Japan Commissions Fifth Taigei-Class Submarine JS Chogei at Kobe Shipyard

World

YOKOSUKA, Japan — March 10, 2026 : The Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) formally commissioned JS Chogei (SS-517), the fifth submarine of the Taigei-class diesel-electric attack submarine program. The vessel was delivered earlier the same day by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries at its shipbuilding facility in Kobe before entering active service. Following commissioning, JS Chogei was assigned to Submarine Division 2 of Submarine Flotilla 2, which is based at the Yokosuka Naval Base in Kanagawa Prefecture. The induction marks the latest step in Japan’s ongoing modernization of its conventional submarine fleet. Dimensions, Crew and Design Characteristics JS Chogei has a crew of approximately 70 personnel and measures 84 meters in overall length, with a beam of 9.1 meters and a draft of 10.4 meters. The submarine has a standard displacement of about 3,000 tonnes, making it slightly larger than submarines of the earlier Soryu-class submarine. Soryu-class boats share the same length and beam but have a slightly smaller draft of 10.3 meters and a standard displacement of around 2,950 tonnes. The Taigei-class was designed with improvements in detection capabilities and reduced acoustic signature, aimed at increasing survivability and situational awareness in underwater operations. A notable design change introduced with this class is the inclusion of female-only accommodation spaces, allowing up to six female crew members to be housed onboard. This represents the first time such facilities have been incorporated into JMSDF submarines. Naming Convention and Construction Cost The submarine’s name, Chogei, translates to “long whale” in Japanese. All submarines in the Taigei class incorporate the word “Gei”, meaning whale, in their names. This continues a JMSDF naming pattern that previously used “Shio” (tide) and “Ryu” (dragon) for earlier submarine classes. The class name Taigei itself means “big whale.” The construction cost of JS Chogei was approximately 68.4 billion yen, equivalent to roughly $434 million. Propulsion and Performance JS Chogei uses a diesel-electric propulsion system generating approximately 6,000 horsepower, enabling the submarine to reach a maximum submerged speed of about 20 knots. The Taigei-class incorporates lithium-ion battery technology supplied by GS Yuasa, replacing traditional lead-acid batteries. This technology was first introduced on the final two Soryu-class submarines—Oryu (SS-511) and Toryu (SS-512). Japan currently remains the only country operating diesel-electric submarines equipped with lithium-ion batteries, although South Korea plans to introduce similar systems on later variants of its KSS-III-class submarine during the late 2020s. Engines and Power Generation Improvements Beginning with the fourth boat in the class, Raigei (SS-516), the submarines incorporate the Kawasaki 12V25/31 diesel engine, developed by Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The engine is paired with an updated snorkel system designed to improve power generation efficiency and battery charging performance. Earlier submarines in the class—Taigei (SS-513), Hakugei (SS-514), and Jingei (SS-515)—use two Kawasaki 12V25/25SB V-12 diesel engines. Despite these changes in propulsion components, the overall submerged performance across the class remains broadly similar. Sensors and Combat Systems The Taigei-class submarines are equipped with the ZQQ-8 high-performance sonar system, developed by Oki Electric Industry. This sonar suite replaces the earlier ZQQ-7 system used on the Soryu-class and provides enhanced underwater detection capability. The class also incorporates a new combat management system that integrates sensor data, command-and-control functions, and weapon engagement capabilities into a unified operational framework. Additional sensor and stealth improvements include: A new-generation sonar system using fiber-optic array technology An enhanced snorkel system designed to reduce acoustic and other signatures during snorkeling operations The submarines are fitted exclusively with non-penetrating optronic masts, eliminating the traditional penetrating periscope. The system installed is the Optronic Sensor A-type Kai-1, developed by Mitsubishi Electric in cooperation with Nikon. Weapons and Defensive Systems The Taigei-class submarines are armed with six 533-millimeter torpedo tubes capable of launching the Type 18 torpedo, the successor to the earlier Type 89 torpedo. The Type 18 incorporates improvements in propulsion, target detection, and onboard processing. In addition to torpedoes, the submarines can deploy the UGM-84L Harpoon Block II anti-ship missile, which has an operational range of approximately 248 kilometers. The missile provides the submarine with the capability to engage surface targets from standoff distances. The class is also equipped with a torpedo countermeasure system similar to that installed on the final four Soryu-class submarines. Taigei-Class Construction Timeline The commissioning of JS Chogei continues the planned rollout of the Taigei-class program: Taigei (SS-513) — commissioned March 2022 Hakugei (SS-514) — commissioned March 2023 Jingei (SS-515) — commissioned March 2024 Raigei (SS-516) — commissioned March 2025 Chogei (SS-517) — commissioned March 2026 The sixth submarine in the class, Sogei (SS-518), was launched in October 2025 and is currently undergoing outfitting, with commissioning planned for March 2027. Additional submarines are under construction as part of Japan’s long-term naval modernization program. Future Procurement and Regional Naval Context In its FY2026 defense budget, Japan’s Ministry of Defense allocated 120.8 billion yen (approximately $766 million) for construction of the 10th submarine of the Taigei class, indicating continued expansion of the program. The commissioning of JS Chogei takes place amid evolving regional naval developments. On November 5, 2025, the People's Liberation Army Navy commissioned its third aircraft carrier, Chinese aircraft carrier Fujian, joining the carriers Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning and Chinese aircraft carrier Shandong. These developments have expanded China’s carrier force to three operational carriers, enabling broader naval operations beyond the First Island Chain and into the Western Pacific. Within this context, Japan’s submarine fleet plays a key role in maritime surveillance and deterrence, particularly around the country’s southwestern island chain, where monitoring of increased naval activity has become an operational priority for the JMSDF.

U.S. Military Loses 11 MQ-9 Reaper Drones Worth Over $330 Million During Operation Epic Fury

World

WASHINGTON — March 9, 2026 : The United States military has lost a total of 11 MQ-9 Reaper unmanned aerial vehicles during the ongoing campaign against Iran, known as Operation Epic Fury, according to U.S. officials who spoke to CBS News. The cumulative value of the lost aircraft exceeds $330 million based on standard procurement estimates for the platform. Operation Epic Fury began on February 28, 2026, and involves sustained U.S. military operations targeting Iranian military infrastructure, including missile launch facilities, air defense systems, naval assets, and command centers. The campaign has included the use of multiple U.S. platforms such as stealth bombers, fighter aircraft, and unmanned aerial systems conducting reconnaissance and strike missions across the region. Role of MQ-9 Reaper in the Campaign The MQ-9 Reaper, produced by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, is a medium-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aerial vehicle widely used by the U.S. military for intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance (ISR), and precision strike operations. The platform can carry weapons including AGM-114 Hellfire missiles and precision-guided bombs while remaining airborne for extended periods. Each MQ-9 Reaper airframe costs approximately $30 million, though the total system cost can be higher when sensors, communications equipment, and ground control stations are included. Based on these estimates, the loss of 11 aircraft represents a financial impact exceeding $330 million. Military analysts note that the MQ-9 was originally designed primarily for operations in environments with limited or no advanced air defense networks. Its relatively slow speed and large radar signature can make it more vulnerable when operating in contested airspace where modern surface-to-air missile systems are present. Confirmed Timeline of Drone Losses U.S. officials have not released a full operational breakdown for every incident, but multiple confirmed engagements during early March outline several of the drone losses across Iran and neighboring areas. On March 5, 2026, U.S. officials confirmed that three MQ-9 Reapers were lost over or near Iran. The exact circumstances for all three aircraft were not immediately disclosed. One drone crashed off the Iranian coast, while the wreckage of another was later located near Khorramabad in western Iran. Separate reports also indicated that one drone may have been mistakenly shot down by Qatari air defense forces in a possible friendly-fire incident during regional air defense operations. On March 6, 2026, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Aerospace Force shot down an MQ-9 Reaper over Isfahan, a central Iranian province that hosts multiple military and industrial facilities. On March 7, 2026, two additional MQ-9 Reapers were downed in separate incidents. One was destroyed in Hormozgan Province in southern Iran, while another was shot down in Tangestan (Tagestan) in Bushehr Province, near Iran’s Persian Gulf coastline. On March 9, 2026, a further drone was shot down over Basra in eastern Iraq by pro-Iranian Iraqi militia forces, expanding the geographic scope of engagements involving the U.S. unmanned aircraft. Later the same day, U.S. officials confirmed that the total number of MQ-9 Reapers lost during the operation had reached 11, though the specific circumstances of the two most recent losses were not publicly detailed. Operational Environment The losses occurred as U.S. and Israeli forces continue coordinated military actions targeting Iranian defense and missile infrastructure. According to assessments released by U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), the operation has involved a range of strike platforms, including B-2 stealth bombers, F-35 fighter aircraft, and unmanned systems conducting surveillance and targeting missions. CENTCOM officials have reported progress in degrading several Iranian military capabilities during the campaign, including reductions in missile and drone launches attributed to Iranian forces in recent days. Despite these operational developments, the downing of multiple MQ-9 Reapers highlights the risks faced by unmanned aircraft operating in regions with active air defense networks and ongoing combat operations.

