World 

Moscow / Kyiv : Russia said it fired an Oreshnik intermediate-range hypersonic missile (IRBM) at targets in Ukraine overnight, describing the strike as retaliation for an alleged Ukrainian drone attempt on a residence associated with President Vladimir Putin. Kyiv rejected the claim outright, calling it “an absurd lie” intended to undermine already fragile peace efforts. According to Moscow, this marked the second operational use of the Oreshnik missile, which Russian officials claim travels at speeds exceeding Mach 10 and cannot be intercepted by existing air-defence systems. While the missile is capable of carrying nuclear or conventional warheads, there was no indication that the weapon used in the overnight attack carried anything other than a conventional payload.   Russian Account of the Strike The Russian Defence Ministry said the operation combined attack drones, high-precision long-range land-based missiles, and sea-launched weapons, targeting what it described as Ukraine’s critical infrastructure. In a statement, the ministry said: “The strike’s targets were hit. The targets included facilities producing unmanned aerial vehicles used in the terrorist attack, as well as energy infrastructure supporting Ukraine’s military-industrial complex.” Ukraine dismissed the allegation that its drones had attempted to strike a Putin residence in Russia’s Novgorod region in late December. Former U.S. president Donald Trump also said he did not believe such a strike had occurred, suggesting that an unrelated incident may have taken place nearby.   Gas Supply Concerns Emerge in Lviv Region Following the Oreshnik strike, local Ukrainian media reported that there was “almost no gas” in parts of Lviv Oblast, raising concerns about the impact of the attack on civilian energy supplies. Earlier reports suggested that the missile hit a strategic underground gas storage facility near the city of Stryi. The facility is located approximately 66 kilometres from Lviv city and about 75 kilometres from the Polish border, underscoring the proximity of the strike to NATO territory. Ukrainian officials have not publicly confirmed the full extent of the damage, but the reports have intensified fears of further disruptions to heating and energy availability during winter conditions. The governor of the Lviv region earlier acknowledged that Russian attacks had struck an infrastructure site, while Ukraine’s air force later confirmed that Russia had launched an Oreshnik missile from the Kapustin Yar test range near the Caspian Sea.   Questions Over Oreshnik’s Military Impact Russia first used the Oreshnik missile in November 2024, when it said the weapon struck a Ukrainian military factory. Ukrainian sources later claimed that the missile carried dummy warheads and caused limited damage. Despite Putin’s assertion that the missile’s destructive power rivals that of a nuclear weapon even when armed conventionally, some Western officials remain sceptical. One U.S. official said in December 2024 that the system was not regarded as a battlefield game-changer.   Putin Issues Stark Warning The strike coincided with a highly symbolic appearance by Vladimir Putin in full combat uniform, during which he issued a stark warning to Kyiv. “If Kyiv refuses peace, Russia will crush all its goals in the Special Military Operation through pure military force,” he said. Kyiv argues that missile strikes on energy infrastructure and escalating rhetoric contradict Moscow’s stated interest in negotiations. As claims and counterclaims continue, the reported gas shortages in western Ukraine highlight the potential civilian consequences of Russia’s expanding use of advanced missile systems in the conflict.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-09 13:59:57
 World 

Washington / Moscow : Tensions between United States and Russia have intensified sharply after U.S. forces began pursuing four Russian-linked oil tankers attempting to escape from Venezuela, prompting Moscow to deploy warships and signal possible retaliatory action against U.S.-linked shipping.   According to U.S. officials and maritime intelligence sources, the tankers — Galileo, Sintez, Expander, and a fourth unidentified vessel — are suspected of carrying Venezuelan crude oil in violation of U.S. sanctions. American authorities allege the ships used evasive practices, including renaming, reflagging, and opaque ownership structures, to bypass international monitoring while exporting oil from Venezuelan ports.   U.S. Navy and Coast Guard assets have been tracking the vessels since their departure, describing the operation as part of a broader crackdown on what Washington calls a “shadow fleet” used to move sanctioned oil. Officials say interception or seizure remains an option if the ships are deemed to be operating outside the protections of international maritime law.   Russia has reacted forcefully. Russian naval units have been ordered to move toward the tankers’ projected routes to ensure their safe passage, while the Kremlin has condemned the U.S. pursuit as illegal. In a further escalation, Russian officials and state-linked analysts have warned that Moscow is considering reciprocal measures, including the capture or detention of U.S.-linked oil tankers, should Russian shadow fleet vessels be seized by the United States.   The threat of tit-for-tat tanker seizures marks a serious turning point, raising concerns that sanctions enforcement at sea could spiral into a wider maritime confrontation. Analysts warn that the involvement of commercial shipping, naval escorts, and competing legal claims significantly increases the risk of miscalculation.   With Venezuela remaining central to the dispute and U.S.–Russia relations already under strain, the pursuit of these tankers highlights how energy security, sanctions policy, and military power are converging on the high seas, adding a new and dangerous dimension to the growing geopolitical rivalry.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-09 13:53:23
 World 

President Donald Trump has unveiled one of the most ambitious defense spending proposals in U.S. history, calling for a 50% increase in the American military budget for 2027, pushing total defense outlays to an unprecedented $1.5 trillion. The proposal, announced through statements on Truth Social, was framed by Trump as a response to what he described as “troubled and dangerous times,” arguing that the United States must decisively outpace its rivals in military power, readiness, and technological superiority. The announcement immediately reverberated across financial markets and defense policy circles, signaling a potential structural shift in how the United States funds, manages, and prioritizes its armed forces.   NATO Pressure and a Global Defense Spending Surge Trump’s proposal comes just weeks after NATO formally pledged to raise collective defense spending to 5% of GDP by 2035, a dramatic escalation from the long-standing 2% benchmark. Alliance officials privately acknowledge that sustained pressure from Trump—who has repeatedly criticized European allies for underinvesting in defense—was a major catalyst behind the decision. By pushing U.S. defense spending toward $1.5 trillion, Trump is signaling that Washington intends not only to lead NATO politically, but to financially and militarily dominate the alliance in an era defined by great-power competition with China and Russia, persistent instability in the Middle East, and emerging threats in cyberspace and outer space.   Market Shock: Defense Stocks Slide on Policy Uncertainty Despite the headline figure suggesting massive future spending, Trump’s accompanying remarks rattled investors. He proposed a $5 million cap on executive compensation at major defense contractors and called for a temporary ban on stock buybacks and dividends until what he termed “critical national priorities” are resolved. The lack of detail on enforcement mechanisms spooked markets. Shares of Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics fell by more than 4%, while Northrop Grumman dropped by over 5% in heavy trading, reflecting investor concern that higher government spending could come with tighter profit controls.   Why the U.S. Seeks a $1.5 Trillion Military Budget U.S. military spending already far exceeds that of other nations: total outlays for defence, including personnel, operations, procurement and research, have historically ranked the United States as the largest spender globally by a wide margin. Proponents of the budget surge cite several factors: Great Power Competition: Tensions with strategic rivals like China and Russia, and instability in regions such as the Middle East and Eastern Europe, are cited as drivers of increased readiness. Modernization Needs: Upgrading advanced capabilities — such as next-generation aircraft, hypersonics, missile defense systems and space forces — requires substantial capital investment beyond routine maintenance. Global Commitments: Maintaining U.S. force posture and fulfilment of alliance obligations, including supporting NATO forward presence and Indo-Pacific deterrence, demands sustained high funding levels. Experts note that the baseline U.S. defence spending for 2025 was already on the order of $850 billion in discretionary funding before Trump’s proposal, reflecting enduring commitments to personnel, operations and modernization.   Where the U.S. Defense Budget Stands Today According to recent reporting, the current U.S. defense baseline for 2026 is approximately $901 billion, already the largest military budget in the world. That figure represents roughly 3–3.3% of U.S. GDP. Trump’s proposed $1.5 trillion budget would push defense spending close to 5% of GDP, levels last seen during the Cold War’s most intense periods. Pentagon officials argue that inflation, personnel costs, fuel prices, and the rising complexity of advanced weapons have significantly reduced real purchasing power, even as nominal budgets reach record highs.   How the Pentagon Actually Spends Its Money Cross-checked against official Department of Defense budget tables, the FY2025 request provides a clear picture of how U.S. military funding is distributed: Approximately $181.9 billion, or about 22%, is devoted to military personnel, covering salaries, housing allowances, healthcare, pensions, and benefits for active-duty troops, reservists, and civilian employees. The largest share—around $337.9 billion, or roughly 40%—goes to operations and maintenance. This category funds training, fuel, spare parts, base operations, and the maintenance of ships, aircraft, armored vehicles, and missile systems. About $167.5 billion, or around 20%, is allocated to procurement, supporting the purchase of new weapons platforms such as fighter jets, warships, submarines, armored vehicles, and precision-guided munitions. A further $147.7 billion, or nearly 18%, is directed toward research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E)—the core of U.S. military modernization, including hypersonic weapons, missile defense, artificial intelligence, space systems, and nuclear modernization.   U.S. Military Bases: Inside and Outside America The United States maintains the world’s largest global military footprint, but base counts vary depending on definition. Publicly cited estimates indicate around 750 overseas U.S. base sites across roughly 80 countries. Broader Department of Defense datasets, using a wider definition of “sites” and “facilities,” count thousands of installations and more than 500,000 individual facilities worldwide. In financial terms, the Pentagon does not publish a single, precise percentage split for spending on domestic versus overseas bases. However, most analysts agree that the majority of base-related costs are incurred inside the United States, reflecting the scale of domestic infrastructure and personnel concentrations. Overseas bases, while fewer in number, remain strategically critical for deterrence, rapid deployment, and forward presence.   Weapons, Maintenance, and Modernization When personnel and daily operations are set aside, the numbers highlight the cost of sustaining and upgrading U.S. military power. Maintenance of existing platforms—ships, aircraft, armored vehicles, and missile systems—accounts for a significant share of operations and maintenance funding. Combined spending on procurement and RDT&E, which together represent around 38% of the FY2025 request, illustrates how heavily the Pentagon is investing in modernization. This includes next-generation aircraft, expanded naval fleets, missile defense systems, space-based assets, and advanced nuclear capabilities.   What Changes Under a $1.5 Trillion Budget If Trump’s proposal were enacted, Pentagon planners estimate that absolute spending on domestic U.S. bases would rise from roughly $230–250 billion today to over $350 billion, even if the percentage share remains broadly similar. Spending on new weapons procurement and modernization could climb from about $450 billion annually to nearly $500 billion, accelerating programs for next-generation aircraft, naval expansion, missile defense, and nuclear modernization. In percentage terms, modernization and new weapons purchases could rise from around 35% of the budget today to nearly 40%, reflecting a strategic shift toward long-term competition with peer adversaries rather than counter-insurgency operations.   A Defining Debate Ahead Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense vision sets the stage for one of the most consequential military budget debates in modern U.S. history. Supporters argue it is essential to deter peer competitors and preserve American military superiority. Critics warn of fiscal strain, market disruption, and the long-term sustainability of such spending. As Congress weighs the proposal and allies recalibrate their own defense plans, one conclusion is unavoidable: the structure, scale, and priorities of U.S. military spending are on the verge of a profound transformation.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-09 13:32:31
 World 

