World
A government plane carrying the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s Minister of Mines crashed during landing at Kolwezi Airport in Lualaba Province on Monday, 17 November 2025, at around 1:20 p.m. local time. Despite the dramatic incident, all passengers and crew members evacuated safely, according to early official reports. The aircraft, identified by local media as an Embraer ERJ-145, had departed from Kinshasa earlier in the day. As it approached Kolwezi, the plane reportedly skidded off the runway, veered into the surrounding strip, and caught fire shortly after stopping. Airport firefighters and emergency personnel responded within minutes, helping everyone exit before flames spread through the cabin. Approximately 20 people were on board, including Mines Minister Louis Watum Kabamba, advisers, and members of his security detail. No serious injuries were reported, although most of the luggage and documents inside the aircraft were destroyed in the fire. Initial indications point to a possible technical failure involving the landing gear or tires, which may have caused the aircraft to lose control during touchdown. The Ministry of Transport has opened a full investigation to determine the exact cause, and aviation specialists are already examining the remains of the aircraft. The minister and his delegation were en route to Kolwezi to visit the site of a recent mining disaster that killed dozens of people in the province. The team was scheduled to assess the situation, meet local authorities, and oversee immediate response measures. In a brief statement released after the crash, the minister’s office described the event as “a frightening incident” but confirmed that “the minister is safe and continuing with his duties as planned.” The crash has renewed questions about aircraft maintenance standards and safety oversight in the country, especially for planes used by senior government officials. Further updates will be provided as investigators release additional findings.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 17:51:52
World
Former President Donald Trump has sharply rejected the European Union’s new Migration and Asylum Pact, using recent speeches and interviews to attack it as a threat to national sovereignty and a model he says the United States must “never follow.” While the EU Migration Pact is an internal European law that does not bind the U.S., Trump’s stance adds fresh political pressure on both sides of the Atlantic at a time when migration is already a central election issue in Europe and America. What Is The EU Migration Pact? The EU Migration and Asylum Pact is a wide-ranging package of 10 new laws agreed by EU governments and the European Parliament in 2023–2024. It aims to create a common system for handling people who arrive without permission at the EU’s external borders. Under the pact: All irregular arrivals will face screening, including checks on identity, health and security, with biometric data such as fingerprints and facial images recorded in the Eurodac database. People will be directed either into an asylum procedure or into fast-track return procedures if their claims are judged weak or clearly unfounded. Responsibility for asylum claims will still lie first with the country of first entry, but a new “mandatory solidarity mechanism” will allow other EU states to relocate migrants or instead pay money or send staff to help front-line countries. The pact will be phased in, with key measures expected to apply from 2026 after a transition period that began in mid-2024. Supporters in Europe say the package is meant to reduce chaos at borders, speed up decisions, and share responsibilities more fairly among the 27 member states. Critics from both the right and the left argue that it either does not go far enough to stop irregular migration or that it risks eroding human rights by expanding detention and speeding deportations. Why Trump Says He Rejects The Pact Trump presents the EU Migration Pact as a warning for the United States, not as an agreement Washington might join. In his view, it shows what he calls the “globalist” approach to borders that he has opposed since his first term. His rejection is rooted in several familiar themes from his earlier migration policies. 1. Sovereignty and control over borders Trump has long argued that international or multilateral deals on migration weaken a country’s sovereign right to decide who enters. During his first presidency, the U.S. withdrew from the UN Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, with the administration saying it “undermined U.S. sovereignty” and clashed with American immigration laws. In the same language today, Trump portrays the EU pact as proof that “Brussels” is taking decisions away from national governments and forcing them to accept migrants or pay penalties. He claims this kind of burden-sharing could be a model that “open-border Democrats” want for the U.S.—a claim his critics say is misleading because the pact applies only inside the EU. 2. Fear that the pact is too “soft” on irregular migration From the right-wing side of European politics, many argue the pact is still not strict enough, particularly on returns and detention. Leaders in Poland, Hungary and other countries have attacked the relocation and solidarity rules, and some governments are already exploring opt-outs or partial exemptions. Trump aligns himself with this criticism. He points to the fact that in the EU, only about 20% of people with final return orders are actually deported, and he argues that, instead of solidarity, Europe needs much tougher deportation systems, including offshore processing centres—ideas that are also being debated inside the EU itself. 3. Domestic politics and campaign messaging For Trump, migration is also a campaign weapon. In a charged political environment, attacking Europe’s pact lets him: Rally his base by warning that Democrats and European leaders are part of the same “elite” that favors migration and weak borders. Contrast his hard line on the U.S.–Mexico border with what he calls “European chaos.” Use rising far-right sentiment in Europe as proof that ordinary people everywhere are rejecting “open-border” policies. European analysts say his recent UN speech and other remarks about migration have included false or exaggerated claims about numbers and crime, but they also warn that this rhetoric can still influence European debates and strengthen anti-migration parties. Impact On The European Union Even though the EU Migration Pact was negotiated without any formal U.S. role, Trump’s rejection and rhetoric can still affect European politics in several ways. Pressure on already-divided member states The pact passed only after years of difficult negotiations, and opposition has not disappeared. Some governments and parties argue it goes too far on solidarity, others say it goes too far on detention and returns. Far-right and nationalist parties often cite Trump’s hard line as a model for Europe. As the EU begins to implement the pact before it becomes fully operational in 2026, Trump’s attacks may: Help Eurosceptic and anti-migration parties mobilize voters against governments that support the deal. Encourage more member states to look for exemptions, delays, or alternative arrangements, including deals with third countries for offshore processing or “return hubs.” Strains in transatlantic relations EU officials have tried to frame the pact as a balanced compromise that combines border control with human rights protections, and they are sensitive to claims that Europe is either too weak or too harsh. When Trump publicly attacks the pact, it risks: Undermining trust between Brussels and Washington on sensitive issues like resettlement, readmission agreements with countries of origin, and joint naval or border operations. Making it harder for the EU to present itself as a norm-setter on asylum and human rights if it is seen as following, or fighting with, Trump-style policies. At the same time, some European leaders quietly use Trump’s criticism to defend the pact at home, arguing that if both far-right and human-rights groups dislike it, it might actually be a centrist compromise. Impact On The United States Trump’s rejection of the EU Migration Pact does not change U.S. law, but it shapes the political debate and some aspects of foreign policy. 1. Domestic migration debate By pointing to Europe, Trump tries to create a simple contrast: a “Europe of crisis” versus a “strong U.S. border” under his approach. This can: Push U.S. debate further toward deterrence, walls, and mass deportations, echoing the toughest ideas now circulating in both the U.S. and parts of the EU. Reduce space for compromise immigration reforms in Congress, because any attempt at broader deals or regional cooperation can be attacked as “an EU-style pact.” 2. Cooperation with Europe on migration and security The U.S. and EU need each other on border security, counter-smuggling, and deals with transit countries in North Africa, the Balkans and beyond. Europe is currently tightening its own tools, from digital border systems like the Entry/Exit System to new return mechanisms. If Trump continues to attack the EU approach as weak or dangerous, it could: Make European leaders more cautious about sharing information or strategies, worried that cooperation might be politicized in U.S. domestic debates. Push some EU states to seek new partners for migration deals, including African or Middle Eastern countries, rather than closely aligning with U.S. strategy. 3. The wider message to the world Finally, Trump’s rejection of the EU Migration Pact sends a signal to other regions. It suggests that two of the world’s major democratic blocs—the European Union and the United States—are moving on parallel but politically conflicting paths on migration governance. While the EU experiments with a complex mix of shared responsibility, faster procedures and stronger deportations, Trump promotes a simpler message of “fortress borders” and minimal multilateral commitments. That gap risks making it harder to build global frameworks on migration, such as the UN compacts that Washington previously stepped away from. Looking Ahead The EU Migration Pact is only beginning to move from paper to practice, with key parts scheduled to take effect around 2026. European governments are still writing the rules, building facilities, and training staff. Irregular crossings into the EU actually fell in 2024, but routes and pressures are shifting, and the political temperature remains high. Trump’s loud rejection of the pact will not stop Europe from implementing it, but it will shape the narrative—in both Brussels and Washington—about what “successful” migration policy looks like. For now, the EU is betting on shared rules and managed solidarity, while Trump is betting that voters on both continents will prefer hard borders and national go-it-alone strategies. How those two visions play out will help decide not just the future of migration policy, but also the health of transatlantic relations in the years to come.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 17:46:54
World