GE Aerospace Invests $1 Billion in U.S. Plants to Expand Aircraft Engine Production

World

EVENDALE, Ohio — March 9, 2026 : GE Aerospace announced plans to invest $1 billion in its U.S. manufacturing facilities and supplier network during 2026, a move aimed at accelerating aircraft engine deliveries, expanding production of key aerospace components, and strengthening domestic defense manufacturing capacity. The investment will support operations in more than 30 communities across 17 U.S. states and will be accompanied by the hiring of 5,000 additional workers in manufacturing and engineering roles during 2026. The planned recruitment matches the number of employees the company added in 2025 and is intended to meet rising demand from both commercial aviation customers and defense programs. “Maintaining U.S. aerospace leadership requires sustained investment in our people, our facilities, and the technologies that will define the future of flight,” said H. Lawrence Culp Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of GE Aerospace. “This investment is for our customers, our communities, and our country.” Second Consecutive $1 Billion Manufacturing Investment The 2026 spending plan represents GE Aerospace’s second consecutive $1 billion annual investment in U.S. manufacturing. Since 2024, the company has announced more than $2.5 billion in investments directed toward domestic production sites and its supplier base. Alongside these production investments, GE Aerospace maintains approximately $3 billion in annual research and development spending, supporting technology development across commercial aviation, defense systems, and advanced manufacturing processes. Company officials said the latest funding round is designed to increase output at facilities responsible for manufacturing and assembling both commercial and military aircraft engines while reducing delivery timelines for customers. Facility Upgrades Across Multiple States The investment will fund infrastructure modernization, new machinery, advanced manufacturing equipment, and expanded testing capabilities across several major GE Aerospace locations. In Cincinnati, Ohio, where the company is headquartered, $115 million will be allocated to modernize infrastructure, expand engine test cell capacity, and enhance advanced 3D metal printing capabilities used in the production of complex aerospace components. At the company’s Lynn, Massachusetts facility, more than $40 million will be used to upgrade buildings, refresh manufacturing machinery, and increase engine testing capacity. In Durham, North Carolina, the company will invest $20 million in specialized tooling, engine assembly systems, and building improvements aimed at increasing production efficiency. Additional investments include $10 million in Madisonville, Kentucky, which will support the acquisition of new machines, inspection equipment, tooling, and facility upgrades. The Lafayette, Indiana site will receive $7 million to upgrade tools and production equipment associated with narrowbody engine assembly and delivery operations. Expanded Production for Defense Programs A significant portion of the 2026 investment will focus on defense manufacturing. More than $275 million will be directed toward facilities that produce defense engines and related components, part of a broader effort to strengthen the U.S. defense industrial base and support evolving military operational requirements. Over the past three years, GE Aerospace has already directed approximately $600 million toward defense engine production, reflecting increased demand from U.S. and allied defense programs. Company officials stated that expanding domestic production capacity for military engines and components remains a key priority as defense procurement requirements continue to grow. Increased Capacity for Commercial Aircraft Engines On the commercial aviation side, the investment will also expand production capacity for the CFM LEAP engine, which powers the Boeing 737 MAX and Airbus A320 aircraft families. GE Aerospace plans to allocate $200 million to increase manufacturing of high-pressure turbine durability kits for the LEAP engine. According to the company, these kits are designed to more than double engine time-on-wing, particularly in hot and demanding operating environments where engines typically experience higher wear. The funding will also support production of a reverse bleed system, a design feature intended to reduce the need for on-wing maintenance by improving engine operating efficiency. Supplier Network Investment To address supply chain constraints that have affected the global aerospace industry in recent years, GE Aerospace will allocate more than $100 million to its external supplier network. The funding will provide priority suppliers with new tooling, production equipment, and manufacturing upgrades, enabling them to stabilize production schedules and meet delivery commitments. Company officials said these investments will also support improved coordination between GE Aerospace and its suppliers as demand for aircraft engines continues to grow. Production Gains from Operational Improvements GE Aerospace reported that supply chain improvements implemented through its FLIGHT DECK lean operating model have already produced measurable results. In 2025, material input from priority suppliers increased by more than 40 percent year-over-year. This improvement contributed to a 25 percent increase in commercial engine deliveries and a 30 percent increase in defense engine deliveries compared with the previous year. Company officials indicated that continued investment in supplier capacity and production systems is expected to support further growth in engine output over the coming years. Workforce Expansion and Training Programs The company’s plan to hire 5,000 additional U.S. workers in 2026 is part of a broader workforce development strategy designed to address the growing need for skilled aerospace manufacturing personnel. In fall 2025, the GE Aerospace Foundation launched a $30 million workforce development initiative aimed at training 10,000 workers in specialized aerospace manufacturing skills by 2030. The program focuses on developing expertise in areas such as advanced manufacturing, precision machining, and aerospace component production, which are considered critical for supporting long-term growth in the aviation and defense sectors. GE Aerospace officials stated that the combined investments in manufacturing facilities, supplier networks, and workforce development are intended to increase production capacity while strengthening the resilience of the U.S. aerospace manufacturing ecosystem.

Poland and Turkey Collaborate on Iryda Plus Counter-Drone UAV Equipped with Machine-Gun Interceptor System

World

WARSAW — March 9, 2026 : A Polish defense consortium led by MBF Group S.A. is advancing development of the Iryda Plus (IRYDA+), an unmanned aerial platform designed specifically to intercept and destroy hostile drones. The project is being developed in cooperation with a Turkish technology partner and is intended to provide a cost-effective kinetic counter-drone capability against medium-class unmanned aerial vehicles, including the Russian-made Shahed-series loitering munitions and Orlan-10 reconnaissance drones. The program is being executed by a consortium formed in September 2025 that includes MBF Group S.A. as project leader, Squadron Sp. z o.o.—part of ASE Group—responsible for technical development and systems integration, and the Eugeniusz Kwiatkowski Polish Industrial Lobby (PLP), which provides expert support and project promotion. MBF Group, listed on Poland’s NewConnect market and headed by Col. Janusz Czarnecki, oversees strategic coordination and business management for the initiative. In February 2026, MBF Group signed a Right of First Refusal (ROFR) agreement with the Turkish firm Shark Aviation. The arrangement grants the Turkish partner priority rights for potential future acquisition of the system while also supporting cooperation on UAV technologies and components. The agreement does not obligate an immediate purchase but establishes a framework for industrial collaboration and future procurement opportunities. Design Purpose and Operational Concept The Iryda Plus is being developed as a dedicated counter-unmanned aerial system (C-UAS) platform designed to address the growing challenge posed by relatively inexpensive drones and loitering munitions. Modern air defense systems frequently rely on interceptor missiles that cost significantly more than the targets they destroy, creating a cost-exchange imbalance. Developers state that the Iryda Plus is designed to reduce interception costs by using a reusable unmanned aircraft equipped with kinetic weapons rather than expensive missile interceptors. The system is intended to patrol designated airspace for extended periods and engage hostile drones once they are detected. The platform is designed primarily to counter medium-class UAVs, but developers indicate that its performance parameters may also allow it to engage larger unmanned systems. Flight Performance and Technical Characteristics According to project specifications, the Iryda Plus is designed with performance characteristics tailored for persistent aerial patrol and pursuit interception. The aircraft operates at a cruising and patrol speed of approximately 180 to 200 kilometers per hour, allowing it to conduct long-duration monitoring missions over protected areas. For interception, the drone can accelerate to pursuit speeds between 250 and 280 kilometers per hour, enabling it to intercept aerial targets traveling at speeds of up to 220 kilometers per hour. Its minimum operational flight speed is estimated at 50 to 60 kilometers per hour, allowing the aircraft to maintain stable flight while conducting surveillance or waiting for target detection. The system is designed with an endurance of up to 10 hours, enabling extended patrol missions and allowing the aircraft to remain airborne while awaiting potential targets. The drone also features an operational payload capacity of approximately 15 to 20 kilograms, supporting sensor packages and onboard weapon systems. These parameters are intended to enable the platform to intercept UAVs commonly used for reconnaissance and strike missions, including loitering munitions and tactical surveillance drones. Armament and Targeting System The primary armament of the Iryda Plus consists of a 7.62-millimeter light machine gun mounted on a 360-degree rotary nacelle that allows the weapon to engage targets from multiple angles during flight. Instead of relying on explosive warheads or electronic jamming systems, the drone employs a hard-kill kinetic interception method, physically destroying or disabling hostile UAVs using direct gunfire. Target engagement is managed by an onboard Target–Aim–Shot (TAS) system. This framework integrates artificial intelligence and sensor data fusion to automate several elements of the engagement process. The TAS system performs automatic target tracking, evaluates engagement parameters such as relative position and motion, and adjusts firing solutions in real time. By processing sensor data and targeting calculations directly on the aircraft, the system enables rapid response during aerial engagements. Developers state that the drone uses edge computing, allowing its AI systems to process targeting information locally rather than relying on constant communication with external control systems. This approach is intended to ensure the drone can continue operating in environments affected by electronic warfare, communications disruption, or signal jamming. Sensors and System Integration The platform can be equipped with electro-optical and infrared (EO/IR) sensor systems for target detection and identification. Developers have also indicated the possibility of integrating radar systems and linking the drone into broader air defense command networks. The modular architecture is designed to allow integration with existing detection and command systems, enabling the aircraft to operate as part of a layered defense structure for identifying and neutralizing reconnaissance drones, strike UAVs, and loitering munitions. Project Economics and System Configuration The economic model behind the Iryda Plus is based on reducing the cost of counter-drone operations by using reusable unmanned interceptors instead of expensive missile systems. At the current stage of development, the estimated cost of a complete operational set—including a ground control station and three Iryda Plus aircraft—is expected to amount to several million euros. The consortium has also formalized internal agreements covering financing, intellectual property rights, and profit distribution. Under these arrangements, MBF Group and Squadron each hold 47.5 percent shares, while the Polish Industrial Lobby retains 5 percent. Development Status and Potential Deployment Development work on the system is continuing with the goal of producing demonstrator platforms and preparing for eventual commercialization. Initial briefings on the project have reportedly been presented to Polish authorities, who have expressed preliminary interest in the concept. The Iryda Plus has been described by its developers as Europe’s first unmanned fighter aircraft designed specifically for counter-drone missions, combining Polish engineering development with international industrial cooperation. No official timeline has been announced for the aircraft’s first flight or potential operational deployment.

