World
In November 2025, China officially commissioned the Fujian (Type 003) — its first catapult-equipped supercarrier, signaling the most serious challenge yet to U.S. naval dominance. This move comes as the U.S. Navy’s USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), the world’s most advanced nuclear-powered carrier, continues its global operations. Both ships represent their nations’ peak achievements in naval engineering — yet they are built on vastly different doctrines. The Ford is designed for global power projection and nuclear endurance, while the Fujian is a regional strike platform meant to dominate the Western Pacific and South China Sea. Below is a deep, technical, and strategic comparison of the two — covering propulsion, sensors, aircraft, catapult systems, automation, and strategic value. General Design and Dimensions Specification USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) Fujian (Type 003) Country United States China Commissioned 22 July 2017 5 November 2025 (reported) Shipyard Newport News Shipbuilding, Virginia Jiangnan Shipyard, Shanghai Displacement (full load) ~100,000 long tons (~112,000 tons) Estimated 80,000–85,000 tons Length 1,106 ft (337 m) ~1,050 ft (316 m, estimated) Beam (Flight Deck Width) 256 ft (78 m) ~246 ft (78 m, estimated) Draft 41 ft (12.5 m) ~36 ft (11 m, estimated) Hull Material High-tensile steel with layered armor Steel with radar-reducing superstructure Island Design Reduced radar cross-section, smaller island More compact island, farther aft (for deck efficiency) Verdict: The Ford is larger and heavier, offering greater hangar space and aviation fuel capacity. Fujian, while slightly smaller, is comparable in deck area — a feat for China’s first indigenous supercarrier. Propulsion and Power Systems Feature Ford Fujian Type Nuclear Conventional Reactor / Engine Type 2 × A1B nuclear reactors, 4 shafts Conventional steam turbines (possibly gas-steam hybrid), 8 boilers (speculated) Power Output ~700 MW total electrical power ~150–200 MW estimated electrical output Speed 30+ knots 30 knots (estimated) Range Unlimited (nuclear) ~10,000–12,000 nautical miles (before refueling) Endurance 25+ years before reactor refueling Limited by fuel logistics (~45–60 days without replenishment) Verdict: Nuclear propulsion gives the Ford unmatched endurance and power for energy-intensive systems (EMALS, radars, directed-energy weapons). Fujian’s conventional plant limits its operational range, tying it closer to home waters and supply lines. Launch and Recovery Systems System Ford Fujian Launch System EMALS (Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System) — 4 catapults Electromagnetic Catapult System (Type-003 EM system) — 3 catapults Arresting Gear Advanced Arresting Gear (AAG) PLAN Electro-hydraulic Arresting Gear Launch Rate ~160 sorties/day nominal; 270 in surge Estimated 120–150 sorties/day (early projections) Launch Energy Control Fly-by-wire digital modulation Similar concept using power storage banks (MVDC) Launch Compatibility Supports F-35C, UAVs, AEW aircraft Supports J-15T, J-35, KJ-600, drones (future UCAVs) Verdict: Both carriers use electromagnetic catapults — a rare technological parity. The Ford’s EMALS is combat-proven; Fujian’s version is new and untested but reflects major progress in Chinese naval engineering. Aircraft Capacity and Composition Category Ford Fujian Aircraft Capacity 75–90 aircraft 60–70 aircraft Fighter Aircraft F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, F-35C Lightning II J-15T (Flanker-based), J-35 (stealth fighter) AEW Aircraft E-2D Advanced Hawkeye KJ-600 (AEW&C aircraft) Electronic Warfare (EW) EA-18G Growler J-15DT EW variant (planned) UAV Integration MQ-25 Stingray (tanker), MQ-9 naval variant GJ-11 Sharp Sword (stealth UCAV, test phase) Helicopters MH-60R/S Seahawk Z-20 and Z-18 ASW/utility Sortie Rate ~160–270 per day 120–150 per day (estimated) Deck Elevators 3 advanced electromagnetic elevators 2 traditional elevators Verdict: The Ford’s air wing is larger, more diverse, and fully fifth-generation integrated. Fujian’s air wing is smaller but introduces new AEW and stealth fighters — transforming China’s naval aviation. Sensors, Radar, and Combat Systems System Ford Fujian Primary Radar Dual Band Radar (DBR): X- and S-band AESA arrays Type 346B AESA (same family as on Type-055 destroyers) Combat System Aegis-like Ship Self-Defense System (SSDS) Mk2 PLAN Integrated Combat System (ICS, based on Type-055 network) Data Links Link 16, CEC, NIFC-CA Beidou-based network, datalink with Type-055s & AEW aircraft Electronic Warfare Suite AN/SLQ-32(V)7 SEWIP Indigenous ECM/ECCM suite, details classified Self-Defense Missiles ESSM, RIM-116 RAM, Phalanx CIWS HQ-10 SAMs, Type 1130 CIWS Decoys / Jammers Nulka, SRBOC, SLQ-32 Chaff/flare dispensers, electronic jammers Verdict: The Ford has a broader, more integrated C4ISR network and proven radar systems. Fujian’s sensors rival top-tier destroyers, but full fleet data integration remains under development. Crew, Automation, and Maintenance Feature Ford Fujian Crew (ship + air wing) ~4,500 ~2,500–2,800 (estimated) Automation Level Highly automated — 25% reduction in manpower vs Nimitz Moderate automation, less advanced software control Weapons Elevators 11 advanced electromagnetic elevators 8 hydraulic elevators (estimated) Maintenance Intervals 12 years between major overhauls Regular drydock after 5–7 years (fuel-dependent) Verdict: Ford’s automation cuts crew size and boosts efficiency. Fujian’s systems are more conventional, but China has made major strides in maintenance design. Strategic Role and Doctrine Strategic Focus Ford Fujian Operational Range Global — Atlantic, Pacific, Indian Oceans Regional — South China Sea, Taiwan Strait, Indian Ocean Power Projection Blue-water dominance and deterrence Regional sea control and anti-access area denial (A2/AD) Carrier Strike Group Support 1 cruiser + 2–3 destroyers + submarines + supply ships 1–2 Type-055 cruisers + 2–3 Type-052D destroyers + logistics ships Allied Infrastructure Global (NATO, Indo-Pacific, CENTCOM bases) Regional (Djibouti, Gwadar, and home ports) Doctrinal Purpose Global response, deterrence, crisis management Strategic deterrence, Taiwan contingency, regional control Verdict: The Ford is designed to project power worldwide; Fujian is built to dominate Asia’s maritime periphery. Network Warfare and Future Integration Ford integrates with F-35C’s sensor fusion, E-2D Hawkeye’s networked battlespace management, and U.S. satellites, forming the backbone of NIFC-CA (Naval Integrated Fire Control - Counter Air) — allowing cross-domain target sharing between ships, aircraft, and land units. Fujian will link with KJ-600 AEW aircraft, Type-055 cruisers, and China’s Beidou navigation satellites, forming the PLAN’s first carrier-centric battle network. Integration remains under development, but China is rapidly improving its C4ISR architecture. Strategic Implications For the United States: The Ford symbolizes unrivaled global reach — able to sustain combat operations thousands of miles from home, support expeditionary forces, and deploy carrier strike groups on demand. Its nuclear endurance, automated systems, and combat-proven fleet structure keep the U.S. far ahead in operational readiness. For China: The Fujian marks China’s arrival as a true blue-water navy. Its CATOBAR system enables modern carrier aviation — a critical step toward competing with Western navies. While it cannot match Ford’s global endurance, it makes China regionally dominant across Asia-Pacific waters. With Fujian, the PLAN can now project power beyond the first island chain, maintain persistent air coverage, and challenge U.S. naval supremacy near its maritime frontiers. Strengths and Weaknesses Aspect Ford Advantage Fujian Advantage Propulsion Nuclear, unlimited endurance Simpler maintenance, lower cost Aircraft Capacity 75–90 aircraft New stealth fighters (J-35) and AEW capability Sortie Generation Highest in the world (160–270/day) Still developing but revolutionary for China Sensors / Network Global combat integration (CEC, Link 16) Integrated with regional PLAN assets Strategic Range Global blue-water Regional A2/AD environment Combat Experience 80 years of carrier doctrine Rapidly improving, still learning Cost $13 billion (CVN-78) Estimated $8–9 billion (Fujian) Conclusion The USS Gerald R. Ford remains the benchmark for carrier dominance — unmatched in endurance, combat integration, and global reach. Its nuclear propulsion, automated systems, and fifth-generation air wing keep it far ahead in sustained power projection. However, China’s Fujian is a technological milestone. It elevates the PLAN from a regional force to a near-peer navy capable of operating CATOBAR carriers, electromagnetic launch systems, and stealth air wings. While Fujian cannot yet equal the Ford in endurance or experience, its emergence closes the capability gap faster than many predicted.Together, these carriers represent a new era of competition: Ford — the standard of global dominance.Fujian — the symbol of China’s rise as a maritime power. Both will define 21st-century naval warfare — not through size alone, but through technology, integration, and strategy.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 18:01:20
World
In a statement released on November 8, 2025, in Kabul, the spokesman of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA), Zabihullah Mujahid, accused elements within the Pakistan Armed Forces of pursuing “anti-Afghanistan policies” and fomenting tensions through “manufactured pretexts.” The remarks were issued under the title “Remarks by the Spokesperson of the Islamic Emirate Concerning Recent Developments and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP)”.In his post on X (formerly Twitter), Mujahid contended that certain Pakistani military factions view a strong, stable Afghanistan as contrary to their interests: “Unfortunately, certain military elements in Pakistan appear to perceive a strong central government in Afghanistan, along with stability, security, and development, as contrary to their interests.” He added that these elements had, for years, exploited Afghanistan's instability, conflicts, and displacement — and now seem intent on creating fresh tensions. Historical Context and the TTP Mujahid’s statement sought to push back against assertions linking the Taliban’s return to power in 2021 with the resurgence of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). He argued that both “insecurity in Pakistan” and the emergence of the TTP stretched back to 2002 — as a consequence of misguided Pakistani military policies, including alignment with the U.S., drone strikes in Waziristan, and the alienation of local populations. He referenced a sequence of Pakistani military operations — including Operation Al-Mizan, Operation Rah-e-Rast, Operation Sher Dil, Operation Nijat, Operation Koh-e-Safid, and Operation Zarb-e-Azb — pointing out how these operations had led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of civilians and resulted in casualties of 80,000-90,000 military personnel and civilians, based on Islamabad’s own figures. By framing it this way, Mujahid aimed to portray the current faults as home-grown to Pakistan’s internal security and policy failures — rather than as consequences of Afghanistan’s change in governance. Afghanistan’s Stance on Sovereignty and Refugees The Afghan statement emphasised that the Islamic Emirate has taken steps since 2021 to uphold regional stability. These steps include: Facilitating dialogue among tribal, political, and religious figures. Relocating tribal refugees away from the contentious Durand Line border region, and banning weapon possession among refugee populations. Issuing religious edicts (fatwas) forbidding individuals to engage in foreign jihad operations without authorisation. Offering to facilitate the safe return of refugees to their homes, while insisting it will not allow Afghan territory to be used for interference in another country’s affairs. Mujahid stressed: “The Islamic Emirate warmly welcomes any efforts and measures that enable these refugees to safely return to their homes. At the same time … the Islamic Emirate continues to consider itself responsible for ensuring that no one uses its territory to interfere in the affairs of another country, and it will take necessary steps to prevent such actions, God-willing.” Breakdown of Talks & Rising Tensions The statement comes on the heels of a deadlock in talks between Afghanistan and Pakistan held in Istanbul on 6-7 November 2025, mediated by Turkey and Qatar. Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Asif announced there were “no plans for a fourth round” of negotiations. Key points from this phase: The Afghan delegation said they participated “in good faith and with appropriate authority,” expecting Pakistan to engage seriously and constructively. The IEA accused Pakistan of trying to shift responsibility for security entirely onto Kabul while refusing to assume any of its own. Afghanistan’s Minister for Tribes, Borders & Tribal Affairs, Noorullah Noori, warned Pakistani officials “not to test the patience of Afghans,” cautioning against over-confidence in technology and noting that “both the elders and youth of Afghanistan will rise to fight” if challenged. Implications: What’s at Stake Regional Stability:The two neighbours share a long and disputed border along the Durand Line. With mutual accusations escalating, the risk of military confrontation or cross-border escalation looms large. Afghanistan’s reaffirmation of its duty to defend its land and citizenry signals its readiness to respond to any external aggression. TTP and Cross-Border Militancy:Pakistan maintains that the TTP — a militant group based in Pakistan’s tribal areas and aligned with the Afghan Taliban — uses Afghan territory as a sanctuary. Kabul counters that the TTP issue predates the Taliban’s takeover and is Pakistan’s internal security problem. The disagreement here remains a major stumbling block to any lasting peace. Refugees and Humanitarian Dimension:The displacement of tribal populations due to past Pakistani military operations continues to influence border dynamics, local allegiances, and security on both sides. Afghanistan emphasises its willingness to see refugee returns, but hints at responses if its territory is misused. Diplomatic Channels vs. Blame Game:The breakdown of Istanbul talks indicates a shift from negotiation to hardened rhetoric. Unless either side softens its stance, there is a danger of a protracted stalemate or further confrontation. The Afghan side emphasised its desire to cooperate “within limits” of its capabilities and responsibilities. Concluding Thoughts The statement by Zabihullah Mujahid marks a clear escalation in messaging by the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan — a direct rejection of Pakistani claims, a reassertion of Afghan sovereignty, and a warning against interference. By placing blame on specific “elements within the Pakistani military,” Kabul signals that the issue lies not with Islamabad’s civilian leadership, but with its security establishment that, in Afghanistan’s view, benefits from persistent instability. In the immediate term, this rhetorical standoff risks hardening attitudes on both sides of the Durand Line, threatening border security and regional cooperation. For Pakistan, the challenge is to contain the TTP insurgency and demonstrate good faith diplomacy. For Afghanistan, the task is to balance international legitimacy with national pride and sovereignty. How this evolving confrontation unfolds will significantly shape South Asia’s security calculus, testing both countries’ ability to prevent historical grievances from igniting a new front of conflict.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 17:31:53
