Why The Wire’s “China Control” Narrative on India’s S-400 Collapses Under Scrutiny, Without Evidence

New Delhi — A recent article by The Wire describing India’s S-400 air defence system as a “dangerous bet” has sparked sharp debate within defence circles, not for what it says, but for what it omits. At the centre of the controversy is the claim that China controls the S-400 supply chain, allegedly leaving India strategically vulnerable. Yet a closer examination of operational data, official timelines, and India’s broader air-defence posture presents a markedly different picture.

A Critique Built on Thin Sourcing

The article’s central argument relies almost entirely on the views of a single foreign analyst whose expertise is rooted in the Ukraine conflict, with no quoted Indian defence officials, no Ministry of Defence verification, and no operational data from India’s own experience. For a system that has already seen combat use under Indian command, this absence is striking. Defence planners point out that strategic assessments divorced from battlefield outcomes risk becoming theoretical exercises rather than serious analysis.

Operation Sindoor and the Combat Record

Those outcomes came into sharp focus during Operation Sindoor (May 2025), when India’s long-range air-defence network was activated at scale for the first time. According to declassified assessments and independent global defence analysts, the S-400 did not merely perform adequately; it reshaped the air battle.

Indian batteries reportedly tracked more than 100 hostile aerial targets simultaneously, ranging from fighter aircraft to support platforms. This overwhelming situational awareness forced multiple Pakistani strike packages to abort missions, jettison ordnance prematurely, and retreat deep inside their own airspace. In several sectors, air denial was achieved without firing a single interceptor, underscoring the system’s deterrent value.

The defining moment came with what analysts describe as a world-record engagement. An Indian S-400 unit, operating under the callsign “Sudarshan,” intercepted a high-value Pakistani airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft at a distance exceeding 300 kilometres. The aircraft, believed to be a Saab-2000-based AEW&C platform, represented a critical node in Pakistan’s air-command network. The interception shattered previous benchmarks for operational long-range surface-to-air kills and has since been cited by multiple independent defence monitors worldwide.

Beyond the record-setting shot, Indian authorities confirm that several hostile fighter aircraft attempting to probe the air-defence envelope were successfully neutralized, despite the use of modern electronic countermeasures.

The Supply-Chain Claim and India’s Domestic Capability

The assertion that Beijing “controls” S-400 spare parts forms the backbone of the “dangerous bet” narrative. Indian defence officials argue that this claim collapses when viewed against confirmed domestic timelines. India is not positioning itself as a perpetual buyer; it is moving decisively toward becoming a sustainer.

The Ministry of Defence has verified that a dedicated Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) facility for the S-400 is under construction, in collaboration with Almaz-Antey. Scheduled to be fully operational by 2028, the facility will service radar arrays, electronic modules, and missile canisters on Indian soil, insulating the system from external geopolitical shocks.

A senior official from the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) put it bluntly: India has sustained MiG-21s, Su-30MKIs, and T-90 tanks for over six decades without Chinese interference. Suggesting that the country suddenly lacks the metallurgy or electronics expertise to maintain the S-400, the official said, “is an insult to India’s defence industrial base.”

Akashteer: The Game Changer Behind the Scenes

Much of the public debate has focused on missile launchers and radars, but Operation Sindoor highlighted a quieter revolution. Project Akashteer, India’s automated air-defence command and control system, acted as the neural network binding disparate assets into a single, responsive shield.

During the operation, Akashteer fused data from S-400 radars with indigenous systems, presenting commanders with a unified air picture. Threats were automatically classified and assigned to the most appropriate weapon, ensuring efficiency and preventing fratricide. Low-flying drones were handed off to short-range systems, while the S-400 was preserved for high-value aircraft and ballistic threats. Defence officials describe this integration as decisive in achieving seamless air denial.

A Layered Shield, Not a Single Basket

Contrary to claims that India has concentrated its air-defence strategy around a single system, the S-400 sits at the top of a layered and increasingly indigenous air-defence architecture. Medium- and short-range systems such as Akash, QRSAM, and MR-SAM provide operational depth, while development continues on extended-range interceptors under Project Kusha (XRSAM). Parallel progress on ballistic missile defence (BMD) further strengthens this multi-tiered shield.

Russia, despite global sanctions, remains on track to deliver the final two S-400 regiments by 2026, completing India’s planned deployment. By that stage, defence officials say, India’s integrated air-defence architecture will stand among the most comprehensive and resilient networks outside the United States and Russia.

Analysis and Conclusion

Labeling the S-400 a “dangerous bet” requires overlooking a combat record that includes a historic long-range interception, ignoring verified plans for domestic sustainment, and discounting six decades of experience maintaining complex foreign-origin systems. It also requires sidelining transformative enablers like Akashteer that have fundamentally altered how air battles are fought.

The debate, defence analysts argue, is less about hardware and more about narrative. Selective sourcing and the absence of Indian operational voices risk distorting public understanding of a system that has already demonstrated its value under fire. The reality emerging from Operation Sindoor is clear: India’s air-defence strategy is not a gamble, but a layered, evolving posture grounded in battlefield experience and growing self-reliance.

In defence circles, analysts also observe that The Wire’s coverage pattern has repeatedly aligned with narratives favourable to Pakistan and China, often adopting external strategic talking points while downplaying Indian operational data and official positions, a tendency that has again surfaced in its handling of the S-400 debate.