Trump Rejects UK Plan to Deploy Aircraft Carriers to Middle East Amid Rising US-UK Tensions Over Iran Conflict

World

WASHINGTON / LONDON — March 9, 2026 : U.S. President Donald Trump has rejected a reported proposal from the United Kingdom to deploy two aircraft carriers to the Middle East in response to the ongoing conflict involving Iran. The decision highlights increasing diplomatic friction between Washington and London over military cooperation, base access, and broader strategic policies connected to the conflict. Trump Rejects British Carrier Support In a message posted on the social media platform Truth Social, Trump confirmed that the United Kingdom had been considering sending naval forces to the region but stated that the United States no longer requires British participation. “The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East,” Trump wrote. “That’s OK, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember.” Trump also criticized the timing of the proposed deployment, writing that the United States does not require support from countries that “join wars after we’ve already won.” The remarks followed reporting by The Guardian that the British government had begun preparations for a potential deployment of the Royal Navy’s flagship aircraft carrier HMS Prince of Wales (R09) to the Middle East. The United Kingdom was reportedly considering sending two carriers as part of a broader naval presence in the region. UK Military Preparations Continue Officials at the UK Ministry of Defence stated that no final decision has been made regarding the carrier’s deployment. If approved, HMS Prince of Wales would likely operate alongside HMS Dragon (D35), which is already en route toward the Middle East. The ministry also confirmed that aircraft from the Royal Air Force, including Typhoon and F-35 fighter jets, are conducting operational flights over Jordan, Qatar, and Cyprus. British officials said these missions are focused on protecting UK personnel and installations in the region rather than participating in broader offensive operations. Earlier, Prime Minister Keir Starmer authorized the deployment of four additional Typhoon fighter jets to Qatar to strengthen defensive coverage for British forces stationed in the Gulf. British military deployments have also been reinforced in Cyprus. Wildcat helicopters equipped with anti-drone systems were sent to the island after a recent drone strike caused minor damage to a British air base there. The incident did not result in casualties. Dispute Over Base Access and Strategic Decisions Trump’s rejection of the proposed carrier deployment comes amid a series of disagreements between Washington and London regarding the conflict with Iran. One major point of contention occurred prior to the February 28 airstrikes conducted by the United States and Israel against Iranian targets. At that time, the United Kingdom declined to allow U.S. forces to use certain British-controlled bases for operations connected to the campaign. British officials said the decision was based on concerns that the strikes could raise issues under international law. The refusal required American aircraft to conduct longer flight operations from other locations, which Trump later criticized publicly. Spain also declined to allow U.S. forces to use its bases for operations related to the conflict, prompting similar criticism from the U.S. president. Chagos Islands and Diego Garcia Dispute Another source of disagreement involves the United Kingdom’s agreement to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. The archipelago hosts the strategically important Diego Garcia, a joint U.S.–U.K. military installation that plays a major role in long-range air and naval operations across the Middle East and Indo-Pacific regions. Trump has strongly criticized London’s decision, arguing that any arrangement affecting the long-term status of the islands could complicate U.S. military access to the base. In previous statements, he warned that the proposed agreement could jeopardize control of a critical strategic facility. Debate Within the UK Government Within the United Kingdom, the extent of British military involvement in the regional conflict has also become a subject of political debate. UK Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy recently stated that there is a legal basis for the Royal Air Force to conduct strikes against Iranian missile launch sites if necessary to protect British personnel in the region. Lammy said such action could target missile sites believed to be preparing attacks against British forces or facilities. His comments led to questions from members of Parliament regarding the government’s operational plans and legal justification for potential military actions. Prime Minister Starmer has taken a more cautious public stance on the issue. In recent remarks, he stated that his government does not support “regime change from the skies,” emphasizing that the United Kingdom’s current deployments are focused on defensive operations and the protection of British personnel and assets. Growing Diplomatic Tension Trump has also repeatedly criticized Starmer’s leadership approach in public statements and social media posts. In several comments earlier in the week, the U.S. president said that the British prime minister “is not Winston Churchill,” reflecting dissatisfaction within the Trump administration over the United Kingdom’s handling of the crisis. Despite the tensions, cooperation between the two countries has continued in certain areas. After the initial dispute over base access, the United Kingdom later allowed U.S. forces to use British facilities for specific defensive missions. According to reports, U.S. bomber aircraft landed at Royal Air Force bases in Britain on March 6 and March 7 to support operations intended to prevent Iranian missile launches that could threaten British personnel in the region. Conflict Context The diplomatic dispute is unfolding as the confrontation between the United States and Iran enters its second week. U.S. military operations began following coordinated American and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets on February 28. Trump has since demanded Iran’s unconditional surrender and has rejected negotiations with Tehran, while Western allies continue to debate the scale and nature of their involvement in the conflict.

DARPA and Bell Textron Begin Manufacturing X-76 High-Speed VTOL Experimental Aircraft Under SPRINT Program

World

WASHINGTON — March 9, 2026 : The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has formally designated its newest experimental aircraft as the X-76, marking the transition of the SPeed and Runway INdependent Technologies (SPRINT) program into the manufacturing phase. The aircraft is being built by Bell Textron Inc. following the successful completion of a Critical Design Review (CDR), a milestone that confirmed the design is ready for physical construction and system integration. The SPRINT program is a joint effort between DARPA and the U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) aimed at developing an aircraft capable of combining the high cruise speeds typically associated with fixed-wing jets with the vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) capabilities of rotary-wing platforms. The initiative seeks to remove the long-standing requirement for prepared runways while preserving rapid long-distance mobility. Program Background and Development Phases The SPRINT program began in November 2023 with Phase 1, during which competing contractors conducted conceptual and preliminary design work. Two teams—Bell Textron and Aurora Flight Sciences—participated in the early stages of the program. In May 2024, DARPA advanced both companies into Phase 1B to continue refining their concepts. After a competitive down-selection process, Bell Textron was chosen in July 2025 to proceed with Phase 2 of the program. Under the Phase 2 and Phase 3 contract awarded in June 2025, Bell Textron is responsible for detailed engineering design, manufacturing of the X-plane demonstrator, integration of major subsystems, ground testing, certification activities, and preparation for the flight test campaign. Following the recent Critical Design Review, Bell has now begun assembling the aircraft and integrating its propulsion and flight systems at company facilities. The program is moving through the manufacturing and ground testing phases, with the demonstrator expected to be completed in 2027. Aircraft Design and Performance Goals The X-76 demonstrator is intended to validate technologies that allow an aircraft to maintain high-speed cruise performance while remaining independent of runways. According to DARPA program objectives, the aircraft is being engineered to achieve cruise speeds between 400 and 450 knots (approximately 460–518 miles per hour or 740–833 kilometers per hour) at operational altitudes. At the same time, the aircraft must be capable of hovering and operating from austere environments, including unprepared surfaces where conventional aircraft cannot operate. The design seeks to address the longstanding trade-off between the speed of fixed-wing aircraft and the operational flexibility of helicopters. The Bell Textron concept incorporates a stop/fold rotor propulsion system. This configuration allows the aircraft to lift off vertically using rotor-based propulsion similar to a helicopter. Once airborne, the system transitions to forward flight, where the rotor mechanism can be stopped and folded, enabling efficient high-speed cruise similar to that of a jet-powered aircraft. The design builds on Bell’s experience in tiltrotor development but introduces new mechanisms intended to improve speed, aerodynamic efficiency, and operational versatility. Operational Objectives The X-76 is being developed as a technology demonstrator rather than an operational aircraft. Its primary purpose is to test integrated systems and validate aerodynamic and propulsion concepts that could later be scaled into operational platforms. DARPA and SOCOM are examining how such technologies could support a range of future military missions, including: infiltration and exfiltration of special operations forces contested personnel recovery troop transport and logistics support armed escort missions dispersed operations aligned with concepts such as Agile Combat Employment According to U.S. Navy Commander Ian Higgins, the DARPA SPRINT program manager, traditional runways have historically served as both an operational advantage and a potential vulnerability for military aviation. Aircraft that can operate without prepared airstrips could enable rapid deployment and sustained operations in regions where runways are unavailable, damaged, or targeted during conflicts. X-76 Naming and X-Plane Lineage The aircraft’s “X-76” designation is intended to mark the upcoming 250th anniversary of the United States in 2026, referencing the year 1776. The designation also places the aircraft within the long-standing U.S. tradition of X-planes, experimental aircraft developed to explore new aerospace technologies and push the boundaries of flight performance. X-plane programs historically focus on experimental capabilities rather than immediate operational deployment, with test data used to inform future aircraft development. Funding and Program Status For Fiscal Year 2026, DARPA has requested $55.2 million to continue advancing the SPRINT program. The funding is intended to support development of the demonstrator aircraft and reduce technical, schedule, and cost risks associated with future runway-independent high-speed vertical-lift systems. While the program has released general performance goals and propulsion concepts, specific technical details—including aircraft dimensions, payload capacity, and full propulsion configuration—have not yet been publicly disclosed. Flight Test Timeline The X-76 demonstrator is currently progressing through manufacturing, system integration, and ground testing activities. According to program plans, initial flight testing is scheduled to begin in early 2028. Data collected during the flight test campaign will help evaluate the feasibility of high-speed VTOL aircraft capable of operating without runways and will inform potential future acquisition decisions by SOCOM and other branches of the U.S. Armed Forces regarding next-generation vertical-lift capabilities.

