India
A high-level team from India’s Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) recently wrapped up a significant visit to an Airbus facility near Munich, where they closely examined the Eurodrone—Europe’s flagship unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) program. The visit, held in June 2025 as part of an ongoing Programme Working Group meeting, marked a key moment in India’s evaluation of advanced drone systems for its military. The Eurodrone, jointly developed by Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, left a strong impression on the Indian delegation. The DRDO officials, particularly experts from the Aeronautical Development Establishment (ADE), were notably impressed by its powerful performance, including its 2,300 kg payload capacity and its all-weather operational capability—both critical features for modern warfare scenarios, especially in India’s varied terrain and climate. This interest comes at a time when India's Army, Navy, and Air Force are jointly planning to induct up to 97 Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) drones in the coming years. With rising strategic needs across the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and over the Indian Ocean Region, there is growing urgency to acquire drones that can perform intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition, and reconnaissance (ISTAR) missions in high-risk, high-altitude, and maritime environments. The Eurodrone ticks many of these boxes. Its twin-turboprop configuration, powered by General Electric’s Catalyst engines, is designed for sustained endurance and versatility. The drone can be equipped with a wide range of sensor suites, including Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) cameras, and signals intelligence (SIGINT) equipment. Additionally, its ability to carry precision-guided weapons and operate safely in non-segregated airspace adds to its combat utility. India officially joined the Eurodrone program as an observer in January 2025, following a request made in August 2024. As an observer, India, alongside Japan, now receives regular technical updates and performance reports, giving its defense planners a clear view of Eurodrone’s capabilities and limitations. This level of access is also expected to benefit India’s indigenous UAV efforts, including platforms like the Tapas-BH-201 and the future Archer-NG. Beyond just inspection and observation, the visit allowed the DRDO team to engage directly with European engineers, offering a rare chance to compare design philosophies and understand complex integration techniques. This hands-on insight could prove invaluable as India looks to narrow the gap between foreign platforms and its domestic drone ecosystem. However, while the Eurodrone is technologically advanced, it is not without its issues. Launched in 2015, the program has encountered repeated delays, and the first prototype flight is now pushed to mid-2027. Rising development costs and the financial burden of staying involved as an observer are also concerns India will have to weigh carefully, particularly as it balances the need for quick acquisitions with the desire to build at home. India’s military drone market, currently valued at around $1.5 billion, is expected to grow sharply over the next decade. Whether India decides to purchase foreign systems like the Eurodrone or use these insights to strengthen its domestic programs will shape the future of its drone warfare capabilities. In any case, the DRDO’s visit to Munich reflects a deliberate and informed approach toward adopting cutting-edge aerial technologies. As global security dynamics evolve, partnerships like this—whether through full procurement, technology transfer, or collaborative development—could define how India meets the complex surveillance and combat challenges of tomorrow.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 11:54:46
India
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) has marked another milestone in India’s defence technology journey by developing a sophisticated 6 KW Solid State Power Amplifier (SSPA). This breakthrough system represents a major advancement in radar transmitter technology, promising greater efficiency, reliability, and operational readiness for future defence radar systems. The project has been developed by DRDO’s Electronics & Radar Development Establishment (LRDE) in collaboration with Bengaluru-based Aidin Technologies Pvt. Ltd. The amplifier is built using state-of-the-art Gallium Nitride on Silicon Carbide (GaN on SiC) technology — a material combination globally recognised for delivering superior performance in modern electronic systems. What is a Solid State Power Amplifier (SSPA)? A Solid State Power Amplifier is an electronic device that takes in a low-power radio frequency (RF) signal and boosts it to a much higher power level. This amplified signal is then sent to a radar antenna, enabling it to detect and track objects like aircraft, missiles, and ships over long distances. Unlike older vacuum tube-based transmitters (like magnetrons and klystrons), solid state systems are smaller, safer, more reliable, and need far less maintenance. Key Features of DRDO’s 6 KW SSPA Peak Power Output: 6 KW (kilowatts) in pulsed operation. Frequency Range: 2.9 GHz to 3.3 GHz, suitable for S-band radar applications like the Indian Navy’s Air and Missile Defence Radars (AMDR). Pulse Width: 100 microseconds. Duty Cycle: 10 percent (meaning it emits pulses for 10% of the time). Modular Design: Built with eight 1.5 KW amplifier modules combined through advanced power combining techniques, offering both scalability and fault tolerance. This modular approach allows the system to continue working even if one module fails — an essential feature in military operations where equipment reliability is critical. Why GaN on SiC Technology Matters Gallium Nitride (GaN) on Silicon Carbide (SiC) is one of the most advanced semiconductor technologies available today. It provides several advantages: Higher Power Density: Can deliver more power in a smaller, lighter package. Superior Thermal Performance: SiC efficiently dissipates heat, ensuring stable operation even at high power. Wider Frequency Range: Operates efficiently across a broad range of frequencies, making it ideal for multi-band radar systems. Higher Efficiency: Converts input power to output RF power more effectively, reducing energy waste and operational costs. This makes GaN on SiC an ideal material for modern military radar systems, which demand high power, precision, and continuous operation. System Design and Operation The DRDO 6 KW SSPA is housed in a standard 19-inch, 18U rack. Each amplifier module includes forced air cooling systems to manage heat, industrial-grade power supplies compatible with 380V and 440V three-phase AC, and built-in monitoring, control, and protection systems. It also features remote control capabilities through Ethernet and RS422 communication protocols, allowing seamless integration with modern defence command networks. Benefits Over Traditional Tube-Based Systems Solid state power amplifiers like this one offer clear advantages over older, tube-based systems: Instant Operation: No warm-up time, unlike magnetrons and klystrons. Lower Maintenance: No fragile components like filaments or cathodes. Greater Reliability: MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) exceeding 250,000 hours compared to 3,000 hours for traditional systems. Graceful Degradation: Can keep working at reduced capacity if one module fails. Lower Operating Voltages: Safer and easier to maintain. Superior Phase Stability: Essential for accurate target tracking and clutter rejection. Applications in Modern Defence Systems The 6 KW SSPA is designed primarily for next-generation naval and land-based radar systems like the AMDR. However, its modular design means it can be adapted for: Long-range Surveillance Radars Fire Control Radars Missile Tracking Systems Electronic Warfare (EW) Systems This flexibility ensures it will support a wide variety of mission-critical applications for India’s armed forces. Strategic Importance and Future Implications The successful development of this indigenous 6 KW SSPA marks a vital achievement in India’s defence self-reliance efforts. It not only reduces dependence on foreign suppliers but also positions India among the global leaders in solid state radar transmitter technologies. The DRDO’s LRDE, since its establishment in 1962, has been India’s premier radar design agency. This latest innovation, in partnership with Aidin Technologies, demonstrates India’s growing capability in high-end defence electronics and positions the nation to develop even higher-powered and multi-band radar systems in the coming years. The DRDO’s 6 KW Solid State Power Amplifier using GaN on SiC technology is a landmark in indigenous radar technology development. It promises to enhance the operational readiness, reliability, and performance of India’s next-generation radar systems while contributing to national security and defence modernisation goals. As India moves towards building advanced, networked, and resilient military systems, innovations like this amplifier will play a crucial role in strengthening the country's defence technology base.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-23 11:32:52
World
In a stunning escalation of Middle East tensions, the United States launched airstrikes on three key nuclear facilities in Iran on Sunday, marking a dramatic shift in Washington’s posture after days of speculation. The strikes, which coincided with Israel’s ongoing campaign against Iran, were confirmed in a televised address by former President Donald Trump. “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” Trump declared from the White House. “Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace.” The global response to the strikes was swift and deeply divided, reflecting the geopolitical complexity of the moment. Israel: ‘Change History’ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu hailed the strikes as a historic milestone. In a video message, he praised Trump’s “bold decision” and claimed it would bring the region closer to “prosperity and peace.” “America has been truly unsurpassed,” Netanyahu declared. He also told Israelis that his long-standing promise to neutralize Iran’s nuclear program had been “fulfilled.” United Kingdom: ‘Stability is Priority’ British Prime Minister Keir Starmer acknowledged the threat of a nuclear-armed Iran but urged caution. “Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat,” he said on X. Starmer emphasized the importance of returning to diplomacy and prioritizing regional stability. European Union: ‘Step Back’ The European Union’s chief diplomat, Kaja Kallas, issued a warning against further escalation. “I urge all sides to step back,” she posted on social media, adding that EU foreign ministers would meet Monday to assess the situation. The EU continues to call for Iran to rejoin nuclear negotiations under international oversight. United Nations: ‘Dangerous Escalation’ UN Secretary-General António Guterres described the strikes as a “dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge.” He warned that further military actions could spiral into a broader conflict and reiterated that diplomacy remains the only viable solution. The UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), reported no increase in off-site radiation levels. However, it has called for an emergency meeting on Monday to assess the damage and implications. Iraq: ‘Grave Threat’ Neighboring Iraq expressed alarm over the US action. Government spokesman Basim Alawadi warned the strikes could destabilize the entire region. “This military escalation constitutes a grave threat to peace and security in the Middle East,” he said. India – “Time for willing diplomacy” India’s Ministry of External Affairs called for “maximum restraint” and urged all parties to return to dialogue. Indian defence expert Praful Bakshi, speaking to ANI, noted India’s strategic position as a friend to both Iran and Israel. He said, “Time for India to be more vigilant… PM Modi will raise this issue with both sides to end this war” . Russia – “Strong Condemnation”; Medvedev warns of new war Russia’s Foreign Ministry “strongly condemned” the strikes, calling them a “gross violation of international law… a dangerous escalation” Deputy Head of Putin’s Security Council Dmitry Medvedev labelled the action “initiating a new war,” warning it may have the opposite effect by “strengthening” Iran and uniting its people behind Supreme Leader Khamenei . China – Breach of UN Charter; warning of repeating Iraq mistake China’s Foreign Ministry denounced the U.S. attack as a “serious violation of international law and the UN Charter,” asserting it exaggerated tensions in the Middle East . State media echoed concerns that the U.S. may be repeating “past strategic mistakes” in the region and urged immediate ceasefire and renewed talks Saudi Arabia: ‘Exercise Restraint’ Saudi Arabia, another key regional player, voiced “great concern” over the attacks on its neighbor. The Saudi foreign ministry urged all parties to “exercise restraint” and work to de-escalate tensions. Riyadh's statement referred to Iran as the “sisterly Islamic Republic,” signaling its desire to avoid being pulled into a broader conflict. Hamas: ‘Brutal Aggression’ Palestinian militant group Hamas condemned the US strikes as “blatant aggression” against Iran’s sovereignty. They labeled it a “flagrant violation of international law” and a “direct threat to international peace and security,” aligning themselves more closely with Tehran amid shared opposition to Israel and the US. US Domestic Politics: ‘Unilateral Military Action’ Back home, the US political landscape was also roiled by the strikes. House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries accused Trump of bypassing Congress and dragging the country into another Middle Eastern conflict. “President Trump misled the country, failed to seek authorization, and risks American entanglement in a disastrous war,” Jeffries said. He laid full responsibility for potential consequences at Trump’s feet. What Lies Ahead? The attack on Iran’s nuclear sites marks one of the most significant military escalations in the region in years. While some nations have welcomed the move as a step toward disarmament, others fear it could trigger a larger conflict. With emergency meetings scheduled by both the EU and the UN, the world is bracing for Iran’s response—diplomatic or otherwise. As global leaders walk a tightrope between confrontation and de-escalation, the coming days may well define the future of the Middle East and international nuclear diplomacy.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 17:02:47
World
As tensions surge between the United States and Iran, particularly following any direct military strike from Washington, the Islamic Republic holds a wide array of retaliatory tools—from ballistic missiles to proxy militias and strategic maritime disruptions. This article explores in depth what a coordinated Iranian retaliation could look like, analyzing the threat landscape from missile reach to covert operations. Iran’s Missile Arsenal: A Strike Within Reach Iran’s missile doctrine centers around deterrence and asymmetric retaliation. It is home to the largest and most diverse ballistic missile program in the Middle East, fielding weapons with ranges that can reach hundreds, and even thousands, of kilometers. Major Iranian Missiles & Their Range: Missile Type Range (km) Notes Fateh-110 SRBM 300–700 Solid-fueled; used by Hezbollah and others Zolfaghar SRBM 700 Used in Syria and Iraq Dezful SRBM/MRBM 1,000 Extended range of Zolfaghar Shahab-3 MRBM 1,300–2,000 Based on North Korean Nodong-1 Ghadr-110 MRBM 1,800 More advanced than Shahab-3 Sejjil-2 MRBM 2,000+ Solid-fueled, two-stage; hard to intercept Kheibar Shekan MRBM 1,450 Maneuverable reentry vehicle; evades ABM systems Khorramshahr-4 IRBM 2,000+ Heavy payload; designed to evade radar U.S. Bases Within Iran’s Missile Range (Up to 2,000 km) Iran can potentially hit U.S. forces and assets across the Middle East using its medium-range ballistic missiles (MRBMs). List of Countries with U.S. Bases within 2,000 km of Iran: Country Major U.S. Bases Approx. Distance from Iran Notes Iraq Al Asad Airbase, Erbil Airbase 400–900 km Already attacked by Iran in 2020 Kuwait Camp Arifjan, Ali Al Salem Air Base ~550 km Major logistics hub Bahrain Naval Support Activity (5th Fleet HQ) ~250 km Command hub for Persian Gulf Qatar Al Udeid Airbase ~800 km Largest U.S. base in region UAE Al Dhafra Airbase ~800–1,200 km Hosts U.S. F-22s, ISR platforms Saudi Arabia Prince Sultan Airbase, Eskan Village ~900–1,300 km U.S. troops re-established here Oman Thumrait, Muscat ~1,500–1,800 km Maritime surveillance focus Jordan Muwaffaq Salti Airbase ~1,200 km ISR & drone operations Syria Al-Tanf Garrison ~1,000 km Special Forces outpost Afghanistan U.S. now withdrawn, but IRGC keeps options ~1,000–1,200 km Former area of interest Turkey Incirlik Airbase (NATO) ~1,800 km Hosts U.S. nuclear weapons These bases host thousands of American troops, surveillance assets, fighter jets, missile defense systems, and logistics depots—prime targets for Iranian retaliation. Proxy Network Activation: “Axis of Resistance” Iran’s most effective retaliatory weapon isn’t always a missile—but its shadow army of regional proxy groups, which allow it to strike without leaving fingerprints. Iranian-Aligned Proxies Capable of Attacking U.S. Assets: Group Location Capabilities Iran Support Hezbollah Lebanon Rockets (Fateh-110), drones, ATGMs Full IRGC-backed Hashd al-Shaabi Iraq Rockets, drones Direct command Kata’ib Hezbollah Iraq SRBMs, drones, truck bombs Elite Quds Force ties Houthis (Ansar Allah) Yemen SRBMs, cruise missiles, naval drones High-level support Hamas & PIJ Gaza Strip Rockets, tunnels Strategic, indirect Fatemiyoun Brigade Syria (Afghans) Ground operations IRGC recruits Zainabiyoun Brigade Syria (Pakistanis) Ground operations IRGC-trained These proxies have already conducted attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq, Syria, and Jordan, and have threatened to escalate further if Iran is attacked directly. Land-Based Infiltration or Guerilla Warfare A direct Iranian land invasion of U.S. assets is virtually impossible due to geography and U.S. regional alliances. However, Tehran could: Use proxies to infiltrate military bases with suicide missions, as seen in Syria and Jordan. Activate sleeper cells near bases or consulates. Launch rocket/artillery ambushes near border zones or along supply routes. Strait of Hormuz & Oil Export Disruption Iran has repeatedly threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint through which ~20% of global oil passes. Iran can: Deploy naval mines and fast attack boats. Use anti-ship missiles from the coast (Noor, Khalij Fars). Launch drone attacks on oil tankers, as seen in past incidents. Blocking the strait would send oil prices skyrocketing and provoke a strong international military response—but it remains one of Iran’s highest-leverage tactics. Terrorism & Cyber Retaliation If direct military options are too risky, Iran might: Support terror attacks on U.S. embassies or consulates (similar to 1983 Beirut or 1996 Khobar Towers). Launch cyberattacks against U.S. infrastructure—power grids, water systems, or financial services. The IRGC’s cyber unit has already targeted U.S. facilities in the past. Use criminal and narco networks for covert operations, especially in Latin America and Africa. U.S. Global Assets at Risk Besides bases, other vulnerable assets include: Naval ships in the Gulf and Red Sea Embassies and diplomatic outposts across West Asia Private American oil companies operating in the region Logistics supply chains via commercial cargo routes A Multi-Axis Response Doctrine In the event of a U.S. strike on Iran, Tehran’s response would likely be: Asymmetric and layered—combining missile strikes with cyberattacks, proxy wars, and oil export disruptions. Proxy-led—leveraging decades of regional influence to hit American interests without overt Iranian involvement. Geographically dispersed—from Iraq to Lebanon, the Red Sea to the Gulf of Oman, Iran’s retaliation wouldn’t be limited to its borders. Iran’s deterrence lies not in launching one big war—but in a thousand small wars, everywhere at once.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 16:50:10
History
