aerial warfare, French defense giant Thales is enhancing its TALIOS (Targeting Long-range Identification Optronic System) pod with embedded artificial intelligence for the Rafale F4.3 fighter aircraft. Scheduled to be operational by 2026, this upgraded targeting system will offer real-time image analysis, enabling pilots to identify, classify, and engage targets with unprecedented speed and accuracy. At the heart of this transformation is the integration of deep learning algorithms into the TALIOS pod, making it capable of automated target recognition, classification, and prioritization — a task that it will perform 100 times faster than traditional systems. This marks a critical evolution in airborne targeting, especially in high-intensity combat scenarios where milliseconds can determine mission success. Smarter Eyes in the Sky The upgraded TALIOS pod will leverage Thales' new cortAIx accelerator, allowing it to process live imagery on the fly. What sets this system apart is its onboard edge processing — the AI doesn't rely on external datalinks or remote processors. All critical image analysis and decision-support tasks happen within the pod itself. This ensures reliable performance even in contested environments where communications may be jammed or denied. By integrating AI directly into the pod, TALIOS becomes more than just a passive sensor. It actively assists the pilot by flagging potential threats in real-time. From tanks and bunkers to hidden air defenses and camouflaged vehicles, the system can autonomously detect, classify, and display relevant targets, helping pilots focus on decision-making and tactical maneuvers instead of spending time sifting through raw imagery. Enhancing Pilot Decision-Making One of the key benefits of the AI-enhanced TALIOS is its ability to reduce cognitive load. In combat, the sheer volume of visual data from sensors can overwhelm even experienced pilots. With pre-selected targets presented based on threat relevance, pilots can act faster, engage with more confidence, and reduce the risk of human error. Importantly, the final decision to engage still rests with the pilot — AI here is an assistant, not an autonomous trigger. Additionally, the pod’s "Permanent Vision" mode overlays live imagery onto a 3D tactical map, creating an augmented reality-style interface that improves situational awareness in complex environments, whether over dense urban terrain or rugged mountains. Technical Advancements The TALIOS F4.3 version will include: Day and night operation using high-definition color sensors and a Mid-Wave Infrared (MWIR) thermal imager. High-resolution ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) capabilities for both air-to-ground and air-to-air operations. Compatibility with the networked battlefield vision of France’s Scorpion and future air-combat initiatives, enabling data sharing between manned and unmanned systems. AI-powered threat classification libraries that learn and improve over time, adapting to new enemy tactics and camouflage patterns. Timeline and Development The TALIOS AI upgrade is being developed as part of a 2023 contract between Thales and France’s Directorate General of Armament (DGA). Engineers have been training the pod’s deep learning systems using a rich database of military images, flight test data, and simulation scenarios. The upgrade is tightly aligned with the upcoming Rafale F4.3 standard, which itself is a bridge to the F5 variant expected later this decade. By 2026, TALIOS with AI will be operationally deployed on French Air and Space Force Rafales, with export opportunities likely to follow. For countries like India, which operate the Rafale and already utilize TALIOS, this development could pave the way for enhanced targeting capabilities through future upgrades. The AI-enhanced TALIOS pod represents a paradigm shift in combat aviation. By bringing real-time intelligence, object recognition, and autonomous assistance to the cockpit, Thales is reshaping how pilots engage the enemy — faster, smarter, and safer. As air forces worldwide look to integrate artificial intelligence into their platforms, TALIOS may well become a benchmark in AI-assisted aerial targeting for years to come.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 13:09:08
Israel Rapidly Expands Use of Camero-Tech’s XAVER 400 to Aid Rescue Operations After Missile Strikes
World
In the wake of rising security threats from Iran, Israel has stepped up its efforts to protect and save civilian lives. The country’s Homefront Command has rapidly expanded the use of an advanced life-saving device — the XAVER 400 through-wall imaging system, developed by Israeli technology firm Camero-Tech. This move comes after recent Iranian missile attacks targeted residential areas, causing several buildings to collapse and trapping people under debris. The XAVER 400 is a compact, portable system designed to detect human presence through walls, rubble, and other barriers. It uses Ultra-Wideband (UWB) sensing technology combined with powerful image reconstruction software to provide real-time images of what lies behind solid surfaces. This technology allows search and rescue teams to quickly locate survivors who might otherwise remain undetected. Over the past week, the system has been deployed in multiple cities across Israel, especially in areas hit hardest by missile strikes. Camero-Tech’s Founder and CEO Amir Beeri emphasized its importance, saying, “When buildings collapse or people are trapped behind barriers, every second matters. Our system gives rescue teams the ability to see through walls in real-time, helping them locate survivors faster and more safely. It’s not just an operational advantage but a life-saving tool.” Since the conflict with Iran began, the demand for the XAVER 400 has surged. Camero-Tech’s Vice President Ilan Abramovich explained, “We have seen repeated missile strikes on residential neighborhoods, with several buildings collapsing as a result. In these critical moments, when people may be trapped under rubble, our system gives rescue forces immediate, life-saving visibility.” Founded in 2004, Camero-Tech is an Israeli defence technology company known for its expertise in radar-based imaging systems. The Xaver series, which includes different models for tactical, military, and rescue operations, is currently used in nearly 60 countries worldwide. Camero-Tech operates as part of the SK Group, one of Israel’s leading defence and security industry conglomerates. The rapid expansion of XAVER 400 use underlines the challenges Israel faces amid escalating regional tensions and highlights how modern technology can play a crucial role in saving lives during crises. As missile threats continue, tools like the XAVER 400 are becoming an essential part of Israel’s emergency response strategy.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 13:05:25
World
At the 2025 Paris Air Show, European missile giant MBDA revealed a game-changing innovation for modern warfare — a new one-way effector drone designed not just to strike, but to trigger and overwhelm enemy air defenses. With a focus on mass production, deep strike capabilities, and tactical deception, this drone represents a major shift in how future conflicts may be fought. What Is the One-Way Effector Drone? MBDA’s new drone is a jet-powered kamikaze system carrying a 40-kilogram (88-pound) warhead. But unlike traditional missiles, this drone’s core mission is to force enemy defense systems to respond — and reveal themselves in the process. Once detected, these air defense assets can then be targeted and destroyed by follow-up long-range weapons. The drone has an impressive range of 500 kilometers (311 miles), enabling it to penetrate deep into hostile territory. Its warhead is “large enough to compel the enemy to engage,” according to MBDA, making it ideal for drawing out and exhausting enemy surface-to-air missile systems and radar. Strategic Purpose: Drawing Fire, Not Just Delivering It Rather than sneaking past defenses, the effector drone is built to be intentionally noticed. It works best when launched in large salvos, saturating enemy detection networks and disrupting layered air defense systems. It’s not just about taking out targets; it’s about causing confusion, forcing reaction, and clearing a path for precision-guided missiles, jets, or other lethal assets to follow. This concept is heavily inspired by lessons learned from the ongoing war in Ukraine, where both sides have used cheap, massed drones to overwhelm defenses and shape the battlefield in real time. From Missiles to Mass Production: A Civilian-Driven Revolution One of the most radical features of MBDA’s new drone isn’t just its design — it’s how it’s built. In a major shift from traditional, often slow defense manufacturing, MBDA is partnering with civilian drone makers and automotive companies to rapidly scale production. The result? A new industrial model that could produce up to 1,000 drones per month. This approach mirrors how commercial industries operate — fast, flexible, and built to scale — meeting the urgent demands of modern warfare. “We’re entering an era where quantity matters as much as quality,” said MBDA CEO Eric Beranger. “Our new effector drone is designed not just for performance, but for mass deployment.” What’s Next? Flight tests for the one-way effector drone are scheduled to begin this autumn, with the first production units expected by 2027. Once operational, these drones could be a key enabler for any military needing to crack open enemy air defense networks and assert air superiority. Why It Matters The future of warfare is changing — fast. MBDA’s one-way effector drone shows that modern conflict will depend not only on precision, but on volume, deception, and adaptability. By combining a clever tactical role with mass production, MBDA may have created one of the most effective tools yet for next-generation warfare — a drone that’s meant to die, so others can win.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 12:38:58
India