Washington / Caracas: A fresh political and energy debate has erupted after claims linked to former US President Donald Trump that access to 30–50 Million Barrels of Venezuelan oil could represent a major Strategic Energy Gain for the United States. Energy analysts, refinery engineers, and Senator Jeff Merkley argue the opposite: that the oil in question is largely Extra-Heavy, Tar-Like Crude, among the most Difficult And Expensive petroleum grades in the global market to transport and refine. At the heart of the controversy is Venezuela’s Orinoco Petroleum Belt, the source of most of the country’s remaining large-scale production. While Venezuela formally holds the world’s Largest Proven Oil Reserves, industry data consistently shows that a dominant share of those reserves consists of Extra-Heavy Crude, fundamentally different from the Light And Medium Oils that underpin global benchmark markets.   Why Venezuelan Oil Is Described As “Tar-Like” Crude oil quality is primarily measured by API Gravity and Viscosity. The lower the API gravity, the heavier and thicker the oil. Much of Venezuela’s Orinoco crude falls well below 10 Degrees API , placing it firmly in the Extra-Heavy Category, whereas "high quality" crude like West Texas Intermediate (WTI) is around 40°.  At ambient temperatures, this oil can barely flow, often compared by engineers to Bitumen Or Asphalt rather than conventional liquid crude. Compounding the challenge, Orinoco crude contains High Sulfur Levels and elevated concentrations of Metals Such As Vanadium And Nickel. These impurities accelerate equipment corrosion, degrade catalysts and raise maintenance costs. As a result, this oil cannot be handled, transported or refined using standard infrastructure without significant modification.   What This Means In Practical Terms Senator Merkley’s criticism centers on the gap between Political Messaging and Industrial Reality. Extra-heavy crude requires Special Handling At Every Stage of the supply chain. To move it from oilfields to export terminals, operators must either Heat The Crude, Dilute It With Lighter Hydrocarbons, or Partially Upgrade It At Source. Each option carries substantial Capital And Operating Costs. Once the oil reaches a refinery, the complexity intensifies. Unlike light crude, which naturally yields gasoline, diesel and jet fuel, extra-heavy crude produces large volumes of Low-Value Residue. Converting this residue into usable fuels requires Deep-Conversion Units such as Delayed Cokers or Hydrocrackers, which are expensive, hydrogen-intensive and energy-hungry.   Which Refineries Can Actually Process Venezuelan Heavy Crude Globally, only a limited number of refineries are configured to handle Venezuelan extra-heavy oil on a sustained and economic basis. In the United States, this capability is concentrated along the US Gulf Coast, where several large refineries were historically designed to process Heavy Latin American And Middle Eastern Crudes and are equipped with advanced coking and hydroprocessing units. Outside the US, India and China are the most notable processors. India’s most complex refining systems, designed for Maximum Feedstock Flexibility, have processed Venezuelan heavy crude in the past when sanctions and logistics allowed. In China, both state-owned refiners and some independent facilities have experience running Heavily Discounted Extra-Heavy And Sanctioned Crudes, adjusting volumes based on geopolitics and pricing. By contrast, many refineries in Europe, Africa And Parts Of Asia lack the deep-conversion infrastructure required, making Venezuelan extra-heavy oil either technically unsuitable or economically unattractive.   Can US Refineries That Process Saudi Crude Handle Venezuelan Oil? A central source of confusion is the comparison with Saudi crude. Saudi Arabia exports several medium-to-heavy grades, but even its heavier crudes are generally Less Viscous And Cleaner than Venezuela’s Orinoco oil. Some US refineries that process Saudi crude can technically run Venezuelan heavy crude, but only if they possess Sufficient Coking Capacity, Robust Hydrogen Supply and Blending Flexibility. Even then, refinery throughput may need to be reduced, operating costs increase and profitability depends heavily on securing the crude at a Steep Discount. Refineries lacking these features cannot simply switch feeds without Major Capital Investment.   The Hidden Costs Of Transport And Upgrading Transport logistics represent another major barrier. Extra-heavy crude often requires Large Volumes Of Diluent, such as light oil or naphtha, simply to flow through pipelines and tankers. This diluent must be sourced, shipped and sometimes recovered, adding further cost and complexity. Within Venezuela, years of Underinvestment And Sanctions have left pipelines and upgraders in degraded condition. Restoring or expanding this infrastructure would require Billions Of Dollars and extended timelines, undermining claims of rapid or easy access to refined fuel.   Political Claims Versus Energy Reality Energy economists warn that headline figures like “30–50 Million Barrels” can be misleading. While the volume sounds significant, the Net Usable Fuel Output, after accounting for upgrading losses, refinery constraints and logistics, is far smaller. The true value of the oil depends entirely on Refinery Compatibility, Discount Levels and Geopolitical Constraints. This is the core of Senator Merkley’s warning: portraying Venezuelan extra-heavy crude as a near-term energy solution glosses over the engineering, financial and geopolitical barriers involved. In a market where refinery capacity is already tight, few operators are eager to retool plants for one of the world’s most challenging crude grades. Venezuela’s oil is vast, but Abundance Does Not Equal Accessibility. Much of it is Extra-Heavy, Tar-Like Crude that demands specialized pipelines, diluents, upgraders and deep-conversion refineries. While a small number of refineries in the United States, India And China can process it, none can do so cheaply or instantly. As a result, analysts say claims that Venezuelan oil offers an easy strategic windfall risk overstating benefits while understating costs. In global energy markets governed by Engineering Reality, not political slogans, Not All Barrels Are Created Equal.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 17:33:19
 Space & Technology 

Vadodara : In a significant boost to India’s nuclear self-reliance, a Vadodara-based MSME, Vividh Hi-Fab Pvt. Ltd., has successfully developed critical indigenous equipment for the handling, transfer and storage of spent nuclear fuel. The achievement is expected to sharply reduce India’s dependence on imported nuclear fuel management systems and strengthen domestic capability in one of the country’s most strategic and regulated sectors. Three Years of R&D to Meet NPCIL Standards The indigenisation programme is the result of nearly three years of sustained research and engineering, carried out to meet the stringent safety and performance requirements of the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL). According to officials familiar with the project, the equipment underwent multi-stage inspections, material validation and safety testing by central government agencies before being cleared for operational use. The first batch of indigenously manufactured spent fuel storage racks is now ready for dispatch to the Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, one of India’s most critical nuclear power facilities.   World’s First Integrated Nuclear Storage Manufacturing Facility Vividh Hi-Fab has emerged as the world’s first facility capable of manufacturing all three types of nuclear spent fuel equipment under one roof. These include: Fuel Transfer Machines Spent Fuel Transportation Containers Spent Fuel Storage Racks These systems are essential for the safe movement, shielding and long-term storage of highly radioactive spent fuel after it is removed from reactor cores. Until now, India relied largely on foreign suppliers for such complex and safety-critical equipment.   Advanced Borated Stainless Steel Enhances Safety A key technological highlight of the new storage racks is the use of borated stainless steel, a specialised alloy enriched with boron to absorb neutrons and control radiation levels. This material is globally recognised for its ability to prevent criticality, while allowing high-density storage of spent fuel assemblies in reactor pools. The adoption of borated stainless steel ensures long-term structural integrity, resistance to corrosion, and reliable performance under high radiation and thermal conditions.   Strategic Impact on India’s Nuclear Programme Experts say the indigenous development of spent fuel handling systems represents a major strategic breakthrough for India’s nuclear ecosystem. Beyond cost reduction and import substitution, domestic manufacturing offers NPCIL greater control over quality assurance, lifecycle support and future upgrades. The milestone also highlights the growing role of Indian MSMEs in advanced defence and nuclear manufacturing—domains traditionally dominated by large public-sector enterprises and overseas vendors.   Next Phase: Full Domestic Fuel Management Capability With storage racks now cleared for deployment at Kudankulam, work is progressing on the fuel transfer machines and transport containers to complete a fully indigenous end-to-end spent fuel management chain. As India accelerates its nuclear power expansion to meet rising energy demand and long-term decarbonisation goals, developments such as this underscore how home-grown engineering, advanced materials and MSME innovation are becoming central to the country’s energy security and strategic autonomy.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 17:15:38
 World 