Once a beacon of modernization in the Middle East, Iran today stands as a deeply religious, politically isolated nation under clerical rule. How did this transformation take place? Who ruled before the current regime? Could the old order ever return? And what has been the price—particularly for women? The Shah’s Iran: A Modernizing Monarchy Before 1979, Iran was ruled by the Pahlavi dynasty, first under Reza Shah Pahlavi (1925–1941), and later his son, Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi (1941–1979). The monarchy was deeply focused on modernization, centralization, and secularization. The Shah’s most ambitious initiative—the White Revolution (1963)—ushered in land reforms, women’s suffrage, industrialization, and education programs. During the 1960s and 70s, Iran experienced an economic boom. Western fashion, cinema, music, and liberal values flourished in Tehran and other cities. Women were among the greatest beneficiaries: they could vote, hold office, become judges, and dress freely. Iran appointed its first female minister, Farrokhroo Parsa, in 1968—something unthinkable in today’s regime. Iran’s capital was sometimes referred to as the “Paris of the Middle East,” and despite criticisms of autocracy, corruption, and inequality, the country was widely seen as an emerging modern state. The Islamic Revolution: Collapse of the Old Order In 1979, following years of political repression, widening inequality, and backlash from the religious clergy, Iran erupted in protest. Leading the revolution was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, an exiled Shia cleric who galvanized a coalition of Islamists, leftists, students, and traditionalists. On February 11, 1979, the monarchy collapsed. The Shah fled to Egypt; Khomeini returned from exile to Tehran, declaring the birth of an Islamic Republic. Shortly after, a national referendum overwhelmingly backed the formation of this new theocratic system, replacing monarchy with “Velayat-e Faqih”—rule by Islamic jurists. The new constitution gave ultimate power to the Supreme Leader (Khomeini, and later Ali Khamenei), whose word overrides even that of the president or parliament. The revolution also resulted in brutal purges of monarchists, liberals, and secularists. The Family Protection Law was repealed. Veiling became mandatory. Political dissent was silenced. And the once-Western-aligned Iran turned radically anti-American and anti-Israel. Women’s Freedoms: Then and Now Under the Shah (Pre-1979): Women had the right to vote (since 1963) and run for office. Female ministers and judges were common in the late 1970s. Women wore Western clothes freely in public. The marriage age was raised, and women had improved divorce and custody rights. Under the Islamic Republic (Post-1979): Hijab became compulsory. Veil-police monitor public behavior. Women cannot sing publicly, and are banned from certain sports stadiums. Family law reverted to Sharia-based rules, disadvantaging women in divorce, custody, and inheritance. Yet paradoxically, female literacy and education soared—today, over 60% of university students are women. In recent years, women like Mahsa Amini (whose death in 2022 sparked nationwide protests) became symbols of a generation demanding reform. The Islamic Republic Today Iran is currently ruled by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (in power since 1989), and President Ebrahim Raisi, a hardliner elected in 2021. Institutions like the Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) wield massive influence, and elections are tightly controlled by the Guardian Council, which filters out reformist candidates. The system is rigid, but it faces growing pressure from a restless population, especially among youth and women, who seek more freedoms and economic opportunities. What Happened to the Old Regime? Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, son of the late Shah, now lives in exile in the U.S. He has no formal political power, but remains a symbol of opposition. In 2023–24, protests inside Iran saw chants like “Reza Shah, bless your soul!”, especially among young people who never lived under the monarchy but idolize its modern image. While monarchist sentiment is rising among exiles and some inside Iran, there is no serious path to restoration under current conditions. The Islamic Republic’s power structure—anchored in the IRGC, clergy, and security forces—is deeply entrenched. Who Comes After Khamenei? At 85, Ali Khamenei’s death will trigger a major power transition. A body called the Assembly of Experts is tasked with selecting the next Supreme Leader, though insiders believe the IRGC will heavily influence the decision. Some say Mojtaba Khamenei (Ali’s son) could succeed him, suggesting dynastic ambitions within the clerical framework. Others advocate for reform from within. A monarchist restoration would require not only regime collapse but mass domestic and elite support, which currently does not exist. Conclusion Iran’s journey from a modern monarchy to an Islamic theocracy reshaped its identity, international standing, and social fabric. While the Islamic Republic has achieved ideological durability, it has come at the cost of personal freedoms—especially for women—and international isolation. The old regime lives on in memory, particularly in the voices of younger Iranians yearning for a freer, more open society. But barring a political earthquake, the return of the Shah remains more nostalgic dream than imminent reality.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 12:29:52
World
World’s Bunker Buster Bombs: How Other Countries Compare to the USA Bunker buster bombs are specialized weapons designed to destroy hardened underground targets like command bunkers, weapons depots, and nuclear facilities. While the United States leads this category with the massive GBU-57 MOP, other countries have developed their own bunker-busting bombs — though on a much smaller scale and for regional or tactical purposes. Let’s first compare the bunker buster bombs fielded by other countries. Top Bunker Buster Bombs by Other Countries Rank 💣 Bomb Name ⚖️ Weight 🌐 Country 📌 Capability 1️⃣ GBU-57A/B MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) 13,600 kg USA Penetrates 60 meters of concrete, targets deep nuclear & command bunkers 2️⃣ GBU-28 Bunker Buster 2,268 kg USA Developed for Iraq’s deep bunkers, penetrates up to 6 meters of concrete 3️⃣ KAB-1500L-Pr 1,500 kg Russia Laser-guided, designed for hardened command posts and bunkers 4️⃣ SPICE-2000 (Penetrator variant) 1,000 kg India / Israel Precision-guided, famous for the 2019 Balakot airstrike 5️⃣ Storm Shadow / SCALP EG 1,300 kg UK / France Cruise missile with a BROACH warhead for hardened targets 6️⃣ KAB-500L-Pr 500 kg Russia Tactical penetrator bomb for light bunkers and shelters 7️⃣ AASM Hammer (penetrator variant) 250–1,000 kg France Modular guided bomb kit, up to 1,000 kg with bunker-penetrating variant 8️⃣ HOPE / HOSBO (planned) Up to 1,000 kg Germany Future precision glide bomb family under development Quick Highlights by Country Accept USA: Russia: Relies on KAB-1500L-Pr and KAB-500L-Pr laser-guided bombs for hardened targets. Also uses thermobaric bombs (like ODAB-1500) for fortified positions. India & Israel: Use SPICE-2000 precision-guided bombs with a penetration variant. India deployed this effectively during the 2019 Balakot airstrikes. UK & 🇫🇷 France: Field the Storm Shadow / SCALP EG cruise missile with a bunker-penetrating BROACH warhead, combat-proven in Syria and Libya. France: Also uses the AASM Hammer modular bomb kit, including a penetrator variant. Germany: Developing the HOPE / HOSBO precision glide bomb family for future tactical bunker-busting needs. None of these weapons exceed a weight of 1,500 kg or have penetration capability comparable to the US GBU-57 MOP. Most are designed for light to medium-depth bunkers, airbases, or fortified camps. Why Only the USA Has Massive Bunker Busters Like the GBU-57 MOP The United States is the only country to develop and field a bunker buster like the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) — a 13,600 kg bomb capable of destroying facilities buried up to 60 meters under reinforced concrete. Here’s why: 1️⃣ Strategic Global Need Unlike other nations, the USA regularly faces potential military operations against: Deep nuclear sites in Iran (Fordow) North Korea’s underground nuclear facilities Chinese hardened command centers Other countries primarily deal with regional threats where a 500–1,500 kg bomb is sufficient. The US alone requires the ability to strike deeply buried, nuclear-capable enemy targets worldwide. 2️⃣ Advanced Technological Capability Creating a 13-ton bomb that can penetrate 60 meters of concrete is extremely complex: Requires advanced metallurgy to survive impact. Needs specialized fuzing systems to detonate deep underground. Must be paired with GPS/INS guidance systems for precise delivery. Very few nations possess the technological base to develop such a weapon. 3️⃣ Exclusive Delivery Platforms Only the United States operates a bomber capable of carrying and deploying such a bomb: The B-2 Spirit stealth bomber can carry the GBU-57 while evading sophisticated air defenses. No other nation fields a stealth heavy bomber of this class. While Russia’s Tu-160 and China’s H-6 can carry heavy bombs, they lack the stealth and penetration capabilities needed for such missions. 4️⃣ High Costs and Political Sensitivity Ultra-heavy bunker busters like the GBU-57 MOP are: Very expensive to develop and deploy Politically sensitive as they’re designed specifically for strategic nuclear sites and command bunkers. Most countries don’t face situations that justify investing in such weapons, and using them would signal major escalation in conflict. 5️⃣ Alternatives Used by Other Nations Since massive bunker busters are impractical for most militaries, other countries prefer: Thermobaric bombs (like Russia’s ODAB-1500) Cruise missiles with penetrator warheads (UK’s Storm Shadow) Precision-guided bombs in the 500–2,000 kg range for tactical needs These are cheaper, easier to deploy, and sufficient for regional conflicts. Conclusion USA Rest of the World Unique strategic need to strike deep underground nuclear bunkers globally Focus on regional or tactical hardened targets Possesses stealth heavy bombers (B-2 Spirit) to carry 13-ton bombs No equivalent operational platform Massive investment in ultra-heavy penetration bomb technology Prioritize smaller, cheaper, conventional or alternative methods GBU-57 penetrates 60 meters of concrete No other bomb exceeds 6–10 meters penetration The United States stands alone in fielding a bomb like the GBU-57 MOP because of its global strategic commitments, technological edge, and dedicated stealth bombers. Other countries focus on smaller tactical weapons suitable for their regional threats. Unless another nation finds itself facing the same kind of deep, hardened nuclear-capable adversaries, it’s unlikely anyone else will build a bomb like the MOP anytime soon.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 11:50:20
World