Taiwan has quietly taken a major step in rebuilding its naval strength. After years of uncertainty, delays, and shifting priorities, the Republic of China (ROC) Navy has resumed work on its long-awaited next-generation frigate, a program once considered frozen but now revived with new funding, new urgency, and a new strategic purpose. A Program Brought Back to Life In late October, a small but important detail appeared in Taiwan’s 2026 defense budget: NT$142.03 million (US$4.4 million) set aside for the “design and evaluation” of a 6,000-ton combat vessel. For defense watchers, this was the first confirmation that the next-generation frigate—once shelved due to technological roadblocks—had finally returned. Soon after, the ROC Navy posted a public call for proposals, signaling that the program was officially moving again. Engineers, naval architects, and defense companies are now preparing to submit designs for what could become Taiwan’s most advanced warship. The Original Vision and the Long Pause When the Navy unveiled its 12-item modernization plan in 2016, the next-generation frigate was one of its most ambitious projects. The goal was to build a 4,500-ton vessel equipped with a modern electronically scanned array radar—a leap forward in Taiwan’s maritime air-defense capability. The ROC Navy turned to the nation’s top weapons developer, the National Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology (NCSIST). But ambition soon met reality. The Navy wanted not just an ESA radar, but a compact AESA radar, the same class of technology used on the world’s most advanced destroyers and stealth fighters. Developing an AESA radar that could fit the size limits of a 4,500-ton frigate proved too difficult. The program stalled. Requirements changed. Meetings stretched on. And slowly, the project faded into silence. To fill the gap, the Navy shifted attention toward smaller 2,500-ton “Tier-2” frigates, quicker to build and desperately needed to maintain the fleet. But the big ship—the one meant to lead Taiwan’s future surface fleet—never disappeared. It simply waited. A Bigger Ship With Bigger Aspirations Now reborn as a 6,000-ton vessel, the next-generation frigate appears to be evolving into something far more capable than what the Navy first imagined. According to reporting from Taiwan’s UPMedia, the new ship may be designed to carry Mk 41 vertical launch systems, opening the door to a striking possibility: the launch of Taiwan’s Hsiung Feng IIE (HF-2E) land-attack cruise missile. This would give Taiwan something its navy has never had—long-range strike capability from the sea. A ship armed with land-attack missiles would fundamentally change Taiwan’s maritime posture, transforming the Navy from a force focused on defense into one capable of deterrence far from its shores. Modifying the Fleet for Long-Range Strike The plan doesn’t end with the new frigate. The Navy is reportedly modifying the Keelung-class destroyers—once part of the U.S. Navy’s Kidd-class—to: Install HF-2E launch systems on the rear deck Integrate new fire-control consoles Prepare for pre-programmed land-attack strikes Taiwan already has experience adapting missiles to the Mk 41 VLS, having tested its Hai Kung III air-defense missile with the system. Engineers believe that the same approach can be used to integrate the HF-2E, giving Taiwan a consistent launch platform across its surface fleet. In other words, the new frigate is not just a ship—it's the centerpiece of a broader transformation. Why Taiwan Needs New Warships Now On paper, Taiwan has 25 major surface combatants. In practice, many of these ships are old—some very old. The Chi Yang-class frigates, originally American Knox-class ships built in the late 1960s and early 1970s, are more than 50 years old. They run on steam turbines, an obsolete technology, and their air defense systems are limited. Even the newer ships—the Kang Ding and Cheng Kung classes—date back to the 1990s and early 2000s. Fifteen of Taiwan’s warships are more than two decades old. In a region being transformed by China’s rapidly expanding navy, time is not on Taipei’s side. The next-generation frigate is meant to replace the aging fleet with something far more capable: a ship with modern radars, modern missiles, and the ability to survive and fight in an increasingly hostile environment. A New Strategic Role Beyond replacing old hulls, the new frigate fits into Taiwan’s wider defense strategy: “resolute defense, multi-domain deterrence.” China’s naval activities near Taiwan have surged. PLA destroyers and frigates regularly sail close to the island. Chinese carriers are operating more frequently in the western Pacific. And Beijing’s missile arsenal continues to grow. Taiwan’s response is clear: Build ships that can detect threats earlier, shoot down incoming missiles, and potentially strike back at distant military targets if necessary. The next-generation frigate may become the ship that ties these objectives together. What Comes Next With funding in place, the Navy will now enter a yearlong design and evaluation phase. Domestic shipbuilders will compete for the contract. NCSIST will continue work on the AESA radar. Engineers will refine combat system integration. If all goes smoothly, the first hull could be laid down before 2028, and the ship could enter service early in the next decade—just as Taiwan’s oldest frigates reach the end of their lives. A Ship for a New Era The revival of the next-generation frigate program marks more than the return of a delayed project. It signals Taiwan’s determination to modernize its navy—quietly, steadily, and with a clear understanding of the strategic environment it faces. After years of waiting, the ROC Navy’s future flagship is finally moving from concept back toward reality.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 17:33:31
World
Greece has officially signed a contract for a fourth FDI HN frigate, completing a program that will shape the Hellenic Navy’s main fighting fleet for the next 30 years. The deal, announced by Naval Group on November 17, turns a long-standing option into a confirmed order. It also comes at a key moment, as the first ship in the series — HS Kimon — is nearly ready for delivery after finishing advanced sea trials. This decision is an important step in Greece’s wider military upgrade and shows Athens’ determination to keep a strong, modern naval presence in the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean, especially as regional tensions continue to rise. Turning an Option Into Strategy The FDI program began under the 2021 Franco-Greek Strategic Partnership, when Athens selected three frigates with an option for a fourth, collectively valued at around €3 billion. Contracts signed in 2022 set delivery timelines for two ships in 2025 and a third in 2026. By exercising the final option now, Greece ensures consistent capability across the entire Kimon-class fleet and secures long-term support arrangements with France. Officials say the fourth frigate maintains fleet cohesion and guarantees operational availability at a time when maritime activity in the region is rising sharply. A Compact Frigate With Heavyweight Capabilities Despite a displacement of about 4,500 tons, the FDI HN brings a high-end combat suite typically associated with larger destroyers. The ship features: 32 Aster 30 long-range air-defense missiles in Sylver A50 VLS Thales Sea Fire AESA radar with 360-degree surveillance and ballistic-threat tracking 21-cell RAM launcher for point defense 8 Exocet MM40 Block 3C anti-ship missiles MU90 lightweight torpedoes and CANTO anti-torpedo decoys Fully digital SETIS 3.0 combat system Powered by a 32 MW CODAD plant, the ship reaches 27 knots, has a 5,000-nautical-mile endurance, and operates with a reduced core crew of about 125 sailors thanks to its high level of automation. Below the waterline, the combination of the Kingklip Mk2 hull sonar and CAPTAS-4 Compact towed array gives the frigate an advanced anti-submarine profile rarely seen in vessels of this size. Strategic Value in a Crowded Maritime Arena With the fourth FDI added, the Hellenic Navy will be able to keep two ships continuously deployed — one in the Aegean and another in the eastern Mediterranean or operating with NATO maritime groups. Each frigate offers its own air-defense “bubble,” long-range strike capability, and deep ASW reach, enabling Greece to form flexible surface action groups for escort, deterrence, and crisis-response missions. The timing is significant. Greece faces a more assertive Turkish naval posture, with Ankara investing in TF-2000 destroyers, I-class frigates, Reis-class submarines, and a growing arsenal of indigenous anti-ship and cruise missiles. These trends continue to influence long-running sovereignty disputes and frequent maritime and airspace confrontations. Athens has responded with a €25-billion, 12-year modernization plan, combining naval upgrades with new air and missile defenses under the Achilles Shield architecture. FDIs are designed to operate as networked nodes alongside Rafale fighters, upgraded F-16Vs, and future F-35A aircraft, sharing targeting data and coordinating intercepts or strike operations. Industrial Cooperation Expands Inside Greece Beyond operational capability, the program is reshaping Greece’s defense industrial base. Naval Group’s Hellenic Industrial Participation initiative now includes over 120 contracts with more than 70 Greek companies. Local partners are contributing to UAV integration, counter-UAS systems, HVAC and propulsion support, underwater inspection, and other subsystems essential for long-term sustainment. Key partnerships include: ALTUS LSA – UAV integration HAI – Centaur counter-UAS systems FARAD, MELITA, Petros Petropoulos – mechanical and propulsion components DIVING STATUS – underwater hull inspection These industrial ties are expected to deepen as the fourth hull enters production. A Fleet Built for the Late 2020s and Beyond The addition of the fourth FDI is part of a broader effort to shape a balanced, layered naval force. Greece is simultaneously upgrading its Hydra-class MEKO 200 frigates and evaluating the acquisition of second-hand Italian FREMMs, creating overlapping tiers of capability from high-end air defense to maritime security operations. By the late 2020s, the Hellenic Navy aims to field a networked fleet built around the FDI HN — a ship designed to see farther, react faster, and survive better than those it replaces. The new contract does more than simply increase fleet numbers. It locks in qualitative maritime superiority for Greece at a time when geopolitical competition in the eastern Mediterranean is accelerating, ensuring the country can project stability and deterrence across one of the world’s most closely watched waterways.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 16:14:49
World