World : Global maritime security is facing one of its most serious tests in years after the United States seized a Russian-linked oil tanker, an action that has triggered sharp warnings from Moscow and raised fears of retaliation against Western commercial shipping in key European sea lanes.   Security and shipping industry sources indicate that Russia is weighing countermeasures that could include the detention or seizure of U.S.- and UK-flagged oil tankers operating in the North Sea, Black Sea, and Baltic Sea. While no formal directive has been announced, the intensifying tone of official statements has heightened concerns that a commercial shipping confrontation may be approaching.   The immediate trigger was the interception and seizure of a tanker that U.S. authorities say was part of Russia’s “shadow fleet”. Washington alleges such vessels use complex ownership structures, frequent reflagging, and deceptive tracking practices to bypass Western sanctions on oil exports. U.S. officials have described the operation as a lawful enforcement action, carried out under domestic legal authority and supported by allied intelligence.   Moscow has rejected the justification outright, branding the seizure illegal and provocative. Russian officials argue that the action violated international maritime norms and freedom of navigation, and they have demanded clarification on the status of the crew and cargo. The Kremlin has portrayed the episode as evidence that Western states are prepared to use force against civilian shipping to enforce sanctions.   In the days following the incident, Russian state media and senior lawmakers issued increasingly blunt warnings that the move would not go unanswered. References to “mirror measures” and “reciprocal actions” have been widely interpreted as signals that Western-flagged vessels could face inspections or detentions in waters where Russia maintains a strong naval presence. Although the government has stopped short of confirmation, maritime risk analysts report heightened Russian naval and coast guard activity in sensitive regions.   Across Europe, the episode has sharpened anxieties within NATO and among coastal states already dealing with elevated tensions at sea. Officials privately acknowledge that any attempt to detain a U.S.- or UK-flagged tanker, even under administrative pretexts, could escalate rapidly into a diplomatic or military crisis. As a result, governments are reviewing naval patrol patterns, port security measures, and emergency response plans to protect commercial traffic.   The implications extend far beyond security concerns. The North Sea, Baltic Sea, and Black Sea are critical arteries for Europe’s energy supply, handling large volumes of crude oil and refined products. Even the perception of increased risk is unsettling shipping markets. Insurers are reassessing war-risk premiums, while ship operators consider rerouting or delaying voyages to limit exposure.   Energy analysts warn that prolonged uncertainty could add volatility to global oil prices and complicate Europe’s energy planning at a time when supply chains remain fragile. Shipping executives stress that commercial vessels, crewed by multinational sailors, are ill-suited to becoming instruments of geopolitical retaliation.   Western diplomats maintain that the tanker seizure was narrowly targeted at sanctions enforcement and not intended to provoke Moscow. Yet analysts caution that confrontations at sea are prone to miscalculation, particularly when civilian vessels and heavily armed naval forces operate in close proximity.   For now, the situation remains fluid and highly sensitive. But the message from maritime security circles is stark: the world’s most feared scenario — escalation through commercial shipping — is no longer hypothetical, and the coming weeks may determine whether restraint or retaliation defines the future of Europe’s surrounding seas.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 17:06:18
 India 

NEW DELHI : In a transformative shift for India’s border surveillance capabilities, the Indian Army has signed a landmark ₹168 crore ($20 Million) contract with Bengaluru-based defense pioneer NewSpace Research & Technologies (NRT). The deal marks the first-ever procurement of High Altitude Pseudo Satellite (HAPS) technology—specifically the Medium Altitude Persistent Surveillance System (MAPSS)—capable of remaining airborne for days without refueling. The procurement, executed under the Ministry of Defence’s iDEX (Innovations for Defence Excellence) initiative, introduces a new era of "stratospheric warfare" where solar-powered sentinels will provide a permanent "eye in the sky" over India’s western frontier.   Strategic Advantage: "No Hiding Place" for Adversaries Defense sources indicate that the primary operational mandate for these solar-powered platforms is to maintain an unbroken vigil over the Punjab and Sindh sectors. Unlike traditional satellites, which have predictable orbit gaps, or standard drones that must return for fuel, the NRT HAPS/MAPSS can "park" over a specific region for extended durations. "This capability effectively removes the 'fog of war' for our planners," a senior defense official stated. "We will now possess the ability to detect every single takeoff and landing from critical Pakistani airbases instantly. Whether it is a fighter jet scrambling from Sargodha or a transport aircraft lifting off from Karachi, the data will be available to Indian command centers in real-time." This persistent stare capability is expected to neutralize the element of surprise often relied upon by adversaries, allowing the Indian Air Force (IAF) and Army to counter-mobilize before an enemy aircraft even crosses the border.   Technical Specifications: The NRT Solar Platform Developed indigenously by NewSpace Research & Technologies, the platform represents a leap in aerospace engineering. While often termed a "drone," its operational profile is closer to a low-orbit satellite. Platform Name: MAPSS (Medium Altitude Persistent Surveillance System) – A tactical derivative of the HAPS program. Propulsion: Fully Electric, Solar-Powered (Day/Night Cycle capable). Endurance: 48+ hours to several days (Current Block); Future strategic versions aim for 90-day endurance. Operational Altitude: 60,000 ft – 65,000 ft. The aircraft flies above most weather systems and conventional short-range air defense envelopes. Stealth Features: Acoustic: Near-silent operation due to electric motors. Thermal: Negligible heat signature compared to jet engines, making it invisible to heat-seeking missiles. Radar: Built with composite materials offering an extremely low Radar Cross Section (RCS). Payloads: Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), Electro-Optical/Infra-Red (EO/IR) sensors, and Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) suites to intercept enemy communication.   Post-Operation Sindoor Reality The urgency for such technology was reportedly driven by lessons learned during Operation Sindoor (mid-2025), where the need for continuous, deep-penetration surveillance without risking manned aircraft became apparent. The solar UAVs fill the critical gap between space-based satellites and conventional MALE (Medium Altitude Long Endurance) drones like the Heron or Reaper.   A "Swarm" in the Stratosphere This ₹168 crore contract is viewed as a validation order. Sources confirm that the Indian Armed Forces have a combined roadmap (IAF and Army) to eventually induct over 50 such platforms. This proposed fleet would create a "mesh network" in the sky—a data-sharing web where multiple solar drones communicate with each other to track moving targets across hundreds of kilometers. "NewSpace Research has demonstrated that Indian R&D can beat global timelines," said an industry observer. "Deploying a solar-powered asset that can stay aloft for days was once the domain of NASA or Airbus. Now, it is an operational reality for the Indian Army." Deliveries of the first systems are expected to commence within the next 12 months, with immediate deployment planned for the high-altitude deserts of Ladakh and the plains of Rajasthan.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 16:36:06
 World 

Kaohsiung: The Republic of China Navy (ROCN) has formally commenced the most extensive modernization of its Kang Ding–class surface combatants, as the frigate Kang Ding (PFG-1202) entered a CSBC Corporation Taiwan dry dock in Kaohsiung on January 3, 2026. The refit is part of a fleetwide combat system performance improvement program valued at approximately NT$43.1599 billion, aimed at significantly enhancing air-defense, sensor, and missile capabilities across all six ships of the class by 2030. According to reporting by United Daily News, the frigate entered dock already showing clear signs of pre-refit preparation, confirming that the long-planned upgrade effort has transitioned from planning into active execution.   Visible Radar Changes Signal Deep Sensor Modernization Even before docking, external modifications on Kang Ding highlighted the depth of the forthcoming upgrades. Roughly two-thirds of the supporting structure for the Hai Shen G (Triton-G) low-altitude search radar, located aft of the main mast, had already been removed. This visible change signals preparation for the installation of a new primary air-search sensor. Under the modernization plan, the ROCN is replacing the legacy DRBV-26D Jupiter II two-dimensional radar and the Triton-G system with the Type 997 Artisan three-dimensional radar. The Artisan represents a generational leap in capability, offering full 3D air-search performance, markedly improved resistance to clutter and electronic countermeasures, and the ability to simultaneously track hundreds of air and surface targets. The radar’s instrumented range is commonly cited at over 200 kilometers, with significantly higher track refresh rates than the older 2D systems. These improvements directly enhance detection range, altitude discrimination, and engagement-quality tracking—capabilities that are essential for supporting modern, vertically launched surface-to-air missiles.   Missile Capability Expanded Through Vertical Launch System At the heart of the upgrade is the integration of a new domestically developed Hua Yang vertical launch system (VLS), a transformational addition for the Kang Ding class. The original ships, derived from the French La Fayette design, were constrained by limited air-defense missile capacity and reliance on trainable launchers. The new VLS architecture is designed to support Taiwan’s indigenous Tien Chien II (Sky Sword II) surface-to-air missiles, dramatically increasing reaction speed, engagement envelopes, and the number of simultaneous threats the ship can counter. By combining 360-degree missile coverage with the 3D tracking performance of the Artisan radar, the refitted frigates gain a substantially improved layered air-defense capability against aircraft, cruise missiles, and emerging aerial threats.   Combat System Integration Across the Fleet Beyond radars and missiles, the NT$43.1599 billion program encompasses comprehensive upgrades to combat management systems, electro-optical sensors, and mission software. A key technical challenge is ensuring seamless integration between the French-origin ship architecture and Taiwan’s domestically developed weapons and sensors. The ROCN plans to refit the six frigates sequentially, generally at a pace of one ship per year, balancing modernization with operational availability to avoid significant gaps in surface combatant readiness. Completion of the entire program is targeted for 2030.   Kang Ding–Class Frigate Specifications Originally commissioned in the 1990s, the Kang Ding–class frigates are Taiwan’s locally designated variant of the French La Fayette class. According to publicly available specifications: Kang Ding (PFG-1202) displaces approximately 3,800 tonnes full load, measures 125 meters in length, and has a beam of 15.4 meters. Propulsion is provided by a CODAD arrangement using four SEMT Pielstick diesel engines, enabling a maximum speed of around 25 knots and a range exceeding 7,000 nautical miles at cruising speed. The ship operates with a crew of roughly 160 personnel. Prior to modernization, the class was equipped with limited-area air-defense missiles, anti-ship missiles, a 76 mm main gun, close-in weapon systems, and embarked helicopters for anti-submarine warfare. The current upgrade fundamentally reshapes this configuration, particularly in the air-defense domain.   Strategic Context The refit of Kang Ding marks a critical milestone in Taiwan’s broader naval modernization drive, as the ROCN seeks to extend the operational relevance of its surface fleet amid a rapidly evolving regional security environment. By combining modern sensors, vertical launch missiles, and upgraded combat systems, the Kang Ding–class frigates are set to transition from lightly defended patrol combatants into significantly more capable multi-role escorts. With the first ship now in dry dock, the program’s execution phase is underway—setting the pace for a decade-defining transformation of Taiwan’s frontline frigate force.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 16:18:10
 World 

