Abdul Basit Claims PAF to Surpass IAF by 6-8 Years with Chinese J-35 and Turkish TF Kaan Inductions
Abdul Basit, a former Pakistan High Commissioner to India, has sparked discussions across defense and strategic circles with his bold assertion that the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) will hold a significant technological advantage over the Indian Air Force (IAF) in the coming years. According to Basit, the induction of advanced fighter jets, such as the Chinese J-35A stealth aircraft and Turkey's TAI TF Kaan, will place the PAF 6-8 years ahead of the IAF in terms of aerial warfare capabilities.
Basit’s remarks underline the PAF's ongoing modernization drive, which he claims has already positioned it as a formidable force in the region. Despite the IAF’s numerical superiority, Basit argues that the qualitative edge currently lies with Pakistan due to its focus on acquiring state-of-the-art technology. He highlights that Pakistan’s strategic alliances with China and Turkey have enabled it to procure cutting-edge aircraft designed to rival the capabilities of adversaries in South Asia.
A focal point of Basit’s statements is the J-35A, a Chinese fifth-generation stealth fighter. Equipped with advanced avionics, long-range precision strike capabilities, and stealth technology, the J-35 is expected to revolutionize PAF operations. Basit describes it as a "game-changer," suggesting that the aircraft will enhance Pakistan’s ability to counter regional threats effectively, particularly from India.
The J-35’s development is part of China’s broader ambition to create aircraft capable of rivaling the U.S. F-35, and Pakistan’s access to this technology underscores the strength of its partnership with Beijing. Once operational, the J-35 is anticipated to bolster Pakistan’s deterrence capabilities and improve its readiness for modern, high-intensity conflicts.
Basit also highlighted Turkey's TAI TF Kaan, a next-generation fighter currently under development. With its advanced multi-role capabilities, including air superiority and ground attack missions, the TF Kaan is expected to complement the J-35 in diversifying and strengthening the PAF’s fleet. This collaboration with Turkey further underscores Pakistan’s strategy of diversifying its defense procurements to reduce reliance on any single source.
In his remarks, Basit criticized what he sees as India’s slow pace in developing and deploying fifth-generation fighter jets. While the IAF has initiated programs like the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), these projects are still years away from operational readiness. According to Basit, this delay gives Pakistan a strategic window to cement its aerial superiority. He argued that by the time India’s AMCA project becomes a reality, Pakistan would have already integrated and operationalized the J-35 and TF Kaan into its fleet.
The claims made by Basit come at a time when South Asia is witnessing an intensifying arms race, particularly in the air domain. If Pakistan succeeds in acquiring and integrating these advanced platforms as envisioned, it could shift the regional balance of power, leading to heightened tensions. India, for its part, continues to invest in indigenous defense production and partnerships with countries like France and the United States to counter these developments.
However, Basit’s claims have drawn mixed reactions from defense experts. While some analysts agree that the J-35 and TF Kaan could give the PAF a temporary edge, others point out the challenges associated with operationalizing and maintaining such advanced platforms. Additionally, questions remain about the economic feasibility of these acquisitions for Pakistan, given its ongoing financial struggles.
Abdul Basit’s statements reflect a broader narrative of competition and rivalry between India and Pakistan. Whether or not the PAF achieves the superiority he envisions, the introduction of advanced platforms like the J-35 and TF Kaan signifies Pakistan’s determination to modernize its air force and maintain strategic parity with India. As both nations continue to invest heavily in defense, the implications for peace and stability in the region remain uncertain.