When U.S. B-2 stealth bombers dropped six massive bombs on Iran’s underground Fordow nuclear facility, it wasn’t just a show of force — it was a calculated choice dictated by physics, engineering, and decades of military planning. Fordow is one of the most fortified nuclear sites on Earth, buried deep inside a mountain. The only way to hit it effectively was with the most powerful non-nuclear bomb in the U.S. arsenal: the GBU-57 A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator, or MOP. Let’s understand why this bomb — weighing nearly 13,600 kilograms (30,000 pounds) — was the only viable option the U.S. had to strike Fordow. Why Fordow Required a GBU-57 A/B Strike Fordow, located near Iran’s holy city of Qom, isn’t your average nuclear site. It was deliberately built under 80 meters (260 feet) of rock and soil, carved into the side of a mountain, to protect it from airstrikes. On top of that, it's guarded by advanced Iranian and Russian-made surface-to-air missile systems, making conventional attacks dangerous and ineffective. While Israel had already struck another Iranian facility at Natanz with smaller munitions, even Israel’s most advanced bombs couldn’t crack Fordow’s mountain armor. The only weapon in existence capable of doing that is the U.S.-made GBU-57 A/B, and the only aircraft able to deliver it is America’s stealth B-2 Spirit bomber. What Makes the GBU-57 A/B “Bunker Buster” So Special? The GBU-57 A/B is not just big — it’s incredibly powerful and precise. Here’s what makes it unique: Weight: Roughly 13,600 kg (30,000 lbs). Length: Over 20 feet (6 meters) long. Penetration Power: Can go through 200 feet (61 meters) of earth or 60 feet (18 meters) of reinforced concrete before exploding. Warhead: Carries a conventional explosive, not nuclear — yet causes massive localized destruction due to its kinetic energy and deep penetration. These bombs are often dropped in pairs or more, one after another, to “drill” through rock by using successive blasts. This is believed to be the tactic used at Fordow. Only the B-2 Stealth Bomber Can Deliver It The B-2 Spirit bomber is the only aircraft in the world equipped to carry and deliver the GBU-57 A/B. Here’s why: Payload Capacity: Can carry up to 18,000 kg (40,000 lbs) of weapons. Stealth: Its radar-evading design allows it to slip past enemy defenses. Range: Can fly 7,000 miles (11,000 km) without refueling — or 11,500 miles (18,500 km) with one refueling. Cost: At $2.1 billion per aircraft, the B-2 is the world’s most expensive military plane. The U.S. Air Force has tested it with two GBU-57 bombs at once, demonstrating it can carry nearly 60,000 lbs (27,200 kg) of destructive payload. Israel, despite its advanced air force, lacks the aircraft to carry such a weapon, and the U.S. has never exported the GBU-57 A/B. This is why Israel urged the U.S. to step in — because only America had the bomb and the bomber needed to strike Fordow. Risk of Nuclear Contamination? Fordow is known to be enriching highly enriched uranium, raising fears that a strike could release radioactive material. But according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), similar strikes at Natanz by Israel only caused local contamination, with no effect on surrounding areas. The U.S. likely calculated that the same would be true at Fordow. Why This Strike Matters This operation marks the first time the U.S. has directly struck Iranian nuclear infrastructure as part of Israel’s war effort — something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been pushing for. It signals a major escalation in regional tensions and demonstrates just how advanced and capable the U.S. military remains when facing extreme threats. Final Thoughts The Fordow facility was built to survive anything short of a nuclear attack. The GBU-57 A/B bomb, delivered by the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, was the only non-nuclear option capable of cracking its defenses. This airstrike wasn’t just about sending a political message — it was about using the only tool in the world capable of doing the job. And right now, only the United States has that tool.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 11:19:51
World
In a dramatic escalation of tensions in the Middle East, the United States launched a powerful airstrike operation on three of Iran’s key nuclear sites. Former U.S. President Donald Trump, who is actively involved in directing military decisions, confirmed the attacks in a statement on his Truth Social platform early Saturday. Which Sites Were Attacked? The U.S. targeted three major Iranian nuclear facilities: Fordow — an underground uranium enrichment facility built deep inside a mountain near the city of Qom. Natanz — Iran's largest and most important uranium enrichment plant. Esfahan — home to nuclear research and fuel production sites. These sites are crucial to Iran's nuclear program, and their targeting marks one of the most significant military moves in the region in recent years. What Was Used in the Attack? According to military sources, the U.S. operation involved: Total 125 U.S Military Aircraft Involved , in which 7 B-2 Spirit stealth bombers — long-range, radar-evading aircraft capable of delivering heavy payloads over fortified targets . The bombers dropped 14 GBU-57 "Massive Ordnance Penetrator" bunker-buster bombs, 12 on the Fordow site & 2 on Natanz, designed specifically to destroy deeply buried and hardened structures like underground nuclear facilities . Total 71 Precision Munitions dropped in this Operation named ' Midnight Hammer ' The operation was supported by one U.S. Navy Ohio-class guided-missile submarine, positioned in the northern Arabian Sea, which launched 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles targeting key air defense and radar installations around Natanz and Esfahan, clearing the way for the bomber strike. Why Was the Attack Carried Out? This military strike comes amid rising tensions between Iran, Israel, and the United States. Just two days earlier, Trump had publicly stated he would decide within two weeks whether to support Israel in its military standoff with Iran. However, increased intelligence about possible Iranian nuclear activities reportedly prompted immediate action. Iran had threatened to retaliate against U.S. military bases and allies in the region if attacked. Despite this, Trump declared the mission a success and urged for peace following the operation. “There’s not another military in the world that could have done this. Now is the time for peace!” Trump wrote. Evacuation of U.S. Citizens from Israel In parallel to the airstrikes, the U.S. Embassy in Israel began evacuating American citizens and residents from Israel and the West Bank due to fears of potential Iranian counterattacks on U.S. personnel and assets in the region. Former Governor Mike Huckabee confirmed on social media that the U.S. government was actively assisting its citizens in the region. What Happens Next? While the immediate military objective appears accomplished, the region remains tense. Iran has vowed to respond, and neighboring countries have increased their military alert levels. Analysts warn of possible retaliatory missile or drone attacks against U.S. bases in Iraq, Syria, and the Persian Gulf.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-22 10:52:49
India
New Delhi Rejects Speculation of Stealth Fighter TalksOn June 21, 2025, Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh set the record straight regarding India’s interest in fifth-generation stealth fighter jets. Appearing on a podcast, he said, “On F‑35A and Sukhoi Su‑57E, whatever has been discussed has been informal. We don’t have any formal consultation going on on these.” This statement dispels rumours circulating in recent days that India was in serious negotiations for either the US‑made F‑35A or the Russian Su‑57E (m.economictimes.com). Strategic Shift Towards Self‑RelianceInstead of pursuing foreign stealth jets, India is focusing on developing the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). With a projected timeline of roughly eight years to first flight and production, this initiative seeks to bolster indigenous capabilities and industrial participation. Singh highlighted that the AMCA programme is now open to both public and private sector firms, including Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), under a competitive execution model (m.economictimes.com). Procurement Reforms and Growing Export VoiceIn the same podcast, Singh outlined broader defence reforms. He noted that procurement timelines are being accelerated—from six years down to two. He emphasized that funding isn't an issue; rather, red tape is. Additionally, India’s defence exports have surged to ₹23,000 crore, underscoring growing confidence in the domestic defence manufacturing industry (economictimes.indiatimes.com). Russia’s Su‑57E Offer in ContextEarlier this year, Russia officially offered the Su‑57E for joint production in India, promising full technology transfers, local assembly, and source-code access (reuters.com). However, reports suggest New Delhi may condition any future deal on integrating Indian-made AESA radars and mission systems—insisting on GaN-based Uttam and Virupaksha radars rather than Russia’s GaAs-powered Byelka (defencesecurityasia.com). These demands reflect New Delhi's push for technological sovereignty and seamless integration with existing fleets. F-35A: Geopolitics vs. PragmatismThe US has also quietly signalled potential interest in selling F‑35As to India. Still, Singh’s statement confirms no binding or formal steps in that direction—reinforcing New Delhi’s cautious stance and prior reliance on French Rafales, American logistics, and evolving Make‑in‑India priorities (medial.app). What This All Means Key Dimension Implication No Formal Talks Clears public ambiguity—India is not in contract negotiations with U.S. or Russia on stealth jets. AMCA Focus Signals a strategic pivot towards indigenous 5th-generation capability. Tech Sovereignty India insists on domestic avionics and sensors, even for foreign platforms. Procurement Efficiency Faster buy cycles, growing export potential hints at policy overhaul. The Road Ahead AMCA Development First flight targeted around 2033. Open competition may invite private firms like Adani or Tata alongside HAL. MRFA Competition As India progresses with AMCA, it is still expected to fill fleet gaps under the Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) programme—likely involving Rafales, F‑21, Super Hornets, Gripens, and possibly Su‑57E or F‑35A in the long run (x.com, medial.app, en.wikipedia.org). Supplier Strategy India’s insistence on source-code and sensor control may limit choices. Russia appears willing to comply; the U.S. is less flexible on tech transfer. Defence Secretary Singh’s clear stance underscores a multi-pronged approach: no external shortcuts to fifth-gen capabilities, deeper defence industrialization, and procurement reform. India is charting a path balancing strategic autonomy with global partnerships—eyeing stealth but on its own terms.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 16:22:48
World