London / Tallinn — British defence engineering group Babcock has entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Estonian defence technology firm Frankenburg Technologies to jointly develop a new, affordable maritime counter-unmanned aerial system (C-UAS), addressing the rapidly escalating threat posed by one-way attack drones and loitering munitions across Europe. The collaboration, announced through a Babcock press release, reflects growing urgency among NATO and European militaries to field scalable and economically sustainable air-defence solutions, as low-cost drones increasingly challenge traditional, high-value missile interceptors.   Containerised Maritime Launch System Under the MoU, Babcock will design and manufacture a cost-effective, containerised launch platform optimised for maritime and coastal defence roles. Drawing on its long-standing expertise in naval launch systems and complex weapons integration, Babcock’s solution is intended to be rapidly deployable on warships, auxiliary vessels, ports, offshore installations and critical coastal infrastructure. The containerised approach allows the system to be modular and scalable, enabling operators to tailor missile load-outs based on threat intensity while keeping costs under control. The system is designed to deliver kinetic, hard-kill protection as part of a layered counter-drone architecture, complementing electronic warfare and soft-kill measures.   Frankenburg’s Mark 1 Missile: Designed for Mass and Affordability Central to the new system is Frankenburg Technologies’ Mark 1 counter-drone missile, a compact interceptor purpose-built to defeat small UAVs, one-way attack drones and loitering munitions at very short range. The Mark 1 is a lightweight, ultra-short-range missile, measuring approximately 650 mm in length and weighing under 2 kg, making it significantly smaller than conventional air-defence interceptors. It uses a solid-fuel rocket motor to achieve rapid acceleration against low-altitude, slow-to-medium speed aerial targets. Guidance is handled by an autonomous onboard system, allowing the missile to prosecute targets after launch without continuous external control. The seeker and guidance logic are designed to cope with cluttered environments and dense drone attacks, reducing dependence on vulnerable data links. The missile carries a compact high-explosive fragmentation warhead, optimised to destroy or disable small aerial targets efficiently. With an effective engagement range of up to approximately 2 km, the Mark 1 is not intended to replace high-end surface-to-air missiles, but rather to fill a critical gap in close-range air defence, where using expensive interceptors against cheap drones has proven economically unsustainable. A defining feature of the Mark 1 programme is its manufacturing philosophy. Frankenberg has designed the missile from the outset for high-volume production, enabling rapid output measured in hundreds of missiles per week. This approach supports the core objective of delivering order-of-magnitude cost reductions compared with legacy short-range air-defence missiles, allowing defenders to counter mass drone attacks with mass of their own.   Responding to the Changing Character of Warfare Recent conflicts have underscored how swarms of inexpensive drones can overwhelm traditional air-defence systems. The Babcock–Frankenburg solution is intended to meet this challenge head-on by pairing low-cost interceptors with a robust, naval-grade launch system, suitable for continuous operations in harsh maritime environments. The joint capability is expected to enhance protection for naval task groups, expeditionary forces and critical national infrastructure, particularly ports, shipyards and energy facilities that are increasingly exposed to asymmetric aerial threats.   Building Sovereign Capability and Export Potential Although Frankenberg Technologies is headquartered in Estonia, its engineering leadership is based in the United Kingdom, aligning closely with Babcock’s domestic industrial footprint. The partnership is expected to contribute to the development of a new sovereign defence capability, supporting high-skilled jobs in the UK while strengthening Europe’s indigenous counter-drone industrial base. Both companies see significant export potential, as allied nations seek affordable maritime and land-based C-UAS solutions that can be fielded quickly and in large numbers.   Industry Leaders on the Partnership David Lockwood, Chief Executive Officer of Babcock, highlighted the urgency of industrial adaptation to new threats. “Defence has entered a new era with the rapid development of drone warfare, and industry needs to respond to this growing threat. We work with the brightest start-ups on defence’s most critical challenges, and we’re pleased to be working with Frankenburg Technologies on the development of an innovative maritime counter-drone air defence system.” Kusti Salm, Chief Executive Officer of Frankenburg Technologies, stressed the importance of designing air defence for scale from the outset. “The drone threat has changed the character of warfare, and every layer of defence now needs to be designed for mass and speed. Partnering with Babcock allows us to combine rapid innovation with proven maritime and industrial expertise, accelerating the delivery of an operational counter-drone capability.”   Outlook While the MoU stops short of a production contract, it establishes a framework for system development, integration and future trials. If successful, the Babcock–Frankenburg initiative could deliver a deployable, export-ready maritime C-UAS solution, tailored to the realities of drone-dominated conflict and the growing need for affordable, high-volume air defence in the years ahead.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 16:00:29
 World 

BERLIN : German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier on Wednesday issued a strong warning against the direction of U.S. foreign policy under President Donald Trump, saying the global rules-based order is in danger of collapsing into a “den of robbers” where power politics override international law. Speaking at a high-level symposium in Berlin, Steinmeier said the post-World War II international system is facing its most serious challenge in decades, with democracy, multilateralism, and shared values under sustained pressure. His remarks represented one of the harshest critiques yet by a senior European head of state of Washington’s recent actions on the global stage. Although the German presidency is largely ceremonial, Steinmeier — a former foreign minister with long diplomatic experience — is regarded as a moral authority in foreign affairs and enjoys greater freedom to speak openly than serving government officials. As a result, his words carry significant political and symbolic weight both in Europe and beyond.   A Second Historic Rupture Steinmeier described Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its full-scale invasion of Ukraine as a historic watershed that fundamentally altered European security. He said the current conduct of the United States now represents a second major rupture in the foundations of the international order. “There is the breakdown of values by our most important partner, the United States, which helped build this world order,” Steinmeier said. “It is about preventing the world from turning into a den of robbers, where the most unscrupulous take whatever they want, and where regions or entire countries are treated as the property of a few great powers.”   Democracy ‘Under Attack as Never Before’ Without naming specific operations, Steinmeier appeared to allude to recent U.S. actions abroad, including developments involving Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, which have triggered international criticism and renewed debate over sovereignty and legitimacy. He warned that global democracy is being challenged “as never before,” citing the erosion of democratic norms, the rise of unilateralism, and the weakening of institutions designed to prevent conflict and restrain the use of force.   Call for Shared Global Responsibility Steinmeier urged Europe and other democratic powers not to remain passive, stressing that defending the rules-based international system cannot depend on a single nation. He called on established and emerging powers alike to take greater responsibility for upholding international law, protecting smaller states, and resisting a return to spheres of influence. His remarks come amid growing concern in European capitals about the future of transatlantic relations and fears that intensifying great-power rivalry could undermine decades of diplomatic stability and economic cooperation. As global tensions rise, Steinmeier’s intervention highlighted a core anxiety in Berlin: that without renewed commitment to shared rules and values, the world risks sliding toward an international system governed by force, not law.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 15:48:53
 World 