Qatar Notifies U.S. of Plan to Expel Hamas Leaders After Group Refuses to Condemn Iranian Missile Strikes

World

DOHA / WASHINGTON — March 9, 2026 : Qatar has informed the United States that it intends to expel the political leadership of Hamas from its territory after the group declined to publicly condemn recent Iranian missile attacks targeting Qatar and other Gulf states. The decision marks a significant shift in Doha’s long-standing policy of hosting Hamas’ external political office and reflects growing regional tensions linked to the ongoing conflict between Iran, the United States, and Israel. Qatar’s Notification to Washington According to officials familiar with the matter, Qatari authorities formally communicated their intention to the United States in recent diplomatic discussions. Senior Hamas political figures have operated from Doha for more than a decade, using the Qatari capital as their primary external headquarters. The move follows Hamas’ refusal to issue any statement condemning Iranian strikes that targeted several members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), including Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. Qatari officials have not publicly announced a timetable for the expulsion, and the number of Hamas leaders who may be required to leave the country has not been disclosed. U.S. officials acknowledged receiving the notification from Qatar but declined to comment on the details of ongoing consultations. Background: Hamas Presence in Qatar Qatar has hosted Hamas’ political office since 2012 under an arrangement that allowed the group’s leadership to operate from Doha while maintaining diplomatic contacts in the region. The office functioned as one of Hamas’ principal external bases and served as a location for political coordination separate from the organization’s military operations in Gaza. The presence of Hamas leadership in Qatar has also played a role in mediation efforts involving ceasefire negotiations, prisoner exchanges, and hostage release discussions in previous conflicts involving Israel and Palestinian factions. Doha maintained the arrangement while balancing relations with regional actors and the United States. Iranian Missile Attacks on Gulf States The diplomatic shift occurred amid a broader regional escalation that began in late February 2026. Iran launched hundreds of ballistic missiles and attack drones toward Gulf states in response to a coordinated U.S. and Israeli military campaign against Iranian targets known as Operation Epic Fury, which began on February 28. Multiple Gulf countries were targeted during the retaliatory strikes, including Qatar. On March 3, an Iranian ballistic missile penetrated Qatari air defenses and struck Al Udeid Air Base, the largest U.S. military installation in the Middle East and the forward headquarters of U.S. Central Command. The strike damaged the U.S.-built AN/FPS-132 early-warning radar system, a strategic missile detection facility valued at approximately $1.1 billion. The radar system is designed to detect and track ballistic missile launches across long distances and provides early warning data for regional missile defense networks. Despite the attacks on Qatari territory and critical infrastructure, Hamas leadership did not issue any condemnation of Iran’s actions. Qatari authorities reportedly viewed the absence of a response as incompatible with the group’s continued presence in the country. Diplomatic and Security Considerations Qatar maintains a close defense partnership with the United States and hosts thousands of American military personnel at Al Udeid Air Base. The base serves as a central hub for U.S. air operations and command functions across the Middle East. At the same time, Doha has historically pursued a diplomatic strategy that includes maintaining communication channels with various regional actors, including Palestinian factions. Hosting Hamas’ political leadership was part of this approach, which positioned Qatar as an intermediary in several regional negotiations. The recent Iranian strikes on Qatari territory appear to have altered the political environment surrounding that arrangement. Limited Relocation Options for Hamas Leadership If the expulsion proceeds, Hamas’ external leadership will face a limited number of potential destinations for relocating its political bureau. Turkey is considered an unlikely option, as current indications suggest that Ankara may not agree to host the group’s senior leadership under present circumstances. Syria is also no longer considered viable following the change of government in Damascus. Lebanon, another country where Palestinian factions have historically maintained a presence, has become increasingly unstable, making it an uncertain long-term base for Hamas officials. Without a confirmed alternative host country, the removal of Hamas’ political office from Doha would significantly reduce the group’s diplomatic and logistical presence in the Gulf region. Regional Context The decision comes during a period of heightened military activity and political tension across the Middle East. Iran’s missile launches toward Gulf targets were part of its response to the U.S.–Israeli strikes conducted under Operation Epic Fury. Several Gulf states have since strengthened security coordination with the United States in response to the threat. Qatar’s notification to Washington reflects ongoing consultation between the two countries regarding regional security and defense cooperation. The future status of Hamas’ political leadership and its potential relocation remain uncertain as diplomatic discussions continue.

U.S. Strike Destroys IRGC Navy Shahid Soleimani-Class Missile Corvette Near Bandar Lengeh

World

BANDAR LENGEH / WASHINGTON — March 9, 2026 : A missile corvette operated by the naval branch of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGCN) was destroyed on Monday following a strike attributed to United States forces off the coast of Bandar Lengeh in southern Iran. Iranian authorities confirmed that the vessel belonged to the Shahid Soleimani-class of guided-missile corvettes. The incident occurred in waters near Bandar Lengeh, a strategic port city in Hormozgan Province located along the northern approaches to the Strait of Hormuz. Open-source video circulating online shows a large explosion followed by fire and smoke engulfing the vessel shortly after the strike. U.S. Central Command has not released operational details about the specific engagement, though the incident is reported to be part of broader maritime operations targeting Iranian naval assets in the Persian Gulf. Iranian officials have not disclosed the number of casualties or confirmed the exact hull number of the destroyed vessel. Shahid Soleimani-Class Missile Corvette The destroyed ship belonged to the Shahid Soleimani-class, a line of domestically developed guided-missile corvettes built for coastal defense and multi-domain operations in the Persian Gulf. The class represents a key element of the IRGC Navy’s modernization effort and was designed to support asymmetric maritime warfare in confined littoral waters. The lead ship of the class, Shahid Soleimani, entered service with the IRGC Navy on September 5, 2022. At least four vessels of this class are believed to be operational. A defining feature of the class is its catamaran, or twin-hull, configuration. The hull structure is constructed primarily from lightweight aluminum rather than conventional steel, reducing overall displacement and lowering radar cross-section. The superstructure incorporates angled surfaces intended to deflect radar signals and improve survivability in contested environments. The twin-hull configuration provides additional stability in rough seas and allows the ship to carry a large weapons payload relative to its size. Technical Characteristics The Shahid Soleimani-class corvette measures approximately 65 to 67 meters in length, with a beam ranging between 14.5 and 20 meters depending on the specific configuration. The vessel has a standard displacement of around 600 tonnes, which can exceed 1,000 tonnes when fully loaded with weapons, fuel, and operational equipment. Propulsion is provided by four domestically produced diesel engines, enabling the ship to reach a maximum speed of about 32 knots (59 km/h). The propulsion system allows the vessel to operate across long distances in the Persian Gulf and adjacent waters. The ship’s operational range is estimated at approximately 5,000 nautical miles (about 9,300 kilometers) when traveling at cruising speed, allowing it to conduct extended maritime patrols and escort missions without frequent refueling. Missile Systems and Armament The Shahid Soleimani-class corvette is designed as a heavily armed missile platform. One of its most notable features is the integration of Iran’s first naval vertical launching system (VLS) installed on a catamaran-type vessel. The vertical launch system includes six large launch cells intended for surface-to-surface cruise missiles, including the Abu-Mahdi long-range anti-ship missile. In addition, the ship carries up to 16 smaller VLS cells designed for surface-to-air missiles used for air defense. These air-defense missiles include variants such as the Navvab, Sayyad-2, and Sayyad-3 systems. In addition to the vertical launch system, the corvette is equipped with six box launchers for anti-ship cruise missiles. These typically include four longer-range missiles, such as the Noor, Ghadir, or Qader, and two shorter-range missiles of the Nasir type. Close-range defensive armament includes a 30 mm automatic cannon mounted forward and multiple Gatling-style guns ranging from 20 mm to 23 mm, typically between four and six units depending on configuration. These weapons are intended to defend against small boats, drones, and incoming threats at short range. The ship is also equipped with electronic warfare systems, including two chaff dispensers designed to counter radar-guided missiles. Aviation and Support Capabilities The vessel incorporates a large helicopter deck approximately 14 meters wide, enabling operations with light and medium helicopters as well as unmanned aerial vehicles. Helicopters capable of operating from the deck include the Bell 412 and Bell 206, while the platform is also capable of supporting various Shahed-series drones used for reconnaissance or strike missions. Beneath the helipad is a crane and launch system used to deploy fast attack boats. This mechanism allows the vessel to launch, retrieve, and rearm up to three fast boats during operations. These smaller craft are commonly used by the IRGC Navy in swarm tactics in the confined waters of the Persian Gulf. Operational Role in the Persian Gulf The Shahid Soleimani-class vessels serve as multi-role command and missile platforms within the IRGC Navy. Their mission set includes anti-ship warfare, coastal defense, air defense, and coordination of fast attack craft operations. Designed specifically for operations in the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf, the ships combine missile strike capability with support functions for smaller patrol boats and drones. The class represents one of the IRGC Navy’s most modern surface combatants and reflects Iran’s emphasis on precision-guided missile systems and distributed naval warfare. Ongoing Conflict Context The destruction of the corvette adds to reported Iranian naval losses since the current conflict began on February 28, 2026, when large-scale strikes targeting Iranian military infrastructure were initiated. Details about the exact weapon system used in the strike, the number of personnel aboard the vessel, and the extent of associated damage to nearby assets have not been released by U.S. officials or Iranian authorities.