World
For years, scientists have dreamed of building particle beam weapons — devices that can fire streams of tiny particles at almost the speed of light. These beams could hit enemy satellites or missiles with such energy that they melt or disable them instantly. But there has always been one big problem: power. To work, a particle beam weapon needs two things at the same time — massive energy and perfect timing. The particles have to be pushed and accelerated by strong electromagnetic fields, and these fields must turn on and off at exactly the right moments — within millionths or even billionths of a second. If the timing is even slightly off, the beam loses focus and becomes useless. The problem is, powerful systems are usually slow to control, while precise systems can’t handle huge energy bursts. Scientists have spent decades trying to make both happen together — without success. Now, a group of Chinese engineers say they have solved this puzzle. A Major Breakthrough by Chinese Scientists According to a study published in Advanced Small Satellite Technology, a research team led by Su Zhenhua at DFH Satellite Co., Ltd. (China’s biggest satellite builder) has built a new power system that can do both — deliver very high energy and keep super-accurate timing. In ground tests, their device produced 2.6 megawatts (MW) of pulsed power — that’s roughly the energy needed to power over 2,000 homes — while keeping its timing accurate to just 0.63 microseconds (a little more than half a millionth of a second). By comparison, older systems usually had less than 1 MW of power and timing errors that were thousands of times worse. The team said this new system could be useful for things like particle beam weapons, electronic warfare simulators, and advanced radar systems, which all need short, powerful, and precisely controlled bursts of energy. How It Works Instead of relying on one special part, the engineers redesigned the entire power system from top to bottom. Solar panels provide the base electricity, just like on normal satellites. A special converter boosts the low-voltage solar power into very high voltage — like pumping water up into a tank to store it at high pressure. This energy is stored in a bank of capacitors (devices that can release power very quickly). When triggered, these capacitors discharge the energy through a system that keeps the current steady and smooth. To make sure everything fires at exactly the same time, the system uses a central control chip — known as an FPGA — that synchronizes 36 separate modules so they all release their energy within 630 nanoseconds (less than a microsecond) of each other. The result is a powerful, clean energy pulse that could be used for lasers, particle accelerators, or high-energy space equipment. Why This Matters This breakthrough could open the door to new kinds of space-based directed energy weapons — devices that attack using electricity instead of explosives. Right now, space defense relies heavily on missiles, which are expensive and single-use. But a satellite that fires beams or pulses powered by sunlight could attack multiple targets quickly and cheaply. Such systems could disable or damage satellites without creating dangerous space debris — making them a silent but powerful tool in future space conflicts. However, the same technology could also have peaceful uses. Peaceful Applications The Chinese researchers said their pulsed power system can help in many non-military areas: Ion thrusters for faster and more efficient space travel. Laser communication systems for high-speed data links between satellites. Lidar and radar systems for better Earth observation and weather monitoring. Microwave systems that can map or sense the Earth’s surface in detail. So, while the technology could power weapons, it could also be key to the next generation of scientific and civilian satellites. Challenges Experts say this is an impressive step, but turning it into a real space system won’t be easy. Space is an extreme environment — it’s freezing cold, has no air for cooling, and is full of harmful radiation. Electronics that work on Earth often fail in orbit. Also, managing heat is a huge challenge. A satellite that releases megawatts of power must somehow get rid of all the waste heat, or it will overheat and fail. And even if such a system works in space, using it as a weapon raises tough questions — both technical and political. Would it really be powerful enough to damage hardened satellites? How would other countries respond if such a satellite appeared in orbit? These are issues that go beyond engineering. A Glimpse Into the Future Still, this new technology marks a major leap in space power systems. For the first time, scientists have shown that it might be possible to deliver huge power with incredible precision in a satellite-sized device. If proven in orbit, this could transform everything from space travel to defense, creating systems that use pure energy to move, communicate, or even fight. For now, it remains a laboratory success — but one that could shape the next chapter in the race for space dominance. Because in the coming decades, energy and timing, not just rockets and missiles, may decide who controls the final frontier.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 16:11:07
World
Germany is reportedly preparing a major defence proposal to supply Greece with over 400 infantry fighting vehicles (IFVs), marking one of the largest European land systems offers in recent years. The package, valued at more than €2 billion, includes a mix of new-generation KF41 Lynx IFVs and refurbished Marder 1A3 vehicles, along with extensive local industry participation and long-term financing options. A Two-Tier Armoured Vehicle Package According to sources in Athens and Berlin, the offer comprises 205 new KF41 Lynx vehicles built by Rheinmetall and 200 Marder 1A3 IFVs from the surplus stocks of the German Army (Bundeswehr). The Marder units would undergo comprehensive refurbishment before delivery to ensure combat readiness and standardisation with Greek operational requirements. The proposal will soon be formally presented to Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and Defence Minister Nikos Dendias, as part of ongoing efforts to modernise the Hellenic Army’s armoured fleet amid increasing regional security challenges. Germany’s package is designed as a “strategic partnership offer” — combining new-generation equipment, technology transfer, and industrial cooperation — reflecting Berlin’s intent to strengthen its defence ties with Athens while supporting European defence autonomy. Industrial Partnership and Local Production A defining element of the proposal is the industrial participation clause, which is expected to exceed 25% of the total programme value. Greek companies will be involved in vehicle assembly, component production, armour systems, and maintenance support. The primary Greek partner in this endeavour would be EODH S.A., a company already working closely with Rheinmetall in armour protection technologies. EODH is anticipated to play a central role in the integration, testing, and logistical support phases of both the Lynx and Marder vehicles, ensuring that a significant portion of the work remains within Greece. Other domestic defence firms could also benefit from subcontracts for electronic systems, optics, and communication suites, potentially revitalising segments of Greece’s struggling defence industrial base. Financing and Strategic Benefits To make the offer more attractive, Germany is reportedly including favourable financing terms, with long repayment periods and potential government-backed credit guarantees. Such arrangements are designed to ease the budgetary burden on Greece’s defence ministry while enabling faster procurement of urgently needed assets. For Berlin, the deal not only opens a new export opportunity but also reinforces political and defence cooperation with Athens, especially as both countries share interests in stability in the Eastern Mediterranean and EU-NATO defence integration. Greece’s Armoured Modernisation Context The proposal arrives as Greece continues a broad modernisation of its ground forces. The Hellenic Army currently operates 40 Marder 1A3s, which were transferred from Germany in 2022 as part of an exchange — Athens sent its older BMP-1 IFVs to Ukraine in return. The Marder 1A3, while an older platform, offers solid reliability and remains a capable vehicle for mechanised infantry operations. However, the addition of the KF41 Lynx would represent a leap in capability. The Lynx, one of the world’s most advanced infantry fighting vehicles, features a modular architecture, digital battlefield integration, enhanced survivability, and the ability to mount various weapons from 30mm cannons to anti-tank missiles. It can carry eight soldiers and boasts modern protection systems suitable for NATO-standard operations. Tanks Modernisation: The Leopard Path Ahead Parallel to the IFV proposal, Germany has also offered Greece cooperation on main battle tank upgrades. Both Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (KMW) and Rheinmetall are vying for the contract to modernise Greece’s large Leopard 1A5 and Leopard 2A4 fleets. The upgrade options vary widely: A basic modernisation of the 183 Leopard 2A4s — involving new fire control, sensors, and armour improvements — is estimated at €700 million. A full upgrade to the Leopard 2A7 HEL standard, similar to those operated by Germany and Qatar, could cost up to €1.5 billion. Greece is currently evaluating the cost-benefit ratio of these options, balancing between comprehensive upgrades and maintaining operational readiness across its entire fleet. Strategic Implications If accepted, the German proposal could significantly enhance Greece’s armoured warfare capabilities, enabling the Hellenic Army to phase out ageing Soviet-origin platforms and standardise with NATO systems. For Germany, the deal represents a continuation of its strategy to deepen defence-industrial partnerships within Europe — mirroring similar KF41 Lynx production collaborations in Hungary and Australia. The project would also strengthen Greece’s defence autonomy, boost its domestic manufacturing sector, and solidify its position as a key NATO ally on Europe’s southeastern flank. While negotiations are still at an early stage, the political and industrial signals suggest that both Athens and Berlin are interested in reaching a comprehensive defence agreement. With Greece’s focus on modernising its army after decades of constrained budgets, and Germany’s push to expand its defence exports within Europe, this deal could mark a turning point in bilateral defence cooperation. If finalised, the acquisition of KF41 Lynx and Marder 1A3 vehicles — alongside the potential Leopard tank upgrades — would form the backbone of Greece’s next-generation land combat capability for decades to come.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 15:58:02
World
Germany is moving quickly to modernize its military. The Bundestag’s Budget Committee has approved 14 new defense projects for the Bundeswehr, covering everything from new weapons and digital systems to better medical and communication tools. These projects will be funded through Germany’s special defense fund and future national budgets, as part of the country’s effort to make its armed forces stronger and more modern. New Anti-Drone Missile for Skyranger 30 One of the most important new projects is the development of a Small Anti-Drone Missile for the Skyranger 30 air defense system. This missile will help German forces destroy small and very small drones, which are becoming a big threat on modern battlefields. The Skyranger 30, made by Rheinmetall, already uses a 30mm cannon and advanced sensors to track and shoot aerial targets. By adding the new guided missile, the system will be able to stop small drones that traditional weapons struggle to hit. The German Defence Ministry said, “With the Small Anti-Drone Missile in combination with a 30mm cannon, the Skyranger 30 can counter small and very small drones.” This will be the Bundeswehr’s first armored system able to stop drones directly on the frontlines. The Skyranger 30 might also become part of the European Sky Shield Initiative, which aims to build a shared air defense network across Europe. New P13 Pistol to Replace the Old P8 The committee also approved a new P13 pistol to replace the old P8, which has been in service for over two decades. The P13 will have a better design, improved safety features, and will be easier to handle and maintain. According to the Defence Ministry, the new pistol will fix the “technical and ergonomic problems” found in the P8 and will give soldiers a modern, reliable sidearm for self-defense and close-combat situations. Better Medical Transport on Military Planes Germany also plans to improve how it moves injured soldiers. The Bundeswehr will get modular patient transport kits that can be installed in A400M and C-130J transport planes. These kits will allow quick conversion of cargo aircraft into medical evacuation planes (MEDEVAC) when needed. The kits are expected to be ready by 2029 and will help the military respond faster in both combat and humanitarian operations. Upgrades for Navy Ships The German Navy will also receive upgrades. The committee approved plans to modernize the Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) launchers on naval ships and buy new RAM Block 2B missiles. These newer missiles can detect and destroy fast, low-flying threats, such as anti-ship or cruise missiles. The deliveries will begin between 2030 and 2032, helping ensure that German warships stay protected for many years. Digitalisation and Communication Germany is also investing in making its military more digital. The committee extended its contract with BWI GmbH, the IT service provider for the Bundeswehr. This will continue support for the “Digitalisation of Land-Based Operations” project — a key step toward modern, networked military systems. With BWI’s help, the Bundeswehr will upgrade its communication systems, battlefield networks, and sensor integration, ensuring better coordination during operations. The funding also includes new portable radios, thermal sights for G36 rifles and MG4 machine guns, and secure SINA-based networking systems for classified communications. Improving Field Support and Safety Apart from combat equipment, the Bundeswehr will also get several practical improvements: Mobile field kitchens that can be set up quickly during missions. Fire protection containers to increase safety in field bases. A new standard maritime command and weapon deployment system, developed with Canadian partners, to unify naval control systems. Heinrich Hertz Satellite: Secure Military Communications In space, Germany is boosting its secure communications. The German Aerospace Centre (DLR) has signed a contract to operate the Heinrich Hertz satellite, which will include a military component. This satellite will help the Bundeswehr with secure, high-speed communication and will also support joint efforts with the Ministry of Research, Technology, and Space. It is expected to play an important role in improving strategic communication for Germany and NATO missions. A Step Forward for the Bundeswehr These 14 projects show that Germany is serious about modernizing its armed forces after years of underinvestment. The new anti-drone systems, updated naval defenses, modern weapons, and digital upgrades are designed to make the Bundeswehr more efficient, connected, and ready for today’s threats. In simple terms, Germany is preparing its military for the future of warfare — one that depends on technology, speed, and smart defense systems. As Europe faces new challenges, these investments show that Germany is determined to build a stronger, more capable defense force for itself and its NATO allies.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 15:37:39