Moscow : Russian state defence conglomerate Rostec has claimed that its fifth-generation stealth fighter, the Su-57, has successfully operated in contested airspace over Ukraine, evading enemy radars and electronic warfare (EW) systems. The assertion, made by Rostec chief executive Sergey Chemezov, highlights Moscow’s confidence in its most advanced combat aircraft, while also drawing attention to the increasingly electronically dense battlefield created by the Russia-Ukraine war. Speaking to Russian media, Chemezov stated that the Su-57 “evades all kinds of obstacles, including radars and electronic warfare systems,” adding that Russian pilots are satisfied with the aircraft’s performance in real combat conditions. While the comments underline official confidence, independent verification remains limited, and analysts stress that such claims require technical and operational context.   What “Evading Radars and Electronic Attacks” Actually Means In modern air warfare, “evading radars” does not mean invisibility. Instead, it refers to reducing detection and tracking ranges, complicating an enemy’s ability to lock on and engage. The Su-57 incorporates stealth shaping, internal weapons bays, and radar-absorbent materials, all designed to lower its radar cross-section (RCS), particularly against high-frequency fire-control radars used by surface-to-air missile systems. Electronic warfare survivability is equally critical. Fighters rely on onboard electronic countermeasures, electronic support measures, and sensor fusion to detect hostile emissions, jam or deceive radars, and disrupt missile guidance links. Russian sources emphasize that the Su-57’s integrated avionics allow pilots to identify threats early, select low-risk flight profiles, and strike targets without entering the most dangerous engagement zones. Operational factors also matter. Aircraft may launch stand-off precision weapons, exploit temporary gaps in air-defence coverage, or rely on broader EW activity in the battlespace. Any of these scenarios can result in a mission being completed without interception, which officials often describe as successful “evasion.”   Ukraine’s Radar and Electronic Warfare Environment Ukraine operates a layered air-defence and EW network built from a mix of Soviet-era systems, Western-supplied radars, Israeli tactical sensors, and indigenous electronic warfare solutions. Long-range systems such as S-300 variants form the backbone of strategic air defence, supported by medium-range Buk systems and associated fire-control radars. At shorter ranges, Ukraine employs modern three-dimensional surveillance radars, including Western-supplied systems optimized for detecting low-flying aircraft, cruise missiles, and drones. Israeli-origin RADA tactical radars, widely reported to be in service, enhance short-range air-defence and early warning, particularly against small and fast-moving aerial threats. Alongside radar coverage, Ukraine has rapidly expanded its electronic warfare capabilities, deploying domestically developed jammers and counter-drone systems designed to disrupt navigation signals, datalinks, and radar performance. These systems are frequently repositioned, used intermittently, or paired with decoys and passive sensors, making the battlespace highly unpredictable.   Limited Use but High Strategic Value Open-source assessments indicate that the Su-57 has been used in limited numbers during the conflict, often in carefully controlled roles rather than sustained frontline patrols. Analysts argue this reflects both the aircraft’s small fleet size and Russia’s intent to minimize risk while gaining combat experience. Experts also caution that stealth advantages are never absolute. Low-frequency radars, passive detection methods, and multisensor fusion can still reveal the presence of low-observable aircraft, even if precise targeting remains difficult. In Ukraine’s rapidly evolving conflict, survivability depends as much on tactics and electronic support as on airframe design.   A Claim That Requires Context Chemezov’s statement reinforces Russia’s messaging around the Su-57 as a combat-proven stealth platform, but it remains a claim from an interested party in an information-intensive war. Without detailed data on engagement ranges, specific Ukrainian systems encountered, and mission profiles, the full significance is difficult to assess. What is clear, however, is that the war over Ukraine has become a real-world testing ground for stealth technology, radar networks, and electronic warfare, where success is defined not by invisibility, but by the ability to operate, strike, and survive in contested skies.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 15:41:23
 World 

WASHINGTON / ELKTON, Md. — Northrop Grumman Corporation has been awarded a $94.3 million contract by the U.S. Navy to develop and qualify a new 21-inch-diameter second-stage solid rocket motor (SSRM) designed to significantly extend the range and performance of the Navy’s future missile systems. The effort supports extended-range missile programs intended to deter and defeat fast-moving air, surface and hypersonic threats, according to a company press release.   Rapid Path to Extended-Range Hypersonic Defense The newly funded SSRM program focuses on a low-risk, rapidly developed propulsion design that allows the Navy to accelerate the fielding of extended-range hypersonic defense capabilities in a cost-effective manner. Northrop Grumman stated that the 21-inch-diameter motor is engineered to deliver substantial gains in both range and speed, enhancing mission effectiveness across a wide spectrum of operations. These missions include air warfare, surface warfare, land-attack strike missions, and ballistic missile defense, underscoring the Navy’s interest in a modular propulsion solution that can be adapted across multiple platforms and operational concepts. The service has also expressed interest in broader deployment of Northrop Grumman’s extended-range propulsion technologies across its future missile inventory.   Production and Testing at Elkton Facility Under the contract, Northrop Grumman will continue detailed design work while initiating low-rate initial production of 60 SSRM units. These motors will be manufactured, tested, and delivered from the company’s Propulsion Innovation Center in Elkton, Maryland, a key hub for advanced solid rocket motor development. The program’s schedule highlights the company’s emphasis on speed and manufacturability. Northrop Grumman confirmed that the SSRM concept has already been successfully developed and demonstrated within just 10 months, a timeline the company describes as a critical differentiator in meeting urgent defense requirements.   Industry Leadership in Advanced Propulsion Commenting on the award, Gordon LoPresti, senior director of propulsion systems and control at Northrop Grumman, said the selection reflects the company’s ability to move quickly from concept to production while maintaining affordability and performance. “Being chosen by the U.S. Navy is an honor and a testament to our rapid development capabilities, production capacity and leadership in advanced propulsion solutions,” LoPresti said. “The successful development and demonstration of our SSRM in just 10 months showcases our unique, affordable and versatile extended-range capabilities that will equip the U.S. Navy to excel in its defense and deterrence missions. We are eager and prepared to rapidly qualify and produce these motors in quantities to meet the needs of the U.S.”   Nearly $1 Billion Invested to Expand Rocket Motor Capacity As the nation’s leading propulsion provider, Northrop Grumman continues to invest heavily in facilities, workforce, and manufacturing technologies to ensure it can deliver advanced solid rocket motors at scale. Since 2018, the company has invested nearly $1 billion to expand capacity and modernize capabilities across its weapons and missile component portfolio. With decades of operational experience and more than one million solid rocket motors delivered, Northrop Grumman remains a trusted supplier of propulsion systems supporting national defense, payload delivery, and space exploration missions.   Expanding U.S. Manufacturing Footprint Propulsion development and production activities are currently spread across six strategic sites in West Virginia, Utah, and Maryland, encompassing approximately 10 million square feet of manufacturing space. To meet rising demand, the company is tripling production capacity for small tactical solid rocket motors in West Virginia, doubling output for large SRMs in Utah, and increasing Maryland manufacturing capacity by 25 percent. These expansions are designed to support future high-demand programs, including next-generation missile systems and air-breathing hypersonic propulsion solutions, while reinforcing a resilient U.S. defense industrial base.   Strategic Implications for the U.S. Navy The $94.3 million SSRM contract reflects the Navy’s growing focus on longer-range, faster and more adaptable missile systems in response to evolving global threats. By leveraging a rapidly fieldable and scalable propulsion design, the service aims to close capability gaps in hypersonic and extended-range engagements while maintaining cost discipline and production flexibility. For Northrop Grumman, the award further cements its role as a cornerstone supplier of advanced propulsion technologies, positioning the company at the center of the Navy’s future missile modernization efforts.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 15:09:14
 World 