U.S. Navy Launches Operation ICE CAMP Boarfish to Conduct Under-Ice Submarine Operations in the Arctic

World

ARCTIC OCEAN — March 9, 2026 : The United States Navy has launched Operation ICE CAMP Boarfish, a major Arctic under-ice mission involving nuclear-powered attack submarines and a temporary command facility established directly on drifting sea ice. The operation began on March 7, 2026, and is scheduled to run for approximately three weeks. The mission brings together U.S. naval forces, allied personnel, and specialized Arctic research organizations to conduct under-ice submarine operations and collect operational data in one of the most challenging maritime environments in the world. The exercise is coordinated by the U.S. Navy’s Arctic Submarine Laboratory (ASL) and supported by U.S. Fleet Forces Command. Submarines Deployed for Under-Ice Operations Two nuclear-powered fast-attack submarines are participating in the operation: USS Delaware (SSN-791) and USS Santa Fe (SSN-763). USS Delaware is a Virginia-class submarine, representing the newer generation of the U.S. Navy’s attack submarine fleet. The class is designed for multi-mission operations including anti-submarine warfare, intelligence gathering, strike operations, and surveillance. During ICE CAMP Boarfish, the submarine is conducting evaluations of its performance beneath Arctic sea ice, including stealth characteristics, endurance, acoustic awareness, and navigational precision in shifting ice conditions. USS Santa Fe belongs to the Los Angeles-class, an earlier generation of nuclear-powered attack submarines that remains widely deployed in the fleet. Its participation provides a comparison between legacy and modern submarine platforms. By operating both classes simultaneously, the Navy can assess differences in crew procedures, mission adaptability, and operational effectiveness during under-ice deployments. Naval planners say this approach allows readiness assessments across a broader portion of the submarine force rather than focusing on a single submarine class. Temporary Ice Camp Serves as Command Center A temporary base known as ICE CAMP Boarfish has been constructed on a drifting Arctic ice floe to support the operation. The camp functions as a forward command and logistics hub, housing personnel, communication systems, shelters, and support infrastructure required for sustained Arctic operations. Establishing a command facility directly on sea ice requires complex logistical planning. The camp provides coordination for submarine operations beneath the ice while enabling personnel to conduct monitoring, communications, and operational support activities. According to Capt. David Nichols, the officer responsible for tactical control during the mission, building a functioning base on moving sea ice presents unique operational challenges but provides valuable experience for Arctic deployments. Multinational Participation The operation includes personnel and technical participation from several allied and partner nations. In addition to the United States Navy, participants include representatives from: Royal Australian Navy Royal Canadian Navy Royal Canadian Air Force French Navy Royal Navy of the United Kingdom Scientific and research organizations are also involved, including the Norwegian Defence Research Institute and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. Within the United States, the operation includes participation from the U.S. Marine Corps and the Air National Guard, supporting logistics and Arctic operations alongside the Navy. Transition From Exercise to Operational Status Originally categorized as a training exercise, ICE CAMP Boarfish was recently designated an official military operation. U.S. naval officials said the change reflects the growing strategic importance of Arctic capabilities and the need for sustained operational readiness in the region. The shift aligns with the U.S. Department of Defense Arctic Strategy released in 2024, which emphasizes maintaining access to the Arctic as sea ice diminishes and maritime activity increases. The strategy identifies expanding military and economic activity by Russia and China as factors shaping the evolving security environment in the High North. Milestone for the U.S. Submarine Force Operation ICE CAMP Boarfish also marks the 100th Arctic under-ice evolution conducted by the U.S. Submarine Force. The operation’s name honors the USS Boarfish (SS-327), a Balao-class submarine that played a role in early Arctic submarine exploration after World War II. In 1947, Boarfish served as the flagship vessel during Operation Blue Nose, which conducted one of the first submarine explorations beneath the polar ice cap. That mission demonstrated the feasibility of extended navigation under Arctic ice using new sonar technologies. Objectives of the Mission During the three-week deployment, the submarines and supporting teams are conducting operational testing focused on real-world Arctic conditions. The activities include navigation beneath moving ice cover, evaluation of acoustic environments unique to the Arctic Ocean, and sustained submarine operations in extremely cold and remote conditions. The mission is designed to generate operational data on submarine performance and support the development of procedures for future Arctic deployments. U.S. Fleet Forces Command has not released detailed information about specific tactical activities conducted during the mission. However, officials say the operation is intended to improve submarine readiness and maintain operational access to the Arctic region. USS Delaware and USS Santa Fe remain deployed beneath the Arctic ice as the mission continues through the remainder of the planned three-week operational period.

Death of Iran’s Leadership in Opening Strike Creates Command Vacuum, Leaving Navy Ineffective Against U.S. Fleet