In a conflict where every second and missile counts, Israel’s once-celebrated missile defense system appears to be under strain. Reports now suggest that the country’s interception rate, which historically hovered around 90%, has fallen sharply to nearly 65% during the latest missile exchanges with Iran. Defense analysts and insiders point to several reasons behind this worrying decline — ranging from missile stock shortages to the introduction of more advanced Iranian weapons. Let’s break down what’s happening. A Steep Drop in Interceptions According to reports from NBC and The New York Times, Iran recently launched around 400 missiles towards Israel. Of these, nearly 40 managed to bypass Israel’s air defense and strike populated areas. While a 90% interception rate might sound impressive, this dip to 65% in the latest attacks is significant for a nation that has long relied on its multi-layered defense shield. This drop comes amid warnings from outlets like The Wall Street Journal and Newsweek that Israel’s stockpile of crucial Arrow missile interceptors is running low — a vulnerability Israel can ill afford at a time of escalating tensions. Why Are Missiles Getting Through? Several interconnected factors explain this drop in interception rates: 1️⃣ Depleting Interceptor Stocks Israel’s air defense relies on a layered system: Iron Dome for short-range threats like rockets and mortars. David’s Sling for medium- to long-range rockets and cruise missiles. Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 for high-altitude ballistic missile threats. Arrow interceptors are highly sophisticated and expensive, costing up to $3 million each. Their production is slow and involves a complex supply chain, partly handled by Boeing in the U.S. The current high operational tempo may be exhausting these stockpiles faster than they can be replenished. 2️⃣ Newer, Faster Iranian Missiles Iran has reportedly deployed hypersonic missiles in these recent attacks. Capable of traveling at extreme speeds while maneuvering mid-flight, these missiles drastically reduce the time Israel’s defenses have to respond — from about 10–11 minutes in past scenarios to just 6–7 minutes now. A senior Israeli official admitted the narrower response window makes interceptions much harder, especially when combined with mass salvos of missiles launched simultaneously. 3️⃣ Multiple-Warhead (Submunition) Missiles Some Iranian missiles now carry multiple warheads or submunitions. In one instance, a missile dispersed around 20 submunitions from 23,000 feet, each capable of striking independently within a 16 km area. This technique overwhelms air defense systems by multiplying targets, forcing Israel to either spread its defenses thin or prioritize critical assets — increasing the risk of some warheads getting through. 4️⃣ Possible Electronic Warfare (EW) Tactics Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed it used advanced electronic warfare techniques to confuse Israeli defenses during a recent missile strike. While this claim remains unverified, Iran has demonstrated EW capabilities before — most notably when it captured a U.S. RQ-170 Sentinel stealth drone in 2011 via GPS spoofing. If true, even limited EW disruption could mislead air defense systems, causing interceptors to miss their targets or, in rare cases, misfire. The Manufacturing Bottleneck Another concern is that manufacturing Arrow 2 and Arrow 3 interceptors takes time — involving sensitive technology and meticulous quality checks. The sophisticated nature of these interceptors, coupled with limited production capacity and expensive components, means Israel cannot rapidly replenish stocks during extended conflicts. Should Israel Be Worried? While it’s too soon to conclusively state that Israel’s missile defenses are failing, the combination of faster, smarter Iranian missiles, advanced tactics, and limited interceptor supplies presents a serious challenge. Even if the drop to 65% interception occurred over a limited 24-hour period, it serves as a stark reminder of how quickly modern warfare evolves — and how even the most advanced defense systems can be stretched thin under sustained pressure. For Israel, the next steps will likely involve: Urgently replenishing interceptor stocks. Upgrading systems to handle hypersonic and submunition threats. Enhancing electronic warfare countermeasures. The broader takeaway for military planners worldwide: no missile shield is invincible, and technology races forward on both sides of any conflict.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 16:07:09
World
On May 27, 2025, what seemed like a simple gesture of diplomatic goodwill may have carried deadly intent. According to an MI6 intelligence leak, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, General Asim Munir, allegedly gifted a high-end wristwatch—suspected of concealing an electronic interceptor beacon—to Iran’s top military commander, Major General Mohammad Bagheri, during a private meeting in Rawalpindi. Within 72 hours of this closed-door encounter, Israeli intelligence agency Mossad reportedly used precise geolocation data to eliminate Bagheri in a targeted strike near the Iranian border with Syria—a region long known to be a corridor of Iranian IRGC-Quds Force operations. The unprecedented accuracy of the strike raised red flags in Tehran, prompting a quiet but urgent internal probe into the possibility of electronic compromise. Now, with fingers pointing to an unlikely collaborator—Pakistan—the Islamic Republic finds itself questioning the loyalty of a nation it once considered a strategic Islamic ally. Behind the Scenes: Mossad, MI6, and a Watch The British MI6 report, circulated discreetly among Five Eyes partners and later leaked to select Middle Eastern outlets, paints a damning picture. Sources allege that the wristwatch was embedded with a miniature beacon—likely activated after contact—that relayed General Bagheri’s movements in real time. Experts suggest such devices, small enough to be inserted into the casing of a luxury timepiece, can transmit encrypted signals across vast distances using satellite relays or local cellular networks. Mossad, known for leveraging human intelligence and advanced signal interception technologies, has reportedly been hunting senior IRGC figures involved in arms transfers to Hezbollah and Syria. Bagheri, who oversaw Iran’s foreign military operations, was high on that list. The strike’s timing—days after the supposed gift exchange—raises troubling questions: Did Pakistan knowingly facilitate this operation? Or was it merely a pawn in a much larger intelligence game directed by the West? Strategic Games or Subtle Betrayals? Publicly, Pakistan and Iran have maintained a carefully managed narrative of Islamic brotherhood, joint border security, and economic partnership, especially under the China-Iran-Pakistan corridor discussions. But under the surface, tensions have simmered for years. Iran has accused Pakistan of harboring anti-Shia and separatist elements, especially Baloch insurgents operating across the shared border. Meanwhile, Islamabad views Iran’s deepening military ties with India and Afghanistan with suspicion. Some intelligence analysts suggest Pakistan may be hedging its bets in a volatile region. By subtly aligning with Western intelligence agencies—or even indirectly with Israel—Pakistan could be attempting to clean up its image post-Afghanistan and strengthen its case for more aid and defense support from the U.S. and Gulf monarchies. Others argue this is part of a broader, long-term realignment in West Asia. With Saudi-Israeli normalization talks back on the table and the Abraham Accords still shaping regional diplomacy, Pakistan may see advantage in quietly cultivating backchannels to Tel Aviv—using shared anti-Iran sentiment as a bridge. Iran’s Calculated Silence Interestingly, Iran has not officially accused Pakistan of betrayal, nor has it released any details about the Bagheri assassination. Tehran’s silence may indicate internal uncertainty—or fear of exposing just how deeply its upper echelons may have been penetrated. Leaks from within the Iranian IRGC suggest a complete communications blackout was ordered following the strike, with emergency vetting of all foreign-supplied devices, including diplomatic gifts. Iranian social media, however, has exploded with anger. Hashtags like #TraitorInUmmah and #PakSellout trended on Persian-language Twitter (X), with users questioning whether Pakistan has turned from a brotherly ally into an agent of espionage. Implications for the Ummah Narrative This incident could mark a turning point in how Islamic states perceive each other behind the veil of unity. While organizations like the OIC continue to promote solidarity, the ground reality suggests a world where interests often outweigh ideology. As one Gulf-based analyst told Al-Quds Al-Arabi, “The Ummah is a myth in the age of strategic autonomy. Iran trusted Pakistan; it may have been outmaneuvered not by Zionists, but by its so-called Muslim brethren.” Whether Pakistan played a deliberate role in aiding Mossad, or was an unwitting middleman manipulated by foreign intelligence, the consequences are profound. The Tehran-Islamabad axis, already fragile, is now burdened by a deep layer of mistrust. In an era of shifting alliances and covert wars, the watch on Bagheri’s wrist may become a symbol—not just of betrayal—but of a new Middle East where friendships are conditional, and loyalty is transactional. If this intelligence report holds true, Pakistan stands at the crossroads of an emerging geopolitical realignment—where it must choose between old loyalties and new opportunities. But Tehran will not forget. And in the chessboard of West Asia, every move now will be watched.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 15:27:33
World
In a sharp warning to Washington, Russia has cautioned the United States against any military intervention in the escalating conflict between Iran and Israel, labeling such a move as dangerously unpredictable. The warning comes amid speculation that the U.S. might join Israel in military strikes against Iran following recent hostilities between the two Middle Eastern nations. Tensions soared after Israel carried out a major airstrike on Iranian targets last week, prompting Iran to respond with a barrage of missiles and drones. The situation has alarmed global powers, including Russia and China, who are now calling for immediate de-escalation and a return to diplomacy. Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova made Moscow’s stance clear, warning that any U.S. military involvement would be a grave mistake with unforeseeable consequences. "We would like to particularly warn Washington against military intervention in the situation," she said during a press briefing. Former U.S. President Donald Trump, widely expected to be a key player in the upcoming elections, had stated that he was considering joining Israel’s military efforts against Iran. “I may do it, I may not do it,” Trump said, while also dismissing Russian President Vladimir Putin’s offer to mediate the crisis. “Let’s mediate Russia first,” Trump quipped, referring to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Despite being a strategic partner of Iran and having signed a cooperation agreement earlier this year, Russia has not provided any military assistance to Tehran in this conflict. President Putin has clarified that Iran has not requested military aid, and that their agreement does not mandate such a response. "Our Iranian friends have not asked us about this," he said during a press conference, adding that their recent pact was not a defense treaty. Putin has positioned himself as a potential mediator, having held phone conversations with both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian. Russia, he said, is willing to facilitate peace talks if both parties are interested. His spokesman added that Moscow would be ready to send humanitarian aid to Iran if requested. Adding to Russia’s diplomatic push, Putin recently spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Both leaders strongly condemned Israel’s recent military actions and jointly called for an immediate ceasefire. Xi emphasized that armed conflict is not the solution and stressed the importance of avoiding further escalation or regional spillover. China has echoed Russia’s offer for mediation, expressing hope that a political solution can be reached. Putin’s aide, Yuri Ushakov, said both Moscow and Beijing believe that peace can only be achieved through diplomatic efforts, not military force. However, Western leaders remain skeptical of Putin’s intentions. Trump, along with French President Emmanuel Macron and others, has rejected Russia’s attempts to play peacemaker, citing Moscow’s own ongoing war in Ukraine as a reason to question its credibility. Still, Russia’s firm stance and involvement in Middle East diplomacy highlight its attempt to maintain influence in a region where it has long balanced relationships with multiple players — including Israel, Iran, and Syria. But with the fall of its Syrian ally Bashar al-Assad and the growing instability in the region, Moscow now finds itself walking a diplomatic tightrope, trying to project itself as a stabilizing force while safeguarding its own interests. As the Iran-Israel conflict continues to evolve, the global community watches closely — with hopes of de-escalation, and growing fears of a wider war if international powers become directly involved.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 15:18:00