Ankara : Turkey is preparing a significant leap in unmanned air combat capability as work advances to integrate ASELSAN’s MURAD active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar onto ANKA III, the country’s jet-powered stealth unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV). The move underlines Ankara’s intent to push its low-observable drone fleet beyond precision strike and electronic-warfare missions and into contested airspace dominance, including air-to-air engagement roles.   Linking a National AESA Radar With a Low-Observable Flying Wing MURAD’s integration represents a critical convergence of high-performance national sensor technology with a low-observable flying-wing airframe designed for deep-penetration missions. The MURAD family has already accumulated flight hours on upgraded F-16 Özgür, Bayraktar AKINCI, and Kızılelma platforms, giving Turkish engineers a mature baseline for adapting the radar to ANKA III’s unique stealth geometry. From a technical standpoint, installing a sizeable AESA antenna into ANKA III’s slender nose section is expected to require refinements in internal volume management. Options include a conventional planar nose array or more advanced distributed and conformal arrays embedded along leading edges—an approach enabled by AESA modularity and particularly attractive for missions demanding wide-angle synthetic aperture radar (SAR) mapping, air-to-air search, and electronic-warfare coverage without compromising radar cross-section.   What MURAD Brings to a Stealth UCAV ASELSAN’s MURAD radar family is designed as a multirole, software-defined AESA, optimized for both manned and unmanned combat aircraft. Publicly disclosed capabilities indicate that MURAD supports air-to-air search and track, BVR missile cueing, high-resolution SAR and inverse SAR imaging, ground moving-target indication (GMTI), and robust electronic counter-countermeasures (ECCM). Its solid-state transmit/receive modules, rapid beam steering and low probability of intercept (LPI) waveforms make it well suited for stealth platforms operating inside defended airspace. For unmanned aircraft in particular, MURAD is designed to integrate seamlessly with electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensors, infrared search-and-track (IRST), mission computers and datalinks, enabling sensor fusion and cooperative engagement with other air and ground assets. This architecture allows a UCAV like ANKA III not only to detect and track targets autonomously, but also to share targeting data across a manned-unmanned team.     Kızılelma Sets the Operational Benchmark The clearest indicator of what MURAD can deliver on an unmanned combat platform comes from Kızılelma’s 2025 test campaign. During autumn trials, the unmanned fighter flew with MURAD integrated alongside the TOYGUN electro-optical targeting system, validating sensor fusion and radar cueing in flight. This was followed by a simulated engagement in which Kızılelma successfully executed an F-16 kill scenario using the Gökdoğan beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile guided by MURAD. The programme culminated on 30 November 2025, when Kızılelma detected, tracked and destroyed a high-speed aerial target over the Black Sea with a live-fired Gökdoğan missile. Widely described as the first recorded BVR air-to-air kill by a jet-powered UAV, the event demonstrated that the MURAD radar family can support full air-combat kill chains on fast, manoeuvring unmanned platforms—capabilities now being extended to ANKA III.   ANKA III: From Stealth Strike to Air-Combat Support As radar integration progresses, the broader performance envelope of ANKA III is coming into sharper focus. The jet-powered UCAV is designed with a payload capacity of approximately 1,200 to 1,600 kilograms, enabling it to internally carry a combination of sensors, precision-guided munitions and electronic-warfare payloads while preserving low observability. Dimensionally, ANKA III measures 7.9 to 8.9 metres in length, with a wingspan of 12.5 to 13.1 metres and a compact height of around 2.5 to 2.6 metres, reflecting an emphasis on stealth shaping and internal volume efficiency. Its maximum take-off weight, estimated between 6,500 and 7,250 kilograms, places it firmly in the medium-weight UCAV category, capable of missions traditionally associated with light strike aircraft. Propulsion is provided by a single Ivchenko-Progress AI-322 turbofan engine, supporting a maximum speed of about 787 km/h (Mach 0.7) and a cruise speed near 460 km/h (Mach 0.42). This performance enables rapid ingress and egress for penetration missions while maintaining endurance for prolonged operations. Operationally, ANKA III offers a combat radius of up to 1,075 kilometres, with 750 kilometres considered more typical when optimized for either air-to-air or air-to-ground roles. Endurance of up to 10 hours provides substantial loiter time for ISR, strike coordination and electronic-warfare tasks, while a service ceiling of 12,000 metres (40,000 feet) places the aircraft above many short-range air-defence threats.   Internal Carriage and Emerging Air-to-Air Roles A defining feature of ANKA III is its two internal weapons bays, a design choice essential for maintaining a reduced radar cross-section in high-threat environments. These bays are sized to accommodate INS/GPS-guided precision weapons, imaging-infrared and laser-guided munitions, and increasingly, radar- or infrared-guided air-to-air missiles. When paired with MURAD AESA radar and an infrared search-and-track sensor, this internal carriage enables ANKA III to perform self-escorted strike missions, provide air-combat support, and contribute directly to aerial engagements without relying on external stores that would compromise stealth.   A Cornerstone of Türkiye’s 2026 Manned-Unmanned Vision Together, the integration of ASELSAN’s MURAD AESA radar and the evolving capabilities of ANKA III signal that the platform is no longer an experimental stealth demonstrator. Instead, it is emerging as a combat-credible UCAV capable of exploiting advanced sensors for strike, electronic warfare and air-to-air missions. As Türkiye continues to mature its manned-unmanned teaming doctrine into 2026, ANKA III’s blend of stealth, endurance, internal payload capacity and indigenous sensor integration positions it as a cornerstone of the country’s future air-combat architecture, extending unmanned operations from permissive environments into the most contested airspaces.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 15:04:28
 World 

Copenhagen / Nuuk : Denmark has formally confirmed that its armed forces are operating under long-standing rules authorizing the immediate use of lethal force to defend Greenland in the event of an invasion, reviving a Cold War directive amid escalating tensions sparked by renewed U.S. rhetoric about the strategic importance of the Arctic island. The Danish Defence Ministry said the directive, first issued in 1952, remains valid and applies without exception. Under the rule, Danish troops are required to engage an attacking force instantly, without waiting for political clearance or higher military orders, if Greenland’s sovereignty is threatened. The confirmation follows international concern after U.S. President Donald Trump again described Greenland as a “national security priority,” citing growing Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic.   A Cold War Rule Reaffirmed According to Danish officials, the 1952 order was designed for precisely the kind of high-risk scenario now confronting Copenhagen: a sudden incursion in a remote territory where delays in communication could prove decisive. The rule places responsibility directly on commanders on the ground, authorizing them to open fire immediately to defend Danish territory. Greenland, known locally as Kalaallit Nunaat, is a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. While Nuuk controls most domestic affairs, defence and foreign policy remain the responsibility of Copenhagen, making any military threat to Greenland a direct challenge to Danish sovereignty.   U.S. Statements Rekindle Strategic Dispute The latest tensions were triggered by renewed statements from President Trump, who has repeatedly argued that Greenland’s location and resources make it vital to U.S. security interests. In recent remarks, Trump pointed to increased Russian military activity in the High North and China’s expanding economic footprint in the Arctic as justification for a stronger U.S. posture. Although Washington has not announced any concrete military plans, the language has unsettled European allies. Danish officials privately acknowledge that the concern is less about an imminent operation and more about the precedent set by openly questioning the territorial integrity of a NATO ally.   Frederiksen Warns of NATO Breakdown Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen issued an unusually stark warning, saying that any attempt by the United States to seize Greenland would represent an existential crisis for the trans-Atlantic alliance. In comments to European media, Frederiksen said that an armed move against Greenland by a NATO member would effectively mark “the end of the alliance as we know it,” stressing that NATO’s core principle is collective defence, not coercion among allies. European diplomats say the episode has prompted urgent discussions within NATO capitals at a time when alliance unity is already strained by the war in Ukraine and growing instability in the Middle East.   Greenland’s Strategic Weight Greenland occupies a pivotal position in the Arctic, straddling key air and maritime routes between North America and Europe. The island hosts critical early-warning and surveillance infrastructure, including U.S. military facilities established under post-war defence agreements with Denmark. As Arctic ice recedes, the region has gained further importance due to emerging shipping lanes, access to rare-earth minerals, and expanded Russian military patrols. China, though not an Arctic state, has also declared itself a “near-Arctic power,” investing in research and infrastructure across the region. Defence analysts note that these factors explain Washington’s strategic interest, but they also underscore why Denmark views any challenge to Greenland’s status as unacceptable.   Military Reality on the Ground Greenland’s vast geography and sparse population make defence complex. Danish forces maintain a limited but symbolically important presence, supported by periodic patrols and allied cooperation. Experts say the 1952 “shoot first” rule is intended to compensate for these constraints by ensuring maximum deterrence through immediate response. Any armed clash in Greenland, analysts warn, would almost certainly draw in NATO allies and escalate rapidly, given the presence of U.S. and allied military assets across the Arctic.   Diplomatic Efforts Intensify Behind the scenes, Danish and U.S. officials are engaged in intensive diplomacy aimed at de-escalating tensions. Copenhagen has reiterated that Greenland is not for sale and that its future can only be decided by its people. Greenlandic leaders have echoed this stance, emphasizing self-determination and rejecting external pressure. For now, Denmark’s confirmation of its rules of engagement is intended as a deterrent signal, rather than a prelude to conflict. Yet the episode has exposed deep sensitivities within NATO and highlighted how the Arctic, once a peripheral theatre, is rapidly becoming a central fault line in global geopolitics.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 14:26:25
 World 

The United States Navy has awarded an $11-million contract to ELTA North America to design and produce a new generation of airborne communications jammers for integration into frontline fighter aircraft under the Stand-off Jammer (SOJ) Jets program, marking another step in the navy’s expanding focus on electromagnetic warfare dominance. Under the contract, ELTA North America will design, develop, and fabricate high-frequency (HF) and ultra-high-frequency (UHF) stand-off jamming systems optimized to disrupt adversary voice and data communications while allowing U.S. aircraft to operate outside the most dangerous threat envelopes. The systems are intended to enhance aircraft survivability in heavily contested electromagnetic environments, particularly during high-intensity maritime and joint operations. Unlike radar-centric jammers that focus on higher-frequency fire-control or search radars, ELTA’s new payloads will concentrate on handheld and tactical communications bands, which remain vital for enemy coordination, command and control, and battlefield synchronization.   Stand-Off Jamming and the SOJ Jets Concept The navy’s SOJ Jets initiative is designed to strengthen airborne electronic attack (AEA) capabilities across carrier strike groups, expeditionary forces, and coalition operations. Stand-off jamming allows aircraft to interfere with enemy communications and sensors from long distances, reducing exposure to surface-to-air missiles and modern integrated air-defense systems. The program reflects a shift away from relying solely on a small number of dedicated electronic attack platforms toward a distributed electronic warfare model, in which fighter aircraft can carry modular jamming payloads tailored to mission needs.   How It Fits With the Next Generation Jammer Program The SOJ Jets effort complements the navy’s broader Next Generation Jammer (NGJ) modernization drive, which is replacing legacy systems such as the AN/ALQ-99 Tactical Jamming System. In December 2024, the navy declared initial operational capability (IOC) for the NGJ Mid-Band, now deployed on the EA-18G Growler. NGJ offers significantly higher jamming power, digital beam-forming, and software-defined flexibility, primarily targeting radar and advanced threat emitters. By contrast, the ELTA-developed SOJ payloads focus on communications denial, filling a critical gap by targeting enemy networks that persist even when radars are suppressed.   Training and Operational Ecosystem Expands The growing emphasis on stand-off electronic attack is also evident in the navy’s use of contracted services. In November 2025, Textron Airborne Tactical Advantage Company secured a contract valued at up to $200 million through 2030 to provide stand-off jamming jet services, using modified business jets to help train U.S. forces and evaluate fleet electronic warfare responses. Together, these initiatives signal a comprehensive approach that blends organic navy systems, modular payloads, and contracted adversary simulation to prepare for modern electronic warfare scenarios.   Strategic Implications The $11-million ELTA North America contract underscores a broader doctrinal shift: communications are now as critical a target as radar. Even as modern forces adopt advanced sensors and data links, basic HF and UHF communications remain indispensable — and vulnerable. By investing in stand-off communications jamming for fighter aircraft, the U.S. Navy is reinforcing its ability to disrupt adversary coordination, isolate battlefield units, and shape the electromagnetic environment long before kinetic weapons are employed. As peer competition intensifies, systems like those developed under the SOJ Jets program are set to become a central pillar of future naval air warfare.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 14:10:06
 India 