In a major step toward strengthening India's surveillance capabilities, ideaForge Technology has won a substantial order worth approximately ₹137 crore from the Indian Army for its advanced hybrid mini unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) systems. The order was placed under the emergency procurement route, signaling the Army’s immediate need for reliable and indigenous drone solutions to enhance situational awareness and intelligence gathering. These mini UAVs are not new to the Indian Army. They have already been inducted earlier and have seen active deployment in Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) operations. The current order reflects continued trust in their performance, especially under operationally challenging conditions. A key criterion during the Army's selection process was the origin of critical components. All sub-systems had to be sourced from countries that do not share a land border with India, in line with strategic defense procurement norms. Moreover, the UAVs had to be substantially indigenous in both design and capability—a condition ideaForge comfortably met. ideaForge’s UAVs are known for their rugged design, autonomous capabilities, and operational endurance. Their hybrid mini drones combine vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) with fixed-wing performance, offering the best of both worlds: the ability to launch in confined spaces like a quadcopter and fly long distances like a traditional aircraft. These drones are capable of day and night surveillance, have encrypted communication, GPS-denied navigation, and are highly resistant to jamming—making them ideal for border surveillance, anti-terror missions, and disaster response. ideaForge, which began as a student startup incubated at IIT Bombay, has grown into one of India’s leading drone manufacturers. It has delivered thousands of UAVs across the country for defense, homeland security, and industrial applications. The company operates R&D and manufacturing units across Navi Mumbai, Bengaluru, Delhi, and also has a presence in the United States. This latest order not only reaffirms the Indian Army's commitment to using indigenous technology but also highlights India’s growing confidence in home-grown drone capabilities. As regional threats evolve and the need for real-time intelligence becomes more critical, advanced drone systems like those from ideaForge will play an increasingly vital role in keeping India's borders secure and forces well-informed.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 12:30:53
India
In a significant boost to India's indigenous defense manufacturing and precision strike capabilities, the Indian Army has placed an order for 450 units of the Nagastra-1R loitering munition. Developed by Nagpur-based Solar Industries through its defense subsidiary Economic Explosives Limited (EEL), this acquisition underscores India's growing reliance on homegrown technologies to meet its evolving battlefield requirements. A Homegrown Kamikaze Drone with Strategic Edge The Nagastra-1R is a loitering munition—often referred to as a "kamikaze drone"—designed to hover over a target area and engage high-value targets with pinpoint accuracy. This type of munition is particularly effective in asymmetrical warfare and cross-border tactical strikes, allowing troops to carry out attacks with minimal collateral damage and high precision. One of the standout features of the Nagastra-1R is its operational altitude. It can fly above 4,500 meters, making it significantly harder for conventional radar systems to detect and intercept. This high-altitude capability enhances its survivability and allows deep surveillance and strike missions in mountainous terrains like Ladakh or Arunachal Pradesh, where terrain masking can limit traditional drone operations. Key Specifications and Capabilities Range: The Nagastra-1R boasts an operational range of up to 30 kilometers in manual mode and up to 45 kilometers in autonomous mode, allowing it to strike targets deep inside enemy territory without risking human lives. Endurance: It can loiter over the battlefield for up to 60 minutes, providing real-time surveillance before making a terminal dive onto the target. Guidance System: The munition features a man-in-the-loop guidance system, enabling the operator to abort the mission or redirect the attack in real time. This minimizes the risk of collateral damage and allows for adaptive engagement. Warhead: Fitted with a pre-fragmented high-explosive warhead, the Nagastra-1R is optimized for eliminating soft-skinned vehicles, enemy command posts, radar installations, and personnel clusters. Surveillance Payload: It is equipped with electro-optical and infrared (EO/IR) sensors, allowing day-and-night reconnaissance and target acquisition capabilities. Low Acoustic Signature: The drone features a quiet electric propulsion system, which helps it evade detection by enemy troops and makes it ideal for covert missions. Transport and Deployment: The entire system is man-portable and can be deployed quickly by frontline troops without needing complex launch platforms or logistical chains. Differences from Nagastra‑1 Here’s how the upgraded Nagastra‑1R differs from the original Nagastra‑1: Feature Nagastra‑1 Nagastra‑1R Camera Day/night camera Adds 360° gimbal + optional thermal Precision 2 m CEP Maintains 2 m CEP Recovery Parachute abort/drop Parachute abort/recover + reuse Indigenous Content ~75 % > 80 % Range & Endurance 30–40 km range, 60 min endurance Similar Strategic Implications This procurement is a clear indicator of the Indian Army’s intention to modernize its tactical strike assets and embrace autonomous systems for future conflicts. Loitering munitions like the Nagastra-1R play a vital role in "search-and-destroy" missions, neutralizing threats such as enemy air defense systems or mobile command posts before larger operations are launched. More importantly, the Nagastra-1R is an Indian alternative to imported loitering drones such as the Israeli-made Harop. This shift supports the government’s “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India) initiative in defense production, reducing dependency on foreign suppliers and promoting domestic industrial growth. Background and Development Solar Industries, known for its expertise in explosives, has in recent years pivoted into the defense aerospace domain through its subsidiary EEL. The development of Nagastra-1R involved collaborations with Indian start-ups and military R&D units, ensuring the technology stays within the domestic innovation ecosystem. The drone has already undergone successful field trials with the Indian Army in both desert and high-altitude terrains. Future Outlook With this order, India joins the growing list of countries recognizing the value of loitering munitions in modern warfare, alongside the US, Israel, Russia, and China. Given the success of such systems in recent conflicts—especially in Nagorno-Karabakh and Ukraine—the Indian Army’s investment is timely and strategic. The Nagastra-1R’s induction not only enhances India's tactical strike capability but also sends a message of growing indigenous prowess to adversaries. Future iterations could include AI-assisted target recognition, swarm deployment, and larger payload variants, further expanding its battlefield utility. The acquisition of 450 Nagastra-1R loitering munitions represents a watershed moment in India's defense modernization drive. It reflects the Indian Army’s commitment to enhancing its lethality, flexibility, and autonomy in battlefield operations, while simultaneously strengthening the country's domestic defense industrial base.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 12:19:47
India
In a significant step toward enhancing its conventional long-range strike capabilities, India has reportedly initiated the preliminary development of a powerful new variant of the Agni missile, equipped with a massive 7.5-tonne conventional warhead. While the designation of the missile is not officially confirmed, speculation points toward it being a modified version of the Agni-V, India’s longest-range nuclear-capable ballistic missile. This new iteration, however, is being engineered specifically for non-nuclear tactical roles, marking a notable shift in India’s missile doctrine. According to defense sources, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has started work on two specialized warhead variants for this missile system: Airburst Warhead – Designed to explode mid-air, this variant aims to devastate wide surface areas by showering high-velocity fragments. Such a warhead is ideal for destroying enemy airfields, missile silos, radar stations, fuel depots, logistics hubs, and troop concentrations. Bunker Buster Warhead – Built for penetrating hardened underground facilities, this version is expected to strike targets buried 80 to 100 meters deep, making it especially useful against enemy command and control centers, WMD storage sites, or deeply entrenched bunkers. Technical Evolution and Strategic Utility Unlike its Agni predecessors that primarily served as nuclear delivery systems with ranges exceeding 5,000 km, this new conventional variant is expected to have a reduced range of 2,000–2,500 km. This trade-off allows for a significantly heavier warhead, giving the missile devastating kinetic and explosive impact without crossing strategic nuclear thresholds. The shift to a conventional version is in line with global trends, where nations are increasingly exploring long-range precision strike options that stop short of nuclear escalation but can still achieve strategic objectives. In India’s case, this would offer the ability to carry out punitive, high-value strikes deep inside hostile territory without triggering nuclear retaliation — especially relevant in the context of India’s doctrine of ‘No First Use’ (NFU). Advantages for the Indian Armed Forces Strategic Deterrence Without Escalation: The availability of a heavy-conventional Agni missile gives India an intermediate step between limited air/artillery strikes and nuclear retaliation, enhancing its deterrence posture. Rapid Deep Strike Capability: Unlike cruise missiles, which are slower and potentially vulnerable to interception, this ballistic missile variant would reach its target within minutes, denying adversaries the chance to mobilize defenses. High-Payload Precision: With advanced guidance systems and modular warhead configurations, the missile could offer pinpoint accuracy against strategic military assets and infrastructure across a wide geography. Cost-Effective Option: Conventional payloads are less politically sensitive and cheaper to maintain compared to nuclear warheads. They also allow for repeated use in conventional conflicts, unlike single-use nuclear deterrents. Enhanced Strike Flexibility: The airburst version would be invaluable in neutralizing large troop formations or soft targets, while the bunker buster could serve in surgical preemptive operations or retaliatory decapitation strikes. Geostrategic Implications By developing a conventional missile with such capabilities, India is aligning itself with other major powers like the United States, China, and Russia, all of whom are modernizing and diversifying their missile arsenals for flexible battlefield use. This missile could play a vital role in potential two-front war scenarios, giving Indian forces a robust option to neutralize key military targets inside Pakistan or western China without resorting to nuclear use. Moreover, the development could signal a shift in India's deterrence doctrine from purely retaliatory to active and flexible deterrence, allowing for calibrated, high-impact responses to provocations — especially in the post-Balakot strike era, where expectations for kinetic retaliation have increased. India’s foray into developing a conventionally armed Agni variant with a 7.5-tonne warhead reflects a strategic recalibration in favor of precision and flexibility. It strengthens India's ability to conduct high-value conventional strikes deep inside enemy territory, thereby filling a critical gap between limited conventional engagements and full-scale nuclear confrontation. While still in the early stages, this system, once operational, could emerge as a game-changer in India's strategic arsenal and bolster its standing as a modern, responsive military power.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 12:02:37