World
Indonesia is steadily moving towards a significant milestone in its naval modernization plans by showing active interest in acquiring an aircraft carrier — specifically, the Giuseppe Garibaldi, a former Italian Navy flagship. This potential procurement was highlighted at the IndoDefence 2025 exhibition held in Jakarta from 11–14 June 2025, where Indonesian defense firm REPUBLIKORP, in collaboration with PT Palindo Marine, unveiled a conceptual model of a future naval fleet. The display featured various vessels including a stealth corvette, submarine, fast attack craft, unmanned surface vehicle (USV), and notably, an aircraft carrier model labeled “Giuseppe Garibaldi.” Carrier Model Suggests New Direction Interestingly, the model bore little resemblance to Italy’s actual Giuseppe Garibaldi light aircraft carrier, suggesting it was more of a conceptual design symbolizing Indonesia’s aspirations for a modern carrier fleet, rather than a direct replica. A display panel described the Garibaldi’s roles as a mobile command center capable of air defense, anti-submarine operations, escort missions, and humanitarian aid, underlining its versatility. General characteristics from the panel included: Displacement: 10,100 tons (standard), 13,850 tons (full load) Length: 180.2 meters (591 ft) Beam: 33.4 meters (109 ft) Draught: 5.7 meters (19 ft) These figures suggest a compact light carrier, optimized for regional operations and well-suited to Indonesia’s vast maritime environment. Talks with Fincantieri Confirmed In an interview with Naval News, Mauro Mansini, Director of Sales Naval Business Unit at Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri, confirmed that discussions between the Indonesian and Italian governments are underway. No formal decision has been made yet, but the possibility of transferring the Giuseppe Garibaldi remains on the table. Mansini emphasized the ship’s 15–20 years of remaining service life and its suitability for helicopters, drones, fixed-wing aircraft, and amphibious operations. He also highlighted its history of humanitarian missions, including deployments after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. If an agreement proceeds, the carrier would undergo a refit tailored to TNI AL (Tentara Nasional Indonesia Angkatan Laut) operational needs. Indonesia Eyes TB3 UCAVs for Carrier Operations A notable feature of the exhibition was the presence of Baykar Technologies’ Bayraktar TB3 unmanned combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs) at the REPUBLIKORP booth, displayed aboard the carrier model. The TB3, currently being trialed on Turkey’s TCG Anadolu, is capable of short take-offs from aircraft carriers and amphibious ships. Baykar representatives confirmed that Indonesia has shown serious interest, and a preliminary agreement has been signed for the purchase of 60 TB3 drones. The final deal is reportedly in advanced discussions. For the first time, Baykar officials also revealed that the TB3 exists in two variants: A shipborne model designed for carrier operations A land-based variant with higher maximum take-off weight, larger fuel capacity, and longer endurance This dual-configuration capability could significantly boost Indonesia’s ability to project air power both at sea and from shore bases. What This Means for Indonesia If the Giuseppe Garibaldi deal is finalized, Indonesia would join a small group of Asian nations with an aircraft carrier, strengthening its presence in regional waters amid growing maritime challenges. Coupled with an operational fleet of carrier-capable drones, the move would represent a significant leap in Indonesia’s maritime defense and disaster relief capabilities. For now, official negotiations continue, but the display at IndoDefence 2025 signals Indonesia’s clear intent to develop a modern, flexible, and unmanned-capable naval force.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 15:11:50
India
India is preparing to enter a new era in air combat capability with the planned mass production of the Astra Mk2 beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile (BVR-AAM). Designed and developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the Astra Mk2 is set to become the backbone of the Indian Air Force’s long-range air combat arsenal. In a significant move to accelerate delivery and support self-reliance in defence, the Ministry of Defence will implement a dual production strategy involving both public and private sector players. The Astra Mk2 missile is a significant upgrade over its predecessor, the Astra Mk1, boasting an extended range of 160 km compared to the Mk1’s 110 km. This range expansion, combined with a suite of advanced technologies, makes the Mk2 a formidable weapon in modern air warfare. One of its most critical enhancements is the dual-pulse rocket motor. This innovative system allows the missile to conserve fuel in its mid-course and then ignite a second thrust during its terminal phase, giving it the power to chase down highly maneuverable enemy aircraft in the final moments before impact. Equipped with a state-of-the-art Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) seeker, the Astra Mk2 can detect, lock onto, and engage targets with pinpoint precision, even in complex electronic warfare environments. Its smokeless propulsion system ensures a low visual and infrared signature, enhancing its stealth capability. The missile can reach speeds of Mach 4.5, or about 5,500 km/h, putting it in the same league as the world’s most advanced BVR missiles, such as the AIM-120 AMRAAM and the European Meteor. India’s decision to mass-produce the Astra Mk2 reflects deep confidence in its performance. The Indian Air Force is expected to place an initial order for over 500 missiles, which will be integrated across a wide range of platforms, including the Su-30MKI, Rafale, MiG-29K, and the indigenous Tejas Mk1A. This broad integration strategy will help significantly reduce India’s dependence on foreign missiles such as the Russian R-77 and the French MICA. To meet this high demand, India is implementing a dual-track production strategy. Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL), the public sector missile manufacturing giant, will manage one production line. Alongside BDL, a second line is being created within the private sector, with companies like Larsen & Toubro and Tata Advanced Systems expected to play a central role. This strategy is not only intended to boost production speed but also to foster healthy competition and innovation between the sectors, while building a resilient supply chain. This approach is closely aligned with the government’s “Aatmanirbhar Bharat” (self-reliant India) initiative. By involving private industry and relying heavily on domestic supply chains—over 85% of the Astra Mk2’s components are locally sourced—the project aims to build long-term industrial capability and strengthen India’s position as a defence exporter. Several small and medium enterprises are expected to be drawn into the production ecosystem, offering a boost to local manufacturing and technological development. Operationally, the Astra Mk2 will provide India with a crucial strategic edge, especially in the context of rising regional tensions. It is seen as a direct response to China's PL-15, which is believed to have a range exceeding 200 km, and Pakistan’s AIM-120C missiles. With the Astra Mk2 paired with advanced AESA radars aboard aircraft like the Rafale and Su-30MKI, the Indian Air Force will be able to engage enemy fighters from a safe stand-off distance, enhancing survivability and mission effectiveness. Despite its promise, the path ahead will require careful coordination between the DRDO, BDL, and private partners to ensure the missile's performance meets military expectations. Scaling up production while maintaining rigorous quality control and ensuring timely integration into various aircraft fleets are challenges that must be carefully managed. Still, the upcoming induction of the Astra Mk2 marks a major leap for India’s defence capabilities—one that combines cutting-edge technology, strategic foresight, and industrial innovation.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 14:58:18
World
In a remarkable leap for miniature robotics, a military robotics laboratory in China has successfully developed a mosquito-sized drone designed for covert operations. The breakthrough comes from the National University of Defence Technology (NUDT), located in Hunan province, and was recently showcased on CCTV 7, China’s military television channel. During the broadcast, NUDT researchers displayed a range of advanced robotics projects — from humanoid robots to micro-sized drones almost invisible to the naked eye. One of the most attention-grabbing inventions was a tiny, mosquito-like drone capable of gathering information discreetly in sensitive military situations. A New Tool for Stealth Reconnaissance Liang Hexiang, a student at NUDT, presented the microdrone during the telecast. Holding the tiny device delicately between his fingers, he described it as “especially suited to information reconnaissance and special missions on the battlefield.” The drone, resembling an insect, features two delicate, leaf-shaped wings on each side and three thin, hair-like legs attached to a slender, stick-shaped body. Such micro-sized drones pose unique engineering challenges, as critical components like sensors, control circuits, and power sources must all be miniaturized without compromising performance. Achieving this requires the integration of various advanced technologies, including micro-device engineering, bionics, and materials science. Part of a Global Microdrone Race China’s move mirrors a growing global interest in micro-sized unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). One of the best-known examples is the Black Hornet — a palm-sized, helicopter-shaped drone developed in Norway and now widely used by military forces around the world. Its latest version, the Black Hornet 4, recently earned the prestigious US Department of Defence Blue UAS Refresh award for improved battery life, durability, and operational range. Similarly, in the United States, Harvard University’s Wyss Institute has made headlines with its RoboBee project — a microdrone capable of swimming underwater, flying, and even perching on surfaces using static electricity. Although the US Air Force confirmed work on its own microdrones back in 2021, there’s been little public information since about their progress. Beyond the Battlefield While military applications remain a prime focus, micro-robotics technology holds promise far beyond combat. In the medical world, researchers are exploring micro and nanorobotics for tasks such as targeted drug delivery, minimally invasive surgeries, and high-precision diagnostic procedures. These tiny machines could one day navigate the human body, treating diseases from within. The unveiling of China’s mosquito-sized drone highlights the rapid pace of advancement in military robotics and micro-robotics globally. As nations continue to develop stealthier, smarter, and more capable unmanned systems, such technology is set to reshape the future of both warfare and peaceful applications. Whether on the battlefield, in hospitals, or in environmental monitoring, micro-robots like these are a glimpse into a highly advanced — and potentially discreet — future.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 11:42:53