Berlin / New Delhi : Germany and India are finalising the contours of a submarine manufacturing agreement valued at no less than $8 billion, a deal that would mark the largest defence contract ever undertaken by New Delhi and fundamentally reshape India’s undersea warfare capabilities, according to officials familiar with the negotiations. The proposed agreement, concluded ahead of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s first official visit to India next week, would for the first time include full technology transfer for submarine construction, enabling India to locally manufacture one of the most complex naval platforms in the world.   Strategic Shift in India’s Submarine Programme India’s Navy currently operates around a dozen ageing Russian-origin submarines alongside six newer French-built Scorpène-class boats. Officials said that if the German deal proceeds, New Delhi is likely to cancel plans to acquire three additional French submarines, signalling a strategic pivot toward Germany as a long-term partner for undersea warfare. Under the proposed arrangement, Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems GmbH will partner with Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Ltd., India’s premier submarine construction yard, to manufacture the vessels domestically. Production is expected to take place entirely in India, aligning with New Delhi’s push to localise defence manufacturing.   Submarine Design and Capabilities on Offer Germany is offering a next-generation conventional submarine design derived from its proven Type-214 family, tailored to Indian naval requirements. The boats will be equipped with advanced Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP) systems, allowing them to remain submerged for two to three weeks without surfacing, a critical advantage over traditional diesel-electric submarines. The submarines are expected to feature displacement in the 1,800–2,000-ton class, a crew of about 30–35 sailors, and six 533 mm torpedo tubes capable of launching heavyweight torpedoes, anti-ship missiles, and naval mines. The platform will integrate low-acoustic signatures, advanced sonar suites, electronic warfare systems, and network-centric combat management systems, enabling seamless integration with India’s existing naval assets. Indian officials said New Delhi is seeking full access to hull design, propulsion architecture, combat systems integration, and lifecycle maintenance know-how, ensuring the Navy can independently upgrade and sustain the submarines over their four-decade service life.   Boost to Indian Ocean Deterrence The new submarines would significantly enhance India’s ability to monitor and control vast stretches of the Indian Ocean, at a time when China is expanding its naval presence across critical sea lanes. With extended underwater endurance and stealth, the German-designed boats would strengthen India’s deterrence posture against both regional and extra-regional powers.   Merz Visit Anchors Broader Strategic Ties Chancellor Merz will meet Narendra Modi in Gujarat on Monday before travelling to Bengaluru, India’s technology hub, where he is scheduled to interact with German companies operating in the country. German officials said the visit will also focus on expanding cooperation in pharmaceuticals, advanced manufacturing, and defence technologies. Merz is travelling with a large delegation of German chief executives on his maiden overseas tour and is expected to follow up with a separate business-focused visit to China in the coming weeks.   Reducing Reliance on Russian Arms India has aggressively encouraged foreign defence firms to shift production and share technology since the Modi government blocked imports of most major weapons platforms in 2020. Despite these efforts, India remains the world’s second-largest arms importer, sourcing the bulk of its equipment from Russia, according to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. Germany’s willingness to transfer submarine technology reflects a broader shift in Berlin’s defence posture following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and is also aimed at diversifying India’s military supply chain away from Moscow, officials said.   Official Silence, High Strategic Stakes A spokesperson for Thyssenkrupp Marine Systems declined to comment, while India’s Ministry of Defence and Ministry of External Affairs did not immediately respond to requests for clarification. Nevertheless, officials on both sides described the negotiations as advanced and politically backed, underscoring the strategic importance of the deal. If concluded, the agreement would not only modernise India’s submarine fleet but also establish the country as a regional hub for advanced submarine construction, marking a decisive step in the deepening defence partnership between Berlin and New Delhi.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 13:45:43
 World 

South Carolina / Tel Aviv: Elbit Systems has completed production of the first US-built Sigma NG 155-millimetre self-propelled howitzer at the South Carolina facility of its American subsidiary, Elbit America, marking a significant milestone in the company’s push to localise advanced artillery manufacturing in the United States. The programme reflects a deliberate strategy to align with US procurement preferences favouring domestic industrial capability, a policy emphasis strongly associated with Donald Trump. By shifting production entirely onto American soil, Elbit aims to strengthen its competitiveness for future US Army and allied artillery requirements while reducing political and logistical barriers to procurement.   A Wheeled Howitzer Designed for High-Intensity Warfare The Sigma NG is a next-generation, wheeled 155-millimetre artillery system that integrates high levels of automation, enhanced crew protection, and rapid mobility. Built around a remotely operated turret, the system allows crews to conduct firing missions with minimal exposure, improving survivability in counter-battery and drone-saturated environments. Crucially, the howitzer is capable of firing all standard NATO-compliant 155-millimetre ammunition, ensuring interoperability with existing US and allied stockpiles. This compatibility is viewed as a decisive advantage as the Pentagon seeks to modernise artillery forces without overhauling ammunition logistics.   Transitional Manufacturing Model With Israeli Expertise Although the Sigma NG is now assembled in the United States, early production has involved a limited degree of cross-border industrial cooperation. According to defence industry reporting, selected US-manufactured gun barrel components were temporarily shipped to Israel, where Elbit specialists applied proprietary finishing and integration expertise before the components were returned for final installation in the US-built turret. Company officials indicate this is a transitional arrangement, with future production batches expected to see a higher degree of end-to-end manufacturing carried out within the United States as local capabilities mature.   Common Lineage With Israel’s Roem Artillery System The Sigma NG shares its core design with the Roem self-propelled howitzer operated by the Israel Defense Forces. The Roem employs a 155-millimetre, 39-calibre gun and took nearly six years to progress from development to initial delivery, reflecting the technical complexity of modern automated artillery systems. By basing the Sigma NG on this proven architecture, Elbit has been able to reduce development risk and present the US-built version as a mature, near-ready solution rather than a conceptual prototype.   Positioned for Renewed US Artillery Demand The rollout of the Sigma NG comes amid renewed focus by the US Department of Defense on artillery modernisation. In September, the Pentagon issued a call for concepts and information related to new and upgraded artillery systems, driven by lessons from recent high-intensity conflicts where massed fires and ammunition consumption have re-emerged as decisive factors. Elbit views the Sigma NG as well aligned with these emerging requirements, offering rapid deployment, digital fire-control integration, and high strategic and tactical mobility, while remaining compatible with US doctrine and infrastructure.   Oshkosh Platform and US Supply Chain Integration The howitzer is typically mounted on an Oshkosh Corporation 10×10 military truck, a platform widely regarded for its off-road performance and payload capacity. The US variant of the Sigma NG incorporates a growing proportion of locally sourced automotive, electronic, and support components, reinforcing its status as a domestically produced system. Industry analysts see this as a potential stepping stone toward deeper industrial partnerships and expanded US-based production lines for Elbit’s land systems portfolio.   Current Status in US Service and Potential Customers At present, the US Army does not operate the Sigma NG, and there is no active fleet of wheeled 155-millimetre self-propelled howitzers in American service. The Army’s primary artillery platform remains the tracked M109A7 Paladin, while wheeled systems are still under evaluation. Beyond the US Army, potential customers include the US Marine Corps, National Guard units, and allied forces seeking a highly mobile 155-millimetre solution. European NATO members, Middle Eastern partners, and Indo-Pacific militaries are viewed as likely export candidates, particularly those prioritising rapid deployment and NATO ammunition compatibility.   A Signal of Deeper US Localisation The completion of the first Sigma NG in South Carolina is widely interpreted as a signal of Elbit’s long-term commitment to US localisation. As defence procurement increasingly favours domestic production, the Sigma NG programme may serve as a blueprint for how foreign defence firms adapt to compete in the US market. For Elbit Systems, the US-built Sigma NG is not only a new artillery offering, but a strategic move to secure relevance in the next phase of American and allied artillery modernisation.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-08 13:37:48
 World 