South Korea’s Hanwha Aerospace has delivered another batch of 21 K9A1 self-propelled howitzers to Poland, the Polish Ministry of National Defence confirmed this week. The shipment pushes the total number of K9 guns in Polish service past 200, marking a major milestone in one of Europe’s largest ongoing artillery modernization programmes. A Contract Built for Speed and Scale The new delivery is part of an executive contract signed in August 2022, a landmark agreement worth 2.4 billion dollars for 212 K9A1 howitzers scheduled for handover between 2022 and 2026. The deal was initiated under Poland’s accelerated defence procurement drive following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, prioritizing fast-track delivery of advanced fire-support systems. Hanwha’s rapid production, paired with Poland’s urgent requirement to replenish artillery lost in transfers to Ukraine, has made the K9A1 a central component of Warsaw’s short-term capability reinforcement plan. A Second Deal, and a Bigger Vision By the end of 2023, the momentum was undeniable. Poland returned to the negotiating table and sealed a second, even larger agreement — this time worth 2.6 billion dollars. This new contract included: Six more K9A1s, And 146 K9PLs, a variant custom-built for Poland with Polish electronics, Polish communications gear, and Polish support systems. The K9PL wasn’t just another purchase. It was a sign of where Poland wanted to go: toward domestic production, local expertise, and eventually an artillery fleet that could be sustained without relying on foreign workshops. A Framework for the Future: 672 Guns Behind the signed contracts lies an even broader vision. In July 2022, Poland and Hanwha agreed on a framework for up to 672 K9 howitzers — enough to radically transform the firepower of the Polish Armed Forces. Nothing on that scale has been attempted in Europe since the Cold War ended. But there is a condition:Poland wants technology transfer, and not in small doses. Warsaw wants its own factories assembling, maintaining, and eventually producing the K9 family. A senior defence official put it bluntly:“If Hanwha can build the future of Polish artillery inside Poland, then we will buy more. If not, we will look elsewhere.” Negotiations are ongoing. Replacing the Old, Reinforcing the New The arrival of more than 200 K9A1s has already started to reshape Poland’s artillery structure. The new guns are expected to: Replace the remaining Soviet-era 2S1 Gvozdikas, Strengthen brigades that have given up equipment to Ukraine, And serve alongside the domestically produced KRAB howitzer, which itself uses a Korean chassis. The KRAB production line, stretched thin after large donations to Ukraine, cannot meet Poland’s short-term needs alone — making the K9A1 a crucial reinforcement. Why Poland Chose the K9 Poland’s decision to move forward with the K9 family of self-propelled howitzers stemmed from the platform’s clear battlefield advantages. The K9A1 fires 155mm NATO-standard ammunition, giving Polish artillery units full compatibility with allied supply chains. Its high mobility allows crews to fire and relocate in under a minute, a critical capability in modern warfare where counter-battery radars can pinpoint positions within seconds. The system’s range of more than 48 kilometres, especially when paired with advanced precision-guided rounds, gives Poland the ability to strike deep and respond rapidly to emerging threats. Beyond its technical strengths, the K9 has built a strong reputation worldwide, proving itself in multiple militaries and harsh operational conditions. For Poland, which is expanding and reequipping its artillery at a pace unmatched in Europe, the K9 offered something vital: a modern, combat-ready system that could be delivered immediately, not years down the line. This combination of performance, reliability, and rapid availability made it the obvious choice for a country racing to strengthen its firepower. Toward Europe’s Most Powerful Artillery Force As the latest shipment rolled off the transport ship, Polish crews moved with practiced efficiency, preparing each howitzer for integration into service. The scene has become almost routine now — the clank of metal on metal, instructions echoing across the port, and the flags of Poland and South Korea fluttering together in the wind. Yet beneath that familiar rhythm lies something far more significant. With every arrival, Poland is doing more than simply adding new artillery pieces to its arsenal. It is rebuilding its deterrence, reshaping its defence industry, and positioning itself as one of NATO’s central pillars of firepower. Each K9 that arrives strengthens not only Poland’s immediate military capabilities but also its long-term strategic identity. And with the possibility of hundreds more K9 systems still to be ordered under the broader framework agreement, Poland is steadily forging a future in which its firepower, its industrial base, and its partnerships stand stronger than at any time in its modern history.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 15:58:37
World
Fresh concerns about European security have intensified after Israeli military experts warned that if a war erupted between Russia and NATO, the alliance would have “no chance” against Moscow’s expanding portfolio of advanced strategic weapons. Their assessment gained momentum following reports that Russia’s highly secretive 9M730 Burevestnik—designated by NATO as the SSC-X-9 “Skyfall”—has recently completed one of its most ambitious tests to date. According to intelligence assessments, the missile conducted a 15-hour continuous flight, covering approximately 14,000 kilometers, an unprecedented demonstration of endurance for a nuclear-powered cruise missile. Its range is theoretically unlimited, with Russian engineers claiming the system could remain airborne for months, waiting for the optimal moment to strike. Burevestnik: A Missile Built to Evade NATO The Burevestnik stands out as one of the most ambitious weapons in Russia’s arsenal—a nuclear-powered, low-altitude, nuclear-armed cruise missile designed to bypass traditional air and missile defenses. Its miniature nuclear reactor allows it to maneuver unpredictably, approach targets from unconventional directions, and exploit gaps in radar coverage across the Arctic, Atlantic, and European airspace. Israeli defense analysts argue that NATO’s missile-defense architecture—optimized for ballistic threats and conventional cruise missiles—has no reliable counter to a weapon capable of unlimited-range flight, extended loitering, and near-random routing. “This system removes the concept of a secure rear area,” an Israeli expert noted. “If operational, it undermines NATO’s assumptions about reinforcement, basing, and strategic depth.” Oreshnik Deployment Adds to Strategic Tensions Compounding NATO’s concerns, Belarus has announced plans to deploy the Oreshnik hypersonic medium-range missile in December, according to spokesperson Natalia Eismont, speaking on behalf of President Aliaksandr Lukashenka. Belarus claims the deployment is a direct response to what it calls Western escalation in the region. The Oreshnik’s introduction places another hypersonic system close to NATO borders, reinforcing Russia and Belarus’s integrated military posture and giving Moscow additional strike options in Central and Eastern Europe. Western officials view the deployment as part of a coordinated effort to expand pressure on NATO’s eastern flank, especially at a time when NATO’s air- and missile-defense networks are already stretched. Poseidon: Another Unconventional Threat Looming According to internal NATO assessments, the alliance is increasingly concerned about Russia’s Poseidon nuclear-powered submarine drone—another unconventional system expected to reach operational capability by 2030. Poseidon, a massive autonomous underwater vehicle, is believed to have exceptional endurance and global range, enabling it to target strategic locations such as: Naval bases Major ports and harbors Coastal cities The system is designed to deliver a high-yield nuclear warhead, theoretically capable of generating radioactive tsunamis and devastating coastal infrastructure across the U.S. East Coast, the Pacific, the UK, and France. NATO’s internal report describes Poseidon as a major future threat due to its survivability, stealth, and destructive potential. The Rapid-Strike Scenario Worries Analysts Taken together—the Burevestnik, the Oreshnik deployment, and the looming Poseidon drone—Israeli experts argue that NATO faces a qualitatively new challenge. In a full-scale conflict, Russia could combine: Hypersonic missiles Nuclear-powered cruise missiles Underwater strategic drones Traditional ballistic and cruise-missile systems These weapons, they warn, could disable NATO command hubs, ports, runways, air bases, and reinforcement corridors in the opening phase of a conflict. If systems like Burevestnik can remain airborne for weeks or months, NATO must consider the possibility of persistent airborne nuclear threats, a scenario not factored into Cold War-era planning. Safety Doubts and Operational Questions Remain Despite the concern surrounding Russia’s advanced weapons, Western intelligence officials stress that many of these systems—particularly Burevestnik—have experienced technical setbacks, including failed tests and a deadly reactor accident in 2019. Analysts caution that the number of deployable Burevestnik missiles may remain small due to the system’s complexity, safety risks, and logistical demands. They also emphasize that NATO retains overwhelming advantages in economic strength, conventional forces, and nuclear strike capability. NATO’s Official Response: Confidence Mixed With Caution Publicly, NATO leaders maintain confidence in the alliance’s deterrent posture. They underscore that NATO’s collective nuclear forces remain fully capable of devastating retaliation, and its conventional forces are technologically superior to Russia’s. Privately, however, NATO planners acknowledge that the Burevestnik test, Belarus’s Oreshnik deployment, and Russia’s progress on Poseidon collectively introduce new layers of strategic uncertainty. The alliance is now reviewing aspects of: Early-warning architecture Integrated air and missile defense Transatlantic reinforcement planning Arctic and North Atlantic security A New Era of Strategic Competition Russia’s continued testing and deployment of unconventional systems—ranging from nuclear-powered cruise missiles to hypersonic weapons and autonomous underwater drones—signals a shift in global military dynamics. Whether these systems exist in significant numbers or remain limited prototypes, their development forces NATO to adapt to a new era in which deterrence, early warning, and crisis management must account for weapons that break traditional patterns. The Burevestnik missile—NATO’s SSC-X-9 “Skyfall”—may not make Russia invincible, but its successful flights mark a significant escalation in the strategic competition shaping the future of European and global security.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 14:18:09
World
Germany and France are rethinking their huge €100bn Future Combat Air System (FCAS) project, and both countries are now considering dropping the joint next-generation fighter jet. Instead, they may focus mainly on the “combat cloud”, a shared digital network that will connect aircraft, drones and ground systems. The change comes after years of arguments between Airbus (Germany/Spain) and Dassault Aviation (France). The two companies cannot agree on who controls the design, who does what, and who gets access to which technologies for the new fighter jet. Because of this, the aircraft part of FCAS has barely moved forward. France wants Dassault to have full design authority, saying it has the experience needed to build such a jet. Germany wants Airbus to have a bigger role, arguing that a shared European project must be shared fairly. After years of tension, both sides remain stuck. Because of this deadlock, Germany is now looking at other options, including working with countries in the GCAP fighter programme (UK, Italy, Japan). Some German officials say the country may even need a different future fighter if FCAS does not deliver. Meanwhile, Dassault says France can build its own next-generation fighter if the partnership fails — and Paris has already started small national studies for a possible “Plan B”. With the joint fighter in trouble, Germany and France are turning their attention to the combat cloud, the digital system that will allow European aircraft and drones to share information instantly on the battlefield. This part of FCAS is still progressing and is seen as easier to achieve than the aircraft. The decision is important for Europe’s defense industry. FCAS was meant to support thousands of jobs and keep Europe at the top level in stealth technology, AI, future engines, and advanced sensors. If the fighter project collapses, Europe may end up with different aircraft in different countries, making operations more complex and more expensive — and increasing reliance on U.S. jets like the F-35. France and Germany also have different military needs. France wants a jet able to carry its nuclear weapons and operate from an aircraft carrier. Germany is more focused on NATO operations and replacing its Eurofighters. These differences make it harder to agree on one shared jet. A final decision on the future of FCAS is expected by the end of 2025. The project may continue only as a combat cloud programme, or each country may choose its own fighter, or — though unlikely — they may still find a political compromise. For now, the dream of a single joint European next-generation fighter looks increasingly uncertain.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 13:11:47