India
A high-level team from India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) recently wrapped up a significant visit to an Airbus facility near Munich, where they closely examined the Eurodrone—Europe’s flagship unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) program. The visit, held in June 2025 as part of an ongoing Programme Working Group meeting, marked a key moment in India’s evaluation of advanced drone systems for its military. The Eurodrone, jointly developed by Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, left a strong impression on the Indian delegation. The DRDO officials, particularly experts from the Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE), were notably impressed by its powerful performance, including its 2,300 kg payload capacity and its all-weather operational capability—both critical features for modern warfare scenarios, especially in India’s varied terrain and climate. This interest comes at a time when India's Army, Navy, and Air Force are jointly planning to induct up to 97 Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) drones in the coming years. With rising strategic needs across the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and over the Indian Ocean Region, there is growing urgency to acquire drones that can perform intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance (ISTAR) missions in high-risk, high-altitude, and maritime environments. The Eurodrone ticks many of these boxes. Its twin-turboprop configuration, powered by General Electric’s Catalyst engines, is designed for sustained endurance and versatility. The drone can be equipped with a wide range of sensor suites, including Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) cameras, and signals intelligence (SIGINT) equipment. Additionally, its ability to carry precision-guided weapons and operate safely in non-segregated airspace adds to its combat utility. India officially joined the Eurodrone program as an observer in January 2025, following a request made in August 2024. As an observer, India, alongside Japan, now receives regular technical updates and performance reports, giving its defense planners a clear view of Eurodrone’s capabilities and limitations. This level of access is also expected to benefit India’s indigenous UAV efforts, including platforms like the Tapas-BH-201 and the future Archer-NG. Beyond just inspection and observation, the visit allowed the DRDO team to engage directly with European engineers, offering a rare chance to compare design philosophies and understand complex integration techniques. This hands-on insight could prove invaluable as India looks to narrow the gap between foreign platforms and its domestic drone ecosystem. However, while the Eurodrone is technologically advanced, it is not without its issues. Launched in 2015, the program has encountered repeated delays, and the first prototype flight is now pushed to mid-2027. Rising development costs and the financial burden of staying involved as an observer are also concerns India will have to weigh carefully, particularly as it balances the need for quick acquisitions with the desire to build at home. India’s military drone market, currently valued at around $1.5 billion, is expected to grow sharply over the next decade. Whether India decides to purchase foreign systems like the Eurodrone or use these insights to strengthen its domestic programs will shape the future of its drone warfare capabilities. In any case, the DRDO’s visit to Munich reflects a deliberate and informed approach toward adopting cutting-edge aerial technologies. As global security dynamics evolve, partnerships like this—whether through full procurement, technology transfer, or collaborative development—could define how India meets the complex surveillance and combat challenges of tomorrow.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 11:54:46
India
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has marked another milestone in India’s defence technology journey by developing a sophisticated 6 KW Solid State Power Amplifier (SSPA). This breakthrough system represents a major advancement in radar transmitter technology, promising greater efficiency, reliability, and operational readiness for future defence radar systems. The project has been developed by DRDO’s Electronics & Radar Development Establishment (LRDE) in collaboration with Bengaluru-based Aidin Technologies Pvt. Ltd. The amplifier is built using state-of-the-art Gallium Nitride on Silicon Carbide (GaN on SiC) technology — a material combination globally recognised for delivering superior performance in modern electronic systems. What is a Solid State Power Amplifier (SSPA)? A Solid State Power Amplifier is an electronic device that takes in a low-power radio frequency (RF) signal and boosts it to a much higher power level. This amplified signal is then sent to a radar antenna, enabling it to detect and track objects like aircraft, missiles, and ships over long distances. Unlike older vacuum tube-based transmitters (like magnetrons and klystrons), solid state systems are smaller, safer, more reliable, and need far less maintenance. Key Features of DRDO’s 6 KW SSPA Peak Power Output: 6 KW (kilowatts) in pulsed operation. Frequency Range: 2.9 GHz to 3.3 GHz, suitable for S-band radar applications like the Indian Navy’s Air and Missile Defence Radars (AMDR). Pulse Width: 100 microseconds. Duty Cycle: 10 percent (meaning it emits pulses for 10% of the time). Modular Design: Built with eight 1.5 KW amplifier modules combined through advanced power combining techniques, offering both scalability and fault tolerance. This modular approach allows the system to continue working even if one module fails — an essential feature in military operations where equipment reliability is critical. Why GaN on SiC Technology Matters Gallium Nitride (GaN) on Silicon Carbide (SiC) is one of the most advanced semiconductor technologies available today. It provides several advantages: Higher Power Density: Can deliver more power in a smaller, lighter package. Superior Thermal Performance: SiC efficiently dissipates heat, ensuring stable operation even at high power. Wider Frequency Range: Operates efficiently across a broad range of frequencies, making it ideal for multi-band radar systems. Higher Efficiency: Converts input power to output RF power more effectively, reducing energy waste and operational costs. This makes GaN on SiC an ideal material for modern military radar systems, which demand high power, precision, and continuous operation. System Design and Operation The DRDO 6 KW SSPA is housed in a standard 19-inch, 18U rack. Each amplifier module includes forced air cooling systems to manage heat, industrial-grade power supplies compatible with 380V and 440V three-phase AC, and built-in monitoring, control, and protection systems. It also features remote control capabilities through Ethernet and RS422 communication protocols, allowing seamless integration with modern defence command networks. Benefits Over Traditional Tube-Based Systems Solid state power amplifiers like this one offer clear advantages over older, tube-based systems: Instant Operation: No warm-up time, unlike magnetrons and klystrons. Lower Maintenance: No fragile components like filaments or cathodes. Greater Reliability: MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) exceeding 250,000 hours compared to 3,000 hours for traditional systems. Graceful Degradation: Can keep working at reduced capacity if one module fails. Lower Operating Voltages: Safer and easier to maintain. Superior Phase Stability: Essential for accurate target tracking and clutter rejection. Applications in Modern Defence Systems The 6 KW SSPA is designed primarily for next-generation naval and land-based radar systems like the AMDR. However, its modular design means it can be adapted for: Long-range Surveillance Radars Fire Control Radars Missile Tracking Systems Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems This flexibility ensures it will support a wide variety of mission-critical applications for India’s armed forces. Strategic Importance and Future Implications The successful development of this indigenous 6 KW SSPA marks a vital achievement in India’s defence self-reliance efforts. It not only reduces dependence on foreign suppliers but also positions India among the global leaders in solid state radar transmitter technologies. The DRDO’s LRDE, since its establishment in 1962, has been India’s premier radar design agency. This latest innovation, in partnership with Aidin Technologies, demonstrates India’s growing capability in high-end defence electronics and positions the nation to develop even higher-powered and multi-band radar systems in the coming years. The DRDO’s 6 KW Solid State Power Amplifier using GaN on SiC technology is a landmark in indigenous radar technology development. It promises to enhance the operational readiness, reliability, and performance of India’s next-generation radar systems while contributing to national security and defence modernisation goals. As India moves towards building advanced, networked, and resilient military systems, innovations like this amplifier will play a crucial role in strengthening the country's defence technology base.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 11:32:52
World