U.S / Greenland : The United States is examining whether a Compact of Free Association (COFA)—a legal framework under which Washington assumes responsibility for a partner’s external defense—could be applied to Greenland, a move that would represent an unprecedented extension of a Pacific-era security model into the Arctic. The discussions, first reported by The Economist on January 5, 2025, have gained renewed urgency in early 2026 amid heightened U.S. rhetoric on Arctic security and growing geopolitical competition in the High North.   Background: Greenland’s Status and Strategic Importance Greenland, home to roughly 56,000–57,000 people, has exercised extensive self-government since 1979, controlling domestic policy, taxation, and natural resources. Formally, however, it remains part of the Denmark, which retains authority over foreign affairs and defense. Its geographic position—bridging North America and Europe and overlooking key Arctic sea lanes—has long made it strategically significant for early warning systems, missile defense, and transatlantic security. The island already hosts critical U.S. military infrastructure, including the Thule space and missile-warning facilities, underscoring Washington’s long-standing security footprint. As Arctic ice recedes, opening new shipping routes and exposing mineral and energy resources, Greenland’s strategic value has only increased.   Washington’s Latest Signals The debate intensified in January 2026 following unusually explicit statements from Washington. On January 4, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump publicly stated that the United States “needs Greenland” from a national security perspective. Two days later, on January 6, 2026, the White House confirmed that it was examining “a range of options” regarding Greenland’s future security arrangements—remarks that, according to officials, did not exclude even the use of military force. These comments propelled Greenland’s status from a theoretical policy discussion into a live diplomatic and strategic issue.   What a Compact of Free Association Means A Compact of Free Association is a legally binding but asymmetric partnership. Under existing COFA arrangements, the associated state remains internationally recognized and self-governing in domestic affairs, while the United States assumes full responsibility for external defense and security. Washington gains the right to deploy forces, control strategic access, and manage defense matters on behalf of the partner. Currently, COFA agreements exist only with three Pacific states: the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, and the Palau. In return for defense guarantees, these states receive economic aid, development funding, and trade privileges, including duty-free access to U.S. markets. Applying this model to Greenland would be a significant departure from precedent, shifting a framework designed for small Pacific island nations into the heart of the Arctic and Europe.   Implications for Denmark and NATO Any COFA-style arrangement for Greenland would fundamentally alter the relationship between Nuuk and Copenhagen. Denmark’s constitutional responsibility for Greenland’s defense would effectively be transferred to Washington, raising complex legal and political questions within the Danish realm. For Europe and NATO, the proposal challenges long-standing assumptions about allied sovereignty and burden-sharing. Greenland sits within NATO territory by virtue of Denmark’s membership, meaning a bilateral U.S.–Greenland defense arrangement could blur the lines between alliance obligations and unilateral American control. European allies have privately expressed concern that such a move could set a precedent for U.S. dominance over strategic territories within allied states, potentially weakening collective decision-making.   Greenlandic Perspectives and Domestic Sensitivities Within Greenland itself, reactions are likely to be mixed. While some policymakers view closer ties with Washington as a potential source of economic investment and security guarantees, others see the idea as a threat to self-determination and a step toward de facto U.S. control. Greenlandic politics have long balanced aspirations for eventual independence against economic reliance on Denmark, and a COFA arrangement could reshape that debate entirely. Public opinion is further complicated by Greenland’s Indigenous identity and historical sensitivities to external control, making any transfer of defense authority politically delicate.   A Test of U.S. Power in the Arctic The consideration of a Compact of Free Association with Greenland reflects a broader shift in U.S. strategy toward the Arctic, driven by intensifying competition with Russia and China, climate-driven accessibility, and renewed emphasis on homeland defense. From Washington’s perspective, a COFA could provide maximum strategic control with minimal formal annexation, avoiding the political and legal fallout of outright territorial acquisition. For Europe, however, the proposal raises alarms about the limits of U.S. power within allied territory and the erosion of multilateral norms. If pursued, it would test NATO cohesion, Denmark’s sovereignty, and Greenland’s autonomy simultaneously. Whether the idea evolves into formal negotiations or remains a pressure tactic, it has already succeeded in one respect: placing Greenland at the center of global debates over Arctic security, sovereignty, and the future architecture of U.S. alliances.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-07 16:48:31
 World 

PARIS : The French hydrographic and oceanographic service, Shom, has selected Exail’s DriX H-9 uncrewed surface vehicle (USV) to further expand its national hydrographic and oceanographic capabilities, marking another step in the accelerated transformation of France’s maritime data-collection fleet. The acquisition supports Shom’s strategic objective of delivering certified, high-quality maritime data more rapidly, as demand rises from both civil and military users across widening areas of operational interest. The move reflects a broader shift toward uncrewed systems to increase survey tempo, reduce operational constraints, and extend coverage without compromising data integrity.   Building on Operational Success With DriX H-8 The decision follows the delivery and operational deployment of the DriX H-8, ordered in December 2024 and now operating under the name Marlin. That platform has already demonstrated the value of uncrewed surface systems in real-world hydrographic survey missions, validating their reliability, accuracy, and integration within Shom’s established workflows. Drawing directly on this experience, the newly ordered DriX H-9 represents a significant capability upgrade, offering greater endurance, higher autonomy, and enhanced operational flexibility. Designed for extended missions, the platform can operate for up to 20 days, depending on payload configuration, enabling long-range and persistent survey operations with minimal human intervention.   Flexible Deployment From Shore or Mother Ship A key advantage of the DriX H-9 is its deployment versatility. The USV can be launched directly from shore or from Shom’s hydrographic and oceanographic vessel Beautemps-Beaupré, allowing seamless integration into existing survey campaigns. This flexibility enables Shom to adapt mission planning to environmental conditions, operational priorities, and geographic constraints. From its home base at Brest naval base, the DriX H-9 will be capable of autonomously transiting to survey areas in the English Channel and the Atlantic Ocean, expanding Shom’s ability to conduct offshore and near-coastal missions without tying up crewed vessels.   Faster Data Cycles, Wider Coverage By leveraging uncrewed technologies such as the DriX H-9, Shom aims to accelerate data-acquisition cycles, extend survey coverage, and ensure the timely availability of reliable maritime information. These data are critical for a wide range of applications, including safety of navigation, environmental monitoring, coastal management, maritime spatial planning, and defence-related assessments. Uncrewed systems also offer the advantage of sustained operations in conditions that may be inefficient or impractical for traditional crewed platforms, improving overall fleet resilience and productivity.   Industry Confidence in the DriX Platform “This new order reflects the confidence Shom places in Exail’s uncrewed surface systems and in the operational maturity of the DriX platform,” said Pierre-Louis Roudaut, France Sales Manager at Exail. He noted that the DriX H-9 is the third unit ordered by different customers in just a few months, underscoring growing market confidence in the platform’s extended endurance and autonomy. According to Exail, the H-9’s design is tailored to meet a broad spectrum of operational needs, from coastal hydrography to offshore survey missions, while maintaining high standards of data quality and system reliability.   Complementarity Within Shom’s Fleet Denis Creach, Shom’s Transformation hydro-oceanographic capabilities officer, emphasized the complementary role the DriX H-9 will play alongside existing assets. Operated jointly with Marlin (the DriX H-8), the new platform will benefit from shared infrastructure, common operating procedures, and accumulated crew experience, further reducing the learning curve and accelerating operational readiness.   Strengthening France’s Hydrographic Future With the integration of the DriX H-9 into Shom’s fleet, Exail and Shom continue a close collaboration focused on modernizing France’s hydrographic capabilities. The program highlights how uncrewed surface systems are moving from experimental tools to core operational assets, reshaping the way maritime data is collected, processed, and delivered in support of both national and international requirements.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-07 16:38:31
 World 

Ankara / Tokyo : Türkiye has offered Japan its Bayraktar TB2 unmanned combat aerial vehicle and the ship-capable Bayraktar TB3 as part of deepening bilateral defense cooperation focused on maritime security and unmanned systems. The proposal signals a potential new approach to drone-enabled naval operations in the Pacific, aligned with Japan’s evolving maritime posture. According to a January 7 report by Anadolu Agency, Turkish National Defense Minister Yaşar Güler said the Bayraktar TB2 and TB3 “could contribute to Japan’s defense capabilities,” highlighting their long endurance, persistent surveillance, and cost-effectiveness for maritime missions. Güler noted that constructive discussions have continued since Japanese Defense Minister Gen Nakatani visited Ankara, covering maritime security, unmanned systems, training, and air-defense technologies. A Turkish defense ministry delegation is expected to visit Japan in March 2026 to advance defense-industry cooperation and explore a framework agreement.   TB3 Designed for Short-Deck Naval Operations Developed by Baykar, the Bayraktar TB3 is engineered specifically for operations from compact flight decks. Available specifications indicate an airframe approximately 8.35 meters long with a wingspan of about 14 meters, supporting a payload around 280 kilograms and endurance exceeding 21 hours. The UAV is powered by a turboprop-class engine rated near 170 horsepower and supports both line-of-sight and beyond-line-of-sight communications. Operationally, the TB3 is associated with cruise speeds near 125 knots, maximum speeds around 160 knots, an operating altitude of roughly 20,000 feet, and a service ceiling near 25,000 feet. Test reports indicate significant altitude margin, with documented flights exceeding 33,000 feet and one widely cited test reaching 36,310 feet, providing flexibility for weather, sensor performance, and communications. The UAV’s operational reach of about 1,100 nautical miles is frequently highlighted in naval terms, allowing sensors to extend well beyond a task group’s organic horizon and strengthening early warning and maritime domain awareness.   Sea Trials from TCG Anadolu The TB3’s naval credentials have been reinforced through a series of sea trials. In November 2024, a TB3 prototype successfully launched from the amphibious assault ship TCG Anadolu using the vessel’s 12-degree ski-jump, completed a short maritime flight, and recovered back onto the moving deck without arresting gear or external recovery systems. Follow-on trials through late 2024 and into 2025 reportedly repeated launches and recoveries under varying wind, deck-motion, and payload conditions, focusing on repeatability and operational margins rather than one-off demonstrations. Turkish officials describe these trials as evidence that routine UAV operations from short decks are achievable, enabling persistent sea-based aviation without the complexity of catapults or arresting systems.   Implications for Japan and the Pacific For Japan, the offer comes as it strengthens maritime surveillance, deterrence, and distributed operations across the Western Pacific. A ship-capable UAV like the TB3 could complement manned aviation by providing persistent ISR, extending sensor coverage, and supporting flexible deployment from non-traditional aviation ships. The inclusion of the proven TB2 alongside the navalized TB3 suggests a layered approach combining land- and sea-based unmanned operations. While no procurement decision has been announced, the talks underline growing Türkiye–Japan defense ties and highlight how unmanned, ship-operated aircraft could shape future naval operations in the Pacific and beyond.

Read More → Posted on 2026-01-07 16:09:25
Search