World
In one of the most consequential defense agreements since the war began, Ukraine and France have formalized a plan for Kyiv to acquire 100 Dassault Rafale multirole fighters, marking a historic leap in Ukraine’s long-term air power transformation. The agreement was sealed on November 17, 2025, during President Volodymyr Zelensky’s visit to Villacoublay Air Base near Paris, where he and President Emmanuel Macron signed a letter of intent in front of a Rafale aircraft and the national flags of both countries. The French presidency confirmed the 100-aircraft target, while avoiding details on whether deliveries will draw from existing French stocks or rely entirely on new production. The deal forms the core of a wider 10-year strategic framework aimed at strengthening Ukraine’s aviation, missile defense, and long-term defense-industrial cooperation. A Strategic Partnership Anchored in Long-Term Support President Zelensky called the agreement “historic”, stressing that the Rafale will significantly bolster Ukraine’s air-defense, combat aviation, and deterrence posture as Russia continues high-intensity missile and drone attacks. Months of technical negotiations among Dassault Aviation, MBDA, Thales, and the defense ministries of both nations shaped the final structure of the deal. The framework extends beyond fighters, incorporating enhanced cooperation on SAMP/T air-defense systems, Aster 30 interceptors, and future European-Ukrainian technology exchanges. French officials emphasized that the objective is to ensure Ukraine can “acquire the systems it needs to respond to Russian aggression.” Production, however, remains a critical variable. France faces mounting commitments to major export customers such as India, Egypt, Indonesia, and Croatia, even as Dassault plans to expand output from three aircraft per month in 2025 to four per month by 2029. Additional manufacturing relief will come from Tata Advanced Systems Limited in India, which will begin producing Rafale fuselages from 2028, marking the program’s first international production line. Why the Rafale Matters for Ukraine’s Future Air Force Kyiv’s long-term modernization plan envisions a Western-standard fleet of roughly 250 fighter aircraft, combining F-16s, Gripens, and Rafales. Within this structure, the Rafale is viewed as the heavy multirole backbone, capable of long-range strike missions, air superiority, deep interdiction, and networked joint operations. The aircraft’s advanced SPECTRA electronic warfare suite, low-observable shaping, and compatibility with NATO weapons and data links make it uniquely suited for Ukraine’s future needs. While not fully stealth, the Rafale’s reduced radar cross-section and digital flight-control algorithms give it superior survivability in contested airspace. For Ukraine, the Rafale represents not only a combat capability but a gateway to full NATO interoperability. Airframe and Performance Length: 15.27 m Wingspan: 10.90 m Max takeoff weight: 24.5 tons Engines: 2× Snecma M88-2 Top speed: Mach 1.8 Supercruise: Mach 1.4 Range: 1,850 km (internal fuel), >3,700 km with tanks Combat radius: 1,000–1,400 km Service ceiling: 15,240 m Training, Maintenance, and Interoperability Challenges Integrating the Rafale will require sweeping upgrades to Ukraine’s military infrastructure. Conversion training for Rafale pilots typically takes 10–12 months, with extensive simulator and systems instruction. Pilots currently undergoing F-16 and Mirage training in Europe are expected to form the first cohort for Rafale transition. Meanwhile, Ukraine must build new maintenance hangars, digital avionics support facilities, and NATO-compatible weapons storage and testing centers. Western munitions—such as Meteor, MICA NG, SCALP-EG, and AASM Hammer—require dedicated handling systems not currently available in Ukraine. Despite these challenges, the Rafale is seen as a platform that will anchor Ukraine’s multi-decade modernization and increase its ability to conduct joint operations alongside NATO air forces. Financial Realities and Industrial Cooperation Financing the program remains the most complex hurdle. Ukraine’s defense budget—strained by wartime spending—will likely rely on French export credits, EU security funding, phased payment schedules, and industrial participation mechanisms. Paris, grappling with its own budget pressures, is expected to structure deliveries over several years, tied to production cycles and shared maintenance initiatives. For France, the agreement consolidates its role as a central European defense partner for Kyiv, building on earlier deliveries of Caesar howitzers, Mirage 2000-5F fighters, and Aster 30 missiles. A Defining Turning Point for Ukraine’s Air Power The planned acquisition of 100 Rafale fighters marks one of Ukraine’s most significant military modernization steps since independence. Beyond battlefield effects, it signals a long-term strategic realignment between Kyiv and Paris, one with serious implications for Europe’s defense architecture. Although final delivery schedules and financing details are still being negotiated, the message is clear: France and Ukraine are building a durable, multi-decade defense partnership. The Rafale deal positions Ukraine to field one of the most advanced air forces in Europe—and reshapes the balance of air power across the entire region.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 12:38:35
World
Chinese military and coast guard ships entered Japan’s territorial waters near the Senkaku Islands on Sunday morning, marking one of the most serious confrontations this year. The incident unfolded amid rapidly deteriorating China–Japan relations, following Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s recent remarks suggesting the possible use of force in a Taiwan conflict. The Incident According to the Japan Coast Guard,On Sunday morning four armed China Coast Guard vessels, equipped with deck-mounted machine guns, sailed into the 12-nautical-mile territorial waters surrounding the Senkaku Islands at about 10:15 a.m. The ships remained in the area for nearly two hours despite warnings from Japanese authorities before moving south. Beijing described the action as a “rights enforcement mission” within what it considers China’s own Diaoyu Islands, asserting it was safeguarding maritime rights and national sovereignty. Context of Rising Tensions Relations between the two Asian powers have worsened sharply since Prime Minister Takaichi warned earlier this month that Japan may take military action if China attempts to forcibly change the status of Taiwan.China condemned the remarks as interference in internal affairs, summoning the Japanese ambassador and warning of “serious consequences.” Following the diplomatic clash, China issued safety advisories to its citizens in Japan, citing “security risks,” while major Chinese airlines offered free ticket changes or refunds for travel to Japan. Japan, in turn, lodged a formal diplomatic protest over the territorial waters intrusion, calling the move a clear violation of sovereignty. Strategic Implications The Senkaku/Diaoyu islands sit at a critical junction in the East China Sea, roughly 110 km from Taiwan. Japan maintains the islands are an “inherent part of its territory,” while China claims historic rights over them. Sunday’s incursion — involving armed coast guard vessels — is seen by analysts as a notable escalation in China’s maritime posture. Experts warn that such confrontations raise the risk of unintentional clashes, especially with the U.S.–Japan security alliance watching developments closely. Diplomatic Repercussions Japan summoned China’s ambassador in Tokyo for an immediate protest. In response, Beijing summoned the Japanese ambassador, warning that any Japanese intervention regarding Taiwan would be “doomed to fail.” Tokyo is now studying options to boost surveillance and military readiness across its southwestern island chain, while China has signaled it may increase patrols around the disputed waters. The economic fallout is also drawing attention, with China’s travel warning potentially affecting Japan’s tourism industry — which relies heavily on millions of Chinese visitors annually. Both nations remain firmly entrenched in their positions, with no sign of de-escalation. Analysts believe the coming days may see more Chinese patrols near the Senkaku Islands, while Japan could reinforce its maritime and air defense presence. Without meaningful dialogue, the East China Sea may become the next major flashpoint in Asia’s shifting strategic landscape.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 11:20:56
Space & Technology
Europe’s space industry received a significant boost this week as ArianeGroup and Avio announced a sweeping industrial contract extending through 2029, covering the large-scale production of key Ariane 6 components, the next-generation P160 boosters, and crucial oxygen turbopumps for the Vulcain engine. The agreement also expands cooperation between the two companies by establishing a wider commercial framework for the mutual supply of components for both Ariane 6 and Vega C, Europe’s primary heavy- and medium-lift launch vehicles. Agreement Secures Long-Term Launcher Production The joint venture Europropulsion, owned equally by ArianeGroup and Avio, will produce the P160C solid rocket motors for the operational phase of Ariane 6 and Vega C. The contract ensures P160C production until 2029, supporting Europe’s plans for stable and predictable access to launch services. The P160C, developed by both companies, serves as the common booster for Ariane 6 and the first stage of Vega C. It provides higher thrust and improved performance compared to previous boosters. The system is undergoing qualification in 2025, with its first planned use on an Ariane 6 mission in Q2 2026, expected in the four-booster configuration designed for heavier payloads. Industrial Synergies Strengthen Europe’s Launch Sector Beyond booster production, the contract creates new synergies across the European launch ecosystem: Avio will deliver additional liquid oxygen turbopumps for the Vulcain engine, powering Ariane 6’s first stage. ArianeGroup will supply specialised components and equipment for Vega C, ensuring smoother production flows and reducing dependency on external suppliers. This interlinked industrial arrangement is designed to enhance cost competitiveness, increase production efficiency, and safeguard Europe’s long-term launch capabilities across commercial, governmental, and scientific missions. Leaders Emphasize Cooperation