In a stunning escalation of Middle East tensions, the United States launched airstrikes on three key nuclear facilities in Iran on Sunday, marking a dramatic shift in Washington’s posture after days of speculation. The strikes, which coincided with Israel’s ongoing campaign against Iran, were confirmed in a televised address by former President Donald Trump. “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” Trump declared from the White House. “Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.” The global response to the strikes was swift and deeply divided, reflecting the geopolitical complexity of the moment. Israel: ‘Change History’ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the strikes as a historic milestone. In a video message, he praised Trump’s “bold decision” and claimed it would bring the region closer to “prosperity and peace.” “America has been truly unsurpassed,” Netanyahu declared. He also told Israelis that his long-standing promise to neutralize Iran’s nuclear program had been “fulfilled.” United Kingdom: ‘Stability is Priority’ British Prime Minister Keir Starmer acknowledged the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran but urged caution. “Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat,” he said on X. Starmer emphasized the importance of returning to diplomacy and prioritizing regional stability. European Union: ‘Step Back’ The European Union’s chief diplomat, Kaja Kallas, issued a warning against further escalation. “I urge all sides to step back,” she posted on social media, adding that EU foreign ministers would meet Monday to assess the situation. The EU continues to call for Iran to rejoin nuclear negotiations under international oversight. United Nations: ‘Dangerous Escalation’ UN Secretary-General António Guterres described the strikes as a “dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge.” He warned that further military actions could spiral into a broader conflict and reiterated that diplomacy remains the only viable solution. The UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), reported no increase in off-site radiation levels. However, it has called for an emergency meeting on Monday to assess the damage and implications. Iraq: ‘Grave Threat’ Neighboring Iraq expressed alarm over the US action. Government spokesman Basim Alawadi warned the strikes could destabilize the entire region. “This military escalation constitutes a grave threat to peace and security in the Middle East,” he said. India – “Time for willing diplomacy” India’s Ministry of External Affairs called for “maximum restraint” and urged all parties to return to dialogue. Indian defence expert Praful Bakshi, speaking to ANI, noted India’s strategic position as a friend to both Iran and Israel. He said, “Time for India to be more vigilant… PM Modi will raise this issue with both sides to end this war” . Russia – “Strong Condemnation”; Medvedev warns of new war Russia’s Foreign Ministry “strongly condemned” the strikes, calling them a “gross violation of international law… a dangerous escalation” Deputy Head of Putin’s Security Council Dmitry Medvedev labelled the action “initiating a new war,” warning it may have the opposite effect by “strengthening” Iran and uniting its people behind Supreme Leader Khamenei . China – Breach of UN Charter; warning of repeating Iraq mistake China’s Foreign Ministry denounced the U.S. attack as a “serious violation of international law and the UN Charter,” asserting it exaggerated tensions in the Middle East . State media echoed concerns that the U.S. may be repeating “past strategic mistakes” in the region and urged immediate ceasefire and renewed talks Saudi Arabia: ‘Exercise Restraint’ Saudi Arabia, another key regional player, voiced “great concern” over the attacks on its neighbor. The Saudi foreign ministry urged all parties to “exercise restraint” and work to de-escalate tensions. Riyadh's statement referred to Iran as the “sisterly Islamic Republic,” signaling its desire to avoid being pulled into a broader conflict. Hamas: ‘Brutal Aggression’ Palestinian militant group Hamas condemned the US strikes as “blatant aggression” against Iran’s sovereignty. They labeled it a “flagrant violation of international law” and a “direct threat to international peace and security,” aligning themselves more closely with Tehran amid shared opposition to Israel and the US. US Domestic Politics: ‘Unilateral Military Action’ Back home, the US political landscape was also roiled by the strikes. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries accused Trump of bypassing Congress and dragging the country into another Middle Eastern conflict. “President Trump misled the country, failed to seek authorization, and risks American entanglement in a disastrous war,” Jeffries said. He laid full responsibility for potential consequences at Trump’s feet. What Lies Ahead? The attack on Iran’s nuclear sites marks one of the most significant military escalations in the region in years. While some nations have welcomed the move as a step toward disarmament, others fear it could trigger a larger conflict. With emergency meetings scheduled by both the EU and the UN, the world is bracing for Iran’s response—diplomatic or otherwise. As global leaders walk a tightrope between confrontation and de-escalation, the coming days may well define the future of the Middle East and international nuclear diplomacy.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 17:02:47
World
As tensions surge between the United States and Iran, particularly following any direct military strike from Washington, the Islamic Republic holds a wide array of retaliatory tools—from ballistic missiles to proxy militias and strategic maritime disruptions. This article explores in depth what a coordinated Iranian retaliation could look like, analyzing the threat landscape from missile reach to covert operations. Iran’s Missile Arsenal: A Strike Within Reach Iran’s missile doctrine centers around deterrence and asymmetric retaliation. It is home to the largest and most diverse ballistic missile program in the Middle East, fielding weapons with ranges that can reach hundreds, and even thousands, of kilometers. Major Iranian Missiles & Their Range: Missile Type Range (km) Notes Fateh-110 SRBM 300–700 Solid-fueled; used by Hezbollah and others Zolfaghar SRBM 700 Used in Syria and Iraq Dezful SRBM/MRBM 1,000 Extended range of Zolfaghar Shahab-3 MRBM 1,300–2,000 Based on North Korean Nodong-1 Ghadr-110 MRBM 1,800 More advanced than Shahab-3 Sejjil-2 MRBM 2,000+ Solid-fueled, two-stage; hard to intercept Kheibar Shekan MRBM 1,450 Maneuverable reentry vehicle; evades ABM systems Khorramshahr-4 IRBM 2,000+ Heavy payload; designed to evade radar U.S. Bases Within Iran’s Missile Range (Up to 2,000 km) Iran can potentially hit U.S. forces and assets across the Middle East using its medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs). List of Countries with U.S. Bases within 2,000 km of Iran: Country Major U.S. Bases Approx. Distance from Iran Notes Iraq Al Asad Airbase, Erbil Airbase 400–900 km Already attacked by Iran in 2020 Kuwait Camp Arifjan, Ali Al Salem Air Base ~550 km Major logistics hub Bahrain Naval Support Activity (5th Fleet HQ) ~250 km Command hub for Persian Gulf Qatar Al Udeid Airbase ~800 km Largest U.S. base in region UAE Al Dhafra Airbase ~800–1,200 km Hosts U.S. F-22s, ISR platforms Saudi Arabia Prince Sultan Airbase, Eskan Village ~900–1,300 km U.S. troops re-established here Oman Thumrait, Muscat ~1,500–1,800 km Maritime surveillance focus Jordan Muwaffaq Salti Airbase ~1,200 km ISR & drone operations Syria Al-Tanf Garrison ~1,000 km Special Forces outpost Afghanistan U.S. now withdrawn, but IRGC keeps options ~1,000–1,200 km Former area of interest Turkey Incirlik Airbase (NATO) ~1,800 km Hosts U.S. nuclear weapons These bases host thousands of American troops, surveillance assets, fighter jets, missile defense systems, and logistics depots—prime targets for Iranian retaliation. Proxy Network Activation: “Axis of Resistance” Iran’s most effective retaliatory weapon isn’t always a missile—but its shadow army of regional proxy groups, which allow it to strike without leaving fingerprints. Iranian-Aligned Proxies Capable of Attacking U.S. Assets: Group Location Capabilities Iran Support Hezbollah Lebanon Rockets (Fateh-110), drones, ATGMs Full IRGC-backed Hashd al-Shaabi Iraq Rockets, drones Direct command Kata’ib Hezbollah Iraq SRBMs, drones, truck bombs Elite Quds Force ties Houthis (Ansar Allah) Yemen SRBMs, cruise missiles, naval drones High-level support Hamas & PIJ Gaza Strip Rockets, tunnels Strategic, indirect Fatemiyoun Brigade Syria (Afghans) Ground operations IRGC recruits Zainabiyoun Brigade Syria (Pakistanis) Ground operations IRGC-trained These proxies have already conducted attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq, Syria, and Jordan, and have threatened to escalate further if Iran is attacked directly. Land-Based Infiltration or Guerilla Warfare A direct Iranian land invasion of U.S. assets is virtually impossible due to geography and U.S. regional alliances. However, Tehran could: Use proxies to infiltrate military bases with suicide missions, as seen in Syria and Jordan. Activate sleeper cells near bases or consulates. Launch rocket/artillery ambushes near border zones or along supply routes. Strait of Hormuz & Oil Export Disruption Iran has repeatedly threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint through which ~20% of global oil passes. Iran can: Deploy naval mines and fast attack boats. Use anti-ship missiles from the coast (Noor, Khalij Fars). Launch drone attacks on oil tankers, as seen in past incidents. Blocking the strait would send oil prices skyrocketing and provoke a strong international military response—but it remains one of Iran’s highest-leverage tactics. Terrorism & Cyber Retaliation If direct military options are too risky, Iran might: Support terror attacks on U.S. embassies or consulates (similar to 1983 Beirut or 1996 Khobar Towers). Launch cyberattacks against U.S. infrastructure—power grids, water systems, or financial services. The IRGC’s cyber unit has already targeted U.S. facilities in the past. Use criminal and narco networks for covert operations, especially in Latin America and Africa. U.S. Global Assets at Risk Besides bases, other vulnerable assets include: Naval ships in the Gulf and Red Sea Embassies and diplomatic outposts across West Asia Private American oil companies operating in the region Logistics supply chains via commercial cargo routes A Multi-Axis Response Doctrine In the event of a U.S. strike on Iran, Tehran’s response would likely be: Asymmetric and layered—combining missile strikes with cyberattacks, proxy wars, and oil export disruptions. Proxy-led—leveraging decades of regional influence to hit American interests without overt Iranian involvement. Geographically dispersed—from Iraq to Lebanon, the Red Sea to the Gulf of Oman, Iran’s retaliation wouldn’t be limited to its borders. Iran’s deterrence lies not in launching one big war—but in a thousand small wars, everywhere at once.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 16:50:10
History