World
In a development that could significantly destabilize the already volatile Middle East-South Asia corridor, Pakistan has reportedly leased two of its military bases in Balochistan to the United States, with possible operational access extended to Israeli forces, for launching potential military strikes against Iran, according to regional intelligence sources. The bases—believed to be near Panjgur and Washuk, close to the Iran-Afghanistan border—are strategically located just kilometers from Iran’s southeastern Sistan-Baluchistan province, a region known for its restive dynamics and past insurgencies. Their proximity would allow for rapid deployment of air and drone assets against Iranian military and nuclear sites in the event of an escalation. Strategic Implications If confirmed, this marks a seismic geopolitical shift in Pakistan’s foreign policy calculus. Historically, Pakistan has tried to balance relations between Saudi Arabia, the US, and Iran, but this move could effectively place it at the center of a future US-Israel military campaign against Tehran. Military analysts suggest the location of these bases is not coincidental. “These aren’t just symbolic outposts. They are perfectly positioned for tactical strikes into Iran’s eastern flank, bypassing heavily defended western zones,” said a senior regional analyst.US and Israeli drones or strike aircraft could potentially use these forward bases to carry out surprise, low-altitude attacks deep into Iranian territory, avoiding detection from Iran’s robust western air defense systems. Iranian Response & Regional Fallout Iran has previously warned of “full-spectrum retaliation” if any neighboring country hosts foreign forces involved in aggression against it. Tehran maintains that any launch of attacks from Pakistani soil would be viewed as “an act of war” by Pakistan itself, not just the US or Israel. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has already been reinforcing its eastern border and is likely to elevate threat levels in Sistan-Baluchistan, possibly responding with asymmetric warfare or proxy strikes. The situation could also spark a second front in the ongoing Middle East crisis, stretching Iran’s resources and forcing it to confront a regional coalition that includes not just Israel and the US, but potentially Gulf allies operating from Pakistani or Omani territory. Domestic Blowback for Pakistan Within Pakistan, the decision—if officially confirmed—could cause severe domestic political and security repercussions. Balochistan has been a hotspot for separatist insurgency and anti-state sentiment, and locals are unlikely to welcome a foreign military presence targeting a neighboring country with deep sectarian and cultural ties. Further, Pakistan’s fragile internal politics, its economic crisis, and rising public sympathy for Palestine and Iran could lead to mass protests and internal unrest if the population perceives the military as “selling sovereignty” to Western powers. International Reactions & Next Steps As of now, official confirmation from Islamabad or Washington remains absent, but satellite imagery and restricted NOTAM (Notice to Airmen) zones around the two Balochistan airfields have intensified speculation. Iran is reportedly monitoring military flights and drone activity originating from the region. Should a conflict break out, Pakistan risks becoming a battleground—not just a staging ground—for future retaliation, with massive economic and geopolitical consequences. By leasing strategic bases to foreign powers with clear intent to strike Iran, Pakistan may be walking into a geopolitical minefield. What might be a short-term strategic or financial gain could escalate into long-term instability, both across its borders and within its own fractured domestic landscape. As tensions simmer across the region, the world watches to see whether this decision lights the fuse of a new regional war.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 11:25:30
India
In a significant boost to India’s indigenous small arms manufacturing capability, Bharat Forge Ltd has emerged as the lowest bidder (L1) for a major ₹2000 crore contract to supply 4.5 lakh Close Quarter Battle (CQB) carbines to the Indian Army. The carbines, chambered for 5.56x45mm NATO ammunition, are based on a design developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and are intended to meet the Army’s long-pending demand for compact, modern, and reliable close-combat weapons. This procurement marks a major milestone for the Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) initiative in the defense sector, with Bharat Forge—a part of the Kalyani Group—poised to become a key contributor to the Indian Army’s infantry modernization. Operational Requirements: The Indian Army’s Specs for CQB Carbines The Indian Army issued a detailed General Staff Qualitative Requirement (GSQR) for the CQB carbines to ensure they meet the demanding conditions of modern urban and jungle warfare. The key characteristics of the weapon are: Calibre & Ammunition Calibre: 5.56 x 45mm Ammunition: Must be compatible with existing in-service Indian ammunition stockpiles, ensuring logistical ease and interoperability. Range & Accuracy Effective Range: Minimum 200 meters Accuracy at 100 meters: Single Shot: 9 out of 10 shots within a 15 cm x 15 cm group Automatic Fire: Minimum 60% hits in a 24 cm x 24 cm target during short bursts from a full magazine Reliability Must not exceed: 3 stoppages (Class I or II) per 2000 rounds Zero Class III stoppages, as per Indian Army’s Test Operations Procedure (TOP) 3-2-045 Design & Ergonomics BayonetSupplied with a detachable hardened bayonet (minimum blade length 120mm) with cover. Vertical Forehand GripDetachable grip mountable at the 6 o’clock rail without tools. Rail System (MIL-STD 1913 - Picatinny) Top Rail (12 O’clock): For optics and sights Side Rails (3, 6 & 9 O’clock): For accessories like lights, lasers, and grips Weight & Dimensions Weight: Not exceeding 3 kg ±10% (excluding magazine and accessories) Length: Folded/ Retracted: Max 650mm Extended: Max 800mm Buttstock ConfigurationOptions include fixed, retractable, folding, or combination stocks for operational flexibility. Performance in Harsh Environments The weapon is expected to function reliably across a wide temperature spectrum: Cold: –20°C to –10°C Hot: +40°C to +45°C It is also expected to have a minimum service life of 15 years or 15,000 rounds, backed by OEM certification. Strategic Significance of the Bharat Forge Victory Bharat Forge’s emergence as the L1 bidder signals a turning point in India’s effort to localize small arms production, a segment that has long relied on imports or licensed manufacturing. The DRDO’s design—validated through extensive testing—combined with Bharat Forge’s industrial might and manufacturing experience, promises to deliver a high-performance carbine suited to India’s unique operational environments. The deal will not only equip frontline troops with state-of-the-art weapons but will also stimulate the domestic defense ecosystem, opening opportunities for Tier-2 and Tier-3 suppliers involved in materials, optics, and accessory manufacturing. The ₹2000 crore CQB carbine project is more than just a contract—it represents India’s strategic shift toward self-sufficiency in critical infantry weapon systems. With modern warfare increasingly fought in close quarters—urban, jungle, and counter-terror environments—the induction of these DRDO-designed carbines will provide the Indian Army with a much-needed edge. Bharat Forge’s success in this bid reaffirms the capability of India’s private sector to meet the armed forces’ complex requirements and paves the way for further indigenous innovation in infantry weaponry.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 11:20:35
India
Hyderabad-based defense tech firm Paninian India Pvt. Ltd. is quietly carving its place in India's growing strategic weapons landscape with the development of the SVAYATT-L1, an advanced long-range land attack cruise missile. This cutting-edge missile is purpose-built for precision strikes on high-value targets in heavily defended and GPS-contested environments, placing it in the league of next-generation standoff weapons. SVAYATT-L1’s design philosophy is rooted in stealth, adaptability, and high-precision lethality. The missile features a terrain-hugging low-altitude flight profile, minimizing its radar cross-section and improving survivability in dense air defense zones. Its low observable architecture helps evade enemy radar detection, significantly increasing the chances of penetrating deep into contested airspace. Key Features of SVAYATT-L1: Long-Range Precision Strike : Optimized for deep-strike missions, SVAYATT-L1 is capable of engaging strategic targets with high accuracy over extended ranges, making it ideal for both pre-emptive and retaliatory missions. Stealth & Terrain-Following Flight : The missile incorporates a terrain-hugging flight profile—a tactic often used in modern cruise missiles to fly below enemy radar coverage. This significantly boosts its survivability and effectiveness in radar-dense battle zones. Advanced Navigation & Guidance : What sets SVAYATT-L1 apart is its ability to operate in GPS-denied environments. It uses a sophisticated blend of inertial navigation systems (INS), terrain contour mapping, and optical navigation, ensuring high-precision targeting even under electronic warfare conditions where GPS signals are jammed or spoofed. Dual-Stage Propulsion System : The missile is powered by a booster-sustainer configuration, with the first stage providing the initial thrust using a solid rocket booster (SRB), while the second stage employs a turbofan engine for sustained cruise flight. This enables SVAYATT-L1 to