and European Autonomy Giulio Ranzo, CEO of Avio, praised the agreement: “Avio and ArianeGroup are very satisfied to have signed a broad industrial agreement, seeking to capture synergies between Ariane 6 and Vega C to improve technology, performance, and cost competitiveness. Their joint venture Europropulsion, now over 30 years old, remains a fundamental building block of Europe’s capabilities to access space.” Martin Sion, CEO of ArianeGroup, highlighted the importance of the P160C: “The ramp-up of Ariane 6 is in full swing. The arrival of the P160C motor opens a new chapter for Ariane 6 and Vega C. The agreement demonstrates once again that cooperation is key to ensuring a competitive and autonomous European access to space.” Broader Context: Europe’s Push for Launch Independence The announcement comes at a pivotal time for Europe: The continent is transitioning from Ariane 5 to Ariane 6, with the heavy-lift gap putting pressure on strategic missions. Vega C is preparing for its return to flight in 2025 after earlier setbacks. Competition from U.S. commercial launch providers, as well as increasing capability from China and India, has intensified. Securing long-term production of boosters, engine systems, and launch-critical components is essential to protect Europe’s independent access to orbit and stabilise its institutional launch schedule. A New Chapter for Ariane 6 and Vega C With the P160C entering production, Ariane 6 approaching full operational readiness, and Vega C moving toward its relaunch, the new ArianeGroup–Avio agreement reinforces Europe’s path toward launch resilience. The contract marks not only a production milestone but also a renewed commitment to collaboration, efficiency, and technological advancement across Europe’s space-launch ecosystem—ensuring a stable and competitive European presence in space through the end of the decade.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 11:14:20
World
Türkiye has confirmed the operational performance of its new Tolga short-range air defense system after a series of live-fire trials successfully intercepted multiple unmanned aerial targets on 16 November 2025. The achievement marks a major milestone in Türkiye’s evolving “Steel Dome” layered defense architecture and comes at a time when drone warfare is accelerating globally. Tolga Demonstrates Full Operational Capability According to Anadolu Ajansı and state defense manufacturer MKE, the Tolga system was put through a demanding sequence of live-fire engagements simulating real-world battlefield conditions. Designed to counter drones, loitering munitions, and low-altitude precision weapons, Tolga integrates surveillance, electronic warfare, and kinetic interceptors into a unified defensive structure. During the validation campaign, the system successfully neutralized all assigned unmanned targets, transitioning the program from development status to an operationally deployable capability. The tests reflect lessons drawn from the Russia-Ukraine conflict, where small, inexpensive drones have repeatedly threatened armored units, supply depots, and command nodes. Türkiye’s response is a rapid modernization drive to counter this category of threats with indigenous technologies. A Modular, Multi-Layered Defense Solution At its core, Tolga is designed as a modular close-air-defense ecosystem, merging sensors, effectors, and command functions into a single architecture. Key components include: Dedicated command-and-control unit Search and tracking radar Electro-optical tracking systems Electronic jammers for soft-kill defense 35 mm, 20 mm, and dual 12.7 mm guns, all equipped with specialized anti-drone ammunition The system detects small aerial targets at distances of up to 10 km, classifies them through surveillance and electronic warfare tools, and tracks them continuously using radar fused with electro-optics. Once Tolga identifies a threat’s profile and trajectory, it selects the optimum soft-kill or hard-kill response. Electronic jamming offers the first layer of defense, while kinetic fire — especially the 35 mm Airburst Ammunition — forms the last line against drones maneuvering at close range. Performance in Live Trials: 100% Success Across All Scenarios Development of Tolga began under MKE’s indigenous engineering program, with early displays at IDEF 2025 drawing international attention. The system later entered an accelerated test cycle at the Ministry of National Defense’s Karapınar Test and Evaluation Center in Konya. During the first full-scale live-fire campaign: Tolga recorded a 100% interception success rate Trials covered eight engagement scenarios Targets included micro-UAVs, tactical drones, and cruise-missile-like profiles Most interceptions occurred in the first short burst, demonstrating high accuracy and low ammunition use MKE officials confirmed that serial production infrastructure — including specialized ammunition lines — is fully prepared, enabling rapid delivery to the Turkish Armed Forces and potential export clients. Flexible Deployment Across Land, Sea, and Static Roles A major advantage of Tolga is its deployment versatility. Its architecture allows installation: As a fixed point-defense system for bases and infrastructure On wheeled or tracked vehicles for mobile ground force protection On naval vessels to shield fleets and coastal assets The system can operate in manual, semi-autonomous, or fully autonomous modes, making it suitable for different operational doctrines and threat environments. Tolga’s ammunition families — 35 mm for engagements up to ~3 km, 20 mm for mid-range defense, and 12.7 mm guns for close-in protection — further expand its adaptability. Strategic Role in Türkiye’s ‘Steel Dome’ Defense Network Tolga forms the lower tier of Türkiye’s emerging Steel Dome concept, which combines multiple air defense layers to counter everything from micro-drones to ballistic threats. The system fills a critical gap between point-defense guns and higher-altitude surface-to-air missile systems. Its introduction reflects Türkiye’s drive toward self-reliance in counter-UAS and short-range air defense technologies, reinforced by the global demand for reliable anti-drone systems. Growing Export Potential and Regional Implications By developing a fully indigenous, test-proven system, Türkiye positions itself as a major supplier in the rapidly expanding global counter-UAS market. With drone use rising in the Middle East, Caucasus, North Africa, and Asia, Tolga is expected to draw strong interest from countries seeking modern defenses against low-cost aerial threats. A series of international demonstrations is already planned, signaling Ankara’s ambition to expand its influence through defense partnerships and technology exports. A New Pillar in Modern Drone Warfare The successful debut of the Tolga short-range air defense system highlights how swiftly Türkiye’s defense sector is adapting to modern conflict. By integrating radar, electro-optics, electronic warfare, and advanced airburst ammunition into one cohesive platform, Tolga strengthens Türkiye’s resilience at a pivotal moment. As drone warfare continues to reshape global battlefields, Tolga offers not only enhanced national protection but also a competitive, export-ready solution that may influence global counter-UAS strategies in the years ahead.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 11:04:01
World
In a development sending ripples through the Middle East and the U.S. defense establishment, Saudi Arabia has reportedly requested American approval to purchase 48 F-35 stealth fighters, the most advanced combat aircraft in service today. The proposal, now under consideration by former President Donald Trump, has triggered deep concerns across Israel, the Pentagon, and U.S. policy circles. A Deal Far Bigger Than a Standard Arms Sale At first glance, the request looks like a conventional defense agreement. But the sale of the F-35, the most advanced stealth fighter in the world, is anything but routine. Israel currently remains the only Middle Eastern state operating the F-35, specifically the F-35I “Adir”, equipped with classified Israeli avionics, electronic warfare suites, and cyber systems. These upgrades enhance the jet’s combat performance and survivability and are developed jointly with American defense manufacturers. Why Israel Is Alarmed Should the U.S. agree to the Saudi request, Riyadh would not just receive American technology — it would inevitably gain systems derived from Israeli innovation, embedded deep within the aircraft’s architecture. That’s the heart of the problem. Saudi Arabia maintains close strategic ties with both China and Russia, even cooperating with Beijing on ballistic missile production and with Moscow on oil coordination through OPEC+. Intelligence services warn that any sensitive technology transferred to Riyadh could eventually be accessed by Moscow or Beijing through espionage, joint programs, or intelligence-sharing arrangements. For Israel, this poses a direct threat to its Qualitative Military Edge (QME) — a principle enshrined in U.S. law that guarantees Israel retains superior military capability over its regional neighbors. Losing exclusivity over the world’s most advanced fighter jet would erode the foundation of Israel’s deterrence strategy. American Concerns: Technology Leakage and Strategic Risk In Washington, the sale is viewed as a major security gamble. The F-35 is considered the crown jewel of American airpower, containing some of the most sensitive stealth coatings, mission systems, and sensor fusion software ever exported. U.S. officials fear that transferring this capability to a nation involved in active cooperation with Beijing on ballistic missile production and with Moscow through OPEC+ energy coordination could open doors for espionage, reverse engineering, or intelligence-sharing. Any compromise of F-35 technology would significantly erode America’s long-term technological dominance. Saudi Arabia’s Motive: Deterrence and Prestige Riyadh’s push for the F-35 reflects a combination of strategic and political drivers: Growing threat perception from Iran’s missile and drone arsenal Desire to modernize beyond F-15 and Eurofighter Typhoon fleets Ambition to become the region’s leading airpower Concern over fluctuating U.S. security commitments Possession of fifth-generation stealth fighters would dramatically elevate Saudi Arabia’s military standing. The Trump Factor Former President Trump, known for strengthening ties with Gulf states and backing major arms deals, is now weighing the Saudi request. His decision will have to account for: Potential risk to U.S. secrets Staunch Israeli objections The regional military balance America’s strategic competition with China and Russia At present, there is no indication of an imminent decision. A High-Stakes Choice With Global Consequences This moment forces Washington to confront a fundamental question: Should the world’s most advanced fighter jet — built on both American and Israeli innovation — be transferred to a state with strategic ties to U.S. rivals? Analysts warn that the consequences could extend far beyond the Middle East. Even limited access by Russia or China to F-35 components, software, or stealth materials could accelerate their own military aviation programs and undermine decades of Western superiority. This is not merely an arms sale.It is a pivotal test of how the U.S. safeguards the backbone of its air dominance and the foundation of Israel’s deterrence. As one intelligence official put it: “Any administration considering this deal should think very, very hard.”