Once a beacon of modernization in the Middle East, Iran today stands as a deeply religious, politically isolated nation under clerical rule. How did this transformation take place? Who ruled before the current regime? Could the old order ever return? And what has been the price—particularly for women? The Shah’s Iran: A Modernizing Monarchy Before 1979, Iran was ruled by the Pahlavi dynasty, first under Reza Shah Pahlavi (1925–1941), and later his son, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (1941–1979). The monarchy was deeply focused on modernization, centralization, and secularization. The Shah’s most ambitious initiative—the White Revolution (1963)—ushered in land reforms, women’s suffrage, industrialization, and education programs. During the 1960s and 70s, Iran experienced an economic boom. Western fashion, cinema, music, and liberal values flourished in Tehran and other cities. Women were among the greatest beneficiaries: they could vote, hold office, become judges, and dress freely. Iran appointed its first female minister, Farrokhroo Parsa, in 1968—something unthinkable in today’s regime. Iran’s capital was sometimes referred to as the “Paris of the Middle East,” and despite criticisms of autocracy, corruption, and inequality, the country was widely seen as an emerging modern state. The Islamic Revolution: Collapse of the Old Order In 1979, following years of political repression, widening inequality, and backlash from the religious clergy, Iran erupted in protest. Leading the revolution was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, an exiled Shia cleric who galvanized a coalition of Islamists, leftists, students, and traditionalists. On February 11, 1979, the monarchy collapsed. The Shah fled to Egypt; Khomeini returned from exile to Tehran, declaring the birth of an Islamic Republic. Shortly after, a national referendum overwhelmingly backed the formation of this new theocratic system, replacing monarchy with “Velayat-e Faqih”—rule by Islamic jurists. The new constitution gave ultimate power to the Supreme Leader (Khomeini, and later Ali Khamenei), whose word overrides even that of the president or parliament. The revolution also resulted in brutal purges of monarchists, liberals, and secularists. The Family Protection Law was repealed. Veiling became mandatory. Political dissent was silenced. And the once-Western-aligned Iran turned radically anti-American and anti-Israel. Women’s Freedoms: Then and Now Under the Shah (Pre-1979): Women had the right to vote (since 1963) and run for office. Female ministers and judges were common in the late 1970s. Women wore Western clothes freely in public. The marriage age was raised, and women had improved divorce and custody rights. Under the Islamic Republic (Post-1979): Hijab became compulsory. Veil-police monitor public behavior. Women cannot sing publicly, and are banned from certain sports stadiums. Family law reverted to Sharia-based rules, disadvantaging women in divorce, custody, and inheritance. Yet paradoxically, female literacy and education soared—today, over 60% of university students are women. In recent years, women like Mahsa Amini (whose death in 2022 sparked nationwide protests) became symbols of a generation demanding reform. The Islamic Republic Today Iran is currently ruled by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (in power since 1989), and President Ebrahim Raisi, a hardliner elected in 2021. Institutions like the Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) wield massive influence, and elections are tightly controlled by the Guardian Council, which filters out reformist candidates. The system is rigid, but it faces growing pressure from a restless population, especially among youth and women, who seek more freedoms and economic opportunities. What Happened to the Old Regime? Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, son of the late Shah, now lives in exile in the U.S. He has no formal political power, but remains a symbol of opposition. In 2023–24, protests inside Iran saw chants like “Reza Shah, bless your soul!”, especially among young people who never lived under the monarchy but idolize its modern image. While monarchist sentiment is rising among exiles and some inside Iran, there is no serious path to restoration under current conditions. The Islamic Republic’s power structure—anchored in the IRGC, clergy, and security forces—is deeply entrenched. Who Comes After Khamenei? At 85, Ali Khamenei’s death will trigger a major power transition. A body called the Assembly of Experts is tasked with selecting the next Supreme Leader, though insiders believe the IRGC will heavily influence the decision. Some say Mojtaba Khamenei (Ali’s son) could succeed him, suggesting dynastic ambitions within the clerical framework. Others advocate for reform from within. A monarchist restoration would require not only regime collapse but mass domestic and elite support, which currently does not exist. Conclusion Iran’s journey from a modern monarchy to an Islamic theocracy reshaped its identity, international standing, and social fabric. While the Islamic Republic has achieved ideological durability, it has come at the cost of personal freedoms—especially for women—and international isolation. The old regime lives on in memory, particularly in the voices of younger Iranians yearning for a freer, more open society. But barring a political earthquake, the return of the Shah remains more nostalgic dream than imminent reality.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 12:29:52
World
World’s Bunker Buster Bombs: How Other Countries Compare to the USA Bunker buster bombs are specialized weapons designed to destroy hardened underground targets like command bunkers, weapons depots, and nuclear facilities. While the United States leads this category with the massive GBU-57 MOP, other countries have developed their own bunker-busting bombs — though on a much smaller scale and for regional or tactical purposes. Let’s first compare the bunker buster bombs fielded by other countries. Top Bunker Buster Bombs by Other Countries Rank 💣 Bomb Name ⚖️ Weight 🌐 Country 📌 Capability 1️⃣ GBU-57A/B MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) 13,600 kg USA Penetrates 60 meters of concrete, targets deep nuclear & command bunkers 2️⃣ GBU-28 Bunker Buster 2,268 kg USA Developed for Iraq’s deep bunkers, penetrates up to 6 meters of concrete 3️⃣ KAB-1500L-Pr 1,500 kg Russia Laser-guided, designed for hardened command posts and bunkers 4️⃣ SPICE-2000 (Penetrator variant) 1,000 kg India / Israel Precision-guided, famous for the 2019 Balakot airstrike 5️⃣ Storm Shadow / SCALP EG 1,300 kg UK / France Cruise missile with a BROACH warhead for hardened targets 6️⃣ KAB-500L-Pr 500 kg Russia Tactical penetrator bomb for light bunkers and shelters 7️⃣ AASM Hammer (penetrator variant) 250–1,000 kg France Modular guided bomb kit, up to 1,000 kg with bunker-penetrating variant 8️⃣ HOPE / HOSBO (planned) Up to 1,000 kg Germany Future precision glide bomb family under development Quick Highlights by Country Accept USA: Russia: Relies on KAB-1500L-Pr and KAB-500L-Pr laser-guided bombs for hardened targets. Also uses thermobaric bombs (like ODAB-1500) for fortified positions. India & Israel: Use SPICE-2000 precision-guided bombs with a penetration variant. India deployed this effectively during the 2019 Balakot airstrikes. UK & 🇫🇷 France: Field the Storm Shadow / SCALP EG cruise missile with a bunker-penetrating BROACH warhead, combat-proven in Syria and Libya. France: Also uses the AASM Hammer modular bomb kit, including a penetrator variant. Germany: Developing the HOPE / HOSBO precision glide bomb family for future tactical bunker-busting needs. None of these weapons exceed a weight of 1,500 kg or have penetration capability comparable to the US GBU-57 MOP. Most are designed for light to medium-depth bunkers, airbases, or fortified camps. Why Only the USA Has Massive Bunker Busters Like the GBU-57 MOP The United States is the only country to develop and field a bunker buster like the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) — a 13,600 kg bomb capable of destroying facilities buried up to 60 meters under reinforced concrete. Here’s why: 1️⃣ Strategic Global Need Unlike other nations, the USA regularly faces potential military operations against: Deep nuclear sites in Iran (Fordow) North Korea’s underground nuclear facilities Chinese hardened command centers Other countries primarily deal with regional threats where a 500–1,500 kg bomb is sufficient. The US alone requires the ability to strike deeply buried, nuclear-capable enemy targets worldwide. 2️⃣ Advanced Technological Capability Creating a 13-ton bomb that can penetrate 60 meters of concrete is extremely complex: Requires advanced metallurgy to survive impact. Needs specialized fuzing systems to detonate deep underground. Must be paired with GPS/INS guidance systems for precise delivery. Very few nations possess the technological base to develop such a weapon. 3️⃣ Exclusive Delivery Platforms Only the United States operates a bomber capable of carrying and deploying such a bomb: The B-2 Spirit stealth bomber can carry the GBU-57 while evading sophisticated air defenses. No other nation fields a stealth heavy bomber of this class. While Russia’s Tu-160 and China’s H-6 can carry heavy bombs, they lack the stealth and penetration capabilities needed for such missions. 4️⃣ High Costs and Political Sensitivity Ultra-heavy bunker busters like the GBU-57 MOP are: Very expensive to develop and deploy Politically sensitive as they’re designed specifically for strategic nuclear sites and command bunkers. Most countries don’t face situations that justify investing in such weapons, and using them would signal major escalation in conflict. 5️⃣ Alternatives Used by Other Nations Since massive bunker busters are impractical for most militaries, other countries prefer: Thermobaric bombs (like Russia’s ODAB-1500) Cruise missiles with penetrator warheads (UK’s Storm Shadow) Precision-guided bombs in the 500–2,000 kg range for tactical needs These are cheaper, easier to deploy, and sufficient for regional conflicts. Conclusion USA Rest of the World Unique strategic need to strike deep underground nuclear bunkers globally Focus on regional or tactical hardened targets Possesses stealth heavy bombers (B-2 Spirit) to carry 13-ton bombs No equivalent operational platform Massive investment in ultra-heavy penetration bomb technology Prioritize smaller, cheaper, conventional or alternative methods GBU-57 penetrates 60 meters of concrete No other bomb exceeds 6–10 meters penetration The United States stands alone in fielding a bomb like the GBU-57 MOP because of its global strategic commitments, technological edge, and dedicated stealth bombers. Other countries focus on smaller tactical weapons suitable for their regional threats. Unless another nation finds itself facing the same kind of deep, hardened nuclear-capable adversaries, it’s unlikely anyone else will build a bomb like the MOP anytime soon.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 11:50:20
World