World

WASHINGTON / TEHRAN — March 9, 2026 : Military assessments of the first week of the conflict that began on February 28, 2026 indicate that Iran’s naval forces experienced extensive losses while command disruption significantly affected the country’s initial military response. Analysts attribute the rapid reduction of Iranian naval capabilities to a combination of leadership disruption, damage to command infrastructure, and the technological advantages of United States naval and air forces. Operational evaluations attributed to U.S. Central Command indicate that more than 20 Iranian vessels were sunk or rendered inoperable within the first seven days of the conflict, while some estimates place total losses between 30 and 42 surface ships. During the same period, U.S. officials reported no confirmed damage to any U.S. Navy platforms. Structure of Iran’s Naval Forces Before the Conflict Prior to the outbreak of hostilities, Iran maintained two separate naval organizations: the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy (IRIN), which functions as the country’s conventional maritime force, and the naval arm of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGCN), which is responsible for asymmetric maritime warfare and coastal defense. The IRIN operated an estimated fleet of roughly 100 vessels and submarines. These included seven frigates, three or four corvettes, between 17 and 25 submarines—primarily Russian-built Kilo-class boats and smaller domestically produced midget submarines—along with 21 patrol vessels and multiple logistical support ships. The IRGCN maintained a smaller but specialized fleet focused on asymmetric operations in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. Its inventory included approximately 45 missile boats and fast-attack craft such as the Houdong class, Peykaap II missile boats, C-14 vessels, and MK13 fast patrol craft. In addition, the organization controlled hundreds of smaller speedboats configured for swarm tactics. These naval forces were primarily concentrated around Iran’s southern coastline, particularly at major bases in Bandar Abbas and Konarak, as well as throughout the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. Prior to the conflict, Iranian military officials repeatedly emphasized their ability to disrupt maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz using coordinated swarm attacks, naval mines, coastal missile batteries, and anti-ship missile systems. Iranian commanders described these capabilities as sufficient to challenge technologically superior naval forces operating in the Gulf. Strike on Leadership and Command Infrastructure The initial disruption to Iranian military operations followed a joint United States and Israeli strike carried out on February 28 against a secured compound in Tehran. According to military assessments referenced by Western officials, the strike eliminated Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei along with several senior officials. Simultaneous attacks targeted key Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps headquarters facilities and military communications networks. Under Iran’s constitutional framework and the doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist), the Supreme Leader serves as the commander-in-chief of all armed forces. Both the conventional military and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps operate through command structures that ultimately report directly to the Supreme Leader’s office. The IRGC operates largely outside the civilian government framework, and its operational directives flow through parallel chains of command that bypass the elected president and standard military hierarchy. The naval branch of the IRGC, which controls most of Iran’s coastal missile boats and asymmetric maritime capabilities, is directly integrated into this structure. Military analysts say that the loss of the central command authority combined with the destruction of communications nodes created immediate command-and-control paralysis across both the IRGC and the regular armed forces. Field commanders across multiple branches of the Iranian military were left without updated targeting data, operational coordination, or strategic directives. In a system where major operational decisions require authorization from the highest levels of command, the sudden absence of that authority resulted in widespread disruption of coordinated military activity. Initial Iranian Retaliatory Strikes The command disruption was reflected in the early stages of Iran’s missile response during the first days of the conflict. According to U.S. and Israeli military assessments, initial Iranian ballistic missile and drone launches were dispersed across multiple targets throughout the Middle East without clear operational prioritization. Without functional command-and-control centers capable of providing real-time targeting telemetry and strategic direction, missile units reportedly relied on pre-planned or locally selected targets. Many of these strikes were intercepted by U.S. and Israeli air defense systems and caused limited damage. The absence of centralized coordination also affected naval operations. Iranian naval units did not receive immediate orders to disperse, redeploy, or initiate swarm tactics that had previously formed the core of Iran’s maritime doctrine. Rapid Losses Within the Iranian Navy The lack of coordinated naval response allowed U.S. forces to target Iranian vessels at ports and at sea during the early phase of the conflict. Satellite imagery and official assessments indicate that multiple ships were destroyed while docked at Iranian naval facilities, particularly at Bandar Abbas and Konarak. Several domestic Jamaran-class surface combatants were reportedly struck while moored at their piers before they could deploy. Among the notable losses was the newly converted drone-carrier Shahid Bagheri, which had been adapted to operate unmanned aerial systems. The vessel was hit by Tomahawk cruise missiles while docked at Bandar Abbas before it could launch its drone payload. On March 4, the Iranian frigate IRIS Dena was torpedoed in the Indian Ocean by a U.S. submarine. U.S. officials described the engagement as the first submarine torpedo sinking of a surface combatant by the U.S. Navy since the Second World War. Additional losses included several Bayandor-class corvettes and at least one Kilo-class submarine reportedly destroyed at dock. Reports also indicated the destruction of the IRIS Fateh, one of Iran’s domestically produced submarines. Amid the disruption to command structures, reports also indicated unusual movements by surviving Iranian naval units operating outside their normal patrol areas. The Iranian naval frigate IRIS Alborz, an Alvand-class guided-missile frigate of the Islamic Republic of Iran Navy, reportedly requested assistance from Indian authorities and proceeded toward Kochi, India. According to regional maritime reports, the vessel’s crew was unable to obtain operational instructions from higher command following the breakdown of communications with Iranian naval headquarters, prompting the ship to seek logistical support and guidance after operating for several days without confirmed command directives. By targeting naval assets early in the campaign, U.S. forces effectively eliminated Iran’s ability to deploy conventional naval power beyond the Strait of Hormuz or threaten maritime traffic using larger surface vessels. U.S. operations during this period included the use of stealth B-2 bombers, Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from surface ships and submarines, and persistent surveillance provided by carrier-based aircraft and reconnaissance systems. Within 48 hours, U.S. officials reported that Iranian naval presence east of the Strait of Hormuz had been largely neutralized. Limitations of Asymmetric Naval Doctrine Iran’s naval strategy prior to the conflict relied heavily on asymmetric tactics, particularly coordinated swarm attacks involving fast boats supported by coastal anti-ship missile batteries. However, analysts note that these tactics still required functioning command-and-control links to coordinate targeting, timing, and engagement zones. The removal of central leadership and communications networks disrupted those links. As a result, Iranian fast-attack craft and other asymmetric naval units were unable to organize large-scale coordinated operations against U.S. naval forces during the initial phase of the conflict. Reorganization of Iranian Command After several days of command disruption, Iran’s political leadership began restoring central authority through emergency coordination measures and surviving military communication networks. During this period, Iranian missile operations gradually shifted from dispersed launches to more focused targeting. Military analysts report that surviving localized command nodes and emergency communications protocols enabled missile units to regain a degree of operational coordination. Recent strikes have increasingly focused on military and economic infrastructure belonging to the United States and its regional partners. Among the reported targets were advanced radar and early-warning systems used in regional missile defense networks. Iranian missiles struck an AN/TPY-2 radar system associated with the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) network at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. Additional radar installations in Saudi Arabia were also targeted. Iranian missile strikes have also focused on energy infrastructure. The Bapco refinery in Bahrain and several industrial facilities in the United Arab Emirates were hit in recent attacks, resulting in large fires and forcing state energy companies to declare force majeure at some facilities. On March 8–9, the Assembly of Experts formally appointed Mojtaba Khamenei as the country’s new Supreme Leader, ending the leadership vacancy that had existed since the death of his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The decision restored the formal chain of command for Iran’s armed forces, which constitutionally report directly to the office of the Supreme Leader. Current Status of Iranian Naval Forces By March 9, Iranian naval capabilities have been significantly reduced. Surviving assets consist primarily of a limited number of fast-attack craft, submarines undergoing refit, and coastal defense units. Most remaining vessels remain confined to port or operating under restricted conditions amid continued surveillance and strike operations by U.S. and allied forces. Military analysts note that the rapid collapse of Iranian naval operations during the opening phase of the conflict reflects the highly centralized structure of Iran’s command system. The simultaneous removal of the Supreme Leader and multiple command centers disrupted operational continuity across both the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the conventional military. Subsequent developments indicate that Iran’s missile forces have begun adapting under restored leadership, shifting toward targeted strikes against regional military infrastructure and energy facilities.

United States Delivers Javelin Anti-Tank Missile Systems to Albania’s Land Forces

World

TIRANA, Albania — March 9, 2026 : The United States has delivered a batch of Javelin FGM-148F anti-tank missile systems to the Albanian Land Force, a development that strengthens bilateral defense cooperation and supports Albania’s ongoing military modernization within the NATO framework. The handover ceremony was held on February 27, 2026, at the Land Forces Command Headquarters in Zall-Herr, near Tirana. The event was attended by Albanian Minister of Defence Pirro Vengu, U.S. Chargé d’Affaires Nancy VanHorn, Chief of the General Staff Lieutenant General Arben Kingji, and senior officers from the Albanian Land Force. The delivery forms part of a broader defense cooperation program between Washington and Tirana aimed at improving Albania’s operational capabilities and interoperability with NATO forces. Delivery of Missiles and Supporting Systems According to officials, the United States supplied 35 Javelin FGM-148F missiles through the Section 333 Building Partner Capacity program, a U.S. initiative designed to strengthen the military capabilities of partner nations. In addition to the missiles, the Albanian Ministry of Defence separately acquired Javelin Command Launch Units (CLUs), additional launchers, and advanced simulation and training systems using national funds. These components were procured through the U.S. Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program, ensuring that the Albanian Land Force receives the complete operational system required for deployment, training, and maintenance. Initial deliveries of equipment reportedly began in late 2025, while the February 2026 ceremony marked the completion of the full package of missiles, launchers, and associated training systems. Statements from Albanian and U.S. Officials Albanian Defence Minister Pirro Vengu described the acquisition as an important step in strengthening Albania’s defense capabilities and advancing its modernization efforts. Vengu said the Javelin system had been ordered several years earlier through cooperation with the United States and represents a key component of Albania’s long-term defense planning. He noted that the investment reflects the government’s approach of strengthening national defense capabilities during peacetime in order to ensure preparedness. The minister also emphasized that Albania’s military modernization is intended to reinforce deterrence and national security rather than offensive operations. U.S. Chargé d’Affaires Nancy VanHorn stated that the delivery reflects the strong defense partnership between the United States and Albania and demonstrates Washington’s commitment to regional security and the NATO alliance. VanHorn noted that the Javelin system offers several tactical advantages, including “fire-and-forget” guidance, which allows operators to relocate immediately after launching the missile. The weapon also uses a top-attack flight profile, enabling it to strike armored vehicles at their most vulnerable point. She added that the integration of the system will assist Albania in meeting NATO capability targets and defense spending commitments, contributing to the alliance’s collective defense posture. Overview of the Javelin Weapon System The FGM-148 Javelin is a man-portable, fire-and-forget anti-tank guided missile system developed through the Javelin Joint Venture, a partnership between U.S. defense companies Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. The system is widely used by NATO and allied militaries and has been employed in multiple combat environments. Its infrared imaging seeker allows operators to lock onto targets before launch, after which the missile guides itself autonomously to the target. Key characteristics of the system include: Fire-and-forget guidance, reducing operator exposure after launch Top-attack capability, designed to defeat modern armored vehicles Man-portable configuration, allowing infantry units to deploy the system without heavy vehicles High effectiveness against armored targets, including tanks and fortified positions These features allow infantry units to engage armored threats with minimal exposure and improved tactical mobility. Albania’s Defense Modernization Efforts The acquisition of the Javelin system forms part of Albania’s broader defense modernization strategy, which aims to improve the readiness and capabilities of the Albanian Armed Forces while aligning equipment and doctrine with NATO standards. Albania joined NATO in 2009 and has since been working to upgrade its military infrastructure and equipment in order to contribute more effectively to the alliance’s collective defense missions. To support these modernization initiatives, Albania has increased defense spending in recent years. The Ministry of Defence’s budget for 2026 totals approximately 58.9 billion Albanian leks, equivalent to about $72.3 million or €61 million. Earlier in 2026, Minister Vengu stated that around half of the defense budget for the year will be allocated to the procurement of new military equipment from partner countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel. The acquisition of advanced systems such as the Javelin missile is intended to improve Albania’s deterrence capabilities, operational readiness, and interoperability with NATO forces. Ongoing U.S.–Albania Defense Cooperation The Javelin delivery highlights continued military cooperation between the United States and Albania, particularly in areas related to training, equipment procurement, and capability development. While officials confirmed the delivery of 35 missiles and associated launch systems, no additional details regarding future quantities or follow-on procurements have been announced. The February 2026 handover represents the latest step in Albania’s effort to modernize its land forces and strengthen its role within NATO’s collective security framework.