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-17 10:31:35
World
Relations between the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and Japan have taken a sharp turn toward confrontation after Beijing issued unusually explicit warnings that if Tokyo intervenes in what Beijing calls its “reunification” with Taiwan, it may destroy Japanese military targets. The statement marks one of the most serious verbal escalations between the two neighbours in decades. Why China Said This — What Provoked Beijing According to analysts, Beijing’s sudden escalatory tone was triggered by a combination of political signals, military activities, and public statements from Tokyo: Japanese leaders, including Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, recently repeated that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could create a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan — a legal trigger for collective self-defence with the United States. Japan has expanded military cooperation with the U.S. around Taiwan, including new radar, missile-defence sites, and strengthened Self-Defense Force deployments in Okinawa and the Ryukyu Islands, all within striking distance of Taiwan. Tokyo publicly warned that peace in the Taiwan Strait is “critical” to Japan’s security, which China interpreted as a direct challenge to its One-China principle. China also reacted strongly to Japan’s recent statements criticizing Chinese coast-guard operations near the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, calling them evidence of Japan’s “reviving militarism.” Beijing viewed these moves as signs that Japan is preparing to act as a frontline partner of the U.S. in any Taiwan contingency — prompting China to issue a message intended to deter Japanese involvement. China’s Warning: “Destroy All Military Targets” China’s foreign and defence ministries issued a joint warning this week stating that any Japanese military involvement in Taiwan — defined by Beijing as a domestic matter — would constitute an act of aggression. According to state media and official statements, Japan would “bear the consequences” and face “crushing defeat” if it acts as a frontline in China’s reunification agenda. In one press briefing, a Chinese defence spokesperson warned that Japan’s decision-makers would “pay the heavy price” if Tokyo attempted to deploy its forces in a Taiwan contingency. Beijing also went further by advising Chinese citizens against travelling to Japan, citing “significant risks” to their safety — thereby signalling the dispute may spill over into travel, economic and people-to-people exchanges. Japan’s Response: Caution, Diplomacy & Strategic Ambiguity Tokyo, for its part, has sought to defuse the rhetoric while reaffirming its core policy of peace, security and regional stability. On Nov. 7, Japan’s Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi told parliament that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could amount to a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan and might trigger collective self-defence measures. In response to China’s remarks, Japan summoned China’s ambassador to lodge a protest over what Tokyo called “extremely inappropriate” language by a Chinese consul-general. Japanese officials emphasise, however, that Tokyo remains committed to the 1972 Japan-China Joint Communiqué and has not reversed its official position on Taiwan — which is to support peaceful resolution, while maintaining strategic ambiguity. Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara said Tokyo hoped for a return to dialogue and urged Beijing to take “appropriate measures” so as not to damage broad-based relations. International Reaction: Concern, Caution and Strategic Implications The escalation in rhetoric has drawn attention from the wider Indo-Pacific and beyond. Analysts note the dispute adds another layer of complexity to the strategic competition between China, Japan and the United States in the region. Japan’s annual defence white paper had earlier described China’s military expansion as its most significant strategic challenge. The United States and other regional partners have not yet issued a unified public response specifically to the “destroy all military targets” rhetoric, but ongoing U.S.–Japan defence cooperation suggests growing concern about China’s long-term intentions. Observers caution that the situation risks rapid escalation if miscalculation occurs. Even a relatively small Japanese step toward supporting Taiwan—such as logistic assistance or intelligence sharing—could provoke stronger Chinese counter-measures, including economic pressure, military posturing around Japan’s islands or sanctions targeting Japanese interests.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 17:38:44
India
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is set to deliver an initial batch of its laser-based counter-drone system to the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force (IAF), marking the first induction of this class of weapon system in India. The system, designated the Integrated Drone Detection & Interdiction System (Mk-2) (IDD&IS Mk-2), boasts a 10 kW directed-energy laser and an engagement range of up to 2 km. Initial Order & Future Plans Details emerging from defence sources indicate that the Army and IAF will place an initial order for 17 units of the IDD&IS Mk-2. The quantity is modest by major procurement standards, but reflects caution: this is a “first series” deployment, ahead of further orders pending full operational satisfaction by the services. According to officials, “once the armed forces are satisfied with system performance, follow-on orders will be placed.” Officials emphasise that, worldwide, very few militaries have field-ed pure laser anti-drone weapons, so the Indian decision to procure initially is seen as prudent. System Specifications & Role The IDD&IS Mk-2 incorporates detection, tracking and hard-kill interdiction of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). It uses a 10 kW laser module capable of focusing sufficient energy to disable or destroy small hostile drones within approximately 2 km. The system integrates radar or electro-optical sensors for detection, and combines ‘soft kill’ methods (signal jamming/spoofing) with the high-power laser for ‘hard kill’. While DRDO has not publicly confirmed all technical details of the Mk-2 version, informed commentary notes the 10 kW figure and ~2 km range as key performance parameters. Strategic Context & Global Landscape Laser-directed energy weapons (DEWs) remain at the cutting edge of air-defence technology. Until recently, only a handful of countries—such as Israel, the United States and China—have publicly deployed or demonstrated such systems. Indian procurement of the IDD&IS Mk-2 is therefore significant: it not only addresses the growing threat of drone proliferation but also marks a step toward future high-energy weaponisation. Defence analysts say that by placing a limited initial order, the Indian services are balancing “early adoption” of advanced technology with risk management: operational reliability, maintainability and cost per engagement still need to be proven in realistic conditions. DRDO’s Higher-Power Laser Programme Parallel to the IDD&IS Mk-2, DRDO is working on laser systems of much higher power. In April 2025 it publicly demonstrated a truck-mounted 30 kW laser weapon system (Mk-II (A)) at the National Open Air Range (NOAR) in Kurnool, capable of engaging drones, helicopter-type aerial threats, sensors and surveillance antennas. The 30 kW system reportedly uses multiple laser modules combined to achieve high output and is aimed at “hard kill” of targets at longer ranges (up to 4 km in some reports). DRDO has also declared that development efforts are ongoing for even higher-power systems (50-100 kW class) to counter cruise missiles, incoming missiles and more resilient airborne threats. Implications & Next Steps For the Army and IAF, the adoption of the IDD&IS Mk-2 provides a new layer of drone defence—one that goes beyond traditional kinetic interceptors or jamming. The laser system offers very rapid engagement, reduced logistical burden, and potentially lower cost per shot. The modest initial order of 17 units suggests that the services will evaluate the system under field conditions—deployment, maintainability, weather/optics challenges, integration with command networks—before larger scale procurement. DRDO and industry partners will likely accelerate work on follow-on lasers and ruggedisation of the system. From a manufacturing perspective, DRDO’s involvement signals that the Indian defence eco-system is moving toward greater self-reliance in directed-energy weapons. Caution & Operational Considerations While the technology is promising, practitioners caution that lasers have practical limitations: weather, line-of-sight constraints, thermal blooming, target coatings, and power-management demands. Field trials and service use will reveal how well the Mk-2 system handles these real-world factors. Also, the fact that very few laser DEWs are deployed in combat means that proof of concept remains emerging. This underlines why India has opted for an incremental procurement trajectory.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 17:27:26
World
Russia has unveiled the Su-57E export variant fitted with rectangular 2D thrust-vectoring nozzles, marking a major upgrade in its stealth, propulsion, and export configuration. The fighter’s debut at the Dubai Airshow 2025 — its first public appearance in the Middle East — has intensified speculation over whether India will be offered the low-RCS variant it has long demanded. A New Nozzle Design Signals a Shift in Russia’s Export Strategy Touching down at Dubai World Central in full export trim, the Su-57E immediately drew attention for its new rectangular 2D TVC nozzles, replacing the earlier circular 3D units. The redesigned nozzles significantly reduce radar cross-section, lower infrared signature, and improve stealth shaping at the aircraft’s rear — a known concern for foreign clients. Russian officials privately acknowledge that the nozzle redesign was driven partly by export requirements, with India being one of the nations that insisted on improved rear-aspect signature management. Aggressive Flight Displays Highlight Supermaneuverability During daily demonstrations, test pilot Sergei Bogdan put the Su-57E through high-angle-of-attack turns, post-stall manoeuvres, rapid climbs, and controlled flat spins. The rectangular nozzles maintained the fighter’s hallmark supermaneuverability, showing refined low-speed control and high stability during post-stall flight. Russia emphasized that the Su-57E provides a combination of stealth and agility, reflecting a design philosophy distinct from the F-35. Stealth Features and Sensor Suite Underscore Multirole Capability Officials from Rosoboronexport and Sukhoi highlighted the jet’s blended wing-body design, internal weapons bays, serpentine intake ducts, and radar-absorbent coatings, all contributing to its reduced observability. The aircraft integrates the N036 Byelka AESA radar, advanced IRST, long-range datalinks, and a robust electronic warfare suite, enabling both air-superiority and precision-strike