India
India has taken a major stride in the race for next-generation cybersecurity with QNu Labs, a Bengaluru-based deep-tech startup, unveiling the world’s first end-to-end quantum-safe drone communication platform. The indigenous system represents a breakthrough in secure unmanned operations, offering unprecedented protection for both defense and industrial UAVs. This innovation is not just a milestone for India’s defense and tech ecosystem — it’s a global first that positions the country at the forefront of quantum-secure communications. Quantum-Safe Architecture for the Drone Era The newly launched platform integrates post-quantum encryption, a hardware root-of-trust, and high-speed data protection to ensure mission-critical communication security between drones and their control stations. Developed entirely in India, the system prevents data theft, command spoofing, and signal interference — challenges that have long threatened UAV operations in contested or high-stakes environments. QNu Labs’ drone security solution uses Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Quantum Random Number Generation (QRNG), technologies that rely on the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics rather than mathematical complexity. This ensures that encryption keys can’t be decoded — even by future quantum computers capable of breaking today’s strongest cryptographic algorithms. The Core Technology: Quantum Security in Motion The platform functions as a quantum-secure communication layer, seamlessly integrating into existing UAV systems. Every signal, from telemetry to video feeds, is encrypted using keys generated from true quantum randomness — not software-based pseudo-random algorithms. Key Components: Quantum Key Distribution (QKD): Exchanges encryption keys via quantum states of light. Any interception instantly alters these states, alerting the system. Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG): Produces completely unpredictable random numbers, ensuring uncrackable encryption keys. Post-Quantum Encryption Layer: Provides resistance to decryption attempts by future quantum computers. Hardware Root-of-Trust: Ensures that the encryption process begins from a secure, tamper-proof hardware foundation. This layered approach creates a tamper-proof, unhackable communication network between drones and operators, protecting against cyberattacks, spoofing, or unauthorized command takeover. Defense and Industrial Use-Cases In defense operations, drones are vital for reconnaissance, surveillance, and electronic warfare — all of which demand absolute communication integrity. Traditional encryption is increasingly vulnerable to both advanced hacking and future quantum decryption. QNu Labs’ system guarantees that even if intercepted, the transmitted data remains undecipherable. For industrial applications, such as oil and gas pipeline monitoring, infrastructure inspection, and logistics delivery, the quantum-safe layer ensures secure and authenticated communication, protecting corporate and operational data in real time. By ensuring data confidentiality, authenticity, and integrity, this platform enhances not only security but also mission reliability, especially in long-range or beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations. Part of India’s National Quantum Mission This breakthrough isn’t isolated — it’s part of QNu Labs’ larger effort under the National Quantum Mission (NQM) to establish a robust, quantum-safe communication ecosystem across India. Recently, the company achieved another major milestone by launching a 500 km quantum-safe intercity communication network, connecting critical nodes with QKD-secured fiber infrastructure. This network lays the groundwork for a future where quantum encryption secures everything from government networks to critical infrastructure and defense systems. The National Quantum Mission, announced by the Indian government, aims to place India among the world’s top quantum research and innovation hubs by supporting startups, academia, and industry collaboration. QNu Labs’ achievement is a prime example of how this mission is translating into real-world applications with strategic importance. Advantages of QNu’s Quantum-Safe Platform Unbreakable Security: Quantum encryption ensures absolute protection against current and future cyber threats, including those from quantum computers. Real-Time Tamper Detection: Any interception attempt is instantly identified, maintaining communication integrity. Hardware-Level Trust: Built-in hardware root-of-trust ensures that security starts at the chip level. Ultra-Fast Encryption: High-speed data protection supports real-time HD video, telemetry, and command control without latency. Scalable and Interoperable: Can integrate seamlessly with existing UAV command and control architectures, both military and civilian. Strategic Significance for India By developing a fully indigenous, quantum-safe communication platform, QNu Labs enhances India’s strategic independence in defense and aerospace technology. It reduces reliance on imported cryptographic solutions and mitigates risks of foreign surveillance or backdoor vulnerabilities. This breakthrough aligns with India’s “Atmanirbhar Bharat” (Self-Reliant India) initiative and strengthens the quantum technology pillar of the country’s defense modernization programs. As defense agencies like DRDO, BEL, and private drone manufacturers increasingly seek secure communication systems, QNu Labs’ innovation could become a cornerstone for quantum-secure defense networks and future UAV command infrastructure. About QNu Labs: India’s Quantum Pioneers Founded in 2016, QNu Labs has established itself as a leader in quantum cryptography and post-quantum cybersecurity. Its product line includes: Armos – Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) system Tropos – Quantum Random Number Generator (QRNG) Hodos – Quantum Secure Communication platform With its latest addition — the Quantum-Safe Drone Communication Platform — QNu Labs expands its footprint from terrestrial to aerial applications, bringing quantum security to the skies. As quantum computing accelerates globally, the threat it poses to conventional encryption grows. QNu Labs’ platform anticipates that future, creating an operationally viable, field-ready solution that can defend India’s aerial assets against the cybersecurity challenges of the quantum age. From military UAVs and industrial fleets to critical national communication networks, this development signals the dawn of a new era — one where quantum-safe technologies protect India’s digital and strategic sovereignty. In the years ahead, as India continues to expand its quantum ecosystem, QNu Labs’ innovation could become the benchmark for secure, intelligent, and resilient communication systems — ensuring that the nation’s drones fly not just higher, but safer.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 14:55:35
World
Iran has once again drawn the world’s attention — this time not through rhetoric or regional posturing, but through a dramatic leap in missile capability. Officials in Tehran have claimed that a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), boasting a range of up to 10,000 kilometers, is nearing operational readiness. If confirmed, the development would mark a seismic shift in the balance of power — one that extends Iran’s reach far beyond the Middle East. A Leap From Regional Power to Global Reach For decades, Iran’s missile program was seen as a regional deterrent, designed to hold U.S. bases, Israel, and Gulf nations at risk. Systems such as the Sejjil, Khorramshahr, and Emad provided Iran with ranges between 2,000 and 3,000 km — enough to strike targets across the Middle East and parts of southern Europe. But the latest claims change everything. A 10,000 km-class missile would allow Iran to reach London, Paris, Berlin, and even New York or Washington D.C., placing the U.S. mainland in potential range for the first time. Iranian state media, quoting defense sources, suggested that the new missile has completed a “series of successful tests” involving advanced composite materials and high-efficiency liquid fuel engines. Some analysts believe this refers to an evolved variant of the Khorramshahr-4, known for its storable liquid propellant and compact design. Technical Clues and Strategic Intent While Iran has not officially revealed images or the name of the missile, early reports describe a two-stage system, possibly incorporating lightweight carbon fiber structures to reduce mass and extend range. Western intelligence agencies are skeptical but acknowledge that Iran’s advances in propulsion and guidance systems — demonstrated through its space launch vehicles like Simorgh and Qaem-100 — could form the technological basis for an ICBM. Experts point out that the Qaem-100’s solid-fuel engine, capable of lifting payloads into low Earth orbit, could easily be adapted for long-range ballistic purposes. “Iran’s space and missile programs have always been intertwined,” notes a European defense analyst. “What they learn from putting satellites into orbit can be used to send warheads across continents.” Beyond Bases: Tehran’s Expanding Doctrine Until now, Iran’s deterrence strategy was built on retaliating against regional adversaries — Israel, U.S. bases in the Gulf, and coalition forces in Iraq or Syria. But the tone in recent statements suggests a broader intent. In a televised address, an Iranian defense official said, “Those who think they are safe across the ocean should think again. Deterrence has no geography.” Such remarks hint that Tehran may now be aiming for a global deterrent posture — one designed to dissuade the U.S. from direct military confrontation, particularly amid heightened tensions in the Red Sea, Lebanon, and the Strait of Hormuz. International Reaction: Caution Turns to Alarm The United States has yet to confirm the claim, but Pentagon sources reportedly view the development as a “credible trajectory” rather than mere propaganda. NATO officials have also expressed concern, warning that such a system would “fundamentally alter Europe’s threat landscape.” Israel, meanwhile, has remained characteristically silent but is believed to be monitoring Iran’s missile facilities closely, including Semnan and Imam Khomeini Spaceport, where long-range rocket testing is suspected to take place. Russia and China, while maintaining ties with Tehran, are unlikely to endorse an openly deployed Iranian ICBM, which could complicate their own global arms control narratives. The Bigger Picture: A New Chapter in Missile Proliferation If Iran successfully fields a 10,000 km missile, it would join an elite club of nations — the U.S., Russia, China, North Korea, and India — capable of striking intercontinental targets. Such a leap would not only threaten adversaries but also reshape global non-proliferation efforts, already strained by North Korea’s rapid advancements. Some experts suspect Iran may have conducted covert engine testing using North Korean technology, a cooperation long rumored but never proven. Others point to indigenous development, given Iran’s recent record of complex aerospace achievements despite decades of sanctions. Whether this ICBM truly exists or is part of a strategic psychological campaign, one thing is clear — Tehran wants the world to believe it now has global reach. That perception alone could alter diplomatic equations, military planning, and deterrence postures across continents. If Iran indeed moves forward with deployment, the world may soon enter an unfamiliar reality:a Middle Eastern power capable of striking targets an ocean away. And that possibility — even before the first launch — might be exactly what Tehran wants.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 14:37:47
World