When U.S. B-2 stealth bombers dropped six massive bombs on Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear facility, it wasn’t just a show of force — it was a calculated choice dictated by physics, engineering, and decades of military planning. Fordow is one of the most fortified nuclear sites on Earth, buried deep inside a mountain. The only way to hit it effectively was with the most powerful non-nuclear bomb in the U.S. arsenal: the GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP. Let’s understand why this bomb — weighing nearly 13,600 kilograms (30,000 pounds) — was the only viable option the U.S. had to strike Fordow. Why Fordow Required a GBU-57 A/B Strike Fordow, located near Iran’s holy city of Qom, isn’t your average nuclear site. It was deliberately built under 80 meters (260 feet) of rock and soil, carved into the side of a mountain, to protect it from airstrikes. On top of that, it's guarded by advanced Iranian and Russian-made surface-to-air missile systems, making conventional attacks dangerous and ineffective. While Israel had already struck another Iranian facility at Natanz with smaller munitions, even Israel’s most advanced bombs couldn’t crack Fordow’s mountain armor. The only weapon in existence capable of doing that is the U.S.-made GBU-57 A/B, and the only aircraft able to deliver it is America’s stealth B-2 Spirit bomber. What Makes the GBU-57 A/B “Bunker Buster” So Special? The GBU-57 A/B is not just big — it’s incredibly powerful and precise. Here’s what makes it unique: Weight: Roughly 13,600 kg (30,000 lbs). Length: Over 20 feet (6 meters) long. Penetration Power: Can go through 200 feet (61 meters) of earth or 60 feet (18 meters) of reinforced concrete before exploding. Warhead: Carries a conventional explosive, not nuclear — yet causes massive localized destruction due to its kinetic energy and deep penetration. These bombs are often dropped in pairs or more, one after another, to “drill” through rock by using successive blasts. This is believed to be the tactic used at Fordow. Only the B-2 Stealth Bomber Can Deliver It The B-2 Spirit bomber is the only aircraft in the world equipped to carry and deliver the GBU-57 A/B. Here’s why: Payload Capacity: Can carry up to 18,000 kg (40,000 lbs) of weapons. Stealth: Its radar-evading design allows it to slip past enemy defenses. Range: Can fly 7,000 miles (11,000 km) without refueling — or 11,500 miles (18,500 km) with one refueling. Cost: At $2.1 billion per aircraft, the B-2 is the world’s most expensive military plane. The U.S. Air Force has tested it with two GBU-57 bombs at once, demonstrating it can carry nearly 60,000 lbs (27,200 kg) of destructive payload. Israel, despite its advanced air force, lacks the aircraft to carry such a weapon, and the U.S. has never exported the GBU-57 A/B. This is why Israel urged the U.S. to step in — because only America had the bomb and the bomber needed to strike Fordow. Risk of Nuclear Contamination? Fordow is known to be enriching highly enriched uranium, raising fears that a strike could release radioactive material. But according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), similar strikes at Natanz by Israel only caused local contamination, with no effect on surrounding areas. The U.S. likely calculated that the same would be true at Fordow. Why This Strike Matters This operation marks the first time the U.S. has directly struck Iranian nuclear infrastructure as part of Israel’s war effort — something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been pushing for. It signals a major escalation in regional tensions and demonstrates just how advanced and capable the U.S. military remains when facing extreme threats. Final Thoughts The Fordow facility was built to survive anything short of a nuclear attack. The GBU-57 A/B bomb, delivered by the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, was the only non-nuclear option capable of cracking its defenses. This airstrike wasn’t just about sending a political message — it was about using the only tool in the world capable of doing the job. And right now, only the United States has that tool.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 11:19:51
World
In a dramatic escalation of tensions in the Middle East, the United States launched a powerful airstrike operation on three of Iran’s key nuclear sites. Former U.S. President Donald Trump, who is actively involved in directing military decisions, confirmed the attacks in a statement on his Truth Social platform early Saturday. Which Sites Were Attacked? The U.S. targeted three major Iranian nuclear facilities: Fordow — an underground uranium enrichment facility built deep inside a mountain near the city of Qom. Natanz — Iran's largest and most important uranium enrichment plant. Esfahan — home to nuclear research and fuel production sites. These sites are crucial to Iran's nuclear program, and their targeting marks one of the most significant military moves in the region in recent years. What Was Used in the Attack? According to military sources, the U.S. operation involved: Total 125 U.S Military Aircraft Involved , in which 7 B-2 Spirit stealth bombers — long-range, radar-evading aircraft capable of delivering heavy payloads over fortified targets . The bombers dropped 14 GBU-57 "Massive Ordnance Penetrator" bunker-buster bombs, 12 on the Fordow site & 2 on Natanz, designed specifically to destroy deeply buried and hardened structures like underground nuclear facilities . Total 71 Precision Munitions dropped in this Operation named ' Midnight Hammer ' The operation was supported by one U.S. Navy Ohio-class guided-missile submarine, positioned in the northern Arabian Sea, which launched 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles targeting key air defense and radar installations around Natanz and Esfahan, clearing the way for the bomber strike. Why Was the Attack Carried Out? This military strike comes amid rising tensions between Iran, Israel, and the United States. Just two days earlier, Trump had publicly stated he would decide within two weeks whether to support Israel in its military standoff with Iran. However, increased intelligence about possible Iranian nuclear activities reportedly prompted immediate action. Iran had threatened to retaliate against U.S. military bases and allies in the region if attacked. Despite this, Trump declared the mission a success and urged for peace following the operation. “There’s not another military in the world that could have done this. Now is the time for peace!” Trump wrote. Evacuation of U.S. Citizens from Israel In parallel to the airstrikes, the U.S. Embassy in Israel began evacuating American citizens and residents from Israel and the West Bank due to fears of potential Iranian counterattacks on U.S. personnel and assets in the region. Former Governor Mike Huckabee confirmed on social media that the U.S. government was actively assisting its citizens in the region. What Happens Next? While the immediate military objective appears accomplished, the region remains tense. Iran has vowed to respond, and neighboring countries have increased their military alert levels. Analysts warn of possible retaliatory missile or drone attacks against U.S. bases in Iraq, Syria, and the Persian Gulf.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 10:52:49
India
New Delhi Rejects Speculation of Stealth Fighter TalksOn June 21, 2025, Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh set the record straight regarding India’s interest in fifth-generation stealth fighter jets. Appearing on a podcast, he said, “On F‑35A and Sukhoi Su‑57E, whatever has been discussed has been informal. We don’t have any formal consultation going on on these.” This statement dispels rumours circulating in recent days that India was in serious negotiations for either the US‑made F‑35A or the Russian Su‑57E (m.economictimes.com). Strategic Shift Towards Self‑RelianceInstead of pursuing foreign stealth jets, India is focusing on developing the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). With a projected timeline of roughly eight years to first flight and production, this initiative seeks to bolster indigenous capabilities and industrial participation. Singh highlighted that the AMCA programme is now open to both public and private sector firms, including Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), under a competitive execution model (m.economictimes.com). Procurement Reforms and Growing Export VoiceIn the same podcast, Singh outlined broader defence reforms. He noted that procurement timelines are being accelerated—from six years down to two. He emphasized that funding isn't an issue; rather, red tape is. Additionally, India’s defence exports have surged to ₹23,000 crore, underscoring growing confidence in the domestic defence manufacturing industry (economictimes.indiatimes.com). Russia’s Su‑57E Offer in ContextEarlier this year, Russia officially offered the Su‑57E for joint production in India, promising full technology transfers, local assembly, and source-code access (reuters.com). However, reports suggest New Delhi may condition any future deal on integrating Indian-made AESA radars and mission systems—insisting on GaN-based Uttam and Virupaksha radars rather than Russia’s GaAs-powered Byelka (defencesecurityasia.com). These demands reflect New Delhi's push for technological sovereignty and seamless integration with existing fleets. F-35A: Geopolitics vs. PragmatismThe US has also quietly signalled potential interest in selling F‑35As to India. Still, Singh’s statement confirms no binding or formal steps in that direction—reinforcing New Delhi’s cautious stance and prior reliance on French Rafales, American logistics, and evolving Make‑in‑India priorities (medial.app). What This All Means Key Dimension Implication No Formal Talks Clears public ambiguity—India is not in contract negotiations with U.S. or Russia on stealth jets. AMCA Focus Signals a strategic pivot towards indigenous 5th-generation capability. Tech Sovereignty India insists on domestic avionics and sensors, even for foreign platforms. Procurement Efficiency Faster buy cycles, growing export potential hints at policy overhaul. The Road Ahead AMCA Development First flight targeted around 2033. Open competition may invite private firms like Adani or Tata alongside HAL. MRFA Competition As India progresses with AMCA, it is still expected to fill fleet gaps under the Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) programme—likely involving Rafales, F‑21, Super Hornets, Gripens, and possibly Su‑57E or F‑35A in the long run (x.com, medial.app, en.wikipedia.org). Supplier Strategy India’s insistence on source-code and sensor control may limit choices. Russia appears willing to comply; the U.S. is less flexible on tech transfer. Defence Secretary Singh’s clear stance underscores a multi-pronged approach: no external shortcuts to fifth-gen capabilities, deeper defence industrialization, and procurement reform. India is charting a path balancing strategic autonomy with global partnerships—eyeing stealth but on its own terms.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 16:22:48
World