missions while operating in contested environments. Russia Positions the Su-57E Against Global Competitors Moscow is marketing the Su-57E as an alternative to the F-35, China’s J-20, and the developing KF-21. Unlike Western systems, Russia stresses sovereign use rights, weapons integration freedom, and the absence of political restrictions. Despite this, analysts remain cautious about Russia’s production capacity, long-term sustainment, and supply chain resilience under sanctions. Russian officials confirmed that while current export units use the AL-41F1 engines, future batches are expected to receive the more advanced Izdeliye 30. India’s Big Question: Will It Get the Low-RCS Su-57 Variant? India’s objections during the now-paused FGFA programme focused on the rear-aspect RCS, engine signature, and the depth of available technology transfer. The introduction of rectangular 2D nozzles directly addresses one of India’s core demands. With the AMCA program progressing, India may still seek an interim or complementary fifth-generation solution — and Russia’s upgraded Su-57E appears tailored to re-open that dialogue. Whether Moscow is willing to provide the exact low-observable configuration India wants remains an unresolved but significant question. A Debut with Broader Geopolitical Implications The Su-57E’s appearance in Dubai is more than a flight demonstration — it is a strategic signal. With the Middle East emerging as a competitive fighter marketplace, Russia aims to secure relevance despite sanctions and industrial strain. The jet’s performance in desert conditions is being watched closely by potential buyers and Western analysts assessing Russia’s evolving fifth-generation capability. The revamped Su-57E, equipped with rectangular 2D TVC nozzles, marks Russia’s strongest export push yet for a true stealth-capable fifth-generation fighter. As Moscow courts Gulf customers and eyes renewed interest from India, the question now is whether this enhanced low-RCS configuration will translate into real export orders — and whether New Delhi will reconsider its stance.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 17:08:49
World
A fresh wave of media reports and unverified leaks has thrown Pakistan’s military establishment into controversy once again, after claims surfaced that top Pakistan Army generals secretly met US officials in Qatar to negotiate the deployment of Pakistani troops to Gaza — in exchange for money. According to these reports, Pakistan initially demanded $10,000 per soldier, while the US and Israel allegedly countered with $100. After tough bargaining, a supposed “compromise rate” of $500 per soldier for 10,000 troops was reportedly agreed upon. None of the governments involved have confirmed the story, but the allegation mirrors a long, documented pattern of Pakistan sending soldiers abroad in exchange for financial compensation, fueling further criticism. Why Pakistan Soldiers for Gaza? The alleged discussion aligns with Washington’s push for a Muslim-country–led stabilisation force in Gaza once major combat subsides. The US has repeatedly insisted there will be no American boots on the ground, preferring instead to rely on regional militaries to police Gaza, secure key zones, and neutralise remaining militant elements. For the US and Israel, Pakistan is often viewed as: A large, battle-experienced army A Muslim-majority force that gives political “cover” to a Western plan A military known to participate in foreign deployments if the price is right The latest reports claim Pakistan was approached because of its history of rented troop deployments, particularly in the Middle East, where Pakistani soldiers have long been stationed in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states for security duties. History Suggests Pakistan Sells Its Soldiers — Critics Say While the current Qatar story remains unverified, analysts argue it is consistent with Pakistan’s long-standing pattern of deploying forces abroad for financial and political gain. Black September, 1970: Pakistan’s Darkest Chapter During the 1970 Black September crisis in Jordan, Pakistani soldiers under then-Brigadier Zia-ul-Haq helped the Jordanian monarchy crush Palestinian factions. Historical accounts accuse Pakistani-led units of participating in operations that killed thousands of Palestinians, with estimates often cited as high as 20,000–25,000.For critics today, Gaza would not be the first time Pakistan’s military was accused of turning its guns on other Muslims at the request — and reward — of foreign powers. Troops for Hire in the Gulf Pakistan has kept thousands of troops stationed in Saudi Arabia for decades, protecting royal palaces, training Saudi forces, and guarding sensitive sites. These deployments have consistently brought Pakistan billions of dollars in aid, loans, oil concessions, and military contracts. This history is frequently cited by critics to argue that Pakistan’s military leadership is driven not by ideology or strategic necessity, but by financial incentives. “Richest Generals in the World”: The Money Question The allegation that Pakistan bargained over soldier fees for Gaza reignites a familiar criticism:Pakistan’s generals are among the richest military officers globally, presiding over vast business empires, real-estate networks, and foreign assets while Pakistan itself struggles with poverty and financial collapse. Opposition politicians and analysts argue that: Pakistan’s military elite prioritises foreign deals that personally enrich their institution Public welfare, national security, and citizens’ interests come far below the generals’ financial motives Every international mission becomes another opportunity for the military to earn money, not honour The alleged Gaza troop negotiation, they say, fits this pattern “perfectly.” Inside the Reported Qatar Meeting Media claims suggest the following narrative: US officials met senior Pakistan Army leaders in Qatar, seeking troop contributions for a Gaza stabilisation force. Pakistan reportedly demanded $10,000 per soldier — an amount critics called “absurdly high” and reflective of military greed. The US and Israel allegedly rejected the demand, offering $100 per soldier. After “hard bargaining,” a supposed $500 per soldier settlement for 10,000 Pakistani troops was “informally agreed.” Talks were described as “intense,” with both sides aware that Pakistan’s cooperation required substantial financial incentives. Again, these details come from media leaks, unnamed sources, and regional commentary, not official statements. Why the Claims Sound Believable to Critics Even though the reports remain unverified, analysts argue that the story resonates because it aligns with Pakistan’s long-standing behaviour. Pakistan’s economy is in deep crisis, and many believe the military establishment is increasingly desperate for foreign money. The Pakistan Army has a well-known history of sending troops abroad in exchange for payment, and critics say its generals have repeatedly shown a willingness to pursue secret military diplomacy whenever a lucrative offer emerges. Historically, Pakistan has often served foreign interests — from fighting America’s wars in Afghanistan to providing security to Saudi Arabia — usually in return for aid, cash, or political rewards. Because of this pattern, many commentators insist the question is not whether Pakistan negotiated troop prices, but how much they were offered this time. A Blow to Pakistan’s Image — Whether True or Not The media storm has already dealt a heavy blow to Pakistan’s reputation. Regional analysts accuse Islamabad of exploiting the Gaza tragedy for profit and betraying the Palestinian cause. The idea that the army may treat Pakistani soldiers as export commodities, available for sale to foreign powers, has drawn sharp criticism. Some Middle Eastern commentators argue that, if the claims are accurate, Pakistan would once again be turning its guns on fellow Muslims, echoing its actions during the 1970 Black September crisis in Jordan. Within Pakistan, opposition voices claim the episode confirms a long-standing truth: Pakistan’s generals care more about money and foreign deals than about the country’s own citizens. No Official Confirmation — But Massive Embarrassment Pakistan’s government has not confirmed any troop deployment plan, nor addressed the allegations of price negotiations. The military has remained silent, and the United States has declined to specify which nations it is approaching for a Gaza stabilisation force. Regardless of official silence, the damage is significant. The perception that Pakistan’s military may be ready to sell its soldiers to the highest bidder, especially in a conflict involving Palestinians, has sparked widespread criticism. The controversy has revived painful historical memories and strengthened the belief that Pakistan’s military leadership values profit and foreign approval over principle, dignity, or national interest.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 16:20:56
India
India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has unveiled its latest underwater platform, the Manportable Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (MPAUV), a compact mine-hunting and surveillance system designed for rapid deployment in coastal and littoral zones. Displayed at a recent defence exhibition, the system reflects India’s accelerating push to expand its indigenous autonomous underwater capabilities. Designed for Rapid Underwater Missions According to details released at the venue, the MPAUV is intended to be deployed quickly to secure safe operating areas and transit routes for naval vessels by detecting, classifying and neutralising sea-bottom mines. The vehicle is engineered to support fleets with fast-response underwater reconnaissance in both peacetime and conflict. Despite its man-portable form, the system is built to deliver high underwater performance suited for mine countermeasure (MCM) operations. Capabilities and Mission Role DRDO states that the MPAUV integrates: Surveillance & Neutralisation capability Rapid deployment with wide-area detection Low-false alarms for high mission reliability By combining autonomy with compactness, the platform enables underwater route clearance and area sanitisation without the need for large support vessels. Technical Specifications Key specifications displayed include: Speed: 4 knots Endurance: 6 hours Propulsion: Electric Guidance: Autonomous Operating Depth: 60 metres Dimensions: 2000 mm (length), 160 mm (diameter) Weight: 30 kg Launch Platform: Ship / SCOOPA compatible The MPAUV’s lightweight design allows operators to deploy it swiftly from small boats or larger ships, greatly enhancing flexibility in shallow-water operations. Strengthening Indigenous Underwater Systems The platform—marked “Designed and developed by DRDO”—highlights India’s growing commitment to unmanned underwater systems. As global navies increasingly rely on AUVs for mine warfare, seabed mapping, and coastal surveillance, DRDO’s MPAUV is set to become an essential asset in the Indian Navy’s evolving undersea operations. The system adds to India’s expanding catalogue of indigenous marine robotics intended to bolster maritime security across the Indian Ocean Region.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 15:42:27