In a move that could reshape Europe’s role in the global drone industry, Italy’s Leonardo has announced detailed plans to co-produce Baykar’s full range of unmanned aircraft — including the TB2, TB3, Akinci, and the jet-powered Kizilelma — under a new joint venture named LBA Systems. Unveiled during Leonardo’s 3Q/9M 2025 Results Presentation on 5 November 2025, the partnership represents a significant leap from maintenance and licensing deals toward full-scale manufacturing and systems integration. It effectively establishes Italy as the first European Union hub for mass production of Baykar’s battle-proven UAVs, with a focus on European certification standards, indigenous sensors, and advanced weapon integration. Building a European UAV Hub The LBA Systems venture is designed to set up final assembly lines in Italy, where Leonardo will integrate local avionics, communication systems, and mission payloads into Baykar airframes. Production will cover a wide range of platforms: Bayraktar TB2 – the combat-proven medium-altitude tactical UAV that gained global attention in Ukraine and the Caucasus. Bayraktar TB3 – a navalized version capable of short takeoff and landing, optimized for carrier operations. Akinci – a high-altitude, long-endurance UAV capable of carrying cruise missiles and advanced sensor pods. Kizilelma – Baykar’s latest jet-powered stealth UCAV, capable of supersonic flight and autonomous operations. Leonardo’s industrial contribution will include electro-optical payloads, radar systems, and weapon integration — ensuring that each variant meets EU airworthiness and export compliance standards. Strategic Significance for Europe The collaboration arrives at a critical time. European countries are racing to modernize their aerial capabilities amid shifting defense priorities and supply chain vulnerabilities. By transferring part of Baykar’s production to Italy, both companies are creating an EU-based supply line for advanced unmanned systems — effectively insulating production from export restrictions and third-country dependencies. This also means future European operators could receive UAVs that are assembled, tested, and certified within the EU, making procurement faster and more politically straightforward. For Leonardo, it transforms Italy from a buyer and maintainer into a co-producer — a leap that elevates the country’s position in NATO’s emerging unmanned ecosystem. Integration and Technology Sharing The LBA Systems program aims to combine Baykar’s combat-tested airframes with Leonardo’s sophisticated sensor and mission packages, such as the Grifo radar family, ESM/ELINT suites, and European-standard data links. Leonardo’s precision weapons, including Brimstone-class missiles, guided bombs, and future directed-energy payloads, are expected to be adapted for compatibility with the Bayraktar series. For the Kizilelma UCAV, this collaboration could lead to an enhanced “European variant,” equipped with Leonardo’s Gallium Nitride (GaN)-based radar and future AI-assisted target recognition modules. Sources in Rome suggest initial assembly of Kizilelma could begin at Leonardo’s facilities in Venegono or Turin, with deliveries targeted toward both domestic and European export customers by 2027–2028. Economic and Industrial Impact The venture promises to create hundreds of high-skill jobs in Italy’s aerospace sector and expand Leonardo’s UAV footprint, which has so far focused on surveillance and rotary-wing drones. Analysts see it as a bridge between Turkish innovation and European regulatory structure, offering Baykar access to NATO-compatible markets and Leonardo a foothold in one of the fastest-growing segments of global defense. By localizing production, Italy can also meet growing domestic and EU-level demand for long-endurance ISR and strike platforms, reducing reliance on American or Israeli suppliers. The partnership is expected to strengthen the European defense industrial base, aligning with ongoing EU initiatives to support strategic autonomy in key technologies. A New Chapter in European Drone Cooperation In essence, the Leonardo–Baykar partnership marks a turning point for both companies — and for Europe’s UAV landscape. It blends Turkish efficiency and combat experience with European certification, integration, and export flexibility, paving the way for a new generation of unmanned aircraft built and supported within the EU. As global demand for drones surges and regulatory barriers tighten, Italy’s emergence as a European co-production center for TB2, Akinci, and Kizilelma signals more than industrial cooperation — it signals a strategic shift toward autonomous, certified, and scalable defense manufacturing inside Europe itself.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 14:26:32
India
Over the past few days, India’s skies have witnessed a wave of GPS spoofing incidents—a sophisticated form of signal manipulation that has caused serious disruption to air traffic, particularly around Delhi’s Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGIA) and the India–Pakistan border. The phenomenon, previously confined to conflict zones like Ukraine and the Middle East, now appears to be affecting Indian airspace, raising deep concerns about both aviation safety and national security. According to flight tracking data and reports from pilots, more than 400 flights were grounded or delayed for up to two hours, as aircraft approaching Delhi began to experience erratic navigation readings. Pilots described seeing sudden jumps in altitude and position, with aircraft computers reporting inaccurate coordinates—classic symptoms of a GPS spoofing attack. What Exactly Is GPS Spoofing? Unlike a typical GPS “jammer,” which simply blocks satellite signals, GPS spoofing is an advanced deception technique. It involves transmitting counterfeit satellite signals that overpower the genuine ones, tricking aircraft receivers into calculating false positions or altitudes. In essence, it’s like replacing a pilot’s map with a fake one—accurate enough to look believable, but slightly altered to mislead navigation. For aircraft performing RNP (Required Navigation Performance) approaches that rely on satellite data, this can create dangerous flight path deviations during critical phases such as landing. How Attackers Do It Spoofing can be conducted using portable transmitters, often built from off-the-shelf software-defined radios and open-source GNSS signal generators. These devices can broadcast false GPS signals powerful enough to mislead receivers within a range of several kilometers. Some advanced systems, likely state-sponsored, can coordinate matched-signal spoofing, synchronizing with legitimate satellite timing to gradually shift aircraft off their true path without immediate detection. Such capabilities are often found in electronic warfare units or military-grade jamming systems, several of which have been observed deployed by neighboring countries near sensitive borders. The Impact on Aviation When spoofing occurs, aircraft navigation systems may suddenly display incorrect data—sending autopilot systems off course or causing confusion in the cockpit. Pilots must then switch to manual or ground-based navigation, a complex process during crowded approach sequences. According to one Delhi-based pilot, “The aircraft was showing we were lined up with Runway 28, but radar confirmed we were nearly two miles off track. It’s not a glitch—it’s deliberate interference.” In response, Air Traffic Control (ATC) has been issuing manual radar vectors and advisories to all inbound flights, while ILS (Instrument Landing Systems)—which use ground radio beams instead of satellites—have been temporarily prioritized to ensure safety. Government and DGCA Response The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has confirmed that an investigation is underway into the unusual GNSS anomalies. The Airports Authority of India (AAI) has reportedly fast-tracked the installation of new ILS systems on affected runways at IGI Airport to reduce dependency on satellite navigation. Security agencies are also working with the Indian Air Force and the National Technical Research Organisation (NTRO) to trace the sources of these spoofing signals. Given their geographic concentration, officials suspect cross-border electronic warfare systems could be responsible—though no formal attribution has yet been made. A senior DGCA official told The Times of India: “We’re treating this as a security and operational issue. Data from multiple flights show clear interference patterns, but investigations are ongoing to identify the source.” Why It Matters India’s civil aviation network is one of the busiest in Asia, with over 1,200 daily flight movements in and out of Delhi alone. The integration of satellite-based navigation systems was meant to enhance safety and efficiency—but spoofing demonstrates their vulnerability. In modern warfare and espionage, electromagnetic and cyber operations have become tools of strategic disruption. Even brief interference near major airports can ripple across the air traffic network, causing logistical chaos and potential safety incidents. Globally, similar spoofing campaigns have been recorded over Iran, Iraq, Ukraine, and the Black Sea, often near regions of geopolitical tension. Aviation analysts note that India’s recent pattern of interference resembles localized electronic attacks, possibly aimed at testing detection capabilities. Could This Be Linked to Earlier Events? Online speculation has connected the recent spoofing wave to an alleged “failed attempt” during the SCO Summit involving Prime Minister Narendra Modi, suggesting that the same network behind that incident may still be active. However, security officials have dismissed these claims as unverified and speculative, emphasizing that no credible evidence links the current interference to any assassination plot. The official focus, they said, remains on the technical and operational aspects of the spoofing incidents. How to Counter GPS Spoofing Experts say India must urgently strengthen its GNSS resilience through a mix of technology and policy measures: Redundant navigation: Maintain and modernize ground-based systems like ILS, VOR, and DME for all major airports. Multi-constellation receivers: Use GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, and NavIC together to reduce reliance on a single satellite system. Authentication and monitoring: Implement signal-authentication protocols and real-time interference monitoring networks. Rapid-response units: Deploy mobile detection teams capable of triangulating spoofing sources within hours. India already operates NavIC, its indigenous regional satellite system, which can serve as a vital backup if integrated across commercial aviation fleets. A Wake-up Call The Delhi spoofing incident is a sobering reminder that airspace security now extends beyond radar and missiles—it includes electromagnetic warfare. The disruption of satellite navigation can paralyze airports as effectively as a cyberattack or a physical strike. While flights have since resumed normal operations, the event underscores a growing reality: in the modern digital battlespace, invisible signals can cause visible chaos. As one aviation expert summarized: “This isn’t just a glitch—it’s a message. Someone is testing our defenses in the electromagnetic domain. And India must be ready to respond.”
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 11:44:01
India
In a landmark moment for India’s quantum technology ambitions, Bengaluru-based deep-tech company QpiAI has announced the launch of “Kaveri”, the country’s most powerful 64-qubit superconducting quantum processor. The company confirmed that Kaveri will be commercially available by the third quarter of 2026, positioning India among the select few nations developing advanced, high-qubit quantum computing systems. From Indus to Kaveri: India’s Quantum Journey QpiAI’s announcement marks the next step in a journey that began with the launch of its 25-qubit Indus processor, unveiled earlier this year. The Indus system represented India’s first full-stack superconducting quantum computer — built entirely within the country and integrated with AI-based optimization software, cryogenic hardware, and control electronics. Now, the Kaveri processor pushes that boundary further. Moving from 25 to 64 qubits is not just a numerical upgrade — it represents a significant leap in computational capability. With enhanced coherence times, higher gate fidelities, and improved interconnect performance, Kaveri is designed to handle more complex quantum algorithms and hybrid AI workloads. According to QpiAI, the new processor uses a wafer-scale flip-chip architecture, which minimizes signal loss and boosts stability between qubits. The design is also expected to support multi-chip scaling, paving the way for 128- and 256-qubit processors in the future. The Power of 64 Qubits Quantum processors operate on qubits — units that can exist in multiple states simultaneously, unlike classical bits that are either 0 or 1. The jump from 25 to 64 qubits means Kaveri can theoretically explore vastly larger computational spaces. While current systems still belong to the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, such devices are becoming powerful enough to address practical problems in drug discovery, materials design, supply-chain optimization, and artificial intelligence. QpiAI claims Kaveri will deliver the precision and scalability needed for enterprise-grade quantum computing, providing access through its Quantum-AI hybrid platform, which integrates quantum algorithms with classical AI and machine learning tools. Commercial Availability by 2026 QpiAI stated that Kaveri will be ready for commercial deployment by Q3 2026. Enterprises and research institutions will be able to access it via the company’s cloud-based “Quantum Computing-as-a-Service (QCaaS)” platform, the same infrastructure that currently supports the Indus processor. The company’s long-term roadmap includes developing fault-tolerant quantum systems and scaling beyond 100 qubits. Kaveri will serve as the critical intermediate step, enabling Indian industries to experiment with quantum algorithms on a robust local platform. Funding and partnerships are already in place. QpiAI recently secured $32 million in Series A investment to accelerate its quantum roadmap, with collaborators including L&T Cloudfiniti and multiple Indian academic institutions. Strategic Significance for India The launch of Kaveri is more than a technological milestone — it is a strategic achievement under India’s National Quantum Mission (NQM), a government initiative aimed at developing domestic quantum computing capabilities. QpiAI is one of the startups supported under this program, which seeks to make India a global hub for quantum technologies by 2030. Having a 64-qubit system developed locally demonstrates India’s growing independence in high-end hardware fabrication and cryogenic engineering — areas previously dominated by a handful of Western companies. Moreover, quantum computing has implications far beyond research. It influences national security, secure communications, climate modeling, and AI acceleration, making indigenous development of such systems a matter of strategic importance. Applications Across Industries With Kaveri, QpiAI envisions solving some of the most complex problems that classical computers cannot efficiently handle. Potential applications include: Drug discovery: Simulating molecular interactions and optimizing candidate compounds. Materials science: Designing next-generation catalysts and superconductors. Finance: Enhancing risk modeling and real-time portfolio optimization. Logistics and manufacturing: Streamlining production chains and route optimization using quantum-AI algorithms. By combining quantum processors with AI-driven simulation tools, QpiAI aims to offer an integrated ecosystem rather than just standalone quantum hardware. Challenges on the Horizon Despite the excitement, QpiAI acknowledges that challenges remain. The quantum industry globally faces issues like error correction, decoherence, and environmental noise, all of which affect computation reliability. Scaling from prototype systems to commercial readiness will require not just hardware innovation, but also a mature software stack, talent pool, and industrial adoption. Still, the company’s progress — from a 25-qubit device in 2024 to a 64-qubit machine scheduled for 2026 — underscores the rapid pace of India’s quantum advancement. Over the next 18 months, QpiAI plans to conduct a series of hardware demonstrations, showcasing Kaveri’s performance benchmarks such as qubit fidelity, error rates, and coherence times. The firm will also expand its cloud access to research partners and enterprises for early use-case testing. If QpiAI delivers on its timeline, Kaveri will not just be a processor — it will be a statement of India’s arrival in the global quantum computing race. For a country rapidly emerging as a leader in AI, space, and semiconductors, the leap into quantum hardware signals the beginning of a new technological era. In essence, Kaveri represents India’s quantum dawn — a powerful synthesis of science, strategy, and self-reliance.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 11:23:35