In a conflict where every second and missile counts, Israel’s once-celebrated missile defense system appears to be under strain. Reports now suggest that the country’s interception rate, which historically hovered around 90%, has fallen sharply to nearly 65% during the latest missile exchanges with Iran. Defense analysts and insiders point to several reasons behind this worrying decline — ranging from missile stock shortages to the introduction of more advanced Iranian weapons. Let’s break down what’s happening. A Steep Drop in Interceptions According to reports from NBC and The New York Times, Iran recently launched around 400 missiles towards Israel. Of these, nearly 40 managed to bypass Israel’s air defense and strike populated areas. While a 90% interception rate might sound impressive, this dip to 65% in the latest attacks is significant for a nation that has long relied on its multi-layered defense shield. This drop comes amid warnings from outlets like The Wall Street Journal and Newsweek that Israel’s stockpile of crucial Arrow missile interceptors is running low — a vulnerability Israel can ill afford at a time of escalating tensions. Why Are Missiles Getting Through? Several interconnected factors explain this drop in interception rates: 1️⃣ Depleting Interceptor Stocks Israel’s air defense relies on a layered system: Iron Dome for short-range threats like rockets and mortars. David’s Sling for medium- to long-range rockets and cruise missiles. Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 for high-altitude ballistic missile threats. Arrow interceptors are highly sophisticated and expensive, costing up to $3 million each. Their production is slow and involves a complex supply chain, partly handled by Boeing in the U.S. The current high operational tempo may be exhausting these stockpiles faster than they can be replenished. 2️⃣ Newer, Faster Iranian Missiles Iran has reportedly deployed hypersonic missiles in these recent attacks. Capable of traveling at extreme speeds while maneuvering mid-flight, these missiles drastically reduce the time Israel’s defenses have to respond — from about 10–11 minutes in past scenarios to just 6–7 minutes now. A senior Israeli official admitted the narrower response window makes interceptions much harder, especially when combined with mass salvos of missiles launched simultaneously. 3️⃣ Multiple-Warhead (Submunition) Missiles Some Iranian missiles now carry multiple warheads or submunitions. In one instance, a missile dispersed around 20 submunitions from 23,000 feet, each capable of striking independently within a 16 km area. This technique overwhelms air defense systems by multiplying targets, forcing Israel to either spread its defenses thin or prioritize critical assets — increasing the risk of some warheads getting through. 4️⃣ Possible Electronic Warfare (EW) Tactics Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed it used advanced electronic warfare techniques to confuse Israeli defenses during a recent missile strike. While this claim remains unverified, Iran has demonstrated EW capabilities before — most notably when it captured a U.S. RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drone in 2011 via GPS spoofing. If true, even limited EW disruption could mislead air defense systems, causing interceptors to miss their targets or, in rare cases, misfire. The Manufacturing Bottleneck Another concern is that manufacturing Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 interceptors takes time — involving sensitive technology and meticulous quality checks. The sophisticated nature of these interceptors, coupled with limited production capacity and expensive components, means Israel cannot rapidly replenish stocks during extended conflicts. Should Israel Be Worried? While it’s too soon to conclusively state that Israel’s missile defenses are failing, the combination of faster, smarter Iranian missiles, advanced tactics, and limited interceptor supplies presents a serious challenge. Even if the drop to 65% interception occurred over a limited 24-hour period, it serves as a stark reminder of how quickly modern warfare evolves — and how even the most advanced defense systems can be stretched thin under sustained pressure. For Israel, the next steps will likely involve: Urgently replenishing interceptor stocks. Upgrading systems to handle hypersonic and submunition threats. Enhancing electronic warfare countermeasures. The broader takeaway for military planners worldwide: no missile shield is invincible, and technology races forward on both sides of any conflict.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 16:07:09
World
On May 27, 2025, what seemed like a simple gesture of diplomatic goodwill may have carried deadly intent. According to an MI6 intelligence leak, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, General Asim Munir, allegedly gifted a high-end wristwatch—suspected of concealing an electronic interceptor beacon—to Iran’s top military commander, Major General Mohammad Bagheri, during a private meeting in Rawalpindi. Within 72 hours of this closed-door encounter, Israeli intelligence agency Mossad reportedly used precise geolocation data to eliminate Bagheri in a targeted strike near the Iranian border with Syria—a region long known to be a corridor of Iranian IRGC-Quds Force operations. The unprecedented accuracy of the strike raised red flags in Tehran, prompting a quiet but urgent internal probe into the possibility of electronic compromise. Now, with fingers pointing to an unlikely collaborator—Pakistan—the Islamic Republic finds itself questioning the loyalty of a nation it once considered a strategic Islamic ally. Behind the Scenes: Mossad, MI6, and a Watch The British MI6 report, circulated discreetly among Five Eyes partners and later leaked to select Middle Eastern outlets, paints a damning picture. Sources allege that the wristwatch was embedded with a miniature beacon—likely activated after contact—that relayed General Bagheri’s movements in real time. Experts suggest such devices, small enough to be inserted into the casing of a luxury timepiece, can transmit encrypted signals across vast distances using satellite relays or local cellular networks. Mossad, known for leveraging human intelligence and advanced signal interception technologies, has reportedly been hunting senior IRGC figures involved in arms transfers to Hezbollah and Syria. Bagheri, who oversaw Iran’s foreign military operations, was high on that list. The strike’s timing—days after the supposed gift exchange—raises troubling questions: Did Pakistan knowingly facilitate this operation? Or was it merely a pawn in a much larger intelligence game directed by the West? Strategic Games or Subtle Betrayals? Publicly, Pakistan and Iran have maintained a carefully managed narrative of Islamic brotherhood, joint border security, and economic partnership, especially under the China-Iran-Pakistan corridor discussions. But under the surface, tensions have simmered for years. Iran has accused Pakistan of harboring anti-Shia and separatist elements, especially Baloch insurgents operating across the shared border. Meanwhile, Islamabad views Iran’s deepening military ties with India and Afghanistan with suspicion. Some intelligence analysts suggest Pakistan may be hedging its bets in a volatile region. By subtly aligning with Western intelligence agencies—or even indirectly with Israel—Pakistan could be attempting to clean up its image post-Afghanistan and strengthen its case for more aid and defense support from the U.S. and Gulf monarchies. Others argue this is part of a broader, long-term realignment in West Asia. With Saudi-Israeli normalization talks back on the table and the Abraham Accords still shaping regional diplomacy, Pakistan may see advantage in quietly cultivating backchannels to Tel Aviv—using shared anti-Iran sentiment as a bridge. Iran’s Calculated Silence Interestingly, Iran has not officially accused Pakistan of betrayal, nor has it released any details about the Bagheri assassination. Tehran’s silence may indicate internal uncertainty—or fear of exposing just how deeply its upper echelons may have been penetrated. Leaks from within the Iranian IRGC suggest a complete communications blackout was ordered following the strike, with emergency vetting of all foreign-supplied devices, including diplomatic gifts. Iranian social media, however, has exploded with anger. Hashtags like #TraitorInUmmah and #PakSellout trended on Persian-language Twitter (X), with users questioning whether Pakistan has turned from a brotherly ally into an agent of espionage. Implications for the Ummah Narrative This incident could mark a turning point in how Islamic states perceive each other behind the veil of unity. While organizations like the OIC continue to promote solidarity, the ground reality suggests a world where interests often outweigh ideology. As one Gulf-based analyst told Al-Quds Al-Arabi, “The Ummah is a myth in the age of strategic autonomy. Iran trusted Pakistan; it may have been outmaneuvered not by Zionists, but by its so-called Muslim brethren.” Whether Pakistan played a deliberate role in aiding Mossad, or was an unwitting middleman manipulated by foreign intelligence, the consequences are profound. The Tehran-Islamabad axis, already fragile, is now burdened by a deep layer of mistrust. In an era of shifting alliances and covert wars, the watch on Bagheri’s wrist may become a symbol—not just of betrayal—but of a new Middle East where friendships are conditional, and loyalty is transactional. If this intelligence report holds true, Pakistan stands at the crossroads of an emerging geopolitical realignment—where it must choose between old loyalties and new opportunities. But Tehran will not forget. And in the chessboard of West Asia, every move now will be watched.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 15:27:33
World
In a sharp warning to Washington, Russia has cautioned the United States against any military intervention in the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, labeling such a move as dangerously unpredictable. The warning comes amid speculation that the U.S. might join Israel in military strikes against Iran following recent hostilities between the two Middle Eastern nations. Tensions soared after Israel carried out a major airstrike on Iranian targets last week, prompting Iran to respond with a barrage of missiles and drones. The situation has alarmed global powers, including Russia and China, who are now calling for immediate de-escalation and a return to diplomacy. Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova made Moscow’s stance clear, warning that any U.S. military involvement would be a grave mistake with unforeseeable consequences. "We would like to particularly warn Washington against military intervention in the situation," she said during a press briefing. Former U.S. President Donald Trump, widely expected to be a key player in the upcoming elections, had stated that he was considering joining Israel’s military efforts against Iran. “I may do it, I may not do it,” Trump said, while also dismissing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s offer to mediate the crisis. “Let’s mediate Russia first,” Trump quipped, referring to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Despite being a strategic partner of Iran and having signed a cooperation agreement earlier this year, Russia has not provided any military assistance to Tehran in this conflict. President Putin has clarified that Iran has not requested military aid, and that their agreement does not mandate such a response. "Our Iranian friends have not asked us about this," he said during a press conference, adding that their recent pact was not a defense treaty. Putin has positioned himself as a potential mediator, having held phone conversations with both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Russia, he said, is willing to facilitate peace talks if both parties are interested. His spokesman added that Moscow would be ready to send humanitarian aid to Iran if requested. Adding to Russia’s diplomatic push, Putin recently spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Both leaders strongly condemned Israel’s recent military actions and jointly called for an immediate ceasefire. Xi emphasized that armed conflict is not the solution and stressed the importance of avoiding further escalation or regional spillover. China has echoed Russia’s offer for mediation, expressing hope that a political solution can be reached. Putin’s aide, Yuri Ushakov, said both Moscow and Beijing believe that peace can only be achieved through diplomatic efforts, not military force. However, Western leaders remain skeptical of Putin’s intentions. Trump, along with French President Emmanuel Macron and others, has rejected Russia’s attempts to play peacemaker, citing Moscow’s own ongoing war in Ukraine as a reason to question its credibility. Still, Russia’s firm stance and involvement in Middle East diplomacy highlight its attempt to maintain influence in a region where it has long balanced relationships with multiple players — including Israel, Iran, and Syria. But with the fall of its Syrian ally Bashar al-Assad and the growing instability in the region, Moscow now finds itself walking a diplomatic tightrope, trying to project itself as a stabilizing force while safeguarding its own interests. As the Iran-Israel conflict continues to evolve, the global community watches closely — with hopes of de-escalation, and growing fears of a wider war if international powers become directly involved.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 15:18:00