travel at subsonic speeds over long distances with optimal fuel efficiency. Modular & Reconfigurable Airframe : Designed with mission adaptability in mind, the SVAYATT-L1 uses lightweight composite materials and a modular internal layout. This not only ensures durability but also allows for quick reconfiguration depending on mission objectives or payload requirements. AI-Driven Mission Planning : A standout feature is its AI-assisted mission planning tool, which enables autonomous route selection, obstacle avoidance, threat assessment, and real-time re-targeting. This kind of smart targeting capability allows operators to use SVAYATT-L1 in rapidly evolving tactical scenarios. Strategic Significance The development of SVAYATT-L1 underscores India’s ambition to build a robust indigenous long-range strike capability that doesn’t rely on foreign satellite infrastructure. With adversaries investing heavily in anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) strategies and GPS jamming, the importance of autonomous, terrain-mapping, and AI-enabled missiles like SVAYATT-L1 is becoming ever more crucial. By combining stealth, modularity, and AI-powered precision, Paninian India Pvt. Ltd. is setting a new benchmark in indigenous missile design. Once inducted, SVAYATT-L1 will offer India a surgical, survivable, and scalable option for strategic deterrence and battlefield dominance, especially in high-threat zones. SVAYATT-L1 isn’t just another missile; it represents a transformational leap in India’s cruise missile capability—with a sharp focus on survivability, autonomy, and adaptability in modern war zones. As global military doctrines increasingly shift toward multi-domain and denied-environment warfare, systems like SVAYATT-L1 are not just relevant—they are essential.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 11:02:05
Space & Technology
At the Paris Air Show on 20th June 2025, a major announcement signaled a new chapter in France’s space ambitions. French Minister of the Armed Forces Sébastien Lecornu and Dassault Aviation Chairman and CEO Eric Trappier revealed the signing of an agreement to develop a reusable spaceplane demonstrator, launching the ambitious VORTEX programme — short for Véhicule Orbital Réutilisable de Transport et d’Exploration (Reusable Orbital Vehicle for Transport and Exploration). What is the VORTEX Programme? The VORTEX programme aims to create a new family of reusable space vehicles capable of carrying out autonomous orbital missions and safely transporting payloads and equipment to and from space. Designed as a dual-use platform, it will support both civilian and military space operations. This makes it a valuable asset for France, as space increasingly becomes a vital area of national security and economic development. It’s a bold move to strengthen France’s strategic independence in the growing global space economy, positioning the country alongside other leading space powers like the United States, China, and India. Dassault Aviation’s Experience in Space Projects Although Dassault Aviation is better known for its fighter jets and business aircraft like the Rafale and Falcon series, the company has a long history in space-related projects. In the past, Dassault was involved in notable European spaceplane initiatives such as: Hermès – a proposed crewed spaceplane by the European Space Agency (ESA) in the 1980s. X-38 – a prototype for an emergency crew return vehicle for the International Space Station. IXV (Intermediate eXperimental Vehicle) – a successful ESA mission that tested re-entry technologies in 2015. The VORTEX demonstrator will build upon the technical knowledge gained from these earlier efforts, focusing on cutting-edge capabilities like hypersonic flight control, advanced thermal protection systems, and autonomous flight management — essential for any reusable orbital vehicle. Why Reusable Spaceplanes Matter Reusable spaceplanes are a critical part of modern space strategy. Unlike traditional rockets that are used only once, spaceplanes can take off, enter orbit, return to Earth, and be prepared for another mission. This dramatically reduces launch costs and turnaround times, making space more accessible and responsive for both government and commercial uses. Globally, companies like SpaceX (with its Starship) and China’s Shenlong spaceplane project are actively developing such vehicles. France’s VORTEX programme ensures it keeps pace with these developments, safeguarding national interests and opening opportunities in satellite servicing, space surveillance, cargo transport, and rapid response missions in orbit. NewSpace Approach and Future Prospects The project reflects Dassault’s embrace of the NewSpace philosophy — a trend where traditional aerospace companies adopt the faster, more flexible, and cost-conscious practices seen in private space startups. The VORTEX demonstrator aims to quickly test and validate critical technologies, reducing risks for future operational spaceplanes. According to Dassault Aviation CEO Eric Trappier: “Like our civil and military aircraft, the VORTEX spaceplane is designed to be highly versatile. It will transform the uses of the space sector and open up new fields of application. At the crossroads of aviation and space technologies, VORTEX will pave the way for a new generation of space aeronautics, reinforcing France’s position as a major space power.” What’s Next? The immediate goal is to develop and test the VORTEX demonstrator over the next few years. If successful, it would lead to the creation of an operational reusable spaceplane for France, available for a variety of missions, from deploying small satellites to military reconnaissance and future crewed missions. With growing global competition in space, this initiative is a timely move for France to safeguard its interests, innovate in aerospace technology, and contribute to Europe's independent access to space.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 10:52:09
India
India has taken a remarkable step forward in its defense technology evolution with the introduction of the FWD-LM01, an advanced AI-enabled loitering munition boasting a 100-kilometre range. Developed by the Bengaluru-based Flying Wedge Defence and Aerospace (FWDA), this indigenous system not only enhances India’s tactical capabilities but also reflects its growing confidence in indigenous innovation. Unveiled at the 55th Paris Air Show in 2025—one of the world’s most prestigious defense showcases—the FWD-LM01 instantly made headlines as India’s first export-ready, long-range loitering munition. Until now, Indian-made loitering munitions were restricted to significantly shorter ranges, rarely exceeding 40 kilometers. This new entrant has not only doubled that range but also added cutting-edge artificial intelligence, giving India a competitive edge in next-generation warfare. Compact yet powerful, the FWD-LM01 weighs just 6 kilograms and is designed for rapid, field-level deployment. It can be launched in less than five minutes without the need for elaborate setups or ground infrastructure—an ideal solution for quick-response teams and mobile combat units operating in dynamic battlefield conditions. Despite its small frame, the system is capable of staying airborne for up to 90 minutes and reaching altitudes of 17,000 feet, enabling it to loiter silently over enemy territory in search of targets. One of its most impressive features is its 2-kilogram warhead, guided by EOIR (electro-optical infrared) sensors and an AI-powered navigation and targeting system. This allows the drone to independently identify, verify, and engage enemy assets with precision, significantly reducing human involvement and risk. Such automation is particularly valuable in modern warfare scenarios where speed, precision, and low detection are key to mission success. From its very design to its final assembly, the FWD-LM01 is entirely made in India, in line with the ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’ vision that aims to build self-reliant defense capabilities. The project moved from concept to prototype and flight testing entirely within FWDA’s Bengaluru facility, showcasing the maturity of India’s private defense tech ecosystem. Importantly, the development of the FWD-LM01 is not just a domestic milestone—it’s also a signal of India’s intent to become a serious exporter of high-tech defense systems. Live explosive trials scheduled for later in 2025 will help secure international certifications, paving the way for global sales and collaborative defense agreements. FWDA is also setting its sights on more ambitious projects, including unmanned aerial systems that can engage enemy fighter jets, such as Pakistan’s F-16s and JF-17s. Though still in the conceptual phase, these goals reflect a broader commitment to positioning India as a leader in AI-driven and autonomous defense technologies. India’s defense drone sector is growing rapidly, with industry forecasts pointing to a compound annual growth rate of over 80% from 2020 to 2025 and sustained momentum beyond. As a result, systems like the FWD-LM01 could become the foundation for a new class of Indian-made precision weapons that are fast, intelligent, and capable of neutralizing threats with minimal collateral damage. In essence, the FWD-LM01 is far more than a tactical drone—it’s a symbol of India’s strategic shift toward self-reliance, technological innovation, and global defense leadership. As unmanned systems redefine the nature of warfare, India's timely leap into AI-powered munitions puts it firmly on the map of modern military powers.
Read More → Posted on 2025-06-21 10:47:22Search
Top Trending
-
Agneepath Scheme replaced with Sainik Samman Scheme 2024, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh Relaunched Agniveer Scheme
-
Death in Dhaka: CIA Links Surface After Putin Shielded Modi During SCO Meet
-
Key Differences Between 5th vs. 6th Generation Fighter Jets
-
Pakistan Air Force to Unveil Stealth-Enhanced JF-17 Block 4 Fighter Jet by 2028
-
India’s AMCA Engine Decision: Safran vs. Rolls-Royce Final Expected by 2025
-
Tejas Mk2 Nears 2025 Rollout as HAL Ramps Up Final Assembly and System Integration
-
Pakistan Announces 15% Increase in Defence Budget for 2024-25 Amid Economic Crisis
-
India's TEDBF Program Takes Shape First Flight by 2028: Aiming for Naval Supremacy with Advanced Stealth and Technology
Top Trending in 4 Days
-
Pakistan Army to Deploy Troops to Gaza by January 2026 Under Trump–Munir Deal, $500 Per Soldier
-
Russia Simulates Full-Scale Nuclear War in Siberia, Deploys Yars ICBMs on Combat Patrols
-
Russian Su-57 Conducts First Flight With Next-Generation Izdeliye-177 Engine
-
Russian Strike on Mayaki Bridge Threatens Up to 60% of Ukraine’s Fuel Supply
-
ISRO Successfully Qualifies Drogue Parachutes for Gaganyaan Crew Module
-
U.S. Seizes China-Linked Oil Tanker Carrying Venezuelan Crude in International Waters
-
Indian Navy’s MARCOS Induct High-Tech ‘Hoverbee’ Kamikaze Drones for Stealth Operations
-
Russia Brings Back Nuclear-Powered Heavy Cruiser 'Admiral Nakhimov ' After Costly Rebuild