World
The delicate balance of air power over the Aegean Sea is shifting once again. Greece is now considering the purchase of additional Dassault Rafale fighter jets in response to Turkey’s confirmed deal to acquire Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft — a move that has reignited the long-standing aerial rivalry between the two NATO allies. A Strategic Response to Turkey’s Eurofighter Acquisition Reports from Ekathimerini and French defense outlets suggest that the Hellenic Air Force (HAF) is actively evaluating an order for more Rafales, potentially in the F4 configuration, as part of its broader modernization plan. The development comes after Ankara sealed a $10.7 billion agreement with the United Kingdom for 20 Eurofighter Typhoon jets, with options for additional units in the future. For Athens, Turkey’s Eurofighter purchase represents not just another procurement, but a potential shift in regional air superiority. Turkish officials have indicated their Typhoons will be armed with MBDA Meteor missiles, capable of engaging targets at ranges exceeding 150 kilometers — a direct challenge to Greece’s current advantage in long-range air combat. Maintaining the Edge: Greece’s Rafale Plan Greece first ordered 18 Rafales in 2021 — 12 second-hand and six new — and later expanded that number to 24 aircraft. The jets, based at Tanagra Air Base, have already transformed the operational posture of the HAF with their advanced sensors, AESA radar, and compatibility with Meteor and MICA missiles. Now, Greek defense planners are studying the acquisition of six to twelve more Rafales, possibly of the F4 variant, to further strengthen their qualitative advantage. The Rafale F4 introduces several key upgrades: Enhanced data links and communication systems for network-centric warfare A more advanced infrared search and track (IRST) system Integration with the MICA NG (New Generation) missile Upgraded SPECTRA electronic warfare suite for improved survivability Expanded multi-domain combat capability, integrating air, sea, and land operations The Rafale F4 is designed to remain at the cutting edge through the 2030s, offering Greece a reliable platform even as other regional powers modernize their fleets. The Broader Modernization Framework The new Rafale discussions are part of Greece’s long-term defense modernization plan (2025–2036), valued at over €25 billion. Alongside new fighters, the plan includes: The F-16 Viper upgrade program, bringing Greece’s existing fleet to 4.5-generation standards New air defense and missile systems Investment in unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and naval modernization Athens’ ultimate objective is to maintain a fleet of around 200 modern combat aircraft, phasing out older platforms like the Mirage 2000-5 and F-4 Phantom. The Aegean Rivalry Intensifies The Greek-Turkish air competition has long been a mirror of their geopolitical tensions — over maritime boundaries, energy exploration rights, and regional influence. With Turkey’s new Eurofighters expected to enter service later this decade, Athens fears a narrowing technological gap. Greece’s Rafales, however, currently give it an advantage in sensor fusion, long-range targeting, and electronic warfare. The combination of Meteor missiles and supercruise capability makes the Rafale a formidable opponent, and additional purchases could ensure that advantage remains intact as Turkey upgrades its own forces. Turkish officials have also hinted at parallel progress with the KAAN stealth fighter, formerly known as TF-X, which is expected to enter testing in the coming years. This adds another layer to Athens’ decision-making — to ensure Greece retains a robust, interoperable fleet until fifth-generation platforms become available. Regional and Strategic Implications Beyond national pride, the race for air superiority in the Eastern Mediterranean carries broader NATO implications. Both Greece and Turkey are alliance members, yet their bilateral disputes routinely bring tension within NATO’s southern flank. A growing Greek Rafale fleet — potentially interoperable with France and Egypt — could also strengthen Athens’ position in regional security frameworks. France, meanwhile, sees continued Rafale sales as both an industrial success and a means to reinforce strategic influence in the Mediterranean. The potential deal would also boost Dassault Aviation’s export record, already bolstered by sales to India, Egypt, Croatia, and the UAE. While no official order has been placed yet, sources close to Greece’s Ministry of Defense indicate that discussions with Dassault Aviation are underway and could be finalized once budget approvals are cleared. If completed, this follow-on Rafale acquisition would cement Greece’s airpower dominance in the Aegean — at least for the near future. Yet, with Turkey’s Eurofighters and KAAN program advancing, the regional air balance remains fluid and unpredictable. In the Aegean skies, superiority is not a one-time achievement — it’s a constant race. Greece’s move to expand its Rafale fleet shows that it intends to stay ahead of its rival, no matter how fast Ankara climbs.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-08 10:58:17
World
In a development that could reshape the future of high-speed aviation and missile technology, Chinese researchers have achieved a major propulsion breakthrough — nearly doubling the thrust of a scramjet engine by injecting magnesium powder into its exhaust stream. The advance, led by Yang Qingchun, an associate professor at Beihang University in Beijing, marks one of the most innovative leaps in hypersonic propulsion in recent years and could accelerate China’s race toward Mach 10 flight. Harnessing Fire Within Fire At the heart of the experiment lies a deceptively simple idea: using metallic fuel to ignite “waste gases.” Traditional scramjet engines burn kerosene-based jet fuel (RP-3) at supersonic speeds, but at extreme velocities — beyond Mach 5 — the fuel’s energy yield begins to plateau. The unburned byproducts, mostly water vapour and carbon dioxide, are expelled as hot exhaust, unused. Yang’s team realized that these exhaust gases could act as oxidisers if combined with a reactive metal such as magnesium, which burns explosively even without oxygen from the air. “Magnesium doesn’t need atmospheric oxygen,” the team wrote in their paper published last month in Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica. “It reacts violently with water vapour and carbon dioxide, releasing energy that was previously wasted.” The result was a form of secondary combustion — an afterburner that operates not on fresh air but on the engine’s own exhaust. When magnesium powder was injected into the supersonic flow, it ignited instantly, producing a firestorm that released heat at a rate two to three times faster than kerosene alone. Doubling the Thrust at Mach 6 Tests conducted at Beihang University simulated flight conditions at Mach 6 and 30 kilometres altitude, where air is thin and temperatures soar to 1,800 kelvin (1,527 °C). Under these conditions, injecting magnesium equal to just 13 percent of the exhaust mass led to an 86.6 percent increase in thrust, while overall combustion efficiency reached 65.1 percent. The engine’s specific thrust — the amount of force generated per unit of airflow — jumped from 613 Newton-seconds per kilogram to 1,126 N·s/kg, a near-doubling in performance. Engineers attribute this to magnesium’s rapid exothermic reaction with water vapour, forming magnesium oxide and hydrogen gas that further boosts combustion energy. Liquid kerosene, meanwhile, serves a dual purpose: it circulates through the engine first to cool the walls via regenerative cooling, preventing the structure from melting under hypersonic heat. Then, downstream, the magnesium ignites in a supersonic firestorm stabilized by twin cavities and optimized airflow paths — turning every drop of fuel and every molecule of exhaust into usable thrust. Pushing the Boundaries of Hypersonic Propulsion This approach challenges long-standing assumptions about scramjet limits. Traditional designs face two major hurdles: ignition instability at lower speeds and energy plateau at higher Mach numbers. By using magnesium to ignite residual gases, China’s researchers have effectively bypassed both, unlocking a new form of propulsion efficiency. More importantly, the innovation could allow lighter launch weights, longer range, and higher top speeds for future hypersonic systems. If integrated successfully into a full vehicle, the design could reduce fuel consumption or extend operational range for hypersonic cruise missiles, glide vehicles, or even reusable spaceplanes. In strategic terms, it could also tilt the balance in the global race for hypersonic dominance. The U.S. military, for example, has struggled with repeated testing delays and is only now moving toward fielding its first hypersonic weapon. China, by contrast, has already demonstrated air-breathing hypersonic engines reaching speeds beyond Mach 9, and Yang’s magnesium-fueled system may push that limit even further. Challenges on the Path Ahead Yet, even for China’s rapidly advancing aerospace sector, the road to operational deployment remains steep. Supersonic turbulence and shockwaves inside the combustor can cause uneven distribution of magnesium particles — limiting thrust gains if mixing isn’t perfect. In one experiment, reducing magnesium to 5 percent of exhaust mass dropped thrust gains from 86 percent to just 18.7 percent. Then there’s the issue of erosion. When magnesium burns, it forms sharp magnesium oxide crystals — microscopic blades capable of scouring engine walls and nozzles. To withstand this, future engines will require new heat-resistant and erosion-resistant materials, likely ceramics or metal composites far beyond current jet alloys. Scaling the system for real flight adds further complexity. Yang’s team achieved stable powder injection using nitrogen as a carrier gas, but maintaining that consistency across changing Mach numbers and altitudes will be akin to “threading a needle in a hurricane.” The researchers plan to refine fuel blending techniques and test nano-sized magnesium particles, which may combust more uniformly and efficiently. Redefining Hypersonic Power If perfected, magnesium afterburning could redefine what is possible in high-speed flight. By extracting new energy from exhaust gases rather than discarding them, China’s scramjet technology could deliver both higher performance and better fuel economy — critical for aircraft or missiles that must travel thousands of kilometres at Mach 6 or beyond. In practical terms, it could mean longer-ranged hypersonic missiles, faster reconnaissance aircraft, and more efficient spaceplane boosters. For the People’s Liberation Army, it represents a strategic edge: the ability to field air-breathing vehicles that are lighter, faster, and harder to intercept than anything currently in Western arsenals. As the United States, Russia, and China compete to dominate hypersonic propulsion, Beihang University’s magnesium scramjet breakthrough is more than just a laboratory success. It’s a signal that the physics of flight — long thought to be constrained by fuel chemistry and air resistance — may still have room to evolve. For now, the magnesium engine remains a proof of concept. But if Yang Qingchun’s team can tame its volatility, the day may come when the blinding white flash of burning magnesium isn’t confined to laboratory test chambers — but propels the next generation of hypersonic aircraft through the edge of the stratosphere.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 17:35:37
World