World
Indonesia is steadily moving towards a significant milestone in its naval modernization plans by showing active interest in acquiring an aircraft carrier — specifically, the Giuseppe Garibaldi, a former Italian Navy flagship. This potential procurement was highlighted at the IndoDefence 2025 exhibition held in Jakarta from 11–14 June 2025, where Indonesian defense firm REPUBLIKORP, in collaboration with PT Palindo Marine, unveiled a conceptual model of a future naval fleet. The display featured various vessels including a stealth corvette, submarine, fast attack craft, unmanned surface vehicle (USV), and notably, an aircraft carrier model labeled “Giuseppe Garibaldi.” Carrier Model Suggests New Direction Interestingly, the model bore little resemblance to Italy’s actual Giuseppe Garibaldi light aircraft carrier, suggesting it was more of a conceptual design symbolizing Indonesia’s aspirations for a modern carrier fleet, rather than a direct replica. A display panel described the Garibaldi’s roles as a mobile command center capable of air defense, anti-submarine operations, escort missions, and humanitarian aid, underlining its versatility. General characteristics from the panel included: Displacement: 10,100 tons (standard), 13,850 tons (full load) Length: 180.2 meters (591 ft) Beam: 33.4 meters (109 ft) Draught: 5.7 meters (19 ft) These figures suggest a compact light carrier, optimized for regional operations and well-suited to Indonesia’s vast maritime environment. Talks with Fincantieri Confirmed In an interview with Naval News, Mauro Mansini, Director of Sales Naval Business Unit at Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri, confirmed that discussions between the Indonesian and Italian governments are underway. No formal decision has been made yet, but the possibility of transferring the Giuseppe Garibaldi remains on the table. Mansini emphasized the ship’s 15–20 years of remaining service life and its suitability for helicopters, drones, fixed-wing aircraft, and amphibious operations. He also highlighted its history of humanitarian missions, including deployments after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. If an agreement proceeds, the carrier would undergo a refit tailored to TNI AL (Tentara Nasional Indonesia Angkatan Laut) operational needs. Indonesia Eyes TB3 UCAVs for Carrier Operations A notable feature of the exhibition was the presence of Baykar Technologies’ Bayraktar TB3 unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs) at the REPUBLIKORP booth, displayed aboard the carrier model. The TB3, currently being trialed on Turkey’s TCG Anadolu, is capable of short take-offs from aircraft carriers and amphibious ships. Baykar representatives confirmed that Indonesia has shown serious interest, and a preliminary agreement has been signed for the purchase of 60 TB3 drones. The final deal is reportedly in advanced discussions. For the first time, Baykar officials also revealed that the TB3 exists in two variants: A shipborne model designed for carrier operations A land-based variant with higher maximum take-off weight, larger fuel capacity, and longer endurance This dual-configuration capability could significantly boost Indonesia’s ability to project air power both at sea and from shore bases. What This Means for Indonesia If the Giuseppe Garibaldi deal is finalized, Indonesia would join a small group of Asian nations with an aircraft carrier, strengthening its presence in regional waters amid growing maritime challenges. Coupled with an operational fleet of carrier-capable drones, the move would represent a significant leap in Indonesia’s maritime defense and disaster relief capabilities. For now, official negotiations continue, but the display at IndoDefence 2025 signals Indonesia’s clear intent to develop a modern, flexible, and unmanned-capable naval force.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 15:11:50
India
India is preparing to enter a new era in air combat capability with the planned mass production of the Astra Mk2 beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVR-AAM). Designed and developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the Astra Mk2 is set to become the backbone of the Indian Air Force’s long-range air combat arsenal. In a significant move to accelerate delivery and support self-reliance in defence, the Ministry of Defence will implement a dual production strategy involving both public and private sector players. The Astra Mk2 missile is a significant upgrade over its predecessor, the Astra Mk1, boasting an extended range of 160 km compared to the Mk1’s 110 km. This range expansion, combined with a suite of advanced technologies, makes the Mk2 a formidable weapon in modern air warfare. One of its most critical enhancements is the dual-pulse rocket motor. This innovative system allows the missile to conserve fuel in its mid-course and then ignite a second thrust during its terminal phase, giving it the power to chase down highly maneuverable enemy aircraft in the final moments before impact. Equipped with a state-of-the-art Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) seeker, the Astra Mk2 can detect, lock onto, and engage targets with pinpoint precision, even in complex electronic warfare environments. Its smokeless propulsion system ensures a low visual and infrared signature, enhancing its stealth capability. The missile can reach speeds of Mach 4.5, or about 5,500 km/h, putting it in the same league as the world’s most advanced BVR missiles, such as the AIM-120 AMRAAM and the European Meteor. India’s decision to mass-produce the Astra Mk2 reflects deep confidence in its performance. The Indian Air Force is expected to place an initial order for over 500 missiles, which will be integrated across a wide range of platforms, including the Su-30MKI, Rafale, MiG-29K, and the indigenous Tejas Mk1A. This broad integration strategy will help significantly reduce India’s dependence on foreign missiles such as the Russian R-77 and the French MICA. To meet this high demand, India is implementing a dual-track production strategy. Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL), the public sector missile manufacturing giant, will manage one production line. Alongside BDL, a second line is being created within the private sector, with companies like Larsen & Toubro and Tata Advanced Systems expected to play a central role. This strategy is not only intended to boost production speed but also to foster healthy competition and innovation between the sectors, while building a resilient supply chain. This approach is closely aligned with the government’s “Aatmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India) initiative. By involving private industry and relying heavily on domestic supply chains—over 85% of the Astra Mk2’s components are locally sourced—the project aims to build long-term industrial capability and strengthen India’s position as a defence exporter. Several small and medium enterprises are expected to be drawn into the production ecosystem, offering a boost to local manufacturing and technological development. Operationally, the Astra Mk2 will provide India with a crucial strategic edge, especially in the context of rising regional tensions. It is seen as a direct response to China's PL-15, which is believed to have a range exceeding 200 km, and Pakistan’s AIM-120C missiles. With the Astra Mk2 paired with advanced AESA radars aboard aircraft like the Rafale and Su-30MKI, the Indian Air Force will be able to engage enemy fighters from a safe stand-off distance, enhancing survivability and mission effectiveness. Despite its promise, the path ahead will require careful coordination between the DRDO, BDL, and private partners to ensure the missile's performance meets military expectations. Scaling up production while maintaining rigorous quality control and ensuring timely integration into various aircraft fleets are challenges that must be carefully managed. Still, the upcoming induction of the Astra Mk2 marks a major leap for India’s defence capabilities—one that combines cutting-edge technology, strategic foresight, and industrial innovation.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 14:58:18Search
Top Trending
-
Agneepath Scheme replaced with Sainik Samman Scheme 2024, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Relaunched Agniveer Scheme
-
Key Differences Between 5th vs. 6th Generation Fighter Jets
-
Pakistan Announces 15% Increase in Defence Budget for 2024-25 Amid Economic Crisis
-
India's TEDBF Program Takes Shape First Flight by 2028: Aiming for Naval Supremacy with Advanced Stealth and Technology
-
What Would Happen if the USA Left NATO? A Comprehensive Analysis
-
China's Latest DF-31AG ICBM Test: A Strategic Leap in Global Missile Capabilities
-
India and France to Finalize Rafale-Marine Fighter Jets Deal in April 2025
-
China Unveils the 6th-Generation “Baidi B-Type” Aerospace Fighter Concept
Top Trending in 4 Days
-
Bharat Forge Wins ₹2,000 Cr Contract to Supply DRDO-Designed 5.56mm CQB Carbines to Indian Army
-
Pakistan Leases Military Bases in Balochistan to US and Israel for Iran Strike Operations
-
Global Bunker Buster Bombs Compared: Why Only the USA Has the Massive GBU-57 MOP
-
Satellite Images Reveal Disappearance of U.S. Military Aircraft from Qatar Base
-
Germany Unveils New Drone System Armed with IRIS-T Air-to-Air Missiles for Next-Gen Air Defence
-
Pakistan’s Secret Hand in the Assassination of Iran’s Top General
-
Indian Probe Investigates Use of Electromagnetic Weapons in Arabian Sea Ship Incidents
-
China Turns Sci-Fi Into Reality with Successfully Test Artillery-Launched Drones After 12-Year Quest