Iran Launches Second Ballistic Missile Toward Turkey, NATO Defenses Shoot It Down Near Gaziantep

World

ANKARA, — March 9, 2026 : Turkish authorities reported that a ballistic missile launched from Iran entered Turkish airspace and was intercepted by NATO air and missile defense systems, marking the second such incident within five days as the regional conflict involving Iran, the United States, and Israel continues. According to Turkey’s Ministry of National Defense, the missile was detected approaching Turkish airspace before being neutralized by NATO defensive systems positioned in the eastern Mediterranean. Debris from the intercepted munition fell onto vacant land in the southeastern province of Gaziantep. Officials confirmed that no casualties or structural damage were recorded. Gaziantep lies near the Syrian border and approximately 150 kilometers from Incirlik Air Base, which hosts United States military personnel, and about 200 kilometers from a NATO missile defense radar facility in Malatya that supports the alliance’s ballistic missile defense network. Second Interception Within Five Days The March 9 interception follows a similar event on March 4, when another ballistic missile launched from Iran traveled through Iraqi and Syrian airspace before being intercepted by NATO systems over the eastern Mediterranean. Debris from that interception fell in Hatay province in southern Turkey. Turkish authorities reported no injuries or damage in that incident. In both cases, the Turkish Defense Ministry stated that the missiles were detected moving toward Turkish airspace, although officials said the intended targets remain unclear. The repeated interceptions occurred as the wider regional conflict involving Iran, the United States, and Israel entered its second week. Turkish Government Response Following the earlier March 4 interception, Turkey summoned Iran’s ambassador to Ankara to lodge a formal protest and warned against any actions threatening Turkish territory. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan stated that Ankara reserves the right to respond to any threat directed at the country’s sovereignty or territorial integrity. In a statement issued after the March 9 incident, the Turkish Ministry of National Defense reiterated that Turkey would take all necessary measures to protect its airspace and borders. Iran Denies Targeting Turkey Iran has previously denied launching missiles toward Turkey. Following the March 4 interception, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei stated that Tehran respects Turkey’s sovereignty and that Iranian military operations are defensive in nature. Baghaei said Iran’s missile and drone operations are directed at adversaries involved in attacks against Iran and should not be interpreted as hostile acts toward neighboring countries. As of March 9, Iranian officials had not issued an immediate public statement regarding the latest interception reported by Turkey. NATO Missile Defense Response NATO increased its ballistic missile defense posture across the alliance after the first interception earlier in March. Alliance officials stated that the defensive measures successfully protected allied territory. Turkey plays a key role in NATO’s missile defense architecture. The country hosts a NATO early-warning radar installation in Malatya province that contributes to the alliance’s ballistic missile detection network. Turkey also hosts United States forces at Incirlik Air Base, a major installation used for NATO operations in the region. Although the intercepted missiles entered Turkish airspace, the incidents have not resulted in casualties or significant damage required to invoke NATO’s Article 5 collective defense clause. Diplomatic sources have indicated that Ankara could consider consultations under Article 4 of the NATO treaty, which allows member states to request discussions with allies when they believe their territorial integrity or security is under threat. Turkish Military Deployments Increase Amid the broader regional conflict, Turkey has increased military activity along several strategic fronts. Turkish authorities have expanded deployments along the Iraqi border, moving ground forces, F-16 fighter aircraft, and additional logistical units into southeastern regions. Military reserves have also been mobilized, and air patrols along the Iranian frontier have increased. Separately, the Turkish Defense Ministry announced a phased deployment of six F-16 fighter jets and air defense systems to the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus as part of broader security measures in the eastern Mediterranean. Strategic and Diplomatic Considerations The missile incidents have drawn attention to Turkey’s position within the regional conflict. As a NATO member state hosting alliance missile defense assets and U.S. military personnel, Turkey is directly integrated into Western security structures. At the same time, Ankara has historically maintained diplomatic and economic relations with Tehran and has occasionally criticized U.S. and Israeli policies toward Iran. Analysts note that Turkey’s current response reflects a balancing effort between NATO commitments, national security, and regional diplomacy. Regional Security Concerns The United States Embassy in Turkey updated its travel advisory on March 9, advising against travel to southeastern Turkish provinces due to security risks linked to the conflict in neighboring countries. NATO officials stated that missile defense systems will remain on heightened readiness as long as regional missile activity continues. Turkish authorities have not disclosed details about the missile type or launch location inside Iran, and investigations into the missile trajectories and possible targets are ongoing.

Mirai Robotics Secures $4.2 Million Pre-Seed Funding to Develop Autonomous Maritime Systems

World

PUGLIA, Italy — March 9, 2026 : European robotics startup Mirai Robotics has secured $4.2 million in pre-seed funding as it formally launches operations focused on developing autonomous vehicles and control systems for complex maritime environments. The company, established in 2025, is positioning itself as a dual-use robotics laboratory building technologies designed for both civil and institutional maritime operations. The investment round is among the largest early-stage funding rounds in Italy’s robotics and deep-technology sector. It was led by Primo Capital, Techshop, and 40Jemz Ventures, with participation from several Italian and international angel investors. According to the company, the newly raised capital will support accelerated technology development, expansion of its engineering workforce across Europe, and the launch of pilot programs with industrial partners. Maritime Infrastructure and Economic Significance The maritime domain remains one of the most important components of global infrastructure. More than 80 percent of global trade moves through maritime shipping routes, while over 90 percent of Europe’s foreign trade depends on sea transport. In addition to goods transportation, the oceans host critical digital infrastructure, including subsea cable networks that carry approximately 95 percent of international internet traffic. The economic value of ocean-related industries—often referred to as the blue economy—currently exceeds $2.5 trillion globally and is projected by international estimates to grow beyond $4 trillion by 2030. Despite its scale and strategic importance, large segments of maritime operations remain dependent on traditional, labor-intensive systems with limited digital integration. Industry operators face persistent structural challenges, including high operational costs, limited continuous monitoring capabilities, physical risks associated with maritime environments, and an increasing shortage of qualified personnel. Many maritime sectors are experiencing an aging workforce among captains and vessel operators, while thousands of positions remain unfilled across global shipping and offshore industries. Autonomous Systems for Maritime Operations Mirai Robotics is developing autonomous maritime technologies intended to address these operational gaps through automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence. The company approaches maritime autonomy primarily as an engineering and industrial systems problem rather than a purely software-based solution. The startup has already developed two autonomous vehicles designed for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR), patrolling, and monitoring missions across both coastal and offshore maritime environments. These robotic platforms incorporate several integrated capabilities, including: Advanced perception and sensing systems Autonomous navigation and route management Remote control and supervisory operation functions Embedded safety and reliability protocols The vehicles are designed to operate either independently or as part of distributed maritime monitoring networks, enabling persistent surveillance and operational coverage in environments where human deployment may be costly or hazardous. In addition to its proprietary platforms, Mirai Robotics is also developing modular autonomy, navigation, and control systems that can be integrated into third-party vessels. This retrofit approach allows commercial operators, infrastructure managers, and institutional organizations to upgrade existing fleets with autonomous capabilities without the need to design entirely new vessels. The company describes its technology strategy as “dual-use by design,” meaning its systems are intended for a wide range of maritime applications across civil infrastructure management, offshore industry operations, and government or institutional maritime monitoring missions. Founding Team and Leadership Mirai Robotics was founded by a group of Italian technology and industrial entrepreneurs with backgrounds in aerospace manufacturing, digital product development, and technology investment. The leadership team includes: Luciano Belviso, Chief Executive Officer, previously led Blackshape, an aircraft design and manufacturing company that was later acquired by Angel Holding. His experience includes managing complex industrial engineering operations in the aerospace sector. Luca Mascaro, Chief Product and Technology Officer, founded Sketchin, a digital product design firm later acquired by BIP Group, where he served as Chief Innovation Officer. His work has focused on digital platforms, product design, and innovation strategies. Davide Dattoli, board member, is the founder of Talent Garden, a European network of digital innovation campuses, and an investor in several technology and education companies across Europe. Strategic Location and European Engineering Development Mirai Robotics has established its headquarters in Puglia, a region in southern Italy located along the Adriatic coast. The company states that the location provides strategic proximity to Mediterranean maritime routes, regional industrial partners, and research institutions. Italy’s longstanding expertise in shipbuilding, maritime engineering, offshore infrastructure, defense technologies, and yachting industries was a key factor in the company’s decision to base its primary operations there. Mirai Robotics is also developing a pan-European engineering team specializing in robotics, artificial intelligence, complex systems engineering, and mission-critical operations. The company has begun forming collaborations with universities and research centers to support the development of maritime autonomy technologies. Industry Context and Long-Term Objectives Mirai Robotics aims to contribute to the modernization of maritime infrastructure by introducing software-defined robotics systems capable of operating reliably in extreme and remote ocean environments. According to CEO Luciano Belviso, maritime operations remain one of the last major global infrastructures not yet fully governed by software-based systems. He noted that autonomous robotics can improve safety, operational efficiency, and resource accessibility while supporting security and monitoring functions in challenging maritime conditions. Lead investor Gianluca Dettori, partner at Primo Capital, stated that the maritime sector is approaching a structural transition point due to outdated operational models, increasing risks, and growing shortages of skilled personnel. Automation technologies, he said, could become a foundational layer enabling the long-term expansion of the global blue economy. With its first funding round completed, Mirai Robotics plans to advance prototype development, expand engineering capabilities, and initiate operational pilot programs designed to demonstrate autonomous maritime technologies in real-world environments.