China has quietly but decisively entered the race to dominate the next generation of aircraft propulsion. During the annual conference of the Chinese Society of Engineering Thermophysics in Beijing last week, researchers unveiled a major breakthrough: the completion of ground and high-altitude tests of an adaptive cycle engine (ACE) prototype. The tests demonstrated unprecedented gains in thrust, efficiency, and operational speed range — putting China in direct technological contention with the United States, the long-time leader in this field. The Rise of China’s Adaptive Cycle Engine The presentation, led by Xu Gang, deputy director of the Institute of Engineering Thermophysics at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), showcased years of progress in what Beijing now calls its “next-generation aviation propulsion cornerstone.” Xu’s team has developed a “bypass combustion and inter-stage mixing variable-mode engine” — a revolutionary concept that mitigates the thrust loss suffered by traditional turbine engines at high speeds and altitudes. According to Xu, this ACE prototype is not only capable of sustained supersonic cruise at high Mach numbers but can also serve as the turbine-based propulsion component for combined-cycle systems — a crucial step toward future hypersonic flight. Three-Stream Power: A Step Beyond the U.S. Whereas the U.S. approach to ACE design — exemplified by General Electric’s XA100 and Pratt & Whitney’s XA101 engines — relies on a dual-bypass system, China’s new prototype uses a novel three-stream configuration. The third stream introduces lower-temperature airflow, providing multiple performance advantages: Enhanced power extraction for onboard systems, Superior thermal management, critical for stealth and electronic systems, Reduced infrared signature, making detection harder for enemy sensors, Lower installation drag and exhaust temperature, improving aerodynamic efficiency. This multi-stream architecture represents a significant step toward adaptive propulsion, where the engine autonomously adjusts internal flow paths and thermodynamic cycles to optimize thrust or fuel economy depending on flight conditions. Dual-Mode Operation for Maximum Flexibility Xu’s presentation detailed how the Chinese ACE operates under two primary modes: Mode 1 (Subsonic Cruise) – Only the main combustor operates, maximizing efficiency and reducing fuel burn. Mode 2 (Supersonic Cruise) – The bypass combustor activates, dramatically increasing thrust and enabling high-Mach operation. Ground test data revealed a 27.6% increase in specific thrust, while high-altitude testing showed a 47% increase, compared with conventional turbofan baselines. Fuel consumption was simultaneously reduced by 37.5%, a combination of gains that few engines in history have achieved. Data from Xu’s chart also indicated that the engine could sustain operation at up to Mach 4, placing it in the realm of hypersonic-capable turbine engines — a technology domain that has eluded most global aerospace powers. Engineering the Impossible Designing an adaptive cycle engine is one of the most complex feats in aerospace engineering. At its heart lies the balancing act between thrust and efficiency, two parameters that traditionally conflict. A conventional turbojet or turbofan engine’s efficiency falls sharply at higher speeds due to the increased ram pressure at the compressor inlet, which disrupts airflow and reduces thrust. To overcome this, engineers in the 1960s conceived the variable cycle engine (VCE) — an early ancestor of today’s ACE — which used mechanical actuators and variable ducts to alter bypass ratios and airflow paths dynamically. However, the ACE goes a step further. Rather than relying solely on mechanical adjustments, it uses adaptive airflow routing, bypass combustion, and intelligent control systems to achieve seamless mode transitions. The result is an engine that can behave like a high-bypass turbofan for fuel-efficient subsonic flight and like a low-bypass turbojet when maximum thrust is needed — all within a single powerplant. Global Context: China’s Bid to Catch — or Surpass — the U.S. The United States has spent decades advancing adaptive cycle engines. General Electric’s YF120, tested in the early 1990s on both the YF-22 and YF-23 prototypes, was an early demonstration of this principle. Decades later, the Adaptive Engine Transition Program (AETP) led to the development of GE’s XA100 and Pratt & Whitney’s XA101 — now fully tested and ready for integration into future U.S. aircraft. However, the U.S. Congress’s 2024 defense budget froze ACE integration into the F-35, opting instead to pursue the F135 Engine Core Upgrade (ECU) — a decision that effectively delays military deployment of ACE technology. This pause may provide China with a rare opportunity. While American programs focus on incremental improvements, Beijing’s progress in ACE ground and altitude testing signals a potential leap ahead — particularly if the engine enters flight testing within the next few years. The Bigger Picture: Powering China’s Sixth-Generation Fighter Although Chinese officials have not disclosed the aircraft platform for this engine, observers believe it is being developed for the next-generation stealth fighter sometimes referred to as J-XX or J-20 successor, as well as for future supersonic civilian transport. Chinese state-affiliated aerospace engineers have also hinted that the ACE could serve as part of a combined-cycle propulsion system, integrated with a ramjet or scramjet stage — a critical requirement for hypersonic aircraft and spaceplanes. If successful, this technology could make China the first nation to field an operational adaptive cycle engine capable of Mach 4 operation, reshaping both military and commercial aviation. The Future of Flight — and the End of the “Thrust Trap” Xu Gang’s work represents more than just another aerospace milestone — it’s the culmination of a decades-long ambition to break the so-called “thrust trap”, the point beyond which turbine efficiency collapses at high speeds. By maintaining high thrust across a broad flight envelope — from takeoff to hypersonic cruise — the adaptive cycle engine could dramatically extend combat range, reduce fuel demand, and enhance stealth capabilities of future aircraft. For China, it is not just a technical triumph, but a strategic one — a direct challenge to American dominance in propulsion systems that have defined aerial supremacy for over half a century. As Xu’s presentation concluded in Beijing, one message was clear: “The adaptive cycle engine will redefine what is possible in air-breathing propulsion. It is not just an evolution — it is the foundation of the next era of flight.” If China successfully transitions this prototype from testbed to flight engine, the global balance of aerospace power could shift — and the sky, once again, will become a stage for competition between two technological giants.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 17:26:57
China Blocks BlackRock’s $23 Billion Panama Canal Ports Deal: How Beijing Sank a Landmark Investment
World
In a stunning turn of events, China has effectively blocked a $23 billion deal led by U.S. investment giant BlackRock to acquire a global network of port assets, including two key terminals located at either end of the Panama Canal. What began as a massive infrastructure transaction quickly escalated into a high-stakes geopolitical confrontation—one that reveals how global trade routes are now just as contested as battlefields. The Deal That Could Have Redefined Maritime Power Earlier in 2025, BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset management firm, reached an agreement with CK Hutchison Holdings, a Hong Kong-based conglomerate controlled by billionaire Li Ka-shing, to purchase its global port operations for roughly $22.8 billion. The acquisition included 43 ports across 23 countries, with the crown jewels being the ports of Balboa and Cristóbal, located on either side of the Panama Canal—arguably the most strategically important shipping route in the Western Hemisphere. For BlackRock and its partners, including Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), this was more than a simple infrastructure buyout. It was an opportunity for Western investors to reassert influence over global maritime logistics—especially in a region where China’s economic reach has grown steadily over the past two decades. As BlackRock described it, the investment would “strengthen global supply chain resilience and expand Western participation in strategic trade routes.” For Washington, it was quietly viewed as a win for U.S. influence near the canal that handles nearly 70 percent of its traffic linked to American trade. Who Is BlackRock—and Why the Deal Mattered Headquartered in New York City, BlackRock manages over $10 trillion in assets, making it the largest investment management company on Earth. The firm has vast holdings across energy, infrastructure, and emerging markets, and has increasingly sought ownership in long-term strategic assets—ports, power grids, and logistics corridors that serve as the arteries of global commerce. The acquisition of CK Hutchison’s port portfolio would have given BlackRock not just a profitable asset class, but also a degree of geoeconomic leverage—especially since Hutchison’s terminals have long been seen as part of China’s global maritime strategy. For decades, Hutchison Ports has been one of the major foreign operators near the Panama Canal, with close historical and operational links to Chinese trade networks. By acquiring it, BlackRock was, in essence, pulling a segment of China’s global logistics web back under Western control. Beijing’s Pushback: How China Blocked the Deal No sooner had the deal been announced than alarm bells began ringing in Beijing. State-controlled media denounced the agreement as “a national security risk” and “a handover of Chinese-linked assets to foreign control.” But behind the headlines, Chinese regulators and political officials began taking decisive action. Regulatory Roadblock:Chinese authorities informed CK Hutchison that the sale could not proceed unless a Chinese state-owned enterprise—specifically, COSCO Shipping Holdings—was allowed to participate in the buyer consortium. This effectively meant China wanted a seat at the table, if not direct veto power over strategic port operations. Pressure Through Hong Kong:Because CK Hutchison is based in Hong Kong, it falls under China’s National Security Law and broader regulatory oversight. Beijing’s officials hinted that approval for such a massive transaction could be withheld indefinitely, creating a bureaucratic chokehold that stalled negotiations. State Media Campaign:Chinese state outlets launched a coordinated campaign portraying the sale as a threat to national interests. Editorials warned that transferring control of “ports of strategic significance” to Western entities would “endanger China’s maritime lifelines.” Shares of CK Hutchison dropped sharply after the coverage. Strategic Retaliation Warning:In mid-July 2025, China’s Ministry of Commerce publicly warned that it would “not tolerate acts of economic coercion” and that Beijing would respond if its “legitimate interests in global maritime trade” were undermined. The message was unmistakable: unless Chinese firms were included, the deal would not pass. Collapse of the Deal and Its Global Ripples By late July 2025, the $23 billion deal had collapsed. CK Hutchison confirmed it was re-evaluating its options and would “seek participation from a strategic partner from the People’s Republic of China” in any future sale. The failure marked a decisive win for Beijing. By using regulatory leverage and national-security framing, China successfully protected its influence over vital shipping hubs—without ever formally nationalizing them. For the U.S. and BlackRock, the outcome was sobering. The incident underscored how major private-sector acquisitions can now be derailed by geopolitical power plays. A transaction intended to strengthen Western control over a global infrastructure network had been blocked through non-military but highly effective economic statecraft. Why the Panama Canal Still Matters The Panama Canal remains one of the most strategically critical maritime arteries in the world. It handles roughly 5 percent of all global trade and connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans through a narrow 82-kilometer channel. Whoever controls the ports on either end—Balboa on the Pacific side and Cristóbal on the Atlantic—possesses influence over what enters and exits the canal. That control extends to logistics, security, and even surveillance capabilities. For decades, Washington viewed Hutchison’s role in these ports with suspicion, concerned that Chinese-linked operators could monitor naval or commercial movements. BlackRock’s planned acquisition was meant to mitigate that risk by transferring ownership to a Western firm. Beijing’s intervention ensures that risk—and influence—remain tilted in its favor. The Larger Meaning: A New Era of Economic Power Politics The collapse of the BlackRock-Hutchison deal highlights a broader truth: global infrastructure has become a geopolitical weapon. China’s ability to block a Western consortium from acquiring port assets thousands of miles away demonstrates that it no longer needs to project military power to shape outcomes. Regulatory barriers, capital leverage, and strategic coordination among state-owned firms are proving equally potent tools. For BlackRock, this episode could force a reassessment of how to navigate “geo-regulated” markets, where government influence trumps commercial logic. For the United States, it serves as another reminder that the global contest with China now extends to the very foundations of global trade. And for China, it’s a quiet victory—a reminder that even in an era of Western financial dominance, Beijing’s hand still rests on the levers of global infrastructure. Final Thoughts The $23 billion port deal between BlackRock and CK Hutchison was poised to reshape control over one of the world’s most vital maritime gateways. Instead, it became a case study in how economic diplomacy, regulatory power, and strategic influence can override market forces. China’s decision to block the deal didn’t just halt a corporate acquisition—it reaffirmed the country’s resolve to guard its influence across global shipping lanes, even those far beyond its own coastline. As the Panama Canal saga shows, the next frontier of great-power rivalry isn’t just in weapons or technology—it’s in the ports, terminals, and trade routes that keep the world connected.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 16:12:28
India
