JERUSALEM : Israel has formally requested “operational freedom” from the United States to conduct independent military strikes against Iranian targets, according to senior Israeli defense officials. The request is aimed at securing a U.S. green light, including assurances of non-interference and potential defensive support, should Israel proceed with unilateral action against Iran’s ballistic missile and nuclear-related infrastructure.
Israeli officials say the request reflects mounting concern that Iran is actively rebuilding capabilities damaged during the direct Israel-Iran exchanges of 2024 and 2025. While Iran’s nuclear program remains a core issue, Israeli intelligence assessments now place increasing emphasis on Tehran’s missile reconstitution efforts, which are viewed as an immediate and expanding threat to Israel and the wider region.
The discussions come as the administration of Donald Trump continues to pursue a dual-track strategy combining military pressure with diplomatic engagement. Publicly, Washington has signaled a preference for negotiations over direct escalation, a position that contrasts with Israel’s growing impatience and sense of urgency.
Intelligence Assessment Points to Strategic Opening
According to Israeli security officials, the request for operational latitude is underpinned by a new intelligence assessment concluding that the Islamic Republic is currently in one of its weakest positions in decades. The assessment cites a convergence of internal unrest, economic collapse, and military degradation that has left the Iranian leadership under significant strain.
Protests that intensified nationwide in January 2026 have spread from Tehran’s Grand Bazaar to nearly all major provinces. Human rights organizations estimate that more than 3,400 protesters have been killed and roughly 40,000 detained, as Iranian security forces struggle to contain dissent. Israeli analysts argue that the scale and persistence of the unrest have disrupted command cohesion and diverted regime resources inward.
Economic indicators further reinforce this picture. Inflation is estimated to be approaching 60 percent, while the Iranian rial continues to lose value, eroding purchasing power and public confidence. Israeli officials say these conditions have weakened the regime’s traditional mechanisms of control and reduced its tolerance for prolonged external confrontation.
From a military perspective, Israel assesses that its June 2025 strikes destroyed between 35 and 45 percent of Iran’s ballistic missile stockpile, along with significant elements of its air defense network. While Iran has begun recovery efforts, Israeli planners believe those systems have not yet been fully restored.
Missile Program Moves to the Forefront
Israeli officials stress that the strategic focus has shifted. In their view, Iran’s missile capabilities now represent a more immediate danger than its nuclear timeline alone. Intelligence briefings shared with U.S. counterparts reportedly detail Iranian attempts to rebuild surface-to-surface missile launchers, production facilities, and associated command systems.
Israeli strategists argue that acting before Iran completes these efforts could significantly limit Tehran’s ability to project power or deter future operations. They contend that delay would allow Iran to harden facilities, disperse assets, and restore defensive layers, raising the cost and complexity of any future strike.
Washington and Jerusalem Diverge
The Israeli request has highlighted a growing policy divergence between Jerusalem and Washington. The United States has reinforced its regional posture, including the deployment of the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group to the Persian Gulf, which U.S. officials describe as a deterrent measure designed to protect U.S. forces and international shipping.
President Trump has repeatedly stated that he believes Tehran remains interested in a negotiated outcome, pointing to mediation efforts involving Turkey, Egypt, and Qatar. He has characterized these efforts as part of a broader attempt to achieve a comprehensive arrangement addressing Iran’s nuclear and missile activities.
Israel remains unconvinced. The office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has described recent diplomatic initiatives as insufficient, arguing that Iran is unlikely to comply with any agreement that requires the full dismantling of its missile program. Israeli officials emphasize preemption as a strategic necessity, while U.S. officials continue to prioritize leveraged negotiation.
Potential Targets and Regional Risks
If the United States were to grant the requested assurances, Israeli defense officials say potential operations would likely focus on several categories of targets. These include missile reconstitution sites, where Iran is attempting to restore launchers and production capacity; hardened nuclear facilities, including underground complexes such as Pickaxe Mountain and Taleghan-2; and command-and-control centers linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, including the Thar-Allah Headquarters in Tehran.
Iranian officials have warned that any such strikes would provoke a regional response, threatening U.S. bases and commercial shipping in the Gulf. Israeli defense officials acknowledge the risks but argue that inaction during a period of pronounced Iranian vulnerability could allow Tehran to recover and re-establish deterrence.
For now, Washington has not publicly indicated whether it will grant Israel the operational assurances it seeks. The outcome of these discussions is expected to shape the next phase of U.S.-Israel coordination on Iran, at a moment when diplomatic efforts, military preparations, and internal instability inside Iran are unfolding simultaneously.
——— End of Article ———