Israeli Air Force Strike on Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport Destroys 16 IRGC Quds Force Transport Aircraft

World

JERUSALEM / TEHRAN — March 9, 2026 : The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Israeli Air Force aircraft carried out strikes on Tehran’s Mehrabad International Airport overnight on March 6–7, destroying 16 aircraft associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) Quds Force. The operation was part of a broader wave of Israeli attacks targeting Iranian military infrastructure during the ongoing regional conflict that began on February 28. Strike on Quds Force Logistics Hub According to the IDF, the aircraft destroyed at Mehrabad were used by the IRGC’s Quds Force to transport weapons, financial resources, and military equipment to allied militias and partner organizations across the Middle East. Israeli officials described the airport as a key logistical hub used for sustaining Iran’s network of proxy groups, including Hezbollah in Lebanon. The Israeli military stated that these aircraft had been used repeatedly in recent years to move arms shipments and funds to regional partners. By destroying the aircraft, Israeli planners aim to disrupt supply routes used to support allied militias operating in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. Mehrabad International Airport is a dual-use facility located in western Tehran that handles both civilian flights and military aviation activity. Israeli officials said the operation targeted military assets and infrastructure used by the Quds Force within the airport complex. Additional Aircraft and Infrastructure Targeted The IDF reported that the strike also destroyed several Iranian fighter jets located at the airport. Israeli military officials said those aircraft were targeted because they posed a potential threat to Israeli Air Force aircraft conducting operations over Iranian territory. Additional military infrastructure at the airport was also struck during the operation. The IDF did not specify the types of fighter jets destroyed or the exact facilities damaged, but said the attacks focused on operational assets connected to Iranian military activities. Satellite imagery reviewed after the strikes indicated damage to at least 17 aircraft positioned at Mehrabad Airport. The Israeli military confirmed that 16 of those aircraft were linked to the Quds Force, though the operational status of each aircraft before the strike has not been publicly detailed. Video footage circulating on social media following the attack showed destroyed aircraft on the ground and smoke rising from sections of the airfield. Part of Wider Israeli Air Campaign The Mehrabad strikes occurred during a large-scale Israeli air campaign targeting military infrastructure across Iran. According to Israeli military statements, more than 80 Israeli fighter jets participated in coordinated operations over Tehran and other locations during the weekend. During these missions, Israeli aircraft reportedly dropped approximately 230 munitions on multiple military sites. Israeli officials said the campaign targeted missile production facilities, underground command centers, fuel depots, and several air bases. Among the additional strikes reported by Israel was the destruction of Iranian F-14 fighter jets at an air base in Isfahan. Israeli officials described the operations as part of a broader effort to degrade Iranian military capabilities and reduce threats to Israeli forces. In total, the IDF said more than 400 targets across Iran were struck during the weekend operations. Efforts to Limit Civilian Impact Israeli military officials said the operation at Mehrabad was planned using aerial surveillance and precision-guided munitions to limit potential damage to civilian areas surrounding the airport. Because Mehrabad operates as both a civilian and military facility, Israeli planners said targeting focused on areas used for military logistics and aircraft associated with the Quds Force. Iranian state media confirmed that explosions and fires occurred at Mehrabad Airport following the strikes but did not immediately release detailed information regarding casualties or the full extent of the damage. Background of the Quds Force The Quds Force is the external operations branch of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and is responsible for coordinating Iran’s military and intelligence activities outside the country. The unit oversees support to allied armed groups and militias across the Middle East, including organizations operating in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Yemen. Israeli officials said the aircraft destroyed in the strike were involved in maintaining supply routes used to transfer weapons and financial resources to these groups. Ongoing Conflict The airstrikes occurred during the second week of a widening conflict involving Israel, Iran, and the United States. The escalation began on February 28 and has included missile exchanges and multiple rounds of airstrikes against military infrastructure. The Israeli military said operations against Iranian military assets are continuing. Iranian forces have also continued launching missile attacks toward Israel in response to the Israeli air campaign. As of March 9, Iranian authorities have not released a detailed official assessment of losses at Mehrabad Airport or confirmed the number of aircraft destroyed. The situation remains under active monitoring as military operations continue across the region.

Nigerian Air Force Faces Operational Hurdles with JF-17 Thunder Fleet Amid Technical and Structural Concerns

World

ABUJA, March 9, 2026 — Reports from the Nigerian Air Force (NAF) indicate that the service has identified a number of technical and sustainment concerns affecting its small fleet of JF-17 Thunder multirole fighter aircraft. The issues reportedly include avionics software glitches, structural cracks on parts of the airframe, limitations in the aircraft’s data-link system, and maintenance challenges that are affecting operational readiness. The aircraft in question are three Block II variants jointly produced by Chengdu Aircraft Corporation and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex under the Sino-Pakistani JF-17 program. Nigeria’s jets are equipped with the KLJ‑7 radar, powered by the Klimov RD‑93 turbofan engine, and fitted with the indigenous Link‑17 datalink communication system. Acquisition and Delivery Nigeria signed a contract for the acquisition of three JF-17 Thunder aircraft in 2016, with the agreement finalized in 2018. The procurement package, valued at approximately $184.3 million, covered three Block II fighters and associated equipment. The contract also included an option for the purchase of eight additional aircraft, though this option has not been exercised. The three aircraft, registered NAF-720, NAF-721, and NAF-722, were transported to Nigeria in March 2021 aboard Ilyushin Il‑76 strategic transport aircraft operated by the Pakistan Air Force. They were delivered in a disassembled state and subsequently reassembled at Makurdi Air Base in Nigeria’s Benue State. The fighters were formally inducted into service on 21 May 2021, becoming the most advanced combat aircraft in the Nigerian Air Force inventory at the time. Reported Technical and Structural Issues According to service-level reporting, the Nigerian Air Force has encountered several technical challenges affecting the aircraft since their introduction into operational service. Among the issues cited are avionics software glitches and structural cracks appearing on sections of the airframe and weapon hardpoints, despite the aircraft recording relatively low flight hours since entering service in 2021. Concerns have also been raised regarding the low data transfer rate of the Link-17 datalink system, which reportedly limits the speed and efficiency of information sharing between aircraft and other operational platforms. In addition, maintenance requirements related to the RD-93 turbofan engine and other subsystems have reportedly presented logistical and sustainment challenges for the small three-aircraft fleet. The reported problems have prompted questions within defense circles about the long-term maintainability and operational availability of the type in Nigerian service. Nigerian authorities have not issued an official public statement confirming the reports or detailing the operational impact on the aircraft. Role Within the Nigerian Air Force The JF-17 Thunder is a lightweight, single-engine multirole fighter designed for both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions. In Nigerian service, the aircraft has been used primarily in counter-insurgency and counter-terrorism operations, supporting ongoing military efforts against armed groups in the country’s northeastern region. As of 2026, the Nigerian Air Force operates between 142 and 164 active aircraft across its fleet. Its fighter inventory consists of 11 Chengdu F‑7 fighter-bombers and three JF-17 Thunder aircraft, with the JF-17 representing the most modern fighter platform currently in service. The aircraft forms a central component of the air force’s modernization efforts, which also include the introduction of A‑29 Super Tucano light attack aircraft and other fixed-wing and rotary-wing platforms aimed at improving precision strike, surveillance, and close air support capabilities. Future Procurement and Sustainment Nigeria’s original procurement agreement allowed for the purchase of eight additional JF-17 aircraft, but no further orders or upgrade packages have been announced since the delivery of the initial three fighters. For the time being, the Nigerian Air Force continues to rely on the aircraft as its primary modern fighter platform while working through sustainment arrangements with the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex to maintain operational availability. The reported technical issues have nonetheless drawn attention to the challenges of sustaining a small fighter fleet and the importance of long-term logistical and technical support arrangements for advanced combat aircraft.

Japan Commissions Fifth Taigei-Class Submarine JS Chogei at Kobe Shipyard

World

U.S. Military Loses 11 MQ-9 Reaper Drones Worth Over $330 Million During Operation Epic Fury

World

GE Aerospace Invests $1 Billion in U.S. Plants to Expand Aircraft Engine Production

World

Poland and Turkey Collaborate on Iryda Plus Counter-Drone UAV Equipped with Machine-Gun Interceptor System

World

Trump Rejects UK Plan to Deploy Aircraft Carriers to Middle East Amid Rising US-UK Tensions Over Iran Conflict

World

DARPA and Bell Textron Begin Manufacturing X-76 High-Speed VTOL Experimental Aircraft Under SPRINT Program

World

Qatar Notifies U.S. of Plan to Expel Hamas Leaders After Group Refuses to Condemn Iranian Missile Strikes

World

U.S. Strike Destroys IRGC Navy Shahid Soleimani-Class Missile Corvette Near Bandar Lengeh

World

U.S. Navy Launches Operation ICE CAMP Boarfish to Conduct Under-Ice Submarine Operations in the Arctic

World

Death of Iran’s Leadership in Opening Strike Creates Command Vacuum, Leaving Navy Ineffective Against U.S. Fleet

World

United States Delivers Javelin Anti-Tank Missile Systems to Albania’s Land Forces

World

Iran Launches Second Ballistic Missile Toward Turkey, NATO Defenses Shoot It Down Near Gaziantep

World

Mirai Robotics Secures $4.2 Million Pre-Seed Funding to Develop Autonomous Maritime Systems

World

Israeli Air Force Strike on Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport Destroys 16 IRGC Quds Force Transport Aircraft

World

Nigerian Air Force Faces Operational Hurdles with JF-17 Thunder Fleet Amid Technical and Structural Concerns

World

Search

Top Trending in 24 Hours

Top Trending in 4 Days