India and Armenia are close to signing defence memoranda of understanding (MoUs) worth an estimated $3.5 to $4 billion, marking one of New Delhi’s largest-ever defence export agreements. According to diplomatic and defence sources, the forthcoming deals are centred on modernising Armenia’s air defence network, missile systems, and artillery — a move that could reshape the balance of power in the volatile South Caucasus. Akash-NG: The Cornerstone of Armenia’s Air Defence Revival Sources told Republic Network that negotiations are at an advanced stage for the Akash-NG surface-to-air missile system, India’s next-generation SAM designed by DRDO. The system features an extended interception range of 70–80 km, enhanced radar seeker, and can target multiple aerial threats simultaneously, including drones, aircraft, and cruise missiles. If finalised, the integration of Akash-NG into Armenia’s layered air defence network would mark a strategic leap, providing Yerevan with autonomous protection capabilities independent of Russian-supplied S-300 and 9K33 Osa systems. Armenian officials reportedly see Akash-NG as the backbone of their modern air-defence architecture — flexible, mobile, and battle-proven under Indian conditions. BrahMos Surge After Operation Sindoor The BrahMos supersonic cruise missile — co-developed by India and Russia — has emerged as another focal point of Indo-Armenian discussions. Sources indicate that demand for BrahMos has surged sharply following its successful operational deployment during India’s “Operation Sindoor”, which showcased the missile’s precision and reliability. Negotiators are currently finalising a co-production framework that would allow licensed assembly of BrahMos components within Armenia. This would make Yerevan not just a buyer, but a partner in missile production, a landmark step for India’s growing global defence industry. If concluded, this would be the first instance of BrahMos assembly outside India, underlining both nations’ trust and long-term strategic alignment. Pinaka MLRS: Expanding Armenia’s Artillery Reach Parallel negotiations are also progressing on the Pinaka Multi-Barrel Rocket Launcher System (MLRS) — a powerful, indigenously developed artillery weapon capable of delivering concentrated firepower up to 75 km away. Armenia has shown keen interest in Pinaka due to its mobility, quick deployment, and precision-guided rocket capability, ideal for the country’s mountainous terrain and contested borders. Analysts say the induction of Pinaka would significantly enhance Armenia’s long-range strike and deterrence capabilities, filling a crucial gap in its existing artillery inventory. From Buyer to Partner: Armenia’s Pivot Toward India The groundwork for this unprecedented partnership was laid quietly over the past three years. Armenia, which once relied almost entirely on Russian defence supplies, began diversifying its procurement sources after 2020’s Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. In May 2023, Yerevan posted its first defence attaché in New Delhi, signalling a diplomatic and military realignment. India reciprocated a year later by establishing its first-ever military attaché in Yerevan — the only such posting in the Caucasus region. The relationship deepened with Armenia’s purchase of four Swathi Weapon Locating Radars worth $40 million, systems now deployed along its frontlines and praised for outperforming comparable Russian and Polish models. Since then, India has delivered a steady stream of equipment — from Konkurs anti-tank missiles and Zen anti-drone suites to 155 mm artillery guns and Akash batteries — all under the umbrella of India’s “Make in India” export initiative. Geopolitical and Industrial Significance The upcoming $4 billion deal underscores India’s rise as a global defence supplier. It fits neatly within New Delhi’s goal of reaching $26 billion in defence production by 2030. For Armenia, the agreements offer a strategic alternative to Russian dependency, ensuring supply security and access to advanced, cost-effective technology. This growing partnership also carries regional implications. Armenia’s collaboration with India complements its expanding diplomatic outreach to Greece, Cyprus, and Iran — countries that share a cautious stance toward Turkey and Azerbaijan’s growing assertiveness. By bringing Akash-NG, BrahMos, and Pinaka into Armenia’s arsenal, New Delhi is effectively extending its strategic influence westward into the Caucasus — an area traditionally dominated by Moscow and Ankara. Beyond Weapons: A Broader Strategic Relationship Beyond hardware, both sides are building institutional linkages. The India–Iran–Armenia trilateral dialogue, held in New Delhi in December 2024, focused on transport corridors and cultural cooperation. A week later, Armenia participated in defence-specific talks in Athens with Greece and Cyprus — further proof of its westward reorientation. Each of these developments is part of a larger framework aimed at transforming India–Armenia ties from transactional to strategic.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 16:01:39
World
According to emerging reports, Saudi Arabia is preparing to acquire South Korea’s Hyunmoo-III long-range cruise missile, a system often compared to the American Tomahawk and the Russian Kalibr. While there has been no official confirmation, discussions are said to have taken place between Riyadh and Seoul, marking a potential milestone in Saudi Arabia’s expanding strategic missile ambitions. The move would represent a major step beyond Saudi Arabia’s existing arsenal of short- and medium-range missiles, signaling the Kingdom’s growing interest in building a credible long-range deterrent. Expanding the Missile Partnership Over the past few years, Saudi Arabia has steadily deepened its defense cooperation with South Korea. Riyadh has already purchased several advanced Korean systems, including the CTM-290 tactical ballistic missile and the M-SAM-II (Cheongung-II) surface-to-air missile interceptor. The CTM-290, with a range of about 290 kilometers, provides battlefield-level precision strikes. However, the Hyunmoo-III would extend Saudi capabilities dramatically, allowing precision engagement at distances well beyond the country’s borders. Hyunmoo-III: A Long-Range Precision Weapon The Hyunmoo-III is a family of land-attack cruise missiles developed by South Korea’s Agency for Defense Development (ADD) and manufactured under tight secrecy. The system’s reported range varies by variant: Hyunmoo-III A: ~500 km Hyunmoo-III B: ~1,000 km Hyunmoo-III C: ~1,500–3,000 km With these ranges, Saudi Arabia could potentially strike key Iranian military sites, including command centers, missile bases, and drone facilities, without deploying aircraft into contested airspace. Each missile is guided by advanced inertial and satellite navigation, capable of high precision and low-altitude flight to avoid radar detection. The payload is estimated to be around 500 kilograms, suitable for conventional high-explosive or penetrating warheads. Haeseong Variants and Submarine Launch Capabilities The Hyunmoo program also includes several naval derivatives under the Haeseong family. These systems have helped South Korea build a multi-layered missile force, adaptable across land, sea, and submarine platforms: Haeseong-I: Anti-ship missile with a range of about 150 km. Haeseong-II: Vertical Launch System (VLS) version for surface ships, with a range near 500 km. Haeseong-III: Submarine-launched cruise missile, estimated range 1,000–1,500 km. Haeseong-V: Believed to be an under-development supersonic cruise missile, possibly extending to 1,000 km. All of these systems are operated by the Republic of Korea Strategic Command, which maintains one of Asia’s most modern missile arsenals. A Quiet but Strategic Cooperation The Hyunmoo missile program remains one of South Korea’s most classified defense projects. Details regarding its deployment, testing, and export are rarely made public. Sources indicate that Saudi and South Korean defense officials began exploring a potential missile cooperation framework in early 2025. The talks reportedly involve not only the purchase of the missiles but also options for limited technology transfer or local assembly within the Kingdom. Such arrangements would align with Saudi Vision 2030, which aims to localize half of Saudi Arabia’s defense procurement through domestic manufacturing and partnership ventures. Finding an Alternative After U.S. and Russian Rejections For years, Riyadh has tried to obtain long-range cruise missiles from global suppliers. Its attempts to acquire the American Tomahawk (range ~1,600 km) were blocked under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). Similarly, negotiations with Russia for systems like the Kalibr-NK (range ~2,000–2,500 km) did not materialize due to export and political restrictions. By turning to South Korea, Saudi Arabia appears to be pursuing a practical middle ground—acquiring a capable system from a partner known for discretion and reliability. Strategic Lessons from Abqaiq The September 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities at Abqaiq and Khurais, which temporarily cut national production in half, remain a defining moment for the Kingdom’s defense strategy. The incident demonstrated vulnerabilities in Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure and highlighted the absence of a credible long-range response option. The potential acquisition of the Hyunmoo-III reflects a broader effort to close that gap. With the missile’s extended reach and precision, Saudi Arabia would be better equipped to deter or respond to long-range drone or missile attacks from adversaries. Regional Implications If completed, the Hyunmoo-III acquisition could make Saudi Arabia the first Middle Eastern nation with a proven long-range, land-attack cruise missile system of Asian origin. Such a capability would not only shift the regional military balance but could also prompt neighboring states—particularly Iran—to further accelerate their own missile programs. Defense analysts suggest that the move could also encourage UAE and Egypt to explore similar missile partnerships, given their growing security and industrial cooperation with Asian defense suppliers. A Subtle but Significant Shift Though unconfirmed, the possibility of Saudi Arabia adding the Hyunmoo-III to its arsenal signals an important shift in its defense strategy. It reflects Riyadh’s intent to reduce dependence on Western suppliers, build indigenous capacity, and establish a credible long-range precision-strike capability. While official details may never be made public due to the confidential nature of missile transfers, such cooperation would quietly place Saudi Arabia among a limited group of countries capable of conducting long-range, precision-guided strikes—without external reliance.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 15:45:43
World
A new CNN investigation has unveiled one of the most sweeping military infrastructure expansions in modern history. Since 2020, China has dramatically increased construction at more than 60% of its 136 known facilities tied to missile production and the People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF). Satellite analysis shows over 21 million square feet of new buildings — an area roughly the size of 400 football fields — signaling an unprecedented surge in Beijing’s missile manufacturing capacity. The findings point to a broad and coordinated national effort to boost China’s ability to produce, test, and deploy advanced missiles at a pace that could reshape global security dynamics. Many of the new structures are consistent with weapons development, testing centers, and underground bunkers, while missile components are visible at some sites, confirming the military nature of the construction. The Great Expansion of China’s Missile Industry Across China’s industrial landscape, once-quiet sites have transformed into sprawling complexes surrounded by high-security fencing, blast barriers, and multi-level manufacturing halls. According to imagery reviewed by CNN and independent analysts, the majority of these facilities are linked to the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC) and China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) — two of the country’s largest missile and space enterprises. At several major sites near Beijing, Inner Mongolia, and Anhui, new warehouses and hardened shelters have appeared since 2021. Some are believed to produce components for solid-fuel ballistic missiles such as the DF-26, while others seem designed for hypersonic glide vehicle testing. One analyst quoted in the report described the expansion as “industrial-scale mobilization,” noting that China is now capable of producing short-, medium-, and intermediate-range missiles at rates comparable to Cold War-era U.S. output levels. Post-Ukraine Acceleration: Lessons From Modern War The timeline of China’s missile buildup aligns closely with geopolitical events. Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, Beijing’s construction at missile-related sites accelerated sharply. Satellite imagery shows the number of new buildings rising almost twice as fast from 2022 to 2024 compared to the pre-war period. This pattern reflects a growing recognition in Beijing that modern high-intensity warfare requires massive missile stockpiles. The Russia-Ukraine conflict has demonstrated the critical role of precision strikes, long-range fires, and the exhaustion of munitions in sustained campaigns. China’s leadership, according to Western intelligence assessments, appears determined to ensure the PLA is never caught short of munitions in a potential future conflict — particularly one involving Taiwan or a clash with U.S. forces in the Western Pacific. Expanding the Nuclear Dimension While much of the new construction supports conventional missile programs, the nuclear component of China’s arsenal is expanding rapidly as well. U.S. defense officials estimate that China is adding around 100 nuclear warheads each year, bringing its total stockpile to over 600 operational warheads — a figure that could exceed 1,000 by 2030. New missile silos discovered in Xinjiang and Gansu provinces point to a transition toward a launch-ready nuclear posture, mirroring the deterrence model once used by the United States and Soviet Union. Combined with rapid industrial output, these developments suggest that China aims to narrow the nuclear gap with Washington and Moscow while maintaining a credible second-strike capability. The PLA Rocket Force’s Expanding Role The People’s Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF) — once a relatively obscure branch — is now at the center of China’s defense modernization strategy. Its growing network of bases, production facilities, and command centers reflects its dual mandate: to provide both conventional precision-strike power and nuclear deterrence. Recent reports indicate that China’s DF-17 hypersonic missile and DF-41 intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) are now entering serial production. These systems offer extended range, faster deployment times, and greater survivability, especially when paired with the new infrastructure revealed in the CNN analysis. Strategic Implications: The Dawn of an Industrial Arms Race The scale of China’s expansion has raised alarm across Asia and in Washington. Analysts say the developments mark a transition from incremental modernization to industrial militarization — where the volume of production becomes as important as the sophistication of technology. For the United States, this trend poses new strategic dilemmas. Even with its advanced missile defenses and stockpiles, Washington now faces a rival capable of sustained mass production in a protracted conflict. In the Indo-Pacific, allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan are reassessing their missile defense and deterrence strategies in light of China’s new capacity. India too, observers note, is watching closely. The expansion of missile production facilities — particularly those capable of manufacturing intermediate-range systems — affects the regional balance of power and adds urgency to India’s own missile modernization efforts. An Era of Endless Expansion Though China still trails the United States and Russia in total nuclear numbers, the trajectory of its missile buildup is steep and sustained. Experts say the country’s current pace of construction suggests a long-term plan extending well into the 2030s, when the PLARF could reach levels of industrial readiness unseen outside major superpower conflicts. The new facilities — sprawling over millions of square feet — are not just signs of modernization. They are part of a deliberate strategy to ensure industrial resilience, allowing China to replenish its missile inventory rapidly during wartime. As one defense researcher summarized:“China is preparing not just for deterrence, but for the logistics of a long war. That changes everything.”