World
The United States has completed a major series of stockpile flight tests for its upgraded B61-12 nuclear gravity bomb, validating the weapon’s compatibility with the stealth F-35A and marking a significant milestone in the country’s nuclear modernization program. The announcement was made by the US Department of Energy’s Sandia National Laboratories following the successful trials at the Tonopah Test Range in Nevada. Three Days of Critical Testing According to Sandia, the tests were conducted from August 19 to 21, with operational support from Hill Air Force Base in Utah. During the trials, inert B61-12 units were released from the F-35A, demonstrating the complete end-to-end functioning of the aircraft, its aircrew, and the weapon system under realistic mission conditions. These were the only B61-12 stockpile flight tests using joint test assemblies on the F-35 platform this year, according to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Officials stated that the exercises were intended to evaluate the weapon’s operational readiness, ensuring it performs as expected when carried, released, and guided under combat-representative environments. A Cornerstone of U.S. Nuclear Modernization The B61-12, a modernized variant of the decades-old B61 bomb family, recently completed a multiyear life extension program (LEP) in late 2024. The initiative aims to extend the bomb’s operational service life by at least 20 additional years. The LEP includes: Replacement of ageing components Updated encryption and use-control algorithms Improved safety and arming mechanisms Enhanced compatibility with future aircraft such as the B-21 Raider Sandia officials noted that the LEP addresses all known age-related concerns in the U.S. B61 stockpile, ensuring the weapon remains safe, secure, and reliable well into the 2040s and beyond. Full-scale production of the refurbished B61-12 began in May 2025, with manufacturing expected to conclude in 2026. “Capstone Accomplishment” After Unprecedented Testing Pace Jeffrey Boyd, Sandia’s surveillance lead for the B61-12 and B61-13, praised the achievement, calling it: “the capstone accomplishment of a tremendous amount of planning and effort by those involved across Sandia and many partner agencies.” He added that this marks the highest number of B61-12 surveillance flight tests conducted within a single year, and likely the most for any future year as well — underscoring the intensity of the current evaluation cycle. First-Ever Thermal Preconditioning Trial A notable highlight of the test series was the first-ever thermal preconditioning of a B61-12 joint test assembly carried on an F-35A. The process exposed the weapon to extreme environmental conditions before flight, ensuring it could withstand temperature stresses likely to be encountered during real-world nuclear deployments. Sandia says this thermal testing is crucial to certifying the bomb for global operations, especially in regions with high-temperature fluctuations or extended alert postures. Strengthening Dual-Capable Aircraft Operations The successful release tests confirm the F-35A’s readiness as a dual-capable aircraft, enabling it to carry out both conventional strike and nuclear delivery missions for NATO and U.S. forces. The combination of stealth, advanced sensors, and compatibility with the B61-12 is expected to provide the Pentagon with a more survivable and precise low-yield nuclear option, enhancing deterrence posture in contested airspace. A Legacy Weapon Redesigned for the Future Originally introduced in 1968, the B61 remains one of the longest-serving components of the U.S. nuclear arsenal. The B61-12 variant replaces several older versions, offering: A guided tail-kit for improved accuracy Reduced overall number of variants in the stockpile Enhanced reliability and controlled low-yield strike capability With the F-35A now validated as a carrier, the U.S. nuclear enterprise moves a step closer to completing one of its most important modernization efforts.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 14:49:22
India
Fresh images shared by defence analyst @ReviewVayu have offered the clearest technical confirmation yet that India’s new Astra Mk-II air-to-air missile is a substantially larger and more advanced weapon than the operational Astra Mk-I. The missiles, displayed together at Aero India 2025 and again at the Department of Defence Production pavilion during the India International Trade Fair in New Delhi, have allowed analysts to closely study the structural and propulsion differences between the two variants. Experts observing the latest photographs note that the Astra Mk-II is both longer and wider, signalling a major redesign focused on extending range and terminal performance. The most visible upgrade is its expanded propulsion system: the motor diameter increases from 178 mm in the Mk-I to 190 mm in the Mk-II, confirming additional propellant volume. The images also reveal a distinctive tapered mid-section, a feature absent in Astra Mk-I. Analysts believe this is because the warhead and guidance section on the Mk-II retains the narrower Mk-I diameter, while the motor section has been widened, creating a stepped profile where the two meet. Further study of the display models suggests that the Mk-II incorporates a dual-pulse rocket motor, a major leap from the single-pulse Mk-I. Defence specialists note that both pulse-1 and pulse-2 motors use aft finocyl grain configurations, an advanced grain geometry that supports controlled burn characteristics, improved thrust efficiency, and sustained terminal energy. This allows the missile to re-energise itself mid-flight, enhancing manoeuvrability and kill probability at longer distances. Although the Ministry of Defence has not officially announced the range of Astra Mk-II, the enlarged motor, added fuel volume, and dual-pulse system strongly indicate a range well beyond 150 km, with many analysts estimating up to 200 km in optimal launch conditions. In comparison, the current Astra Mk-I has a maximum range of 110 km. The new imagery also highlights that the Mk-II’s mid-section is not only longer but noticeably wider, reinforcing that the missile carries more propellant than its predecessor. The Astra Mk-II was first unveiled to the public at Aero India 2025, where its expanded dimensions drew significant attention. Its reappearance at the ongoing trade fair has renewed interest among defence observers, who continue to express curiosity about the internal grain geometry of both propulsion pulses—details that remain classified. With a larger airframe, dual-pulse propulsion, and an improved flight profile, the Astra Mk-II marks one of the most significant advancements in India’s air-to-air missile development. The missile is expected to strengthen the Indian Air Force’s long-range engagement capabilities and narrow the gap with global next-generation BVR platforms as testing progresses and induction draws closer.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 14:42:07
World
London/Washington — The BBC is reportedly preparing for a possible $1–$5 billion lawsuit from U.S. President Donald Trump, who claims the broadcaster spread false and damaging reports about him. If the lawsuit goes ahead, it could become one of the biggest legal battles ever faced by the BBC — and British taxpayers may end up paying the cost. Why Trump Plans to Sue People close to the situation say President Trump believes the BBC repeatedly reported wrong, unfair, and biased information about him over the years. His team says BBC coverage of the 2016, 2020, and 2024 U.S. elections, along with documentaries and commentary shows, made him look bad in ways they argue were not true. Trump’s lawyers claim this hurt his reputation worldwide, and they believe U.K. defamation laws — which are stricter than those in the U.S. — give him a strong case. Trump’s Previous Legal Wins This possible lawsuit comes after Trump recently won several major settlements from American tech and media companies. He has already received: $25 million from YouTube and Meta $10 million from X (formerly Twitter) $16 million from CBS and ABC These settlements are not public in detail, but they have encouraged Trump to take on even bigger targets — and the BBC is next on the list. Why British Taxpayers Are Worried Because the BBC is funded mostly by the TV licence fee, the money collected from people across the U.K., any large payout or long legal fight would be supported by the public. Some British lawmakers warn that a multi-billion-dollar lawsuit could cause the BBC to cut services or even need government help. Online, many people joke — or worry — that U.K. households might end up “helping to pay for the Trump Presidential Library.” Experts Split on Whether Trump Can Win Legal experts disagree over whether Trump has a strong case. Some say he might win because U.K. defamation laws demand very careful and accurate reporting from broadcasters. If the BBC made mistakes, that could be used against them. Others argue the BBC has the right to report on the actions of a sitting U.S. President and that much of its coverage falls under fair journalism. Either way, a lawsuit of this size would be historic. So far, the BBC has not commented. However, inside the organization, senior editors and lawyers are reportedly reviewing past reporting to prepare for what could be a long and expensive legal fight. President Trump is expected to decide soon whether to officially file the lawsuit. If he does, the case would likely go to London’s High Court, drawing worldwide attention. For now, the BBC is waiting for Trump’s next move — and the U.K. public is watching closely, knowing they may play an unexpected role in a major international legal battle.
Read More → Posted on 2025-11-16 14:21:18Search
Top Trending
-
Agneepath Scheme replaced with Sainik Samman Scheme 2024, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Relaunched Agniveer Scheme
-
Death in Dhaka: CIA Links Surface After Putin Shielded Modi During SCO Meet
-
Key Differences Between 5th vs. 6th Generation Fighter Jets
-
Pakistan Air Force to Unveil Stealth-Enhanced JF-17 Block 4 Fighter Jet by 2028
-
Pakistan Announces 15% Increase in Defence Budget for 2024-25 Amid Economic Crisis
-
India’s AMCA Engine Decision: Safran vs. Rolls-Royce Final Expected by 2025
-
India's TEDBF Program Takes Shape First Flight by 2028: Aiming for Naval Supremacy with Advanced Stealth and Technology
-
What Would Happen if the USA Left NATO? A Comprehensive Analysis
Top Trending in 4 Days
-
U.S. Army Protests $47,000 Charge for a $15 Black Hawk Component
-
Vietnam Approves Russian Anti-Cancer Drug for Nationwide Distribution
-
U.S. Quietly Reactivates Puerto Rico Military Base as F-35s and Warships Gather Opposite Venezuela
-
Secret Reports Claim Pakistan Agreed to $500-Per-Soldier Deal for Gaza Deployment
-
Japan Unveils Prototype of New Long-Range Anti-Ship Missile Powered by XKJ301-1 Turbojet
-
Japan Accuses China-Backed Hackers of Embedding Malicious Firmware in TP-Link Routers
-
China Sends Type 076 “Drone Carrier” Sichuan for First Sea Trials, First Amphibious Ship Equipped With EMALS
-
U.S. Approves $330 Million Sale of Fighter Jet Spare Parts to Taiwan, First Under Trump Administration