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 15:32:29
India
Aeronautics Limited (HAL) has sealed a landmark agreement with GE Aerospace to procure 113 F404-GE-IN20 engines along with a comprehensive support package to power the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas Mk1A programme. The new deal, announced in November 2025, will ensure the continuity of Tejas production through the early 2030s, marking a key step in India’s aerospace self-reliance drive. The engine acquisition supports the ₹62,370 crore contract that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) signed with HAL on September 25, 2025, for 97 new Tejas Mk1A aircraft — comprising 68 single-seat and 29 twin-seat fighters for the Indian Air Force (IAF). This order expands the indigenous fighter fleet and gives HAL a clear production roadmap for the next decade. Scope and Delivery Timeline Under the fresh agreement, GE Aerospace will supply 113 F404-GE-IN20 engines — including installed units, spares, and support kits — between 2027 and 2032. The timeline has been aligned with the IAF’s Mk1A delivery schedule, ensuring that propulsion availability matches HAL’s growing assembly capacity in Bengaluru and Nashik. The number of engines ordered exceeds the number of aircraft to account for spares, test usage, and attrition reserves, following standard IAF logistics practice. HAL officials have confirmed that the deal includes an engine maintenance and technical support package, which will help the company streamline the fleet’s life-cycle management during initial service years. Building on Earlier Orders This latest deal builds on HAL’s earlier procurement of 99 F404-GE-IN20 engines from GE in 2021, valued at around US$716 million (approximately ₹6,000 crore). That earlier order was meant to power the first batch of 83 Tejas Mk1A aircraft, contracted by the MoD in February 2021. However, global supply-chain disruptions and the need to restart GE’s F404 production line delayed initial deliveries. Over the last two years, deliveries have gradually resumed — a steady sign that the programme has regained momentum. On September 30, 2025, GE Aerospace officially handed over the fourth F404-GE-IN20 engine to HAL at its Bengaluru facility, marking another milestone in fulfilling the 2021 contract. The earlier three engines were delivered After July-2025. This progress demonstrates that GE’s engine production cadence has begun stabilizing, paving the way for larger-scale deliveries under the new 2025 agreement. GE Commits to Ramp Up F404 Engine Production for HAL, Targets 24 Units Per Year by 2027 HAL’s Expanding Production Ecosystem HAL has aggressively expanded its manufacturing footprint to handle the combined orders for 180+ Tejas Mk1A aircraft (83 from 2021 and 97 from 2025). A new Tejas assembly line was inaugurated in Nashik in October 2025, in addition to the existing Bengaluru lines. Once fully operational, HAL will be capable of producing 24 aircraft per year — double its previous rate. However, the company’s production speed is closely tied to the timely availability of engines and imported components such as radars, EW suites, and flight-control actuators. The new 113-engine GE deal is therefore seen as removing a critical bottleneck that had constrained earlier deliveries. The HAL–GE Aerospace agreement for 113 F404-GE-IN20 engines is more than a procurement contract — it’s a structural enabler for India’s indigenous fighter ecosystem. With the first batch of engines from the 2021 deal already in HAL’s possession (the fourth handed over on September 30, 2025), and the next wave of 113 engines scheduled between 2027 and 2032, India’s Tejas Mk1A programme now has a clear propulsion roadmap. This ensures HAL’s assembly lines can operate without critical delays, strengthens the Indian Air Force’s modernization drive, and positions the Tejas as a cornerstone of India’s long-term aerospace independence.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 14:44:44
World
Stockholm, November 2025 — Sweden and Ukraine are intensifying negotiations on a landmark defense agreement that could see Kyiv acquire as many as 150 JAS 39 Gripen E fighter jets, in what would become Sweden’s largest-ever aircraft export deal. The discussions, confirmed by Swedish Defence Minister Pål Jonson in an interview with Reuters, signal Stockholm’s growing role in shaping Europe’s long-term security landscape amid Russia’s ongoing war in Ukraine. A Strategic Partnership Takes Shape The talks stem from a long-term cooperation agreement signed in October, which outlined the framework for Sweden’s military assistance and industrial collaboration with Ukraine. At its core lies the potential export of the Gripen E, Sweden’s latest-generation multirole fighter developed by Saab AB. While the exact value of the proposed deal remains undisclosed, a recent comparison underscores its scale: Thailand’s purchase of just four Gripen jets for 5.3 billion Swedish crowns ($563 million) earlier this year suggests that a 150-aircraft acquisition could be worth tens of billions — a sum far beyond Kyiv’s wartime budget. Yet, Sweden appears willing to shoulder part of the cost. “The financing is moving forward, and we’re working closely with the Ukrainian side,” said Jonson, noting that Sweden is exploring multiple funding avenues, including export credits, frozen Russian assets, and direct military aid. Financing the Future: Sweden’s Aid and EU Assets Sweden’s government has already allocated 40 billion Swedish crowns (approximately $3.7 billion) in its 2026 budget for Ukraine-related aid — with a similar sum expected again in 2027. According to Jonson, portions of this could be directed toward the fighter deal. Another proposal under discussion involves leveraging frozen Russian assets, valued at nearly €200 billion across the European Union, to finance defense assistance to Ukraine. Stockholm has been one of the strongest advocates for using those funds, arguing that they should directly contribute to Ukraine’s reconstruction and military resilience. In parallel, Sweden has presented the concept to a coalition of 16 European countries, informally known as the “coalition of the willing”, which coordinates defense support for Kyiv. Some of these nations — particularly the U.K., whose companies produce components for the Gripen, and the U.S., which supplies the General Electric F414 engine — may also participate financially or industrially in the program. The Gripen E: A Fighter Built for Survival and Affordability The Gripen E represents the most modern variant of Saab’s storied Gripen family. It’s designed for nations seeking high capability without the extreme operational costs associated with fifth-generation fighters like the F-35 Lightning II. Powered by a GE F414G turbofan delivering around 98 kN of thrust, the Gripen E boasts a maximum takeoff weight of 16,500 kg, a combat radius of approximately 800 km, and a top speed exceeding Mach 2. It supports up to 10 external hardpoints, allowing a mix of air-to-air, air-to-ground, and electronic warfare payloads. One of its defining features is its adaptability — it can take off and land on short, unprepared runways, making it ideal for Ukraine’s dispersed basing strategy under wartime conditions. Saab emphasizes that the aircraft’s low maintenance demands and rapid turnaround times allow it to sustain high sortie rates with minimal ground crew — a crucial advantage for a country under continuous threat. Industrial Capacity and Delivery Prospects Saab has confirmed that it can expand Gripen production to meet major new orders. The company currently manufactures the E-series at its facilities in Linköping, Sweden, and at a secondary assembly line in Brazil, where the aircraft is being produced for the Brazilian Air Force. Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, speaking in October, described the potential Ukraine deal as “very realistic” but acknowledged that first deliveries could take about three years. Saab, for its part, is examining ways to increase output capacity and potentially establish a maintenance or assembly partnership with Ukraine itself to support long-term operations. A Coalition Deal Beyond Borders Analysts suggest that Sweden’s initiative could evolve into a multi-nation procurement program, with European allies financing or co-producing parts of the system. “Countries that already manufacture subcomponents of the Gripen system have clear incentives to participate,” Jonson explained, citing British-made electronics and U.S.-built engines. Such a model mirrors the “F-16 coalition” approach that saw several NATO countries contribute aircraft and training to Ukraine’s Air Force earlier this year. The difference, however, lies in the Gripen’s affordability and its political symbolism — a European jet, built by a non-NATO country, strengthening Ukraine’s defense against Russia. Strategic Implications for Europe If completed, the Gripen deal would mark a historic shift in European defense collaboration. It would secure Ukraine a modern, sustainable fighter fleet while cementing Sweden’s emergence as a major defense exporter just months after joining NATO. For Saab, the contract could transform its order book overnight and accelerate technological partnerships across the transatlantic defense ecosystem. For Ukraine, it would provide a long-term solution to defend its skies with a platform tailored for cost-efficiency, survivability, and independence from U.S.-centric supply chains. Despite the optimism, officials caution that several hurdles remain — including formal export approvals, detailed financing arrangements, and the establishment of pilot training and maintenance infrastructure. However, as Pål Jonson noted during Ukrainian Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal’s visit to Stockholm this week, momentum is clearly building. “We are moving forward together,” he said. “This is not only about jets — it’s about securing Ukraine’s future defense for decades to come.”
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 14:22:03
World
Taiwan’s Air Force has confirmed that its first two U.S.-made MQ-9B SkyGuardian unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) will arrive in the third quarter of 2026, with the remaining two scheduled for 2027. The timeline was reaffirmed in briefings to Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan and matches earlier projections made by U.S. defense officials, marking a steady progression in one of Taipei’s most significant intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) programs in years. A Key Delivery in Taiwan’s 2026 Defense Schedule The MQ-9B acquisition forms part of Taiwan’s broader modernization effort aimed at improving early warning, reconnaissance, and precision strike coordination across its armed forces. The schedule of deliveries coincides with several other U.S. equipment programs expected in 2026, including new coastal defense cruise missiles and air defense system components, which together help offset delays in other modernization initiatives. According to multiple defense sources, the $250 million contract, facilitated through the U.S. Air Force under Foreign Military Sales (FMS), covers four MQ-9B SkyGuardian UAVs, two certifiable ground control stations (GCS), and associated logistics, training, and maintenance support packages. The contract also includes sensor integration, data links, and mission system software, ensuring that the Taiwanese fleet is fully interoperable with U.S. and allied intelligence networks. Expanding Taiwan’s Eyes Over the Sea The MQ-9B SkyGuardian, developed by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, represents one of the world’s most advanced medium-altitude, long-endurance (MALE) drones. It is a variant of the combat-proven MQ-9 Reaper, but redesigned for international customers with enhanced endurance and civil airspace certification standards. For Taiwan, the system’s primary role will be persistent maritime surveillance—tracking Chinese naval movements across the Taiwan Strait, Bashi Channel, and South China Sea approaches. Each drone can remain airborne for over 40 hours, cover vast swathes of ocean, and transmit real-time imagery and radar data back to Taiwan’s joint command centers. The MQ-9B will integrate with Taiwan’s existing radar and sensor networks, giving the Republic of China Air Force (ROCAF) and Navy Command a clearer picture of surface and aerial activity near the island. Defense observers note that this ISR upgrade will be crucial as China expands naval patrols and deploys more advanced aircraft and unmanned systems around Taiwan’s air defense identification zone (ADIZ). Technical Highlights of the MQ-9B SkyGuardian Endurance: 40+ hours Operational Ceiling: 40,000 feet Range: Over 6,000 nautical miles with satellite link Speed: Up to 210 knots Payload Capacity: 2,155 kg (external + internal) Sensor Suite: Multi-spectral targeting system (EO/IR), maritime surveillance radar, synthetic aperture radar (SAR), and signals intelligence modules. Though the current deal focuses on surveillance, the SkyGuardian can be configured for precision strike missions if armed in future upgrades—though Taiwan’s current purchase is understood to be for unarmed ISR variants. The Broader Package and Support Framework Alongside the UAVs, Taiwan’s contract includes training for operators and maintenance personnel, spare parts, and a technical support package. Two ground control stations will be established—likely one in southern Taiwan near Kaohsiung for maritime operations and another in the north for strategic monitoring of the Strait. Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense has also coordinated with General Atomics for potential data-sharing and integration with existing U.S. Pacific Command systems, allowing real-time coordination in contingency scenarios. Strategic Significance and Regional Implications Analysts view the MQ-9B acquisition as a strategic intelligence multiplier rather than merely a new asset. With endurance extending far beyond manned patrol aircraft, Taiwan’s forces will gain the ability to maintain continuous watch over key maritime corridors, detect naval movements early, and direct response assets with greater precision. In the context of growing Chinese pressure—both militarily and politically—the addition of the SkyGuardian represents a quiet but transformative shift in Taiwan’s situational awareness. It enables Taipei to build a resilient ISR web that can feed targeting data to long-range missiles and air defense systems, improving deterrence without overt escalation. By 2027, Taiwan will operate a four-strong fleet of MQ-9B SkyGuardians, supported by U.S.-supplied ground infrastructure and logistics. While modest in number, the acquisition signals a strategic deepening of U.S.-Taiwan defense cooperation and an essential step toward autonomous, persistent surveillance in one of the world’s most contested airspaces. As one Taiwanese defense official put it during a recent legislative session: “With these systems, Taiwan will see what it could only imagine before—longer, wider, and clearer than ever.”
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-07 14:04:30Search
Top Trending
-
Agneepath Scheme replaced with Sainik Samman Scheme 2024, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Relaunched Agniveer Scheme
-
Death in Dhaka: CIA Links Surface After Putin Shielded Modi During SCO Meet
-
Key Differences Between 5th vs. 6th Generation Fighter Jets
-
Pakistan Air Force to Unveil Stealth-Enhanced JF-17 Block 4 Fighter Jet by 2028
-
India’s AMCA Engine Decision: Safran vs. Rolls-Royce Final Expected by 2025
-
Pakistan Announces 15% Increase in Defence Budget for 2024-25 Amid Economic Crisis
-
Tejas Mk2 Nears 2025 Rollout as HAL Ramps Up Final Assembly and System Integration
-
India's TEDBF Program Takes Shape First Flight by 2028: Aiming for Naval Supremacy with Advanced Stealth and Technology
Top Trending in 4 Days
-
Ukrainian An-124 “Ruslan” Makes Secretive Landing in Israel, Fueling Speculation of Covert Military Support to Kyiv
-
Türkiye’s Bayraktar Kizilelma Becomes First Unmanned Fighter to Shoot Down an Aerial Target with Air-to-Air Missile
-
US Marines Install G/ATOR Radar in Tobago For Surveillance Over Southern Caribbean and Venezuela
-
Germany Activates Israel’s Arrow-3, Europe’s First Space-Shield Against Ballistic Missiles
-
Zelensky Under Pressure as MP Claims He Has Been “Ordered to Resign" Within This Month
-
America’s Secret F-47 “Ghost Eagle” Fighter Jet Fly With Five Armed Autonomous Drones
-
Venezuela Prepares Asymmetric War Plan: Sabotage, Ambushes, and Guerrilla Attacks Against a Possible US Strike
-
Japan Approves $5.4 billion Supplementary Defense Budget For Accelerate Frigate and Submarine Construction
